Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2019; 46(6); 820-828; doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.03.008

Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy.

Abstract: To assess the clinical course of abdominal wall sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses by determining mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) during hospitalization, and to determine the inter-observer reliability of pressure algometry on the abdominal wall. Methods: Observational, cohort study. Methods: A total of 13 horses presenting with signs of abdominal pain/colic undergoing ventral midline coeliotomy and 10 healthy horses without an abdominal incision. Methods: Measurements were performed on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 postoperatively using a pressure algometer. Measurement sites were marked left and right, abaxial to the abdominal incision. Cranial to the incision, two control points were marked. Measurements were made by one observer, blinded to the recorded MNT values. To determine inter-observer reliability, five horses (surgical group n = 2; nonsurgical group n = 3) were measured by two observers in a randomized order. Results: Mean MNT values on days 5 and 7 were 9.61 Ncm-2 and 10.14 Ncm-2 in the operated group (p = 0.009 ; p = 0.005) respectively versus 13.00 Ncm-2 on day 1. Wound-associated points showed lower values than control points (p = 0.002). The nonsurgical group did not show a difference between control points and wound-associated points (p = 0.06). No significant differences were found between the surgical and the nonsurgical groups at the wound-associated points on any days measured. The inter-observer reliability was low (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.26; Cronbach's alpha of 0.27). Conclusions: Operated animals showed a reduction in MNT values on days 5 and 7 when compared with day 1 and lower values for the wound-associated points when compared with the control points. Inter-observer reliability was low. Pressure algometry could be a useful tool for assessing wound sensitivity after ventral midline coeliotomy in horses, which may improve pain management postoperatively.
Publication Date: 2019-06-10 PubMed ID: 31570274DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.03.008Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Observational Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study assesses the sensitivity of the abdominal wall in horses following ventral midline coeliotomy using pressure algometry. The research showed sensitivity reduced on days 5 and 7 after surgery, and there was low reliability between different observers’ measurements.

Study Overview

  • Titled ‘Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy’, the paper aimed to evaluate how the sensitivity of a horse’s abdominal wall changes following a ventral midline coeliotomy.
  • The measurement method used was pressure algometry, a technique used to measure mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs), which are indicative of sensitivity to pain or discomfort.

Methodology

  • The research took the form of an observational, cohort study, involving 13 horses exhibiting signs of abdominal pain who underwent ventral midline coeliotomy. Ten healthy horses, with no abdominal incision, were also involved for comparison.
  • Sensitivity was measured using a pressure algometer, at different points left and right of the abdominal incision. Two control points without incisions were also marked and measured for comparison.
  • Measurements were taken on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 postoperatively by a single observer who was ‘blinded’, meaning they were not privy to previous MNT values.
  • Inter-observer reliability, the level of agreement between measurements made by different observers, was tested on five horses by two observers conducting measurements in a randomized order.

Results

  • The MNT values on days 5 and 7 were found to be lower than on day 1 in the operated group, indicative of a reduction in sensitivity. The wound-associated points also had lower values than the control points.
  • No significant difference was found in the MNTs between the surgical and non-surgical groups at the wound-associated points on any of the measurement days.
  • The study found low inter-observer reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.26 and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.27, suggesting the measures may not always yield consistent results across different observers.

Conclusions

  • The study concludes that the sensitivity of the abdominal wall in horses, as measured by pressure algometry, reduces on days 5 and 7 following ventral midline coeliotomy, with wound-associated points being less sensitive than control points.
  • However, despite its potential utility in determining postoperative wound sensitivity, pressure algometry’s application is presently limited by its low inter-observer reliability, which could influence the consistency of measurements.

Cite This Article

APA
Visser EM, Menke ES, van Loon JP. (2019). Pressure algometry for assessment of abdominal wall sensitivity in horses after ventral midline coeliotomy. Vet Anaesth Analg, 46(6), 820-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.03.008

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 6
Pages: 820-828

Researcher Affiliations

Visser, Emi Ms
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: e.m.s.visser@uu.nl.
Menke, Eveline S
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Praktijk voor Dierfysiotherapie Eveline Menke, Ermelo, the Netherlands.
van Loon, Johannes Pam
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

MeSH Terms

  • Abdominal Wall / surgery
  • Animals
  • Cohort Studies
  • Colic / surgery
  • Colic / veterinary
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horses
  • Laparotomy / adverse effects
  • Laparotomy / veterinary
  • Male
  • Observer Variation
  • Pain Measurement / veterinary
  • Pain Threshold
  • Pressure