Analyze Diet
Research in veterinary science2017; 115; 387-392; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.012

Role of muscarinic receptors in the contraction of jejunal smooth muscle in the horse: An in vitro study.

Abstract: Nonselective antimuscarinic drugs are clinically useful in several pathologic conditions of horses, but, blocking all muscarinic receptor (MR) subtypes, may cause several side effects. The availability of selective antimuscarinic drugs could improve therapeutic efficacy and safety. We aimed to enlighten the role of different MR subtypes by evaluating the effects of nonselective, and selective M, M and M MR antagonists on the contractions of horse jejunum. Segments of circular muscle of equine jejunum, were put into organ baths, connected to isotonic transducers, and the effects on ACh concentration-response curves, and on electrical field stimulation (EFS)-evoked contractions of intestinal preparations, induced by nonselective or selective MR antagonists, compared to pre-drug level, were studied. Atropine (nonselective MR antagonist), pirenzepine (selective M antagonist), and p-FHHSiD (selective M antagonist) competitively antagonized ACh (pA=9.78±0.21; 7.14±0.25 and 7.56±0.17, respectively). Methoctramine (selective M antagonist) antagonized ACh in a concentration-unrelated fashion; however, it competitively antagonized carbachol, a nonselective muscarinic agonist (pA=6.42±0.23). Atropine dose-dependently reduced EFS-evoked contractions, reaching a maximal effect of -45.64±6.54%; the simultaneous block of neurokinin receptors, almost completely abolished the atropine-insensitive contractions. p-FHHSiD dose-dependently reduced EFS-induced contractions, while pirenzepine caused a minor decrease. Methoctramine, ineffective up to 10M, enhanced the contractions at 10M; the block of neurokinin receptors abolished the increase of contraction. Cholinergic contractions of horse jejunum are mainly mediated by M receptors; M selective antagonists seem to scarcely affect cholinergic, and to enhance neurokininergic contractions of equine jejunum, thus their use entails a lower risk of causing intestinal hypomotility, compared to nonselective drugs.
Publication Date: 2017-07-11 PubMed ID: 28711697DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.012Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the role of different muscarinic receptor subtypes and the effects of their selective or nonselective antagonists in the contraction of horse’s jejunal smooth muscle.

Objective of the Study

  • The main purpose of this study is to understand the role and effects of different muscarinic receptor (MR) subtypes within horse jejunal smooth muscle contraction. The authors aimed to see the impact of nonselective and selective M1, M2 and M3 MR antagonists on these contractions. The ultimate goal is to provide insights that could improve the efficacy and safety of treatments involving selective antimuscarinic drugs in horses.

Methodology

  • The study was carried out using segments of circular muscles taken from equine jejunum. These were then placed into organ baths and connected to isotonic transducers to observe any changes.
  • The researchers then analysed the effects on the ACh concentration-response curves, and electrical field stimulation (EFS)-evoked contractions of the intestinal preparations. Changes were induced by the nonselective or selective MR antagonists compared to pre-drug levels.

Results

  • The nonselective MR antagonist (Atropine), and selective M1 (pirenzepine) and M3 (p-FHHSiD) antagonists all demonstrated competitive antagonism towards ACh.
  • The selective M2 antagonist (Methoctramine), showed antagonism towards ACh in a concentration-unrelated fashion, but displayed competitive antagonism in response to carbachol, a nonselective muscarinic agonist.
  • Atropine was observed to dose-dependently reduce EFS-evoked contractions, with a maximum reducing effect of -45.64±6.54%. Furthermore, when neurokinin receptors were blocked, the atropine-insensitive contractions were almost completely abolished.
  • The M3 antagonist (p-FHHSiD) dose-dependently reduced EFS-induced contractions, whilst the M1 antagonist (pirenzepine) only caused a minor decrease. Interestingly, the M2 antagonist (Methoctramine) enhanced contractions at high concentrations, but this increase was abolished when neurokinin receptors were blocked.

Conclusions

  • The study concludes that the cholinergic contractions in horse jejunum are primarily mediated by M3 receptors. M2 selective antagonists seem to have a minuscule effect on cholinergic contractions and appear to enhance neurokininergic contractions of the equine jejunum.
  • The study also suggests that the use of selective M2 antagonists may pose a lower risk of causing intestinal hypomotility compared to using nonselective drugs.

Cite This Article

APA
Menozzi A, Pozzoli C, Poli E, Bontempi G, Serventi P, Meucci V, Intorre L, Bertini S. (2017). Role of muscarinic receptors in the contraction of jejunal smooth muscle in the horse: An in vitro study. Res Vet Sci, 115, 387-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.012

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2661
NlmUniqueID: 0401300
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 115
Pages: 387-392
PII: S0034-5288(16)30707-X

Researcher Affiliations

Menozzi, Alessandro
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Strada del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy. Electronic address: alessandro.menozzi@unipr.it.
Pozzoli, Cristina
  • Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Poli, Enzo
  • Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Bontempi, Giada
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Strada del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Serventi, Paolo
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Strada del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Meucci, Valentina
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, Via Livornese, S. Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Intorre, Luigi
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, Via Livornese, S. Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Bertini, Simone
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Strada del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Jejunum / physiology
  • Muscarinic Antagonists / pharmacology
  • Muscle Contraction
  • Muscle, Smooth / physiology
  • Receptors, Muscarinic / metabolism

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Ekstrand C, Michanek P, Gehring R, Sundell A, Källse A, Hedeland M, Ström L. Plasma atropine concentrations associated with decreased intestinal motility in horses. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:951300.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.951300pubmed: 36118347google scholar: lookup
  2. Ström L, Dalin F, Domberg M, Stenlund C, Bondesson U, Hedeland M, Toutain PL, Ekstrand C. Topical ophthalmic atropine in horses, pharmacokinetics and effect on intestinal motility. BMC Vet Res 2021 Apr 7;17(1):149.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02847-4pubmed: 33827566google scholar: lookup
  3. Mushtaq S, Das YK, Aksoy A. Comparison of the Inhibitory Effects of Flunixin Meglumine and Meloxicam on the Smooth Muscles Motility of the Gastrointestinal Tract of Cattle. Vet Med Sci 2025 Jan;11(1):e70190.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.70190pubmed: 39792059google scholar: lookup