Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2025; doi: 10.1111/vsu.70050

Reconstruction of an orbital fracture in a mare using a 3D-printed patient-specific implant.

Abstract: To describe surgical repair of an orbital wall fracture communicating with the caudal maxillary sinus using a three dimensional (3D)-printed, patient-specific implant (PSI). Methods: Case report. Methods: A 25-year-old Haflinger mare (370 kg). Methods: The mare presented with severe chemosis and emphysema of the left upper and lower eyelid of 2-weeks duration due to a fracture of the ventral floor and inner wall of the left orbit that communicated with the caudal maxillary sinus. Computed tomographic (CT) data were used to design a PSI replicating the inner surface of the unfractured orbit. The data were converted to an STL file and 3D-printed using polylactic acid (PLA) filament. Surgical access was obtained via a concho-frontal sinus flap combined with sinoscopy. To reconstruct and seal the orbit, the PSI was lined with porcine small intestinal submucosa and secured to the inner orbital wall using two 3.0 mm titanium locking screws and synthetic, non-absorbable transosseous fiber loops. Results: The emphysema resolved postoperatively, and ocular function was unrestricted by the implant. Infection developed subcutaneously adjacent to the transosseous suture fixation at the maxillary bone but resolved with conservative management. Follow-up CT at 11 weeks and owner reports after 18 months confirmed a favorable cosmetic and functional outcome, with only minimal residual ptosis of the left upper eyelid. Conclusions: Application of a PSI axially to the left orbit successfully reconstructed the orbital wall and resolved the communication with the caudal maxillary sinus. Conclusions: Patient-specific implants represent a novel surgical option for the repair of complex orbital wall fractures in horses.
Publication Date: 2025-10-30 PubMed ID: 41165049DOI: 10.1111/vsu.70050Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study reports the successful surgical repair of a complex orbital fracture in a horse using a custom 3D-printed implant designed specifically for the patient’s unique anatomy.

Background and Purpose

  • Orbital fractures in horses, especially those involving communication with sinuses, pose a challenge for surgical repair due to complicated anatomy and the need to restore both function and cosmetic appearance.
  • The researchers aimed to describe the surgical technique and outcomes using a three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific implant (PSI) to reconstruct the orbital wall and seal the communication with the sinus.

Subject and Clinical Presentation

  • The patient was a 25-year-old Haflinger mare weighing approximately 370 kg.
  • She presented with severe chemosis (swelling of the conjunctiva) and emphysema (air trapped under the skin) of the left upper and lower eyelids that had persisted for two weeks.
  • The underlying cause was identified as a fracture of the ventral floor and inner wall of the left orbit, which communicated with the caudal maxillary sinus.

Diagnostic Approach and Implant Design

  • Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to capture detailed 3D images of the fractured orbital structures.
  • CT data from the unaffected side’s orbit were used to digitally replicate the inner surface anatomy of the orbit in a computer-aided design program.
  • The resulting implant model was converted into an STL (stereolithography) file format suitable for 3D printing.
  • A patient-specific implant (PSI) was fabricated using a 3D printer with polylactic acid (PLA) filament, a biocompatible plastic material.

Surgical Procedure

  • Surgical access to the orbit was gained via a concho-frontal sinus flap, a technique that provides visibility and access to the orbit and associated sinuses.
  • Additionally, sinoscopy (endoscopic examination of the sinus) was used to assist in visualization and assessment.
  • The PSI was lined with porcine small intestinal submucosa, a biological material commonly used to support tissue healing and encourage integration.
  • The implant was secured to the inner orbital wall using two 3.0 mm titanium locking screws, providing rigid fixation.
  • Further stabilization was achieved with synthetic, non-absorbable transosseous fiber loops passing through bone tunnels to firmly anchor the implant.

Postoperative Outcomes and Complications

  • The emphysema resolved following the surgery, indicating effective sealing between the orbit and the sinus.
  • Ocular function was restored without impairment from the implant, suggesting successful anatomical and functional reconstruction.
  • A subcutaneous infection occurred near the site of transosseous suture fixation on the maxillary bone, possibly due to the fixation method or materials used.
  • The infection was managed non-surgically with conservative treatment (e.g., antibiotics, wound care) and resolved without further complication.

Follow-up and Long-Term Outcome

  • Follow-up CT scans performed 11 weeks after surgery demonstrated stable positioning of the implant and healing of the fracture.
  • The horse’s owner reported favorable cosmetic and functional outcomes 18 months postoperatively.
  • The only noticeable residual problem was minimal ptosis (drooping) of the left upper eyelid, which did not affect overall function significantly.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications

  • This case demonstrates that 3D-printed, patient-specific implants can successfully reconstruct complex orbital wall fractures in horses, including those with sinus communication.
  • The application of PSI allowed for precise anatomical restoration and durable fixation, enabling symptom resolution and functional recovery.
  • Patient-specific implants offer a novel, tailored surgical option in equine orbital trauma, potentially improving outcomes in difficult cases.
  • Future considerations include monitoring for infection at fixation sites and evaluating material choices to minimize complications.

Cite This Article

APA
Gernhardt J, Böttcher P, Eule JC, Mählmann K, Müller E, Lischer CJ. (2025). Reconstruction of an orbital fracture in a mare using a 3D-printed patient-specific implant. Vet Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70050

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Gernhardt, Jennifer
  • Equine Clinic, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Böttcher, Peter
  • Small Animal Clinic, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eule, J Corinna
  • Unit for Ophthalmology, Veterinary Hospital, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mählmann, Kathrin
  • Equine Clinic, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Müller, Eva
  • Equine Clinic, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lischer, Christoph J
  • Equine Clinic, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Fürst A. Fractures of the Head. In: Wright IM, ed. Fractures in the Horse. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2022:759‐762.
  2. Hartley C, Grundon RA. Diseases and surgery of the globe and orbit. In: Gilger BC, ed. Equine ophthalmology. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2017:151‐196.
  3. Pierce KEJ, Townsend MW. Surgery of the globe and orbit. In: Auer J, Stick A, Kümmerle J, et al., eds. Equine Surgery. 5th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2019:910‐926.
  4. Blogg JR, Stanley RG, Phillip CJ. Skull and orbital blow‐out fractures in a horse. Equine Vet J 1990;22:5‐7.
  5. Turner AS. Surgical Management of Depression Fractures of the equine skull. Vet Surg 1979;8:29‐33.
  6. Gerding JC, Clode A, Gilger BC, Montgomery KW. Equine orbital fractures: a review of 18 cases (2006–2013). Vet Ophthalmol 2014;17:97‐106.
  7. Gardner AK, Santschi EM, C. Mudge MC, Mudge MC, Belknap JK, Metzler AG. Intrasinus bolstering of traumatic maxillary sinus fractures by using Foley catheter balloons in two foals. Vet Surg 2020;49:1255‐1261.
  8. Fürst A, Auer J. Periorbital Fractures. In: Auer J, Stick A, Kümmerle J, et al., eds. Equine Surgery. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2019:1815‐1817.
  9. McMaster M, Caldwell F, Gillen A. Reconstruction of a complicated orbital depression fracture with Medial Wall and globe repositioning in a horse: a collaboration across disciplines and specialties. Vet Surg 2015;45:529‐535.
  10. Habib LA, Yoon MK. Patient specific implants in orbital reconstruction: a pilot study. American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports 2021;24:101222.
  11. Daungsupawong H, Wiwanitkit V. Application of 3D printing in veterinarian science. Res Vet Sci 2025;186:105571.
  12. Deveci MZY, Altuğ ME, İşler CT. Three‐dimensional printing applications in veterinary surgery. J Adv VetBio Sci Tech 2022;7:130‐142.
  13. Thomas C, Amsellem P, Nascene D, Huang YH. Orthopedic applications of 3D printing in canine veterinary medicine. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1582720.
  14. Copperman TS, Idowu OO, Jalaj S. Patient‐specific implants in oculofacial plastic surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;37:241‐247.
  15. Dautzenberg P, Volk HA, Huels N. The effect of steam sterilization on different 3D printable materials for surgical use in veterinary medicine. BMC Vet Res 2021;17:1‐6.
  16. Nickels FA, O'Neill H. Nasal Passages and Paranasal Sinuses. In: Auer J, Stick A, Kümmerle J, et al., eds. Equine Surgery. 5th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2019:698‐710.
  17. Hobert M, Sharma N, Benzimra C. Case report: one‐stage craniectomy and cranioplasty digital workflow for three‐dimensional printed polyetheretherketone implant for an extensive skull multilobular osteochondosarcoma in a dog. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1459272.
  18. Kraft SL, Gavin P. Tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2001;17:115‐130.
  19. Yang MK, Ha SJ, Kim GJ. Efficacy of 3D‐printed patient specific implant for orbital wall fracture repair in a series of 40 patients. Nature 2025;15:4087.
  20. Kozakiewicz M, Elgalal M, Walkowiak B, Stefanczyk L. Technical concept of patient‐specific, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene orbital wall implant. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013;41:282‐290.
  21. Kozakiewicz M, Szymor P. Comparison of pre‐bent titanium mesh versus polyethylene implants in patient specific orbital reconstructions. Head Face Med 2013;9:9.
  22. Shi L, Ronfard V. Biochemical and biomechanical characterization of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS): a mini review. Int J Burns Trauma 2013;3:173‐179.
  23. Phillips J, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Porcine small intestine submucosal grafts for post‐tumor resection orbital reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2014;124:219‐223.
  24. Gomez JH, Schumacher J, Lauten SD. Effects of 3 biologic dressings on healing of cutaneous wounds on the limbs of horses. Can Vet J 2004;68:49‐55.
  25. Bussieres M, Krohne SG, Stiles J, Townsend WM. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa for the repair of full‐thickness corneal defects in dogs, cats and horses. Vet Ophthalmol 2004;7:352‐359.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.