Producer or purchaser: different expectations may lead to equine wastage and welfare concerns.
Abstract: Horses are individual, each having differential characteristics such as height, color, breeding, conformation, and temperament. These bio-characteristics often influence potential purchasers when buying horses. This study sought to investigate if producers and potential purchasers placed similar emphasis on equine bio-characteristics. Sport-horse stakeholders--n = 1377 (792 producers and 585 potential purchasers)--rated various equine bio-characteristics on a Likert psychometric response scale during a questionnaire-based survey. The study analyzed responses, using the Wilcoxan test for statistical significance. The findings indicated consensus between producers and potential purchasers for equine soundness, conformation, and movement. Producers attached significantly greater importance to gender, color, pedigree details, and performance records of the horse and the horse's siblings. In contrast, potential purchasers rated equine temperament and presence (aesthetic appeal) as significantly more important attributes. Shortcomings in suitability for purpose of the horse (such as temperament) could lead to unnecessary wastage and welfare concerns. Producers need to understand consumer expectations/demands to maximize profitability and to avoid wastage and the production of unsuitable horses.
Publication Date: 2008-06-24 PubMed ID: 18569220DOI: 10.1080/10888700802101023Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study investigates the differing priorities between horse producers and potential buyers when assessing various equine characteristics. The findings indicate a significant variance in the importance placed on certain features.
Study Design
This research attracted a large number of sport-horse stakeholders (1377 in total), which included both producers (792) and potential buyers (585). The participants were asked to rank the importance of various equine characteristics, such as gender, color, pedigree, performance records, and temperament, using a Likert scale. This rigorous questionnaire-based survey aimed to understand whether producers and buyers shared similar expectations and priorities when it came to these key attributes.
Statistical Approach
- The researchers analyzed the participants’ responses using the Wilcoxon test, a non-parametric statistical hypothesis test used to compare pairs of an experimental unit.
- The Wilcoxon test was used to identify if there was a significant difference in the way producers and potential purchasers value certain characteristics of the horses.
Key Findings
- The study found a crucial consensus between producers and potential buyers regarding the importance of equine soundness, conformation (the physical appearance and structure), and movement.
- However, the research also uncovered notable differences between the two groups. Producers were found to value gender, color, pedigree details, and performance records of the horse and its siblings more than potential buyers.
- On the other hand, buyers were more concerned with the horse’s temperament and aesthetic appeal.
Implications of the Study
- The divergent priorities between producers and buyers highlighted in this study potentially lead to the production of horses that do not meet potential purchasers’ expectations.
- If purchased horses are found to be unsuitable, for example in their temperament, this could lead to wastage and welfare issues. Essentially, horses could be discarded or ill-treated because they were not suitable for the purchaser’s requirements.
- As a result of these findings, the authors suggest that producers need to have a better understanding of customer expectations and demands in order to reduce wastage, improve horse welfare, and maximize profitability.
Cite This Article
APA
Hennessy KD, Quinn KM, Murphy J.
(2008).
Producer or purchaser: different expectations may lead to equine wastage and welfare concerns.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci, 11(3), 232-235.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700802101023 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Centre for Sports Studies, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
MeSH Terms
- Animal Welfare
- Animals
- Commerce
- Horses / physiology
- Horses / psychology
- Humans
- Psychometrics
- Statistics, Nonparametric
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Temperament
Citations
This article has been cited 3 times.- Condon V, Wilson B, Fleming PJS, Kennedy BPA, Keeley T, Barwick J, McGreevy P. Investigating the Market Value of Brumbies (Equus caballus) in the Australian Riding Horse Market.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 27;13(9).
- Silva ILS, Junqueira GSB, Oliveira CAA, Costa RB, DE Camargo GMF. Inconsistencies in horse coat color registration: A case study.. J Equine Sci 2020 Oct;31(3):57-60.
- Jönsson L, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A, Näsholm A, Dalin G, Philipsson J. Prevalence of clinical findings at examinations of young Swedish warmblood riding horses.. Acta Vet Scand 2013 Apr 18;55(1):34.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists
