Analyze Diet

Reduction of egg reappearance period of cyathostomins in naturally infected horses after increasing doses of ivermectin in Brazil: a grim picture for sustainable parasite control.

Abstract: Cyathostomins are the largest group of parasites in horses that can be controlled by ivermectin (IVM). This study aimed to run a four-dose titration trial of IVM in 28 naturally infected Thoroughbred yearlings. The local Strongyle population had been recorded to be resistant to IVM (200 µg/kg). The parasite fecal egg count (FEC) was performed to investigate the egg reappearance period (ERP) of two and five weeks (w2pt and w5pt) after IVM treatment. FEC was > 1000 on day zero for all groups. Although 100% FEC reduction was reported at w2pt for all concentrations, the FEC at w5pt revealed < 83% efficacy. This study reports the reduction of ERP using the label dose as well as 300, and 400 µg/kg (double dose) of IVM. The protocol allowed IVM to significantly suppress FEC w2pt although not eliminating adult worms, failing to guarantee an extension of its protection period over 8 weeks. Moreover, the FEC at w5pt possibly means the infection was not cleared, and worms reestablished egg laying. We raised the possibility of withdrawing IVM of control programs when the drug has less than 80% FEC reduction at w5pt. Ciatostomíneos são o maior grupo de parasitos de equinos, controlados com ivermectina (IVM). Este estudo teve o objetivo de realizar um teste com quatro doses de IVM, em 28 potros Puro-Sangue Inglês. Os estrôngilos eram resistentes a IVM (200 µg/kg). A contagem de ovos por grama de fezes (OPG) foi realizada após tratamento (pt), para determinar o período de reaparecimento de ovos (PRO) após duas e cinco semanas (s2pt e s5pt). A OPG foi >1000 para todos os grupos. Observou-se 100% de redução na OPG na s2pt para todas as concentrações de IVM. A OPG na s5pt revelou < 83% de redução. Este estudo relata uma redução considerável do PRO utilizando a dose de bula, e as doses de 300 e 400 μg/kg (dobro da dose) de IVM contra ciatostomíneos em equinos. O protocolo permitiu observar a redução da postura de ovos na s2pt com IVM, falhando na garantia da extensão de proteção da droga. O reaparecimento da OPG significa que a infecção não foi eliminada. Foi levantada a possibilidade de restringir o uso de IVM, quando o medicamento atingir menos de 80% de redução da OPG na s5pt.
Publication Date: 2024-08-12 PubMed ID: 39140496PubMed Central: PMC11340864DOI: 10.1590/S1984-29612024043Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Reduction of egg reappearance period of cyathostomins in naturally infected horses after increasing doses of ivermectin in Brazil reveals reduced efficacy and challenges for sustainable parasite control.

Background and Purpose of the Study

  • Cyathostomins are the most common intestinal parasites affecting horses.
  • Ivermectin (IVM) is widely used to control these parasites with a typical dose of 200 µg/kg.
  • Previous evidence had shown the local parasite population to be resistant to the standard IVM dose.
  • The study aimed to evaluate the effect of increasing doses of IVM (including double doses) on parasite control in naturally infected Thoroughbred yearlings in Brazil.
  • The focus was to measure the “egg reappearance period” (ERP), which is the time it takes for parasite eggs to reappear in feces after treatment, indicating a return of the parasite infection.

Study Design and Methods

  • 28 naturally infected Thoroughbred yearling horses were divided into groups receiving four different IVM dose levels: the label dose (200 µg/kg) and increased doses (300 and 400 µg/kg).
  • Fecal egg counts (FEC) were performed before treatment (day zero) and at two and five weeks post-treatment (w2pt and w5pt).
  • A high initial parasite load was confirmed with FEC > 1000 eggs per gram of feces in all groups at day zero.
  • ERP was assessed by recording the reduction in FEC over the post-treatment weeks and comparing them to pre-treatment counts.

Key Findings

  • At two weeks post-treatment (w2pt), all groups showed a 100% reduction in FEC, indicating initial strong suppression of parasite egg shedding.
  • However, by five weeks post-treatment (w5pt), the efficacy dropped below 83% reduction in FEC across all dose groups.
  • This suggests that despite doubled IVM doses, adult worms were not fully eliminated and were able to resume egg laying earlier than expected.
  • The ERP was notably reduced even with higher doses, meaning the period of effective parasite control was shorter than desired (less than the typical 8+ weeks protection).
  • The reappearance of eggs at five weeks post-treatment indicates the infection was not cleared and the parasites quickly reestablished.

Implications and Recommendations

  • The findings highlight the problem of emerging ivermectin resistance in cyathostomin populations in Brazil.
  • Increasing the dose of ivermectin did not prolong the ERP or ensure a longer protective effect against these parasites.
  • The authors suggest reconsidering the use of ivermectin in control programs when the FEC reduction at five weeks falls below 80%, because this signals reduced drug efficacy and resistance development.
  • This could prompt the need for alternative parasite control strategies or drugs to maintain sustainable equine health management.
  • Continuous monitoring of ERP and FEC reduction can serve as crucial indicators for timely detection of ineffective treatments and resistance.

Overall Conclusion

  • The study provides evidence that cyathostomin populations in Brazil are becoming resistant to ivermectin, even at higher-than-label doses.
  • The shortened egg reappearance period and incomplete parasite clearance after treatment challenge the sustainability of current parasite control practices relying heavily on ivermectin.
  • Veterinarians and equine health managers should be cautious about ivermectin resistance, consider integrated parasite management approaches, and avoid over-reliance on this single drug.

Cite This Article

APA
Molento MB, Dall'Anese J, Pontarolo DV, Brandão YO, Yoshitani UY. (2024). Reduction of egg reappearance period of cyathostomins in naturally infected horses after increasing doses of ivermectin in Brazil: a grim picture for sustainable parasite control. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet, 33(3), e003324. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612024043

Publication

ISSN: 1984-2961
NlmUniqueID: 9440482
Country: Brazil
Language: English
Volume: 33
Issue: 3
Pages: e003324
PII: e003324

Researcher Affiliations

Molento, Marcelo Beltrão
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Dall'Anese, Julia
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Pontarolo, Desiree Vera
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Brandão, Yara de Oliveira
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Yoshitani, Ursula Yaeko
  • Laboratório de Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Ivermectin / therapeutic use
  • Ivermectin / administration & dosage
  • Horses / parasitology
  • Brazil
  • Parasite Egg Count
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Female
  • Antiparasitic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Antiparasitic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / drug therapy
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / parasitology
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / diagnosis
  • Feces / parasitology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Abrahão Pires LS, Abrahão C, Dias de Castro LL, Hammerschmidt J, Antunes J, Molento CFM. Welfare assessment of Thoroughbred horses naturally infected with gastrointestinal parasites in Southern Brazil: quantifying the host-parasite relationship. J Equine Vet Sci 2024;136:105062.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105062pubmed: 38588754google scholar: lookup
  2. Babola M, Pontes LS, Moraes A, Piano TGR, Molento MB, Molento CFM. The influence of the silvopastoral system on physiological, behavior, and health responses of the Purunã breed of cattle. Arch Vet Sci 2023;29(1).
    doi: 10.5380/avs.v28i4.92665google scholar: lookup
  3. Canever RJ, Braga PRC, Boeckh A, Grycajuck M, Bier D, Molento MB. Lack of Cyathostomin spp. reduction after anthelmintic treatment in horses in Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2013;194(1):35–39.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.020pubmed: 23318166google scholar: lookup
  4. Civitello DJ, Cohen J, Fatima H, Halstead NT, Liriano J, McMahon TA. Biodiversity inhibits parasites: broad evidence for the dilution effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112(28):8667–8671.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506279112pmc: PMC4507196pubmed: 26069208google scholar: lookup
  5. Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede FHM, Geerts S, Klei TR, Taylor MA. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol 1992;44(1-2):35–44.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90141-Upubmed: 1441190google scholar: lookup
  6. Dall’ Anese J, Silva JDA, Jr, Abrahão CLH, Dias de Castro LL, Brandão YDO, Yoshitani ÚY. The use of body growth and kinship data from 16 generations for predicting Thoroughbred performance. Arch Vet Sci 2023;28(1):12–19.
    doi: 10.5380/avs.v1i1.89547google scholar: lookup
  7. Dias de Castro LL, Abrahão CLH, Buzatti A, Molento MB, Bastianetto E, Rodrigues DS. Comparison of McMaster and Mini-Flotac fecal egg counting techniques in cattle and horses. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep 2017;10:132–135.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.10.003pubmed: 31014585google scholar: lookup
  8. Garud NR, Messer PW, Petrov DA. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data. PLoS Genet 2021;17(2):e1009373.
  9. Halvarsson P, Grandi G, Hägglund S, Höglund J. Gastrointestinal parasite community structure in horses after the introduction of selective anthelmintic treatment strategies. Vet Parasitol 2024;326:110111.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.110111pubmed: 38218052google scholar: lookup
  10. Harris AM, Garud NR, DeGiorgio M. Detection and classification of hard and soft sweeps from unphased genotypes by multilocus genotype identity. Genetics 2018;210(4):1429–1452.
    doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301502pmc: PMC6283157pubmed: 30315068google scholar: lookup
  11. Kaltenbach M, Jackson CJ, Campbell EC, Hollfelder F, Tokuriki N. Reverse evolution leads to genotypic incompatibility despite functional and active site convergence. eLife 2015;4:e06492.
    doi: 10.7554/eLife.06492pmc: PMC4579389pubmed: 26274563google scholar: lookup
  12. Lightbody KL, Austin A, Lambert PA, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Jürgenschellert L, Krücken J. Validation of a serum ELISA test for cyathostomin infection in equines. Int J Parasitol 2024;54(1):23–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.07.001pubmed: 37536388google scholar: lookup
  13. Love S, Murphy D, Mellor D. Pathogenicity of cyathostome infection. Vet Parasitol 1999;85(2-3):113–122.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00092-8pubmed: 10485358google scholar: lookup
  14. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Ionita M, Lewellen A, Collins SS. Field studies indicating reduced activity of ivermectin on small strongyles in horses on a farm in Central Kentucky. Parasitol Res 2008;103(1):209–215.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0959-7pubmed: 18389281google scholar: lookup
  15. Molento MB, Antunes J, Bentes RN, Coles GC. Anthelmintic resistant nematodes in Brazilian horses. Vet Rec 2008;162(12):384–385.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.162.12.384pubmed: 18359933google scholar: lookup
  16. Parr JF, Papendick RI, Youngberg IG, Meyer RE. Sustainable agriculture in the United States. 1990. pp. 50–68.
  17. Porter ML, Crandall KA. Lost along the way: the significance of evolution in reverse. Trends Ecol Evol 2003;18(10):541–547.
  18. Price TD, Qvarnström A, Irwin DE. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proc Biol Sci 2003;270(1523):1433–1440.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2372pmc: PMC1691402pubmed: 12965006google scholar: lookup
  19. Redman E, Whitelaw F, Tait A, Burgess C, Bartley Y, Skuce PJ. The emergence of resistance to the benzimidazole anthelmintics in parasitic nematodes of livestock is characterised by multiple independent hard and soft selective sweeps. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015;9(2):e0003494.
  20. Sangster NC. Pharmacology of anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes: will it occur with the avermectin/milbemycins?. Vet Parasitol 1999;85(2-3):189–204.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00099-0pubmed: 10485365google scholar: lookup
  21. Santos DW, Madeira de Carvalho LM, Molento MB. Identification of third stage larval types of cyathostomins of equids: an improved perspective. Vet Parasitol 2018;260:49–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.08.007pubmed: 30197013google scholar: lookup
  22. Scare JA, Leathwick DM, Sauermann CW, Lyons ET, Steuer AE, Jones BA. Dealing with double trouble: combination deworming against double-drug resistant cyathostomins. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2020;12:28–34.
  23. Schafaschek AII, Portugal TB, Filus A, Moraes A, Guaraldo AC, Pritsch IC. Transient threshold abundance of Haematobia irritans (Linnaeus, 1758) in cattle under integrated farming systems. Int J Plant Anim Environ Sci 2021;11(2):322–341.
  24. Torgerson PR, Paul M, Furrer R. Evaluating faecal egg count reduction using a specifically designed package “eggCounts” in R and a user-friendly web interface. Int J Parasitol 2014;44(5):299–303.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.01.005pubmed: 24556564google scholar: lookup
  25. UZH. Modelling faecal egg counts. Zürich: Department of Mathematics; 2024. [cited 2024 Feb 29].
  26. von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Fritzen B, Demeler J, Schürmann S, Rohn K, Schnieder T. Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms. Vet Parasitol 2007;144(1-2):74–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.036pubmed: 17112667google scholar: lookup
  27. Wescott RB. Anthelmintics for horses. Int J Parasitol 1987;17(2):503–510.
    doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(87)90126-3pubmed: 3294662google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2022 Dec;20:76-88.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.10.005pubmed: 36342004google scholar: lookup