Prevention of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia of foals using two different inactivated vaccines.
Abstract: Two different, inactivated, aluminium salt adsorbed vaccines, one containing a R. equi strain (serotype 1, 10(9) CFU/ml and equine herpesvirus 2 (EHV-2) (1.5 x 10(7) PFU/ml) and another containing R. equi only were used on three studfarms to determine whether the disease can be prevented by vaccination of both pregnant mares and their foals. Pregnant mares received two 3 ml doses of vaccine intramuscularly 6 and 2 weeks before parturition and their foals were vaccinated on two or three occasions at 3, 5 or 7 weeks of age. The efficacy of the vaccines was evaluated on the basis of the clinical signs, serological response (indirect haemagglutination and virus neutralisation tests) and culture of R. equi from sick or dead foals. On studs A and B where the bivalent vaccine was used, 24 and 14 foals were born respectively to the vaccinated mares but no clinical case or death occurred due to R. equi pneumonia, while out of the 10 nonvaccinated control foals (stud B) two succumbed to R. equi pneumonia and 4 other foals had to be treated with antibiotics because of fever, coughing and dyspnea. In stud C, where the vaccine containing R. equi strain alone was used, all 15 vaccinated foals remained healthy but one of the 11 control foals died of suppurative R. equi pneumonia and one foal had to be treated due to R. equi pneumonia. R. equi strains (serotype 1) were isolated from the lungs of all dead foals. The serological response was very weak to both R. equi and the EHV-2 strain. Antibody titres in the colostrum of the vaccinated mares against R. equi (in studs A and B, geometric mean 3.79 +/- 1.63 and 4.14 +/- 1.46, respectively) were practically not higher than titres in the controls (in stud B geometric mean 2.12 +/- 1.96). More antibody was present in the colostrum samples against EHV-2 (geometric mean 6.1 + 1.4 compared to 2.5 +/- 1.2). In all foals antibody levels were hardly detectable against both R. equi and EHV-2 until five weeks of age. From the fifth week, antibody levels gradually increased and by the ninth week their reached a titre of 5.5 +/- 1.8 (2.7 +/- 1.2 in the control foals) against R. equi and 5.2 +/- 1.4 against EHV-2. The favorable clinical results and the low antibody titres in the sera of the vaccinated foals during the first week of life suggest that protection probably was due to repeated vaccination of young foals rather than to vaccination of mares.
Publication Date: 1997-06-16 PubMed ID: 9226835DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(97)00089-8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research focused on preventing Rhodococcus equi pneumonia, a disease that affects foals, by administering two distinct inactivated aluminium salt adsorbed vaccines on three stud farms. Results revealed foals born to immunized mares had significantly improved health outcomes compared to a control group, suggesting vaccination is crucial for preventing cases of R. equi pneumonia.
Research Context
- The study was conducted to assess ways of preventing Rhodococcus equi pneumonia, a disease commonly affecting young foals. Researchers used two distinct kinds of inactivated vaccines for the experiment; the first contained a mixture of R. equi strain and equine herpesvirus 2 (EHV-2), while the second contained only the R. equi strain.
- The investigation was conducted on three different stud farms, providing a diverse set of environments for the research.
Procedure and Methodology
- The methodology involved administering vaccines to both pregnant mares and their foals.
- The mares received two doses of vaccines intramuscularly at six and two weeks before parturition. Their foals were vaccinated on two or three occasions when they reached 3, 5 or 7 weeks old.
- Efficacy of the vaccines was evaluated based on observable clinical signs, serological response (as measured by indirect haemagglutination and virus neutralization tests), and culture of R. equi from sick or dead foals.
Key Findings
- No clinical cases or deaths due to R. equi pneumonia were noted among the foals born to vaccinated mares on two of the three stud farms where the R. equi and EHV-2 mixed vaccine was used. However, among the non-vaccinated control foals, cases of R. equi pneumonia were registered, with some even being fatal.
- On the stud where the vaccine containing only the R. equi strain was applied, all vaccinated foals remained healthy, though there were instances of the disease among the control foals.
- R. equi strains were identified in the lung tissue of all the foals that succumbed to the condition.
- Antibody levels against R. equi and EHV-2 were minimal in the early weeks following vaccination, but began to increase gradually from the fifth week, peaking by the ninth week.
Conclusion
- The conclusion of the research suggests that the use of repeated vaccinations among young foals was more effective in preventing R. equi than vaccination of the mares. The findings indicate that vaccination schedules and methodologies can significantly influence the health outcomes of foals, potentially preventing the occurrence of R. equi pneumonia.
Cite This Article
APA
Varga J, Fodor L, Rusvai M, Soós I, Makrai L.
(1997).
Prevention of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia of foals using two different inactivated vaccines.
Vet Microbiol, 56(3-4), 205-212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(97)00089-8 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Veterinary Science, Budapest, Hungary.
MeSH Terms
- Actinomycetales Infections / immunology
- Actinomycetales Infections / prevention & control
- Actinomycetales Infections / veterinary
- Animals
- Antibodies, Bacterial / blood
- Antibodies, Viral / blood
- Antibody Formation
- Bacterial Vaccines
- Female
- Herpesviridae Infections / immunology
- Herpesviridae Infections / prevention & control
- Herpesviridae Infections / veterinary
- Horse Diseases
- Horses
- Immunity, Maternally-Acquired
- Pneumonia, Bacterial / immunology
- Pneumonia, Bacterial / prevention & control
- Pneumonia, Bacterial / veterinary
- Pregnancy
- Rhodococcus equi / classification
- Serotyping
- Vaccines, Inactivated
- Viral Vaccines
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists