FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Reported Agonistic Behaviours in Domestic Horses Cluster Acc...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(4); 629; doi: 10.3390/ani14040629

Reported Agonistic Behaviours in Domestic Horses Cluster According to Context.

Abstract: Agonistic behaviours are often directed at other animals for self-defence or to increase distance from valued resources, such as food. Examples include aggression and counter-predator behaviours. Contemporary diets may boost the value of food as a resource and create unanticipated associations with the humans who deliver it. At the same time the domestic horse is asked to carry the weight of riders and perform manoeuvres that, ethologically, are out-of-context and may be associated with instances of pain, confusion, or fear. Agonistic responses can endanger personnel and conspecifics. They are traditionally grouped along with so-called vices as being undesirable and worthy of punishment; a response that can often make horses more dangerous. The current study used data from the validated online Equine Behavioural and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ) to explore the agonistic behaviours (as reported by the owners) of 2734 horses. With a focus on ridden horses, the behaviours of interest in the current study ranged from biting and bite threats and kicking and kick threats to tail swishing as an accompaniment to signs of escalating irritation when horses are approached, prepared for ridden work, ridden, and hosed down (e.g., after work). Analysis of the responses according to the context in which they arise included a dendrographic analysis that identified five clusters of agonistic behaviours among certain groups of horses and a principal component analysis that revealed six components, strongly related to the five clusters. Taken together, these results highlight the prospect that the motivation to show these responses differs with context. The clusters with common characteristics were those observed in the context of: locomotion under saddle; saddling; reactions in a familiar environment, inter-specific threats, and intra-specific threats. These findings highlight the potential roles of fear and pain in such unwelcome responses and challenge the simplistic view that the problems lie with the nature of the horses themselves rather than historic or current management practices. Improved understanding of agonistic responses in horses will reduce the inclination of owners to label horses that show such context-specific responses as being generally aggressive.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-02-16 PubMed ID: 38396597PubMed Central: PMC10886179DOI: 10.3390/ani14040629Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates agonistic behaviours (such as aggression and self-defence actions) in domestic horses and their correlation with specific situations, suggesting that these behaviours may stem from fear or pain rather than inherent character traits of the horses.

Objective of the Study

  • The study was aimed at understanding the reasons behind certain undesirable behaviours (agonistic behaviours) exhibited by domestic horses such as aggression, and self-defence mechanisms.
  • The focus is given to ridden horses and the behaviours are examined in various contexts such as when they are saddled, ridden, or hosed down.

Methodology

  • Researchers used data from the Equine Behavioural and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ), which is validated and available online.
  • The behaviours under study included biting, bite threats, kicking, kick threats, and tail swishing as signs of escalating irritation in various situations.
  • The Contextual analysis of the behaviours was done using Dendrographic analysis and Principal Component Analysis

Results

  • The dendrographic analysis revealed five distinct clusters of agonistic behaviours, pointing to the fact that these behaviours may be grouped together depending on specific circumstances or environments.
  • The principal component analysis suggested six related components to these clusters.

Findings and Conclusions

  • The study finds that the motivation behind these behaviours varies with the specific context, challenging the conventional wisdom that such behaviours are simply inherent to the horse and not a result of external factors.
  • Common characteristics were identified in clusters observed during saddling, riding, or when the horse is in a familiar or unknown environment.
  • The findings emphasise the role of fear and pain in triggering these undesirable behaviours, suggesting that improved understanding can prevent horse owners from incorrectly labelling horses with such specific-context responses as generally aggressive.

Cite This Article

APA
Fenner K, Wilson BJ, Ermers C, McGreevy PD. (2024). Reported Agonistic Behaviours in Domestic Horses Cluster According to Context. Animals (Basel), 14(4), 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040629

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 4
PII: 629

Researcher Affiliations

Fenner, Kate
  • School of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
Wilson, Bethany Jessica
  • School of Life and Environmental Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Ermers, Colette
  • School of Environment and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
McGreevy, Paul Damien
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Scott JP, Fredericson E. The Causes of Fighting in Mice and Rats. Physiol. Zool. 1951;24:273–309.
    doi: 10.1086/physzool.24.4.30152137google scholar: lookup
  2. Fenner K, McLean A, McGreevy P. Cutting to the chase: How round-pen, lunging and high-speed liberty work may compromise horse welfare. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2019;29:88–94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.05.003google scholar: lookup
  3. Merkies K, Franzin O. Enhanced understanding of horse–human interactions to optimize welfare. Animal 2021;11:1347.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051347pmc: PMC8151687pubmed: 34065156google scholar: lookup
  4. Ladewig J, McLean AN, Wilkins CL, Fenner K, Winther Christensen J, McGreevy PD. A review of The Ridden Horse pain Ethogram and its potential to improve ridden horse welfare. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;54:54–61.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2022.07.003google scholar: lookup
  5. Reid K, Rogers C, Gronqvist G, Gee E, Bolwell C. Anxiety and pain in horses measured by heart rate variability and behavior. J. Vet. Behav. 2017;22:1–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.09.002google scholar: lookup
  6. Fureix C, Menguy H, Hausberger M. Partners with bad temper: Reject or cure? A study of chronic pain and aggression in horses. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e12434.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012434pmc: PMC2928779pubmed: 20865160google scholar: lookup
  7. McLean A, Christensen J. The application of learning theory in horse training. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:18–27.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.020google scholar: lookup
  8. Innes L, McBride S. Negative versus positive reinforcement: An evaluation of training strategies for rehabilitated horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;112:357–368.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.011google scholar: lookup
  9. McGreevy P. Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists. .
  10. Fenner K, Dashper K, Serpell J, McLean A, Wilkins C, Klinck M, Wilson B, McGreevy P. The development of a novel questionnaire approach to the investigation of horse training, management, and behaviour. Animals 2020;10:1960.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10111960pmc: PMC7693391pubmed: 33114408google scholar: lookup
  11. R Core Team. The R Project for Statistical Computing. 2021.
  12. Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K. Cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. 2022.
  13. Revelle Q. psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. 2022.
  14. Gorecka-Bruzda A, Kosinska I, Jaworski Z, Jezierski T, Murphy J. Conflict behavior in elite show jumping and dressage horses. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2015;10:137–146.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.10.004google scholar: lookup
  15. Jastrzebska E, Wolska A, Minero M, Ogluszka M, Earley B, Wejer J, Gorecka-Bruzda A. Conflict Behavior in Show Jumping Horses: A Field Study. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;57:116–121.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.07.009google scholar: lookup
  16. Mclean A, Mclean M. Academic Horse Training: Equitation Science in Practice. 2008.
  17. Winther Christensen J, Munk R, Hawson L, Palme R, Larsen T, Egenvall A, Konig von Borstel U, Rorvang M. Rider effects on horses’ conflict behaviour, rein tension, physiological measures and rideability scores. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;234:105184.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105184google scholar: lookup
  18. Waite K, Heleski C, Ewing M. Quantifying aggressive riding behavior of youth barrel racers and conflict behaviors of their horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2018;24:36–41.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.01.002google scholar: lookup
  19. Luke KL, McAdie T, Smith BP, Warren-Smith AK. New insights into ridden horse behaviour, horse welfare and horse-related safety. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022;245:105539.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105539google scholar: lookup
  20. Bowers J, Slocombe R. Tensions used on girths on Thoroughbred racehorses. Aust. Vet. J. 2008;78:567–569.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2000.tb11904.xpubmed: 10979514google scholar: lookup
  21. Guire R, Weller R, Fisher M, Beavis J. Investigation Looking at the Repeatability of 20 Society of Master Saddlers Qualified Saddle Fitters’ Observations During Static Saddle Fit. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;56:1–5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.04.001google scholar: lookup
  22. Dittmann MT, Arpagaus S, Hungerbuhler V, Weishaupt MA, Latif SN. Feel the Force”—Prevalence of Subjectively Assessed Saddle Fit Problems in Swiss Riding Horses and Their Association With Saddle Pressure Measurements and Back Pain. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;99:103388.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103388pubmed: 33781419google scholar: lookup
  23. Dyson S, Bondi A, Routh J, Pollard D. An investigation into the relationship between equine behaviour when tacked-up and mounted and epaxial muscle hypertonicity or pain, girth region hypersensitivity, saddle-fit, rider position and balance, and lameness. Equine Vet. Educ. 2012;34:e258–e267.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776185976pubmed: 12108743google scholar: lookup
  24. Hintze S, Murphy E, Bachmann I, Wemelsfelder F, Wurbel H. Qualitative Behaviour Assessment of horses exposed to short-term emotional treatments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;196:44–51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.06.012google scholar: lookup
  25. Payne E, Boot M, Starling M, Henshall C, McLean A, Bennett P, McGreevy P. The evidence for horsemanship and dogmanship in veterinary contexts. Vet. J. 2015;204:247–254.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.004pubmed: 25959129google scholar: lookup
  26. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, Scott SK, McComb K. Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:56.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30777-zpmc: PMC6115467pubmed: 30158532google scholar: lookup
  27. Heitor F, do Mar Oom M, Vicente L. Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses. Part I. Correlates of social dominance and contexts of aggression. Behav. Process. 2006;73:170–177.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.004pubmed: 16815645google scholar: lookup
  28. Elia J, Erb H, Houpt K. Motivation for hay: Effects of a pelleted diet on behavior and physiology of horses. Physiol. Behav. 2010;10:623–627.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.09.010pubmed: 20869976google scholar: lookup
  29. Alberghina D, Giannetto C, VIsser EK, Ellis AD. Effect of diet on plasma tryptophan and serotonin in trained mares and geldings. Vet. Rec. 2010;166:133–136.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.c502pubmed: 20118469google scholar: lookup
  30. Dallaire A. Rest behavior. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. Behav. 1986;2:591–607.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30708-3pubmed: 3492247google scholar: lookup
  31. Nicole CJ, Badnell-Waters AJ, Bice R, Kelland A, Wilson AD, Harris PA. The effects of diet and weaning method on the behaviour of young horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;95:205–221.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.004google scholar: lookup
  32. Bulmer LS, Murray JA, Burns NM, Garber A, Wemelsfelder F, Mcewan NR, Hastie P. High-starch diets alter equine faecal microbiota and increase behavioural reactivity. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:18621.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54039-8pmc: PMC6901590pubmed: 31819069google scholar: lookup
  33. Freire R, Buckley P, Cooper JJ. Effects of different forms of exercise on post inhibitory rebound and unwanted behaviour in stabled horses. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:487–492.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X383883pubmed: 19642410google scholar: lookup
  34. Carroll S, Sykes B, Mills P. An online survey investigating perceived prevalence and treatment options for stereotypic behaviours in horses and undesirable behaviours associated with handling and riding. Equine Vet. Educ. 2020;32:71–81.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13250google scholar: lookup
  35. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of a Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram and Its Relationship with Gait in a Convenience Sample of 60 Riding Horses. Animal 2020;10:1044.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061044pmc: PMC7341225pubmed: 32560486google scholar: lookup
  36. Bell C, Rogers S. Attitudes of the Equestrian Public towards Equine End-of-Life Decisions. Animal 2021;11:1776.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061776pmc: PMC8232243pubmed: 34198636google scholar: lookup
  37. Cook WR, Kibler M. Behavioural assessment of pain in 66 horses, with and without a bit. Equine Vet. Educ. 2019;31:551–560.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12916google scholar: lookup
  38. Carroll S, Sykes B, Mills P. Understanding and treating equine behavioural problems. Vet. J. 2023;296–297:105985.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.105985pubmed: 37127134google scholar: lookup
  39. Rogers S, Bell C. Perceptions of Fear and Anxiety in Horses as Reported in Interviews with Equine Behaviourists. Animal 2022;12:2094.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212904pmc: PMC9658478pubmed: 36359029google scholar: lookup
  40. Story MR, Nout-Lomas YS, Aboellail TA, Selberg KT, Barrett MF, McIlwraith CW, Haussler KK. Dangerous Behavior and Intractable Axial Skeletal Pain in Performance Horses: A Possible Role for Ganglioneuritis (14 Cases; 2014–2019). Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;10:734218.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.734218pmc: PMC8702524pubmed: 34957274google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.