Relative Traffic Tolerance of Cool-Season Turfgrasses and Suitability for Grazing by Equine.
Abstract: Unlike traditional forage grasses, turfgrasses, which were developed to be tolerant of foot traffic and close mowing, may be suitable as alternative ground cover in areas of high hoof traffic such as dry lots. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of eight cool-season turfgrasses as alternative ground cover in heavy use areas. Cultivars were established via seeding in four replicated plots. To simulate horse traffic at a trot, a Baldree traffic simulator was driven over a section of the plot, either 0 (CON), 1 (LOW), or 2 (HIGH) times per week for 6 weeks followed by 4 weeks of rest in the spring, summer, and fall over a 2-year period. Variables assessed include compaction, biomass available for grazing, vegetative cover (persistence), and nutrient composition. Soil compaction increased with the application of traffic treatments (P < .0001). Traffic treatment reduced persistence following traffic by 19%-36% across all trials in both years (P = .0003). For most trials, biomass available for grazing was reduced after traffic treatment by 19% and 43% (P = .02). Overall, tall fescue cultivars were most traffic tolerant followed by hard fescue. Cultivars considered "low" in nonstructural carbohydrate (<15%) included creeping bentgrass in Year 1 and hard fescue and chewings fescue in Year 2. In Year 2, the Ca:P ratio declined beyond what is recommended for horses. Tall fescue, hard fescue, and creeping bentgrass cultivars are recommended for further evaluation as suitable ground cover in areas of heavy use on equine operations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2019-04-25 PubMed ID: 31203989DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.04.005Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article explores the possibility of using turfgrasses, specifically eight cool-season varieties, as an alternative ground cover in areas with constant hoof traffic, such as dry lots. The study examines the grasses’ resilience to simulated horse traffic and their ability to serve as sources of grazing biomass.
Objectives and Methods
- The research aimed to test the suitability of eight cool-season turfgrass cultivars as alternative ground cover for areas subjected to heavy hoof traffic.
- The experiment involved seeding these grass types in four replicated plots and subjecting them to simulated horse traffic of varied frequencies for six weeks, followed by a four-week rest period. This cycle was repeated over two years.
- Using a Baldree traffic simulator, the simulation was done at no instance per week (CON), once a week (LOW), and twice a week (HIGH).
- The study assessed the impact of the traffic on factors such as soil compaction, vegetation persistence, availability of grazing biomass, and nutrient composition.
Results and Observations
- The study found that simulated hoof traffic resulted in increased soil compaction and reduced persistence of the turfgrass after traffic.
- It was also found that the biomass available for grazing decreased significantly after the traffic intervention.
- Among the turfgrass varieties, tall fescue performed the best in terms of traffic tolerance, followed by hard fescue.
- In terms of nonstructural carbohydrates, creeping bentgrass in the first year and hard fescue and chewing fescue in the second year were the lowest.
- However, in the second year, the calcium to phosphorus (Ca:P) ratio fell below the recommended levels for horses.
Conclusions and Recommendations
- The study concludes that tall fescue, hard fescue, and creeping bentgrass are the most suitable for further evaluation as alternative ground cover in areas heavily used by horses.
- The research opens up the possibility of using tolerant turfgrass cultivars as a sustainable alternative to traditional forage grasses in high-traffic areas on equine operations.
Cite This Article
APA
Jaqueth AL, Turner TR, Iwaniuk ME, McIntosh BJ, Burk AO.
(2019).
Relative Traffic Tolerance of Cool-Season Turfgrasses and Suitability for Grazing by Equine.
J Equine Vet Sci, 78, 79-88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2019.04.005 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, The University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Electronic address: ajaqueth@umn.edu.
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, The University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, The University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
- Middleburg Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Middleburg, VA.
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, The University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cold Temperature
- Festuca
- Horses
- Poaceae
- Seasons
- Soil
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Ghajar SM, McKenzie H, Fike J, McIntosh B, Tracy BF. Evaluating digestibility and toxicity of native warm-season grasses for equines.. Transl Anim Sci 2021 Jan;5(1):txaa224.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists