Analyze Diet

Protection of foals against experimental Rhodococcus equi pneumonia by oral immunization.

Abstract: Two groups of three one to three week old foals were immunized orally on four occasions over five weeks with two strains of Rhodococcus equi, a clinical isolate from a pneumonic foal and a laboratory passaged Congo red negative variant of this strain. Three nonimmunized foals of similar age acted as controls. Three weeks after the last immunization, all foals were challenged on five occasions over seven days by aerosol infection with about 10(10) of the pneumonic foal isolate on each occasion. Control foals became seriously ill and were euthanized. Immunization with either strain protected foals equally against the challenge, and resulted in rapid lung clearance. Oral immunization can thus protect foals against severe challenge with R. equi. The proteins associated with Congo red colony staining appear not to be involved in protective immunity.
Publication Date: 1987-10-01 PubMed ID: 3453264PubMed Central: PMC1255362
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study trialed the effects of oral vaccinations against Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in young foals. The immunization significantly reduced illness and aided in rapid lung clearance, giving evidence that this method can protect foals against severe challenges of R. equi.

Methodology of the Study

  • The study comprised two groups of foals, each containing three foals aged one to three weeks old. Three more foals of similar age were kept separate as control.
  • Both groups of foals were orally immunized on four separate occasions over a period of five weeks using two strains of Rhodococcus equi – one was a clinical isolate obtained from a pneumonic foal, and the other was a laboratory-passaged Congo red negative variant of that same strain.
  • Three weeks after their last dose of immunization, all the foals were exposed to aerosol infection – they were subjected to about 10^10 of the pneumonic foal isolate five times over seven days.

Findings of the Study

  • The control foals that were not immunized fell ill severely and had to be euthanized to spare them further suffering.
  • On the other hand, the foals that were immunized with either strain were equally protected against the challenge, resulting in quick clearance of their lungs. This demonstrated that oral immunization can be effective at protecting foals against severe Rhodococcus equi challenges.
  • The study also noted that the proteins associated with Congo red colony staining did not seem to play a significant role in protective immunity.

Implications of the Study

  • The findings of the study suggest that oral immunization could be a feasible and effective method of protecting foals against Rhodococcus equi infections, a significant cause of pneumonia in these animals.
  • The discovery that proteins associated with Congo red colony staining don’t have a significant role in the development of protective immunity against Rhodococcus equi is crucial for future research and the development of more targeted vaccines.

Cite This Article

APA
Chirino-Trejo JM, Prescott JF, Yager JA. (1987). Protection of foals against experimental Rhodococcus equi pneumonia by oral immunization. Can J Vet Res, 51(4), 444-447.

Publication

ISSN: 0830-9000
NlmUniqueID: 8607793
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 4
Pages: 444-447

Researcher Affiliations

Chirino-Trejo, J M
  • Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph.
Prescott, J F
    Yager, J A

      MeSH Terms

      • Actinomycetales Infections / prevention & control
      • Actinomycetales Infections / veterinary
      • Administration, Oral
      • Animals
      • Bacterial Vaccines / administration & dosage
      • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
      • Horses
      • Immunization / veterinary
      • Lung / pathology
      • Pneumonia / prevention & control
      • Pneumonia / veterinary
      • Rhodococcus / immunology

      References

      This article includes 12 references
      1. Can J Comp Med. 1980 Jul;44(3):280-8
        pubmed: 7427776
      2. Infect Immun. 1984 Jan;43(1):397-401
        pubmed: 6360906
      3. Can J Comp Med. 1979 Oct;43(4):356-64
        pubmed: 548158
      4. Vet Pathol. 1983 Jul;20(4):450-9
        pubmed: 6623849
      5. Am J Vet Res. 1985 Oct;46(10):2171-4
        pubmed: 4062025
      6. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1982 Nov 15;181(10):1074-9
        pubmed: 6294027
      7. Can Vet J. 1986 May;27(5):213-7
        pubmed: 17422658
      8. Vet Pathol. 1983 Jul;20(4):440-9
        pubmed: 6623848
      9. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Apr;23(4):794-6
        pubmed: 3700632
      10. Am J Vet Res. 1985 Jan;46(1):13-5
        pubmed: 3918488
      11. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):486-90
        pubmed: 6630438
      12. Equine Vet J. 1982 Apr;14(2):111-6
        pubmed: 7084193