Analyze Diet
Animal reproduction science2011; 125(1-4); 124-132; doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.019

Rating of putative housekeeping genes for quantitative gene expression analysis in cyclic and early pregnant equine endometrium.

Abstract: The aim was an evaluation of a set of housekeeping genes (HKGs) to be used in the normalization of gene expression in the equine endometrium. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), hypoxanthine ribosyl transferase 1 (HPRT1), ubiquitin B (UBB), tubulin alpha 1 (TUBA1), ribosomal protein L32 (RPL32), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), 18S rRNA (18S), and 28S rRNA (28S) HKGs were evaluated using real-time PCR and were compared in different physiological stages of the endometrium. Endometrial biopsies were obtained from mares on day of ovulation (d0, n=4), at late diestrus (LD, n=4), after luteolyis (AL, n=4) of the cycle and on days 14 (P14; n=3), 18 (P18, n=3) and 22 (P22; n=3) of pregnancy. A model based on REML with support of descriptive statistics was proposed in accordance with experimental design and was further confirmed with principal component analysis (PCA). Results were compared with widely used software including geNorm, BestKeeper, and NormFinder. Results indicated that GAPDH was the most stable HKG and RPL32 was ranked as the second best. 18S and 28S were found to be the least stable. The proposed model, PCA, geNorm, and BestKeeper were in agreement in detecting the most stable and the least stable HKGs in the equine endometrium during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy.
Publication Date: 2011-02-18 PubMed ID: 21411251DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.019Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines a set of internal reference genes, known as housekeeping genes (HKGs), to determine which are the most stable for use in gene expression analysis of the horse’s endometrium, particularly during various stages of the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. It found GAPDH to be the most consistent HKG, whereas 18S and 28S were the least stable.

Study Objectives and Methodology

In this study, the researchers aimed to evaluate the stability of a variety of housekeeping genes (HKGs) in the equine endometrium. The HKGs evaluated included Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), hypoxanthine ribosyl transferase 1 (HPRT1), ubiquitin B (UBB), tubulin alpha 1 (TUBA1), ribosomal protein L32 (RPL32), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), 18S rRNA (18S), and 28S rRNA (28S).

  • HKGs are generally stable genes that are utilized in gene expression studies to normalize data.
  • They examined each of these genes using real-time PCR, comparing their stability during different physiological stages of the endometrium.
  • Samples were collected from mares at various points in their cycle: the day of ovulation, late diestrus, after luteolyis, and on days 14, 18, and 22 of pregnancy.

Evaluation Model

The researchers proposed a statistical model for analysis based on Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) methodology.

  • This was also supported by descriptive statistics and followed established experimental designs.
  • The model was further confirmed using principal component analysis (PCA) for additional verification.
  • The results obtained from the selected model were also compared to those achieved with popular software tools such as geNorm, BestKeeper, and NormFinder.

Results and Findings

The results revealed that out of the eight HKGs being tested, GAPDH turned out to be the most stable.

  • The second most stable HKG according to the study was the ribosomal protein L32 (RPL32).
  • Interestingly, GADPH and RPL32 are vital to the metabolism and protein synthesis processes, respectively, and are thus inherently stable.
  • On the other hand, 18S and 28S, which are types of rRNA, were found to be the least stable HKGs in the equine endometrium during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy stages.
  • The researchers’ proposed REML model, PCA, and the software tools geNorm, BestKeeper, and NormFinder were all in agreement in identifying the most and least stable HKGs.

These findings are significant as they provide direction for future gene expression studies in the equine endometrium, helping researchers select the most appropriate housekeeping genes for normalization.

Cite This Article

APA
Kayis SA, Atli MO, Kurar E, Bozkaya F, Semacan A, Aslan S, Guzeloglu A. (2011). Rating of putative housekeeping genes for quantitative gene expression analysis in cyclic and early pregnant equine endometrium. Anim Reprod Sci, 125(1-4), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.019

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2232
NlmUniqueID: 7807205
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 125
Issue: 1-4
Pages: 124-132

Researcher Affiliations

Kayis, Seyit A
  • Biometry-Genetics Unit, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Atli, Mehmet O
    Kurar, Ercan
      Bozkaya, Faruk
        Semacan, Ahmet
          Aslan, Selim
            Guzeloglu, Aydin

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Endometrium / metabolism
              • Endometrium / physiology
              • Estrous Cycle / genetics
              • Female
              • Gene Expression Profiling / methods
              • Gene Expression Profiling / veterinary
              • Horses / genetics
              • Linear Models
              • Pregnancy
              • Pregnancy, Animal / genetics
              • Principal Component Analysis
              • RNA, Messenger / biosynthesis
              • RNA, Messenger / genetics
              • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
              • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary

              Citations

              This article has been cited 10 times.
              1. Stefanetti V, Pascucci L, Wilsher S, Cappelli K, Capomaccio S, Reale L, Passamonti F, Coletti M, Crociati M, Monaci M, Marenzoni ML. Differential Expression Pattern of Retroviral Envelope Gene in the Equine Placenta. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:693416.
                doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.693416pubmed: 34307531google scholar: lookup
              2. Liu W, Yuan X, Yuan S, Dai L, Dong S, Liu J, Peng L, Wang M, Tang Y, Xiao Y. Optimal reference genes for gene expression analysis in polyploid of Cyprinus carpio and Carassius auratus. BMC Genet 2020 Sep 17;21(1):107.
                doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00915-6pubmed: 32943013google scholar: lookup
              3. Dugat T, Leblond A, Keck N, Lagrée AC, Desjardins I, Joulié A, Pradier S, Durand B, Boulouis HJ, Haddad N. One particular Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotype infects cattle in the Camargue, France. Parasit Vectors 2017 Aug 2;10(1):371.
                doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2305-3pubmed: 28764743google scholar: lookup
              4. Azarpeykan S, Dittmer KE. Evaluation of housekeeping genes for quantitative gene expression analysis in the equine kidney. J Equine Sci 2016;27(4):165-168.
                doi: 10.1294/jes.27.165pubmed: 27974876google scholar: lookup
              5. Azarpeykan S, Dittmer KE, Marshall JC, Perera KC, Gee EK, Acke E, Thompson KG. Evaluation and Comparison of Vitamin D Responsive Gene Expression in Ovine, Canine and Equine Kidney. PLoS One 2016;11(9):e0162598.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162598pubmed: 27632366google scholar: lookup
              6. Stefanetti V, Marenzoni ML, Passamonti F, Cappelli K, Garcia-Etxebarria K, Coletti M, Capomaccio S. High Expression of Endogenous Retroviral Envelope Gene in the Equine Fetal Part of the Placenta. PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0155603.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155603pubmed: 27176223google scholar: lookup
              7. da Silveira JC, Carnevale EM, Winger QA, Bouma GJ. Regulation of ACVR1 and ID2 by cell-secreted exosomes during follicle maturation in the mare. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014 May 26;12:44.
                doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-44pubmed: 24884710google scholar: lookup
              8. Lin P, Lan X, Chen F, Yang Y, Jin Y, Wang A. Reference gene selection for real-time quantitative PCR analysis of the mouse uterus in the peri-implantation period. PLoS One 2013;8(4):e62462.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062462pubmed: 23638092google scholar: lookup
              9. Lindqvist A, Manders D, Word RA. The impact of reference gene selection in quantification of gene expression levels in guinea pig cervical tissues and cells. BMC Res Notes 2013 Jan 30;6:34.
                doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-34pubmed: 23363446google scholar: lookup
              10. Aydin OD, Hitit M, Usta Z, Yildiz G, Sacakli P, Kaplan O, Merhan O. Effects of essential oil mixtures on expression of genes involved in lipogenesis and fatty acid oxidation in geese (Anser anser). Trop Anim Health Prod 2023 Dec 30;56(1):30.
                doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03880-1pubmed: 38159113google scholar: lookup