Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2007; 161(24); 814-816;

Prevalence of Setaria equina microfilaraemia in horses in Hungary.

Abstract: Peripheral blood samples were collected randomly from 195 horses in various parts of Hungary, and the presence of microfilariae was evaluated by the Knott technique. On the basis of morphological identification 18 of the horses (9.2 per cent) were infected with Setaria equina, and the infection was confirmed in 10 animals by pcr and sequencing. The level of microfilaraemia was between 1 and 1138 larvae in 2 ml of blood. There was no correlation between the time of sampling or the sex of the animals (stallions versus mares) and the prevalence of infection, but the prevalence decreased with age. There was a significant association between the prevalence of microfilaraemia and the presence of still waters; positive samples were collected either in the region of Lake Balaton, the largest lake in the country, or at places with nearby ponds.
Publication Date: 2007-12-18 PubMed ID: 18083980
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study is about the prevalence of Setaria equina, a type of parasitic worm, in horses in Hungary, exploring any correlation between microfilaraemia, geographical location, and characteristics, like age and sex of the horse.

Study Methodology

  • A total of 195 horses were randomly selected from different locations in Hungary. The researchers selected a diverse group to ensure the findings are representative.
  • From each horse, peripheral blood samples were taken and analyzed using the Knott technique. This technique is used to detect the presence of microfilariae, which are the larvae of the parasite Setaria equina.

Findings and Analysis

  • Microfilariae were found in the blood samples of 18 horses (9.2%), confirming the presence of Setaria equina infection in the tested population.
  • To further confirm the infection, 10 of the horse samples were subjected to PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and sequencing – commonly used genetic techniques which verified the results.
  • The level of microfilaraemia, meaning the number of larvae in the blood, varied widely ranging from 1 to 1138 larvae in a 2ml sample.

Correlation with Other Factors

  • The researchers found that the prevalence of Setaria equina did not have any significant correlation with the time of sampling or the sex of the horses.
  • The prevalence of infection was found to decrease with the age of the horses, suggesting that age may have an impact on the susceptibility of horses to this parasite.
  • One significant correlation discovered in the study was the association between the prevalence of microfilaraemia and the presence of still waters in the horse’s environment. Samples that tested positive for the parasite were predominantly from regions like Lake Balaton or areas with nearby ponds, suggesting a possible link with the parasite’s life cycle or transmission vector.

Implications and Further Research

This research provides insight into the prevalence and factors associated with Setaria equina infection in horses in Hungary. The findings are vital for developing strategies to control and prevent the spread of this parasitic infection. The notable correlation with still waters could be impactful in understanding and managing the environments where horses live. Further investigations can be carried out to understand better the role of water bodies in the life cycle and transmission of Setaria equina.

Cite This Article

APA
Hornok S, Genchi C, Bazzocchi C, Fok E, Farkas R. (2007). Prevalence of Setaria equina microfilaraemia in horses in Hungary. Vet Rec, 161(24), 814-816.

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 161
Issue: 24
Pages: 814-816

Researcher Affiliations

Hornok, S
  • Department of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, István u 2, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.
Genchi, C
    Bazzocchi, C
      Fok, E
        Farkas, R

          MeSH Terms

          • Age Factors
          • Animals
          • Diagnosis, Differential
          • Female
          • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
          • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
          • Horses
          • Hungary / epidemiology
          • Male
          • Microfilariae / growth & development
          • Microfilariae / isolation & purification
          • Prevalence
          • Risk Factors
          • Setaria Nematode / growth & development
          • Setaria Nematode / isolation & purification
          • Setariasis / diagnosis
          • Setariasis / epidemiology
          • Sex Factors
          • Water / parasitology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 3 times.
          1. Fuehrer HP, Alho AM, Kayikci FN, Shahi Barogh B, Rosa H, Tomás J, Rocha H, Harl J, Madeira de Carvalho L. Survey of Zoonotic and Non-zoonotic Vector-Borne Pathogens in Military Horses in Lisbon, Portugal.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:591943.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.591943pubmed: 33195629google scholar: lookup
          2. Ghasemi E, Shamsinia S, Taghipour A, Anvari D, Bahadory S, Shariatzadeh SA, Kordi B, Majidiani H, Borji H, Chaechi Nosrati M, Yousefi A, Shams M. Filarial worms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diversity in animals from Iran with emphasis on human cases.. Parasitology 2020 Aug;147(9):909-921.
            doi: 10.1017/S003118202000058Xpubmed: 32249728google scholar: lookup
          3. Zittra C, Kocziha Z, Pinnyei S, Harl J, Kieser K, Laciny A, Eigner B, Silbermayr K, Duscher GG, Fok É, Fuehrer HP. Screening blood-fed mosquitoes for the diagnosis of filarioid helminths and avian malaria.. Parasit Vectors 2015 Jan 13;8:16.
            doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0637-4pubmed: 25582219google scholar: lookup