Analyze Diet
Respiration physiology1991; 86(3); 315-332; doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(91)90103-p

Respiratory muscle recruitment in awake ponies during exercise and CO2 inhalation.

Abstract: We measured respiratory muscle electromyograms (EMG), inspiratory (I) and expiratory (E) airflow patterns and functional residual capacity (FRC) in six ponies at rest, during treadmill walking at 1.8 mph-5, 10, and 15% grades, and during 2, 4, and 6% CO2 inhalation. There were several similarities in the responses to exercise and CO2 inhalation. The shapes of the I and E flow patterns were not changed appreciably from the respective control patterns during either condition. Mean diaphragm EMG increased from control (P less than 0.05) at 1.8 mph-10 and 15% grades, and during 4 and 6% inhalation. However, mean transversus abdominis EMG did not change significantly from control (P greater than 0.10) during either condition. Exercise did not have an effect (P greater than 0.05) on FRC, and there was only a slight (P less than 0.05) increase in FRC (100 ml or 2%) during 6% CO2 inhalation. Based on the fact that we did not find major differences between exercise and CO2 inhalation in mean diaphragm and transversus abdominis EMG, I and E flow patterns, and FRC we conclude that factor(s) other than the ventilatory stimulus and the non-ventilatory functions of the respiratory muscles are important determinants of the pony's respiratory muscle recruitment pattern under these conditions.
Publication Date: 1991-12-01 PubMed ID: 1788492DOI: 10.1016/0034-5687(91)90103-pGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates how the ponies’ respiratory muscles react during physical exercise and inhalation of carbon dioxide (CO2). The measurements taken included the respiratory muscle electromyograms, inspiratory and expiratory airflow patterns, and the functional residual capacity at different activity levels and CO2 concentrations. The findings suggest that factors beyond the ventilatory stimulus and non-ventilatory functions of respiratory muscles influence the ponies’ respiratory muscle recruitment pattern.

Methodology and Measurements

  • The study involved six ponies in which certain parameters were measured at rest, during treadmill walking at different speeds and gradients, and during inhalation of varying concentrations of CO2.
  • The electromyograms (EMG) of the respiratory muscles were recorded. EMGs measure muscle response or electrical activity in response to a nerve’s stimulation of the muscle.
  • Inspiratory (I) and Expiratory (E) airflow patterns were noted. The inspiratory pattern refers to the flow of air into the lungs when breathing in, and the expiratory is the opposite, showing air release when breathing out.
  • The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) was also measured. FRC is the amount of air that remains in the lungs after an individual has taken a normal breath out.

Findings and Conclusion

  • Neither physical exercise nor CO2 inhalation showed significant changes in the shapes of the I and E flow patterns.
  • There was a notable increase in the diaphragm (a major muscle involved in breathing) EMG from the control level during exercise at 10 and 15% grades and during inhalation of 4 and 6% CO2.
  • On the contrary, the transversus abdominis’ (one of the deepest muscles in the abdomen engaged during a forced exhalation) mean EMG did not demonstrate noteworthy changes from the control level in either condition.
  • FRC was not significantly affected by exercise but showed a slight increase during 6% CO2 inhalation.
  • Comparing changes in the mean diaphragm and transversus abdominis EMG, I and E flow patterns and FRC, the research concludes that factors besides the ventilatory stimulus and non-ventilatory muscle functions significantly influence the recruitment of respiratory muscles in ponies, under the tested conditions.

Implications of the Research

  • The research highlights the robustness of ponies’ respiratory system to different environmental stimuli which could be insightful for veterinary studies.
  • This could also be potentially useful for sports science, particularly for performance optimization of race horses and other equine sports.
  • This research also lays the groundwork for further investigations into what the other ‘determinants’ of respiratory muscle recruitment might be.

Cite This Article

APA
Gutting SM, Forster HV, Lowry TF, Brice AG, Pan LG. (1991). Respiratory muscle recruitment in awake ponies during exercise and CO2 inhalation. Respir Physiol, 86(3), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5687(91)90103-p

Publication

ISSN: 0034-5687
NlmUniqueID: 0047142
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 86
Issue: 3
Pages: 315-332

Researcher Affiliations

Gutting, S M
  • Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.
Forster, H V
    Lowry, T F
      Brice, A G
        Pan, L G

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Carbon Dioxide
          • Electromyography
          • Functional Residual Capacity / physiology
          • Horses / physiology
          • Physical Exertion / physiology
          • Respiratory Mechanics / physiology
          • Respiratory Muscles / physiology

          Grant Funding

          • F32-HL07354-01A1-CLN-2 / NHLBI NIH HHS
          • HL-25739 / NHLBI NIH HHS

          Citations

          This article has been cited 1 times.
          1. Lafortuna CL, Reinach E, Saibene F. The effects of locomotor-respiratory coupling on the pattern of breathing in horses. J Physiol 1996 Apr 15;492 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):587-96.
            doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021331pubmed: 9019552google scholar: lookup