Prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris in horses after ten years of prescription usage of anthelmintics in Sweden.
Abstract: Strongylus vulgaris is considered the most pathogenic nematode parasite of the horse. Frequent deworming programs since the 1970s have reduced the prevalence of S. vulgaris to low levels, but to the price of widespread benzimidazole resistance in the small strongyles (cyathostominae) and ivermectin resistance especially in the equine roundworm Parascaris spp. To slow down the progression of anthelmintic resistance in Sweden, horse anthelmintics were made prescription only medicine in 2007 and selective therapy principles were introduced. This means that only individuals with high egg excretion or clinical signs of helminth infection were treated instead of blanket treatment of all horses on a farm. The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence and risk factors associated with S. vulgaris infection in Sweden ten years after the introduction of a selective therapy regime. A total of 529 faecal samples from 106 farms were collected during March to June in 2016 and 2017. A web-based questionnaire was used to collect information about deworming routines. Strongyle faecal egg counts (FEC) were performed by McMaster and presence of S. vulgaris was demonstrated with a specific PCR on individual larval cultures. Results were analysed by mixed logistic (S. vulgaris prevalence) or linear (FEC) regression models, where farm was included as random factor. The overall prevalence of S. vulgaris at individual and farm levels was 28% and 61%, respectively. We observed a 2.9 increased odds risk of S. vulgaris infection on farms that based their treatment on strongyle FEC only as compared to farms that complemented strongyle FECs with larval cultures or dewormed regularly, 1-4 times per year, without prior diagnosis. We found no association between the prevalence of S. vulgaris and strongyle FEC level, horse age, geographical region or signs of colic. The prevalence of S. vulgaris was 25% in horses shedding ≤150 eggs per gram. Thus horses with low strongyle FECs that are left untreated could be an important source of S. vulgaris infection. This may be an important reason for the approximately three-fold increase in S. vulgaris prevalence since 1999 in Sweden. However, our combined results indicate that selective therapy based on a combination of strongyle FECs and larval cultivation was not associated with an increased risk of S. vulgaris infection. Still, S. vulgaris needs to be monitored continuously and should be taken into careful consideration when the treatment frequency is reduced.
© 2019 The Authors.
Publication Date: 2019-05-26 PubMed ID: 32904767PubMed Central: PMC7458386DOI: 10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100013Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article investigates the prevalence and risk factors of Strongylus vulgaris infection in horses in Sweden, a decade after the selective therapy regime was implemented. The study reveals an increase in the nematode’s prevalence, suggesting that horses with low faecal egg counts could be a substantial source and more robust diagnostic methods are needed.
Objective and Methodology of the Study
- The study aimed to examine the prevalence and risk factors of Strongylus vulgaris infection in horses in Sweden, ten years post the introduction of a selective therapy regime.
- It involved the collection of 529 faecal samples from 106 farms between March and June 2016 and 2017. Information about deworming routines was gathered via a web-based questionnaire.
- The researchers performed strongyle faecal egg counts (FEC) via the McMaster method, while the presence of Strongylus vulgaris was ascertained using a specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on individual larval cultures.
- The outcomes were analyzed by using mixed logistic (in the case of prevalence) or linear (in case of FEC) regression models. Here, the farm was considered as a random factor.
Findings of the Study
- The study found that the total prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris at individual and farm levels was 28% and 61% respectively.
- It was observed that farms that took necessary treatments based on strongyle FEC only had a risk of Strongylus vulgaris infection which was 2.9 times that of farms. These farms implemented larval cultures or dewormed regularly, 1-4 times per annum, without any preceding diagnosis.
- No association was found between the prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris and the strongyle fecal egg count level, horse age, or signs of colic.
- The research identified that horses which had a low strongyle FEC were left untreated, and could hence be an essential source of Strongylus vulgaris infection. This resulted in an approximately three-fold increase in Strongylus vulgaris prevalence in Sweden since 1999.
Conclusion of the Study
- The study’s results suggested that selective therapy, based on a combination of strongyle FECs and larval cultivation, did not increase the risk of Strongylus vulgaris infection.
- However, continuous monitoring of Strongylus vulgaris is needed, suggesting this nematode needs careful consideration when planning to reduce treatment frequency in the future.
Cite This Article
APA
Tydén E, Enemark HL, Franko MA, Höglund J, Osterman-Lind E.
(2019).
Prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris in horses after ten years of prescription usage of anthelmintics in Sweden.
Vet Parasitol X, 2, 100013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100013 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Department of Animal Health and Food Safety, Oslo, Norway.
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology, Uppsala, Sweden.
- National Veterinary Institute, Department of Microbiology, Section for Parasitology diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden.
References
This article includes 38 references
- Bellaw LJ, Nielsen KM. Evaluation of Baermann apparatus sedimentation time on recovery of Strongylus vulgaris and S. edentatus third stage larvae from equine coprocultures.. Vet. Parasitol. 2015;211:99–101.
- Craven J, Bjørn H, Henriksen SA, Nansen P, Larsen M, Lendal S. Survey of anthelmintic resistance on Danish horse farms, using 5 different methods of calculating faecal egg count reduction.. Equine Vet. J. 1998;30:289–293.
- Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede FH, Geerts S, Klei TR, Taylor MA, Waller PJ. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance.. Vet. Parasitol. 1992;44:35–44.
- Drudge JH, Lyons ET. Control of internal parasites of the horse.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1966;148:378–383.
- Duncan JL. Strongylus vulgaris infection in the horse.. Vet. Rec. 1974;95:34–37.
- Duncan JL, Pirie HM. The pathogenesis of single experimental infections with Strongylus vulgaris in foals.. Res. Vet. Sci. 1975;18:82–93.
- Duncan JL, Love S. Preliminary observations on an alternative strategy for the control of horse strongyles.. Equine Vet. J. 1991;23:226–228.
- Enhäll J. Hästar och anläggningar med häst 2016. Statistiska meddelanden.. .
- . 2001/82/EC.. EUR-lex 2018.
- Girma K. Försäljning av djurläkemedel.. .
- Hinney B, Wirtherle N, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin K, Clausen P. A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management.. Parasitol. Res. 2011;109:1625–1635.
- Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. An evidence-based approch to equine parasite control: it ain´t the 60s anymore.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2010;22:306–316.
- Kaspar K, Pfister K, Nielsen MK, Silaghi C, Fink H, Scheuerle MC. Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture – method comparison and occurrence assessment.. BMC Vet. Res. 2017;13:19.
- Kenyon F, Greer AW, Coles GC, Cringoli G, Papadopoulos E, Cabaret J, Berrag B, Varady M, Van Wyk JA, Thomas E, Vercruysse J, Jackson F. The role of targeted selective treatments in the development of refugia-based approaches to the control of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants.. Vet. Parasitol. 2009;164:3–11.
- Lind Osterman E, Höglund J, Ljungström B-L, Nilsson O, Uggla A. A field survey on the distribution of strongyle infections of horses in Sweden and factors affecting faecal egg counts.. Equine Vet. J. 1999;31:68–72.
- Lind Osterman E, Rautalinko E, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Morrison DA, Höglund J. Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms.. Acta Vet. Scand. 2007;49:25.
- Love S, Duncan JL. Could the worms have turned?. Equine Vet. J. 1991;23:152–154.
- Martin F, Höglund J, Bergström TF, Karlsson Lindsjö O, Tydén E. Resistance to pyrantel embonate and efficacy of fenbendazole in Parascaris univalens on Swedish stud farms.. Vet. Parasitol. 2018;15:69–73.
- Molena RA, Peachey LE, Di Cesare A, Traversa D, Cantacessi C. Cyathostomine egg reappearance period following ivermectin treatment in a cohort of UK Thoroughbreds.. Parasit. Vectors. 2018;11:61.
- Nilsson O, Andersson T. Stronylus vulgaris hos häst – epizootologi och profylax.. Svensk Veterinärtidning 1979;31:148–156.
- Nielsen MK, Monrad J, Olsen SN. Prescription-only anthelmintics - a questionnaire survey on strategies for surveillance and control of equine strongyles in Denmark.. Vet. Parasitol. 2006;135:47–55.
- Nielsen MK, Peterson DS, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM, Olsen SN, Kaplan RM. Detection and semi-quantification of Strongylus vulgaris DNA in equine faeces by real-time quantitative PCR.. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008;38:443–453.
- Nielsen MK. Sustainable equine parasite control: perspective and research needed.. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;185:32–44.
- Nielsen MK, Vidyashankar AN, Olsen SN, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM. Strongylus vulgaris associated with usage of selective therapy on Danish horse farms-is it reemerging?. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;26:260–266.
- Nielsen MK, Brananb MA, Wiedenheftc AM, Digianantonioc R, Garberb LP, Kopralb CA. Parasite control strategies used by equine owners in the United States: a national survey.. Vet. Parasitol. 2018;250:45–51.
- Papini RA, De Bernart FM, Sgorbini M. A questionnaire survey on intestinal worm control practices in horses in Italy.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015;35:70–75.
- Peregrine AS, Molento MB, Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in important parasites of horses: does it really matter?. Vet. Parasitol. 2014;201:1–8.
- R Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.. .
- Schneider S, Pfister K, Becher AM, Scheuerle MC. Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment.. BMC Vet. Res. 2014;10:262.
- Slocombe JO, McCraw BM. Gastrointestinal nematodes in horses in Ontario.. Can. Vet. J. 1973;14:101–105.
- Slocombe JO, McCraw BM. Controlled tests of ivermectin against migrating Strongylus vulgaris in ponies.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1981;42:1050–1051.
- . 17 24 § Legislations (In Swedish). SJVFS 2010.
- . Avmaskning Av Häst. (In Swedish). Swedish National Veterinary Institute 2018.
- Tolliver SC, Lyons ET, Drudge JH. Prevalence of internal parasites in horses in critical tests of activity of parasiticides over a 28-year period (1956–1983) in Kentucky.. Vet. Parasitol. 1987;23:273–284.
- Uhlinger C. Uses of fecal egg count data in equine practice.. Comp. Cont. Educ. Vet. Pract. 1993;15:742–749.
- Van Wyk JA, Mayhew E. Morphological identification of parasitic nematode infective larvae of small ruminants and cattle: a practical lab guide.. J. Vet. Res. 2013;80:1–14.
- van Doorn DC, Ploeger HW, Eysker M, Geurden T, Wagenaar JA, Kooyman FN. Cylicocyclus species predominate during shortened egg reappearance period in horses after treatment with ivermectin and moxidectin.. Vet. Parasitol. 2014;206:246–252.
- von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Fritzen B, Demeler J, Schurmann S, Rohn K, Schnieder T, Epe C. Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms.. Vet. Parasitol. 2007;144:74–80.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists