FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Reported Behavioural Differences between Geldings and Mares ...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2020; 10(3); 414; doi: 10.3390/ani10030414

Reported Behavioural Differences between Geldings and Mares Challenge Sex-Driven Stereotypes in Ridden Equine Behaviour.

Abstract: Horse trainers and riders may have preconceived ideas of horse temperament based solely on the sex of the horse. A study (n = 1233) of horse enthusiasts (75% of whom had more than 8 years of riding experience) revealed that riders prefer geldings over mares and stallions. While these data may reflect different sex preferences in horses used for sport, they may also reduce the chances of some horses reaching their performance potential. Further, an unfounded sex prejudice is likely to contribute to unconscious bias when perceiving unwanted behaviours, simplistically attributing them to demographic characteristics rather than more complex legacies of training and prior learning. The current study analysed reported sex-related behavioural differences in ridden and non-ridden horses using data from responses to the pilot study of the Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ) survey. Respondents (n = 1233) reported on the behaviour of their horse using a 151-item questionnaire. Data were searched for responses relating to mares and geldings, and 110 traits with the greatest percentage difference scores between mares and geldings were selected were tested for univariate significance at < 0.2. Multivariable modelling of the effect of sex (mare or gelding) on remaining traits was assessed by ordinal logistic regression, using a cumulative proportional log odds model. Results revealed mares were significantly more likely to move away when being caught compared to geldings ( = 0.003). Geldings were significantly more likely to chew on lead ropes when tied ( = 0.003) and to chew on rugs ( = 0.024). However, despite sex-related differences in these non-ridden behaviours, there was no evidence of any significant sex-related differences in the behaviours of the horses when ridden. This finding suggests that ridden horse behaviour is not sexually dimorphic or that particular horse sports variously favour one sex over another.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-03-02 PubMed ID: 32131444PubMed Central: PMC7142782DOI: 10.3390/ani10030414Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores equine behaviour in relation to the sex of the horse, challenging the notion that geldings and mares exhibit significantly different behaviours when being ridden. Using data from a comprehensive questionnaire, the study showed minor behavioural differences between the horses when not ridden, but no significant distinctions in their behaviour during riding.

Study Overview

  • The study used data from the Equine Behaviour Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ), which was completed by 1233 horse enthusiasts. 75% of these respondents had more than eight years of riding experience.
  • The 151-item questionnaire covered a thorough range of horse behaviours, including ridden and non-ridden actions.
  • Only responses regarding mares and geldings were considered, and 110 traits with the most significant percentage difference scores between the two sexes were selected and tested for statistical significance.

Methodology and Analysis

  • The selected traits were subject to univariate significance testing at a P-value of less than 0.2.
  • An ordinal logistic regression, using a cumulative proportional log odds model, was used to examine the effect of the sex of the horse (mare or gelding) on the remaining traits.

Findings

  • Mares were found to be more likely to move away when being caught compared to geldings. This result was statistically significant.
  • Among geldings, there was a significant propensity to chew on lead ropes when tied and to chew on rugs.
  • Despite these minor differences in non-ridden behaviours, the study found no evidence of any significant sex-related differences during ridden behaviour.

Implications

  • The lack of significant behavioural differences between mares and geldings when ridden suggests that horse behaviour under these conditions is not determined by sex. This finding challenges the commonly held belief among horse riders and trainers that the temperament and performance of a horse is influenced by its sex.
  • The study highlights the need to consider factors beyond sex, such as training and past learning experiences, in understanding and managing unwanted horse behaviours. Ignoring these factors and focusing solely on sex could introduce bias and limit the performance potential of certain horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Aune A, Fenner K, Wilson B, Cameron E, McLean A, McGreevy P. (2020). Reported Behavioural Differences between Geldings and Mares Challenge Sex-Driven Stereotypes in Ridden Equine Behaviour. Animals (Basel), 10(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030414

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 3
PII: 414

Researcher Affiliations

Aune, Anna
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Fenner, Kate
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Wilson, Bethany
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Cameron, Elissa
  • College of Science, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
McLean, Andrew
  • Equitation Science International, 3, Wonderland Ave, Tuerong, VIC 3915, Australia.
McGreevy, Paul
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors report no conflict of interest in this work.

References

This article includes 47 references
  1. Endenburg N. Perceptions and attitudes towards horses in European societies.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Apr;(28):38-41.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05154.xpubmed: 11314233google scholar: lookup
  2. Price M. Finding the first horse tamers.. Science 2018 May 11;360(6389):587.
    doi: 10.1126/science.360.6389.587pubmed: 29748263google scholar: lookup
  3. McGreevy P. Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists. .
  4. Heleski CR, McGreevy PD, Kaiser LJ, Lavagnino M, Tans E, Bello N, Clayton HM. Effects on behaviour and rein tension on horses ridden with or without martingales and rein inserts.. Vet J 2009 Jul;181(1):56-62.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.011pubmed: 19375959google scholar: lookup
  5. Finn JL, Haase B, Willet CE, van Rooy D, Chew T, Wade CM, Hamilton NA, Velie BD. The relationship between coat colour phenotype and equine behaviour: A pilot study. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;174:66–69.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.004google scholar: lookup
  6. Fenner K, Caspar G, Henshall C, Dhand N, Mcgreevy PD, Probyn-Rapsey F. It’s all about the sex: Preconceived ideas about horse temperament based on human gender and horse sex. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:150.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.06.014google scholar: lookup
  7. Robinson IH. The human-horse relationship: how much do we know?. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Apr;(28):42-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05155.xpubmed: 11314234google scholar: lookup
  8. Fenner K, Freire R, McLean A, McGreevy P. Behavioral, demographic, and management influences on equine responses to negative reinforcement. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:11–17.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.08.007google scholar: lookup
  9. Graf P, König von Borstel U, Gauly M. Importance of personality traits in horses to breeders and riders. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2013;8:316–325.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.05.006google scholar: lookup
  10. Ramirez M. “My Dog’s Just Like Me”: Dog Ownership as a Gender Display. Symb. Interact. 2006;29:373–391.
    doi: 10.1525/si.2006.29.3.373google scholar: lookup
  11. Haines EL, Deaux K, Lofaro N. The Times They Are a-Changing … or Are They Not? A Comparison of Gender Stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychol. Women Q. 2016;40:353–363.
    doi: 10.1177/0361684316634081google scholar: lookup
  12. Schippers M. Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory Soc. 2007;36:85–102.
    doi: 10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4google scholar: lookup
  13. Dashper K, Fenner K, Hyde M, Probyn-Rapsey F, Caspar G, Henshall C, McGreevy P. The Anthropomorphic Application of Gender Stereotypes to Horses. Anthrozoos 2018;31:673–684.
    doi: 10.1080/08927936.2018.1529349google scholar: lookup
  14. Duberstein KJ, Gilkeson JA. Determination of sex differences in personality and trainability of yearling horses utilizing a handler questionnaire. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;128:57–63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.012google scholar: lookup
  15. Hurn S. What’s love got to do with it? the interplay of sex and gender in the commercial breeding of Welsh cobs. Soc. Anim. 2008;16:23–44.
    doi: 10.1163/156853008X269872google scholar: lookup
  16. Thomson PC, Hayek AR, Jones B, Evans DL, McGreevy PD. Number, causes and destinations of horses leaving the Australian Thoroughbred and Standardbred racing industries.. Aust Vet J 2014 Aug;92(8):303-11.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.12204pubmed: 24954530google scholar: lookup
  17. Australia R. Australian Rules of Racing 2018. .
  18. Fédération Equestre Internationale. 2019 Veterinary Regulations. .
  19. McConaghy FF, Green LA, Colgan S, Morris LH. Studies of the pharmacokinetic profile, in vivo efficacy and safety of injectable altrenogest for the suppression of oestrus in mares.. Aust Vet J 2016 Jul;94(7):248-55.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.12459pubmed: 27349885google scholar: lookup
  20. Hodgson D, Howe S, Jeffcott L, Reid S, Mellor D, Higgins A. Effect of prolonged use of altrenogest on behaviour in mares.. Vet J 2005 Jan;169(1):113-5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.04.020pubmed: 15683772google scholar: lookup
  21. McDonnell SM. Reproductive behavior of stallions and mares: comparison of free-running and domestic in-hand breeding.. Anim Reprod Sci 2000 Jul 2;60-61:211-9.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00136-6pubmed: 10844196google scholar: lookup
  22. Linklater WL. Adaptive explanation in socio-ecology: lessons from the Equidae.. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2000 Feb;75(1):1-20.
    doi: 10.1017/S0006323199005411pubmed: 10740891google scholar: lookup
  23. Sigurjonsdottir H, Van Dierendonck MCVAN, Snorrason S, Thorhallsdottir AG. Social Relationships In A Group Of Horses Without A Mature Stallion. Behaviour 2003;140:783–804.
  24. McDonnell S. Reproductive behavior of the stallion.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1986 Dec;2(3):535-55.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30705-8pubmed: 3492244google scholar: lookup
  25. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ, Minot EO, Stafford KJ. Stallion harassment and the mating system of horses.. Anim Behav 1999 Aug;58(2):295-306.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1155pubmed: 10458881google scholar: lookup
  26. Cameron EZ, Setsaas TH, Linklater WL. Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13850-3.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900639106pmc: PMC2728983pubmed: 19667179google scholar: lookup
  27. McDonnell SM, Haviland JCS. Agonistic ethogram of the equid bachelor band. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995;43:147–188.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00550-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  28. Araba BD, Crowell-Davis SL. Dominance relationships and aggression of foals (Equus caballus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994;41:1–25.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)90048-5google scholar: lookup
  29. Crowell-Davis SL, Houpt KA, Kane L. Play development in Welsh pony (Equus caballus) foals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987;18:119–131.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90186-9google scholar: lookup
  30. Sackman JE, Houpt KA. Equine Personality: Association With Breed, Use, and Husbandry Factors.. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 Jan;72:47-55.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.10.018pubmed: 30929783google scholar: lookup
  31. Suwała M, Górecka-Bruzda A, Walczak M, Ensminger J, Jezierski T. A desired profile of horse personality—A survey study of Polish equestrians based on a new approach to equine temperament and character. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;180:65–77.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.011google scholar: lookup
  32. Roberts K, Hemmings AJ, Moore-Colyer M, Parker MO, McBride SD. Neural modulators of temperament: A multivariate approach to personality trait identification in the horse.. Physiol Behav 2016 Dec 1;167:125-131.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.08.029pubmed: 27597134google scholar: lookup
  33. Le Scolan N, Hausberger M, Wolff A. Stability over situations in temperamental traits of horses as revealed by experimental and scoring approaches.. Behav Processes 1997 Dec;41(3):257-66.
    doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00052-1pubmed: 24896858google scholar: lookup
  34. Venables WN, Smith DM. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. .
  35. Agresti A. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. .
  36. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. .
  37. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling The False Discovery Rate—A Practical And Powerful Approach To Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Ser. B. 1995;57:289–300.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  38. Fatjo J, Houpt K. Sexual behavior in geldings. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995;46:131–135.
  39. Kaseda Y, Khalil AM. Harem size reproductive success of stallions in Misaki feral horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996;47:163–173.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00675-3google scholar: lookup
  40. Gray ME, Cameron EZ, Peacock MM, Thain DS, Kirchoff VS. Are low infidelity rates in feral horses due to infanticide?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2012;66:529–537.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-011-1301-4google scholar: lookup
  41. Feist JD, McCullough DR. Behavior patterns and communication in feral horses.. Z Tierpsychol 1976 Aug;41(4):337-71.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1976.tb00947.xpubmed: 983427google scholar: lookup
  42. McGreevy PD, Oddie C, Burton FL, McLean AN. The horse-human dyad: can we align horse training and handling activities with the equid social ethogram?. Vet J 2009 Jul;181(1):12-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.005pubmed: 19375965google scholar: lookup
  43. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. Management practices associated with owner-reported stable-related and handling behaviour problems in UK leisure horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2014;155:49–55.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.02.014google scholar: lookup
  44. Baragli P, Padalino B, Telatin A. The role of associative and non-associative learning in the training of horses and implications for the welfare (a review).. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2015;51(1):40-51.
    pubmed: 25857383doi: 10.4415/ann_15_01_08google scholar: lookup
  45. Feh C, de Mazierès J. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses. Anim. Behav. 1993;46:1191–1194.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1309google scholar: lookup
  46. Shoemaker R, Bailey J, Janzen E, Wilson DG. Routine castration in 568 draught colts: incidence of evisceration and omental herniation.. Equine Vet J 2004 May;36(4):336-40.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044890625pubmed: 15163041google scholar: lookup
  47. Kaseda Y, Ogawa H, Khalil AM. Causes of natal dispersal and emigration and their effects on harem formation in Misaki feral horses.. Equine Vet J 1997 Jul;29(4):262-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03121.xpubmed: 15338905google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Stachurska A, Kędzierski W, Kaczmarek B, Wiśniewska A, Żylińska B, Janczarek I. Variation of Physiological and Behavioural Parameters during the Oestrous Cycle in Mares.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 6;13(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13020211pubmed: 36670751google scholar: lookup
  2. Bartolomé E, Perdomo-González DI, Ripollés-Lobo M, Valera M. Basal Reactivity Evaluated by Infrared Thermography in the "Caballo de Deporte Español" Horse Breed According to Its Coat Color.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 21;12(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12192515pubmed: 36230256google scholar: lookup
  3. Wiśniewska A, Janczarek I, Wilk I, Tkaczyk E, Mierzicka M, Stanley CR, Górecka-Bruzda A. Heterospecific Fear and Avoidance Behaviour in Domestic Horses (Equus caballus).. Animals (Basel) 2021 Oct 28;11(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11113081pubmed: 34827813google scholar: lookup
  4. Anzulewicz A, Fenner K, Hyde M, Heald S, Burattini B, Romness N, McKenzie J, Wilson B, McGreevy P. The Impact of the Sex of Handlers and Riders on the Reported Social Confidence, Compliance and Touch Sensitivity of Horses in Their Care.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 8;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010130pubmed: 33430130google scholar: lookup
  5. McKenzie J, Fenner K, Hyde M, Anzulewicz A, Burattini B, Romness N, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Equine Responses to Acceleration and Deceleration Cues May Reflect Their Exposure to Multiple Riders.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 31;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010066pubmed: 33396451google scholar: lookup
  6. Burattini B, Fenner K, Anzulewicz A, Romness N, McKenzie J, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Age-Related Changes in the Behaviour of Domestic Horses as Reported by Owners.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 7;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122321pubmed: 33297447google scholar: lookup
  7. Fenner K, Hyde M, Crean A, McGreevy P. Identifying Sources of Potential Bias When Using Online Survey Data to Explore Horse Training, Management, and Behaviour: A Systematic Literature Review.. Vet Sci 2020 Sep 22;7(3).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci7030140pubmed: 32971754google scholar: lookup
  8. Pérez-Manrique L, León-Pérez K, Zamora-Sánchez E, Davies S, Ober C, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Prevalence and Distribution of Lesions in the Nasal Bones and Mandibles of a Sample of 144 Riding Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 16;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091661pubmed: 32947819google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,105 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.