Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2007; 175(2); 249-258; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.12.016

Radiographic evaluation of tooth drift after cheek tooth extraction and insertion of an intra-alveolar prosthesis in ponies.

Abstract: The aim of the study was to investigate post-extraction tooth drift in ponies and the influence of an intra-alveolar prosthesis. The maxillary 08 was bilaterally repulsed in five ponies under general anaesthesia. On one side the alveolus was left to granulate, and on the other a synthetic bone substitute prosthesis was fitted. Standard radiographic projections of the head were taken monthly during the first year and at 24 months post-operatively. Different cephalometric parameters were measured and statistically analyzed. Rostral and caudal drift were recognized in molar and premolar teeth, respectively. The prosthesis significantly slowed down tooth drift (P<0.001). Although differences in the degree of secondary mandibular overgrowths (on 06s, 11s and 08s) were found between treatments, this had no important clinical consequences. Premolars showed significantly more tooth wear in comparison with molars (P<0.001). Tooth attrition was higher in the prosthesis treated sides (P<0.001).
Publication Date: 2007-02-27 PubMed ID: 17329134DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.12.016Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates tooth position changes in ponies after a cheek tooth extraction and the subsequent impact of using an intra-alveolar prosthesis, a type of synthetic bone substitute.

Objective and Methodology

  • The main objective of this study was to examine the effect of tooth extraction on the positional changes in surrounding teeth, a phenomena termed tooth drift. The study further aimed to understand the influence of an artificial bone substitute prosthesis, placed in the tooth socket, on the tooth drift.
  • For the study, tooth extraction was performed on the upper jaw of five ponies under general anaesthesia. In each pony, the alveolar socket, or the cavity in the jaw that holds the tooth, on one side was left empty to naturally heal while on the other side, a synthetic bone substitute prosthesis was inserted.
  • To track the changes, standard radiographic images of the ponies’ heads were captured monthly for the first year and at 24 months after the procedure. These images were used to measure different parameters associated with the dental and jaw structure and statistically analyzed.

Key Findings

  • After tooth extraction, a drift in the position of remaining teeth was observed. Molar teeth tended to drift toward the front (rostral drift) while premolar teeth drifted in a backward direction (caudal drift).
  • The use of synthetic bone substitute prosthesis was found to significantly hinder tooth drift. In fact, the positional change in teeth was slower on the sides where the prosthesis was installed, indicating its effectiveness.
  • Secondary mandibular overgrowths were observed on teeth, though the implications of this occurrence were not found to be clinically significant.
  • Tooth wear was more significant in premolars when compared to molars. Moreover, the attrition rate was higher on the sides where the prosthesis was used, implying that the use of a prosthesis could increase tooth wear over time.

Implications

  • This study provides valuable insights about tooth drift in ponies, demonstrating that the extraction of a tooth can cause a shift in the positions of the remaining teeth. This indicates the importance of monitoring and managing tooth drift in post-surgery care to prevent potential dental issues.
  • The research also highlights the effectiveness of an intra-alveolar prosthesis in slowing down tooth drift. This could potentially improve the dental care options for animals after tooth extraction surgery.
  • The finding that the prosthesis can increase tooth wear is significant, and suggests that better material or design options might be needed to reduce this side-effect.

Cite This Article

APA
Vlaminck L, Hoegaerts M, Steenhaut M, Maes D, Saunders J, Gasthuys F. (2007). Radiographic evaluation of tooth drift after cheek tooth extraction and insertion of an intra-alveolar prosthesis in ponies. Vet J, 175(2), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.12.016

Publication

ISSN: 1090-0233
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 175
Issue: 2
Pages: 249-258

Researcher Affiliations

Vlaminck, Lieven
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium. lieven.vlaminck@UGent.be
Hoegaerts, Michel
    Steenhaut, Michel
      Maes, Dominiek
        Saunders, Jimmy
          Gasthuys, Frank

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Dental Implants / veterinary
            • Dentistry / veterinary
            • Female
            • Horse Diseases / surgery
            • Horses
            • Male
            • Prosthesis Implantation / veterinary
            • Tooth Extraction / adverse effects
            • Tooth Extraction / veterinary
            • Tooth Migration / veterinary
            • Tooth Movement Techniques
            • Tooth Socket / pathology

            Citations

            This article has been cited 2 times.
            1. Liuti T, Daniel CR, Dixon PM, Reardon RJM. Studies on Age-Related Changes in Equine Cheek Teeth Angulation and Dental Drift. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:804061.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.804061pubmed: 35242831google scholar: lookup
            2. Robert MP, Gangl MC, Lepage OM. A case of facial deformity due to bilateral developmental maxillary cheek teeth displacement in an adult horse. Can Vet J 2010 Oct;51(10):1152-6.
              pubmed: 21197210