Analyze Diet

Reduction of egg reappearance period of cyathostomins in naturally infected horses after increasing doses of ivermectin in Brazil: a grim picture for sustainable parasite control.

Abstract: Cyathostomins are the largest group of parasites in horses that can be controlled by ivermectin (IVM). This study aimed to run a four-dose titration trial of IVM in 28 naturally infected Thoroughbred yearlings. The local Strongyle population had been recorded to be resistant to IVM (200 µg/kg). The parasite fecal egg count (FEC) was performed to investigate the egg reappearance period (ERP) of two and five weeks (w2pt and w5pt) after IVM treatment. FEC was > 1000 on day zero for all groups. Although 100% FEC reduction was reported at w2pt for all concentrations, the FEC at w5pt revealed < 83% efficacy. This study reports the reduction of ERP using the label dose as well as 300, and 400 µg/kg (double dose) of IVM. The protocol allowed IVM to significantly suppress FEC w2pt although not eliminating adult worms, failing to guarantee an extension of its protection period over 8 weeks. Moreover, the FEC at w5pt possibly means the infection was not cleared, and worms reestablished egg laying. We raised the possibility of withdrawing IVM of control programs when the drug has less than 80% FEC reduction at w5pt. Ciatostomíneos são o maior grupo de parasitos de equinos, controlados com ivermectina (IVM). Este estudo teve o objetivo de realizar um teste com quatro doses de IVM, em 28 potros Puro-Sangue Inglês. Os estrôngilos eram resistentes a IVM (200 µg/kg). A contagem de ovos por grama de fezes (OPG) foi realizada após tratamento (pt), para determinar o período de reaparecimento de ovos (PRO) após duas e cinco semanas (s2pt e s5pt). A OPG foi >1000 para todos os grupos. Observou-se 100% de redução na OPG na s2pt para todas as concentrações de IVM. A OPG na s5pt revelou < 83% de redução. Este estudo relata uma redução considerável do PRO utilizando a dose de bula, e as doses de 300 e 400 μg/kg (dobro da dose) de IVM contra ciatostomíneos em equinos. O protocolo permitiu observar a redução da postura de ovos na s2pt com IVM, falhando na garantia da extensão de proteção da droga. O reaparecimento da OPG significa que a infecção não foi eliminada. Foi levantada a possibilidade de restringir o uso de IVM, quando o medicamento atingir menos de 80% de redução da OPG na s5pt.
Publication Date: 2024-08-12 PubMed ID: 39140496PubMed Central: PMC11340864DOI: 10.1590/S1984-29612024043Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Cite This Article

APA
Molento MB, Dall'Anese J, Pontarolo DV, Brandão YO, Yoshitani UY. (2024). Reduction of egg reappearance period of cyathostomins in naturally infected horses after increasing doses of ivermectin in Brazil: a grim picture for sustainable parasite control. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet, 33(3), e003324. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612024043

Publication

ISSN: 1984-2961
NlmUniqueID: 9440482
Country: Brazil
Language: English
Volume: 33
Issue: 3
Pages: e003324
PII: e003324

Researcher Affiliations

Molento, Marcelo Beltrão
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Dall'Anese, Julia
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Pontarolo, Desiree Vera
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Brandão, Yara de Oliveira
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Yoshitani, Ursula Yaeko
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Ivermectin / therapeutic use
  • Ivermectin / administration & dosage
  • Horses / parasitology
  • Brazil
  • Parasite Egg Count
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Female
  • Antiparasitic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Antiparasitic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / drug therapy
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / parasitology
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / diagnosis
  • Feces / parasitology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Abrahão Pires LS, Abrahão C, Dias de Castro LL, Hammerschmidt J, Antunes J, Molento CFM, et al. Welfare assessment of Thoroughbred horses naturally infected with gastrointestinal parasites in Southern Brazil: quantifying the host-parasite relationship. J Equine Vet Sci. 2024;136:105062. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105062.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105062pubmed: 38588754google scholar: lookup
  2. Babola M, Pontes LS, Moraes A, Piano TGR, Molento MB, Molento CFM. The influence of the silvopastoral system on physiological, behavior, and health responses of the Purunã breed of cattle. Arch Vet Sci. 2023;29(1) doi: 10.5380/avs.v28i4.92665.
    doi: 10.5380/avs.v28i4.92665google scholar: lookup
  3. Canever RJ, Braga PRC, Boeckh A, Grycajuck M, Bier D, Molento MB. Lack of Cyathostomin spp. reduction after anthelmintic treatment in horses in Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2013;194(1):35–39. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.020.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.020pubmed: 23318166google scholar: lookup
  4. Civitello DJ, Cohen J, Fatima H, Halstead NT, Liriano J, McMahon TA, et al. Biodiversity inhibits parasites: broad evidence for the dilution effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(28):8667–8671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506279112.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506279112pmc: PMC4507196pubmed: 26069208google scholar: lookup
  5. Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede FHM, Geerts S, Klei TR, Taylor MA, et al. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol. 1992;44(1-2):35–44. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90141-U.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90141-Upubmed: 1441190google scholar: lookup
  6. Dall’ Anese J, Silva JDA, Jr, Abrahão CLH, Dias de Castro LL, Brandão YDO, Yoshitani ÚY, et al. The use of body growth and kinship data from 16 generations for predicting Thoroughbred performance. Arch Vet Sci. 2023;28(1):12–19. doi: 10.5380/avs.v1i1.89547.
    doi: 10.5380/avs.v1i1.89547google scholar: lookup
  7. Dias de Castro LL, Abrahão CLH, Buzatti A, Molento MB, Bastianetto E, Rodrigues DS, et al. Comparison of McMaster and Mini-Flotac fecal egg counting techniques in cattle and horses. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep. 2017;10:132–135. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.10.003.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.10.003pubmed: 31014585google scholar: lookup
  8. Garud NR, Messer PW, Petrov DA. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(2):e1009373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009373.
  9. Halvarsson P, Grandi G, Hägglund S, Höglund J. Gastrointestinal parasite community structure in horses after the introduction of selective anthelmintic treatment strategies. Vet Parasitol. 2024;326:110111. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.110111.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.110111pubmed: 38218052google scholar: lookup
  10. Harris AM, Garud NR, DeGiorgio M. Detection and classification of hard and soft sweeps from unphased genotypes by multilocus genotype identity. Genetics. 2018;210(4):1429–1452. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301502.
    doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301502pmc: PMC6283157pubmed: 30315068google scholar: lookup
  11. Kaltenbach M, Jackson CJ, Campbell EC, Hollfelder F, Tokuriki N. Reverse evolution leads to genotypic incompatibility despite functional and active site convergence. eLife. 2015;4:e06492. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06492.
    doi: 10.7554/eLife.06492pmc: PMC4579389pubmed: 26274563google scholar: lookup
  12. Lightbody KL, Austin A, Lambert PA, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Jürgenschellert L, Krücken J, et al. Validation of a serum ELISA test for cyathostomin infection in equines. Int J Parasitol. 2024;54(1):23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.07.001.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.07.001pubmed: 37536388google scholar: lookup
  13. Love S, Murphy D, Mellor D. Pathogenicity of cyathostome infection. Vet Parasitol. 1999;85(2-3):113–122. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00092-8.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00092-8pubmed: 10485358google scholar: lookup
  14. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Ionita M, Lewellen A, Collins SS. Field studies indicating reduced activity of ivermectin on small strongyles in horses on a farm in Central Kentucky. Parasitol Res. 2008;103(1):209–215. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0959-7.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0959-7pubmed: 18389281google scholar: lookup
  15. Molento MB, Antunes J, Bentes RN, Coles GC. Anthelmintic resistant nematodes in Brazilian horses. Vet Rec. 2008;162(12):384–385. doi: 10.1136/vr.162.12.384.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.162.12.384pubmed: 18359933google scholar: lookup
  16. Parr JF, Papendick RI, Youngberg IG, Meyer RE. In: Sustainable agricultural systems. 1st. Edwards CA, editor. Ankeny: CRC Press; 1990. Sustainable agriculture in the United States. pp. 50–68.
  17. Porter ML, Crandall KA. Lost along the way: the significance of evolution in reverse. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18(10):541–547. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00244-1.
  18. Price TD, Qvarnström A, Irwin DE. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(1523):1433–1440. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2372.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2372pmc: PMC1691402pubmed: 12965006google scholar: lookup
  19. Redman E, Whitelaw F, Tait A, Burgess C, Bartley Y, Skuce PJ, et al. The emergence of resistance to the benzimidazole anthelmintics in parasitic nematodes of livestock is characterised by multiple independent hard and soft selective sweeps. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(2):e0003494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003494.
  20. Sangster NC. Pharmacology of anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes: will it occur with the avermectin/milbemycins? Vet Parasitol. 1999;85(2-3):189–204. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00099-0.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00099-0pubmed: 10485365google scholar: lookup
  21. Santos DW, Madeira de Carvalho LM, Molento MB. Identification of third stage larval types of cyathostomins of equids: an improved perspective. Vet Parasitol. 2018;260:49–52. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.08.007.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.08.007pubmed: 30197013google scholar: lookup
  22. Scare JA, Leathwick DM, Sauermann CW, Lyons ET, Steuer AE, Jones BA, et al. Dealing with double trouble: combination deworming against double-drug resistant cyathostomins. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2020;12:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.12.002.
  23. Schafaschek AII, Portugal TB, Filus A, Moraes A, Guaraldo AC, Pritsch IC, et al. Transient threshold abundance of Haematobia irritans (Linnaeus, 1758) in cattle under integrated farming systems. Int J Plant Anim Environ Sci. 2021;11(2):322–341.
  24. Torgerson PR, Paul M, Furrer R. Evaluating faecal egg count reduction using a specifically designed package “eggCounts” in R and a user-friendly web interface. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44(5):299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.01.005.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.01.005pubmed: 24556564google scholar: lookup
  25. UZH . Modelling faecal egg counts. Zürich: Department of Mathematics; 2024. [cited 2024 Feb 29]. University of Zürich. online. Available from: http://shiny.math.uzh.ch/user/furrer/shinyas/shiny-eggCounts/n
  26. von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Fritzen B, Demeler J, Schürmann S, Rohn K, Schnieder T, et al. Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms. Vet Parasitol. 2007;144(1-2):74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.036.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.036pubmed: 17112667google scholar: lookup
  27. Wescott RB. Anthelmintics for horses. Int J Parasitol. 1987;17(2):503–510. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(87)90126-3.
    doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(87)90126-3pubmed: 3294662google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2022 Dec;20:76-88.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.10.005pubmed: 36342004google scholar: lookup