Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2012; 8; 94; doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-94

Presence and molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens in intestinal compartments of healthy horses.

Abstract: Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens are commonly associated with colitis in equids, but healthy carriers exist. Scarce information is available on the prevalence of Clostridium spp. in gastrointestinal compartments other than faeces in healthy horses, and it is unknown whether faecal samples are representative of proximal compartments. The objectives were to investigate the prevalence of C. difficile and C. perfringens in different intestinal compartments of healthy adult horses and to determine whether faecal samples are representative of colonization in proximal sites and overall carrier status. Results: Toxigenic C. difficile was isolated from 14/135 (10.3%) samples from 8/15 (53.3%) horses. Between zero and three sites were positive per horse, and multiple sites were positive in four horses. Isolates were recovered from duodenum, jejunum, ileum, right dorsal colon, small colon and rectum. When multiple compartments were positive in a single horse, two different C. difficile ribotypes were always present. Clostridium perfringens Type A (CPE, β2 toxin gene negative) was recovered from the left ventral colon of one horse (0.74%, 1/135 samples). Agreement between faeces and overall C. difficile carrier status was good. Conclusions: Clostridium difficile can be found in different compartments of the gastrointestinal tract of healthy horses, and multiple strains can be present in an individual horse. The prevalence of C. perfringens in healthy adult hoses was low, consistent with previous reports. Faecal samples were representative for presence of C. difficile in proximal compartments in 5/8 horses (63%) but were not representative for the specific strain.
Publication Date: 2012-06-29 PubMed ID: 22748233PubMed Central: PMC3514389DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-94Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the prevalence and distribution of bacteria Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens in different gastrointestinal tracts of healthy horses and evaluates if fecal samples are representative of overall bacterial colonization.

Understanding the research background

  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens are bacteria frequently linked to colitis (inflammation of the colon) in equids such as horses, donkeys, and zebras. Despite causing disease, these bacteria could also be found in healthy carriers without signs of sickness.
  • Earlier studies mostly focused on the presence of these bacteria in feces. However, this study intends to explore their prevalence in the various gastrointestinal parts like the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon in healthy horses.
  • The research aims to elucidate if fecal samples accurately represent proximal sites (nearest to the middle of the body, here referring to parts of the digestive tract) and the overall carrier status, thereby providing a comprehensive snapshot of bacterial colonization.

Key findings from the study

  • From 135 collected samples, toxigenic (toxin-producing) C. difficile was isolated from 14 samples (10.3%) representing 8 out of 15 horses (53.3%). The bacteria were identified in different digestive sections such as the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, right dorsal colon, small colon, and rectum.
  • Horses showed varying bacterial colonization, with some having C. difficile presence in up to three digestive compartments. Interestingly, in horses carrying the bacteria in multiple locations, two different C. difficile ribotypes (genetic variations of the bacterium) always coexisted.
  • Clostridium perfringens Type A, another bacterium under look, was detected only in the left ventral colon of one horse (0.74%, 1/135 samples), illustrating a low prevalence in adult horses, which aligns with previous studies.
  • The research found consistency between the bacteria’s presence in feces and overall C. difficile carrier status, suggesting that fecal samples reliably indicate the bacteria’s existence in proximal compartments in 63% (5 out of 8) of the cases.
  • However, fecal samples were not effective in identifying the specific bacterial strain present. They could detect the bacterium’s presence but failed to pinpoint if multiple strains were present concurrently in an individual horse.

Conclusions from the study

  • C. difficile can inhabit various compartments of the gastrointestinal tract in healthy horses, and it’s not uncommon for multiple strains to coexist within the same host.
  • The prevalence of C. perfringens in healthy adult horses is low, confirming earlier studies.
  • Fecal samples can provide a reliable indicator of the presence of C. difficile in proximal compartments in a majority of cases, but they are not dependable for determining the specific bacterial strain.

Cite This Article

APA
Schoster A, Arroyo LG, Staempfli HR, Shewen PE, Weese JS. (2012). Presence and molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens in intestinal compartments of healthy horses. BMC Vet Res, 8, 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-94

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: 94

Researcher Affiliations

Schoster, Angelika
  • Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada. aschoster@life.ku.dk
Arroyo, Luis Guillermo
    Staempfli, Henry Rolf
      Shewen, Patricia Elisabeth
        Weese, Jeffrey Scott

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Carrier State
          • Clostridioides difficile / classification
          • Clostridioides difficile / genetics
          • Clostridioides difficile / isolation & purification
          • Clostridium perfringens / isolation & purification
          • DNA, Bacterial / classification
          • DNA, Bacterial / isolation & purification
          • Feces / microbiology
          • Female
          • Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
          • Horses / microbiology
          • Intestines / microbiology
          • Male
          • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
          • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
          • Ribotyping
          • Transcriptome

          References

          This article includes 33 references
          1. Song X, Bartlett JG, Speck K, Naegeli A, Carroll K, Perl TM. Rising economic impact of clostridium difficile-associated disease in adult hospitalized patient population.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(9):823–828.
            doi: 10.1086/588756pubmed: 18643746google scholar: lookup
          2. Keel MK, Songer JG. The comparative pathology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.. Vet Pathol 2006;43(3):225–240.
            doi: 10.1354/vp.43-3-225pubmed: 16672570google scholar: lookup
          3. Arroyo LG, Weese JS, Staempfli HR. Experimental Clostridium difficile enterocolitis in foals.. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18(5):734–738.
          4. Baverud V, Gustafsson A, Franklin A, Lindholm A, Gunnarsson A. Clostridium difficile associated with acute colitis in mature horses treated with antibiotics.. Equine Vet J 1997;29(4):279–284.
          5. Weese JS, Staempfli HR, Prescott JF. A prospective study of the roles of clostridium difficile and enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens in equine diarrhoea.. Equine Vet J 2001;33(4):403–409.
            pubmed: 11469775
          6. Weese JS, Toxopeus L, Arroyo L. Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea in horses within the community: predictors, clinical presentation and outcome.. Equine Vet J 2006;38(2):185–188.
            pubmed: 16536390
          7. Baverud V, Gustafsson A, Franklin A, Aspan A, Gunnarsson A. Clostridium difficile: prevalence in horses and environment, and antimicrobial susceptibility.. Equine Vet J 2003;35(5):465–471.
            pubmed: 12875324
          8. McNamara SE, Abdujamilova N, Somsel P, Gordoncillo MJ, Dedecker JM, Bartlett PC. Carriage of Clostridium difficile and Other Enteric Pathogens Among a 4-H Avocational Cohort.. Zoonoses Public Health 2010;58(3):192–199.
            pubmed: 20529211
          9. Medina-Torres CE, Weese JS, Staempfli HR. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in horses.. Vet Microbiol 2011;152(1-2):212–215.
            doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.04.012pubmed: 21570780google scholar: lookup
          10. Lavallee C, Laufer B, Pepin J, Mitchell A, Dube S, Labbe AC. Fatal Clostridium difficile enteritis caused by the BI/NAP1/027 strain: a case series of ileal C. difficile infections.. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009;15(12):1093–1099.
          11. Arroyo LG, Stampfli HR, Weese JS. Potential role of Clostridium difficile as a cause of duodenitis-proximal jejunitis in horses.. J Med Microbiol 2006;55(Pt 5):605–608.
            pubmed: 16585649
          12. Songer JG. Clostridial enteric diseases of domestic animals.. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996;9(2):216–234.
            pmc: PMC172891pubmed: 8964036
          13. Waggett BE, McGorum BC, Wernery U, Shaw DJ, Pirie RS. Prevalence of Clostridium perfringens in faeces and ileal contents from grass sickness affected horses: comparisons with 3 control populations.. Equine Vet J 2010;42(6):494–499.
          14. Tschirdewahn B, Notermans S, Wernars K, Untermann F. The presence of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens strains in faeces of various animals.. Int J Food Microbiol 1991;14(2):175–178.
            doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(91)90105-Xpubmed: 1777387google scholar: lookup
          15. Herholz C, Miserez R, Nicolet J, Frey J, Popoff M, Gibert M, Gerber H, Straub R. Prevalence of beta2-toxigenic Clostridium perfringens in horses with intestinal disorders.. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37(2):358–361.
            pmc: PMC84307pubmed: 9889218
          16. Tillotson K, Traub-Dargatz JL, Dickinson CE, Ellis RP, Morley PS, Hyatt DR, Magnuson RJ, Riddle WT, Bolte D, Salman MD. Population-based study of fecal shedding of Clostridium perfringens in broodmares and foals.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220(3):342–348.
            doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.342pubmed: 11829266google scholar: lookup
          17. Bacciarini LN, Boerlin P, Straub R, Frey J, Grone A. Immunohistochemical localization of Clostridium perfringens beta2-toxin in the gastrointestinal tract of horses.. Vet Pathol 2003;40(4):376–381.
            doi: 10.1354/vp.40-4-376pubmed: 12824509google scholar: lookup
          18. Bidet P, Barbut F, Lalande V, Burghoffer B, Petit JC. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999;175(2):261–266.
          19. Kato H, Kato N, Watanabe K, Iwai N, Nakamura H, Yamamoto T, Suzuki K, Kim SM, Chong Y, Wasito EB. Identification of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile by PCR.. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36(8):2178–2182.
            pmc: PMC105000pubmed: 9665986
          20. Stubbs S, Rupnik M, Gibert M, Brazier J, Duerden B, Popoff M. Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium difficile.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000;186(2):307–312.
          21. Baums CG, Schotte U, Amtsberg G, Goethe R. Diagnostic multiplex PCR for toxin genotyping of Clostridium perfringens isolates.. Vet Microbiol 2004;100(1–2):11–16.
            pubmed: 15135508
          22. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–174.
            doi: 10.2307/2529310pubmed: 843571google scholar: lookup
          23. Arroyo LG, Staempfli H, Weese JS. Molecular analysis of Clostridium difficile isolates recovered from horses with diarrhea.. Vet Microbiol 2007;120(1–2):179–183.
            pubmed: 17112686
          24. Ossiprandi MC, Buttrini M, Bottarelli E, Zerbini L. Preliminary molecular analysis of Clostridium difficile isolates from healthy horses in northern Italy.. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;33(6):e25–e29.
            doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2009.10.008pubmed: 20004974google scholar: lookup
          25. Kato H, Kita H, Karasawa T, Maegawa T, Koino Y, Takakuwa H, Saikai T, Kobayashi K, Yamagishi T, Nakamura S. Colonisation and transmission of Clostridium difficile in healthy individuals examined by PCR ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.. J Med Microbiol 2001;50(8):720–727.
            pubmed: 11478676
          26. van den Berg RJ, Ameen HA, Furusawa T, Claas EC, van der Vorm ER, Kuijper EJ. Coexistence of multiple PCR-ribotype strains of Clostridium difficile in faecal samples limits epidemiological studies.. J Med Microbiol 2005;54(Pt 2):173–179.
            pubmed: 15673513
          27. Arroyo LG, Kruth SA, Willey BM, Staempfli HR, Low DE, Weese JS. PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile isolates originating from human and animal sources.. J Med Microbiol 2005;54(Pt 2):163–166.
            pubmed: 15673511
          28. Keel K, Brazier JS, Post KW, Weese S, Songer JG. Prevalence of PCR ribotypes among Clostridium difficile isolates from pigs, calves, and other species.. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45(6):1963–1964.
            doi: 10.1128/JCM.00224-07pmc: PMC1933037pubmed: 17428945google scholar: lookup
          29. Goorhuis A, Bakker D, Corver J, Debast SB, Harmanus C, Notermans DW, Bergwerff AA, Dekker FW, Kuijper EJ. Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078.. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47(9):1162–1170.
            doi: 10.1086/592257pubmed: 18808358google scholar: lookup
          30. Mulvey MR, Boyd DA, Gravel D, Hutchinson J, Kelly S, McGeer A, Moore D, Simor A, Suh KN, Taylor G, Weese JS, Miller M. Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program: Hypervirulent Clostridium difficile strains in hospitalized patients, Canada.. Emerg Infect Dis 2010;16(4):678–681.
            doi: 10.3201/eid1604.091152pmc: PMC3321949pubmed: 20350386google scholar: lookup
          31. Martin H, Willey B, Low DE, Staempfli HR, McGeer A, Boerlin P, Mulvey M, Weese JS. Characterization of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from patients in Ontario, Canada, from 2004 to 2006.. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46(9):2999–3004.
            doi: 10.1128/JCM.02437-07pmc: PMC2546775pubmed: 18650360google scholar: lookup
          32. Gould LH, Limbago B. Clostridium difficile in food and domestic animals: a new foodborne pathogen?. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51(5):577–582.
            doi: 10.1086/655692pubmed: 20642351google scholar: lookup
          33. Marks SL, Kather EJ, Kass PH, Melli AC. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile in diarrheic and healthy dogs.. J Vet Intern Med 2002;16(5):533–540.
            pubmed: 12322702