Analyze Diet

Pulsed magnetic fields improve osteoblast activity during the repair of an experimental osseous defect.

Abstract: The influence of pulsed low-frequency electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) on bone formation was investigated in studies of the healing process of transcortical holes, bored at the diaphyseal region of metacarpal bones of six adult horses, exposed for 30 days to PEMFs (28 G peak amplitude, 1.3 ms rise time, and 75 Hz repetition rate). A pair of Helmholtz coils, continuously powered by a pulse generator, was applied for 30 days to the left metacarpal bone, through which two holes, of equal diameter and depth, had been bored at the diaphyseal region. Two equal holes, bored at the same level in the right metacarpal and surrounded by an inactive pair of Helmholtz coils, were used as controls. All horses were given an intravenous injection of 25-30 mg/kg of tetracycline chloride on the 15th and again on the 25th day after the operation and were killed 5 days later. The histomorphometric analysis indicated that both the amount of bone formed during 30 days and the mineral apposition rate during 10 days (deduced from the interval between the two tetracycline labels) were significantly greater (p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001, respectively) in the PEMF-treated holes than in the controls. As did a previous investigation, these preliminary findings indicate that PEMFs at low frequency not only stimulate bone repair but also seem to improve the osteogenic phase of the healing process, at least in our experimental conditions.
Publication Date: 1993-09-01 PubMed ID: 8410466DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100110508Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study conducted an experiment on horses to investigate the effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) on the process of healing bone defects. The findings suggest that these fields can enhance bone repair and stimulate osteoblast activity, which is involved in bone formation.

Study Design

  • The researchers created a pair of identical holes in the metacarpal bones (in the main body of the bone shaft) of six adult horses. This procedure provided the experimental bone defects.
  • One of the pairs of holes, located in the left metacarpal bone, was treated with PEMFs for 30 days. A pair of Helmholtz coils (a device for creating a uniform magnetic field) connected to a pulse generator were used to produce and expose the bone defects to these fields. The electromagnetic fields used had a peak amplitude of 28 G (a measure of intensity) and a repetition rate of 75 Hz.
  • The other pair of holes, bored in the right metacarpal bone and surrounded by a non-active pair of Helmholtz coils, served as the control group. This means that they underwent the same process but were not exposed to the PEMFs.
  • Throughout the experiment, all the horses received intravenous injections of tetracycline (a type of antibiotic) twice – once on the 15th day, and again on the 25th day after the operation. The role of the tetracycline was to act as a fluorescent marker in the bone tissue, enabling the researchers to monitor the process of bone formation more straightforwardly.

Results

  • Following the experimental period of 30 days, the horses were euthanized, and histomorphometric analysis performed on the bone defects. Histomorphometry is the microscopic examination and measurement of the structure and form of bone tissues.
  • The results indicated that the amount of bone formed after 30 days and the mineral apposition rate — the speed at which new mineralized bone tissue is created — over a 10 day period were both significantly higher in the defects treated with PEMFs compared to the control group.
  • The difference in both these measurements between the treatment and control groups was statistically significant, with p-values lower than 0.01 and 0.0001, respectively. This p-value represents the probability that the researchers would observe such a difference due to pure chance. The lower the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis, which in this context would be that PEMFs have no effect on bone healing.

Conclusions

  • This study’s preliminary findings suggest that low-frequency PEMFs could enhance bone repair and influence osteoblast activity positively. Osteoblasts are specialized cells that synthesize bone tissues.
  • The authors, however, emphasize that further research is required to confirm and expand upon these results, as these findings are based on experimental conditions and may not fully apply to clinical or real-world settings.

Cite This Article

APA
Canè V, Botti P, Soana S. (1993). Pulsed magnetic fields improve osteoblast activity during the repair of an experimental osseous defect. J Orthop Res, 11(5), 664-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100110508

Publication

ISSN: 0736-0266
NlmUniqueID: 8404726
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 5
Pages: 664-670

Researcher Affiliations

Canè, V
  • Institutes of Human Anatomy, University of Modena, Italy.
Botti, P
    Soana, S

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Bone and Bones / diagnostic imaging
      • Bone and Bones / injuries
      • Bone and Bones / physiopathology
      • Electromagnetic Fields
      • Fracture Healing / physiology
      • Horses
      • Male
      • Metacarpus / diagnostic imaging
      • Metacarpus / injuries
      • Metacarpus / physiopathology
      • Osteogenesis / physiology
      • Radiography

      Citations

      This article has been cited 19 times.
      1. Wang T, Liang Z, Wang C, Chen J, Ma Y, Chen S, Zhou D, Hong Z. Pulsed electromagnetic fields mediate sensory nerve regulation for bone formation in aging models. Nat Commun 2025 Sep 29;16(1):8223.
        doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63703-9pubmed: 41022817google scholar: lookup
      2. Friscia M, Abbate V, De Fazio GR, Sani L, Spinelli R, Troise S, Bonavolontà P, Committeri U, Califano L, Orabona GD. Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) as a valid tool in orthognathic surgery to reduce post-operative pain and swelling: a prospective study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024 Sep;28(3):1287-1294.
        doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01256-9pubmed: 38698248google scholar: lookup
      3. De Francesco F, Gravina P, Varagona S, Setti S, Gigante A, Riccio M. Biophysical Stimulation in Delayed Fracture Healing of Hand Phalanx: A Radiographic Evaluation. Biomedicines 2022 Oct 9;10(10).
        doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102519pubmed: 36289781google scholar: lookup
      4. Di Bartolomeo M, Cavani F, Pellacani A, Grande A, Salvatori R, Chiarini L, Nocini R, Anesi A. Pulsed Electro-Magnetic Field (PEMF) Effect on Bone Healing in Animal Models: A Review of Its Efficacy Related to Different Type of Damage. Biology (Basel) 2022 Mar 5;11(3).
        doi: 10.3390/biology11030402pubmed: 35336776google scholar: lookup
      5. Li Y, Yang Y, Wang M, Zhang X, Bai S, Lu X, Li Y, Waldorff EI, Zhang N, Lee WY, Li G. High slew rate pulsed electromagnetic field enhances bone consolidation and shortens daily treatment duration in distraction osteogenesis. Bone Joint Res 2021 Dec;10(12):767-779.
      6. Shayeghan M, Forouzesh F, Madjid Ansari A, Javidi MA. DNMT1 and miRNAs: possible epigenetics footprints in electromagnetic fields utilization in oncology. Med Oncol 2021 Sep 8;38(10):125.
        doi: 10.1007/s12032-021-01574-ypubmed: 34495398google scholar: lookup
      7. Lullini G, Cammisa E, Setti S, Sassoli I, Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM. Role of pulsed electromagnetic fields after joint replacements. World J Orthop 2020 Jun 18;11(6):285-293.
        doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i6.285pubmed: 32572365google scholar: lookup
      8. Massari L, Benazzo F, Falez F, Perugia D, Pietrogrande L, Setti S, Osti R, Vaienti E, Ruosi C, Cadossi R. Biophysical stimulation of bone and cartilage: state of the art and future perspectives. Int Orthop 2019 Mar;43(3):539-551.
        doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4274-3pubmed: 30645684google scholar: lookup
      9. Galli C, Pedrazzi G, Mattioli-Belmonte M, Guizzardi S. The Use of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields to Promote Bone Responses to Biomaterials In Vitro and In Vivo. Int J Biomater 2018;2018:8935750.
        doi: 10.1155/2018/8935750pubmed: 30254677google scholar: lookup
      10. Song K, Im SH, Yoon YJ, Kim HM, Lee HJ, Park GS. A 60 Hz uniform electromagnetic field promotes human cell proliferation by decreasing intracellular reactive oxygen species levels. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0199753.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199753pubmed: 30011321google scholar: lookup
      11. Klumpp R, Trevisan C. Aseptic osteonecrosis of the hip in the adult: current evidence on conservative treatment. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2015 Jan-Apr;12(Suppl 1):39-42.
        doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2015.12.3s.039pubmed: 27134631google scholar: lookup
      12. D'Angelo C, Costantini E, Kamal MA, Reale M. Experimental model for ELF-EMF exposure: Concern for human health. Saudi J Biol Sci 2015 Jan;22(1):75-84.
        doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.07.006pubmed: 25561888google scholar: lookup
      13. Beck-Broichsitter BE, Lamia A, Geuna S, Fregnan F, Smeets R, Becker ST, Sinis N. Does pulsed magnetic field therapy influence nerve regeneration in the median nerve model of the rat?. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:401760.
        doi: 10.1155/2014/401760pubmed: 25143937google scholar: lookup
      14. Ehmke TA, Cherian JJ, Wu ES, Jauregui JJ, Banerjee S, Mont MA. Treatment of osteonecrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2014;16(9):441.
        doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0441-8pubmed: 25074031google scholar: lookup
      15. van Eekeren IC, Reilingh ML, van Dijk CN. Rehabilitation and return-to-sports activity after debridement and bone marrow stimulation of osteochondral talar defects. Sports Med 2012 Oct 1;42(10):857-70.
        doi: 10.1007/BF03262299pubmed: 22963224google scholar: lookup
      16. Fassina L, Saino E, Sbarra MS, Visai L, De Angelis MG, Magenes G, Benazzo F. In vitro electromagnetically stimulated SAOS-2 osteoblasts inside porous hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010 Jun 15;93(4):1272-9.
        doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32620pubmed: 19827111google scholar: lookup
      17. Sen RK. Management of avascular necrosis of femoral head at pre-collapse stage. Indian J Orthop 2009 Jan;43(1):6-16.
        doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.45318pubmed: 19753173google scholar: lookup
      18. Pieber K, Schuhfried O, Fialka-Moser V. [Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF)--results in evidence based medicine]. Wien Med Wochenschr 2007 Jan;157(1-2):34-6.
        doi: 10.1007/s10354-006-0369-3pubmed: 17471830google scholar: lookup
      19. Varani K, Gessi S, Merighi S, Iannotta V, Cattabriga E, Spisani S, Cadossi R, Borea PA. Effect of low frequency electromagnetic fields on A2A adenosine receptors in human neutrophils. Br J Pharmacol 2002 May;136(1):57-66.
        doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704695pubmed: 11976268google scholar: lookup