Analyze Diet
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2022; 20(1); e06985; doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6985

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J. Presl (camphor white oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).

Abstract: Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of an essential oil from the whole plant (L.) J. Presl (camphor white oil), when used as a sensory additive (flavouring) in feed and water for drinking for all animal species. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is safe up to the maximum proposed use levels in complete feed of 30 mg/kg for piglets, pigs for fattening, sows, horses, rabbits, fish, ornamental fish and dogs and of 50 mg/kg for calves (milk replacer), cattle for fattening, dairy cows, sheep and goats. For the other species, the calculated safe concentration in complete feed is 28 mg/kg for chickens for fattening, 42 mg/kg for laying hens, 37 mg/kg for turkeys for fattening and 22 mg/kg for cats. The FEEDAP Panel considered that the use in water for drinking is safe provided that the total daily intake of the additive does not exceed the daily amount that is considered safe when consumed via feed. No concerns for consumers were identified following the use of the additive at the use level considered safe in feed for the target species. The essential oil under assessment should be considered as irritant to skin and eyes, and as a skin and respiratory sensitiser. The use of the additive under the proposed conditions in animal feed was not expected to pose a risk for the environment. Camphor white oil was recognised to flavour food. Since its function in feed would be essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy was considered necessary.
Publication Date: 2022-01-13 PubMed ID: 35058990PubMed Central: PMC8756382DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6985Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the use of camphor white oil, an essential oil derived from Cinnamomum camphora, as a sensory additive for feed and water consumed by various animal species. The study found the substance to be safe for consumption within specific dosage levels, with no significant risk to consumers or the environment.

Investigative Body and Study Background

  • The study was conducted by the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), upon a request from the European Commission.
  • The subject of the request was an examination of the safety and efficacy of essential oil sourced from the whole plant of Cinnamomum camphora (camphor white oil) in being used as a flavouring agent in feed and drinking water for all animal species.

Safety Findings

  • Upon study completion, the Panel concluded the feed additive safe at specific proposed maximum levels, namely 30mg/kg for piglets, pigs for fattening, sows, horses, rabbits, fish, ornamental fish, and dogs, and 50 mg/kg for calves (milk replacer), cattle for fattening, dairy cows, sheep, and goats.
  • The safe concentrations in complete feed were also found to be different for different species, listed as 28 mg/kg for chickens for fattening, 42 mg/kg for laying hens, 37 mg/kg for turkeys for fattening, and 22 mg/kg for cats.
  • For camphor white oil to be safe for use in drinking water, the total daily intake of the additive should not exceed the safe daily amount ascertained while considering feed intake.
  • No consumer safety concerns were noted after using the additive at safe levels in the feed for targeted animal species.
  • However, it’s noted that camphor white oil was found to be irritant to skin and eyes and could potentially cause skin and respiratory sensitization.

Environmental and Efficacy Considerations

  • The additive, under the recommended conditions in animal feed, did not pose any environmental risk.
  • Camphor white oil is acknowledged for its ability to flavour food, which was the proposed function in feed; hence, no further demonstration of its efficacy was considered necessary.

Cite This Article

APA
Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Fašmon Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Edoardo Villa R, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. (2022). Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J. Presl (camphor white oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA J, 20(1), e06985. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6985

Publication

ISSN: 1831-4732
NlmUniqueID: 101642076
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 20
Issue: 1
Pages: e06985
PII: e06985

Researcher Affiliations

Bampidis, Vasileios
    Azimonti, Giovanna
      Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
        Christensen, Henrik
          Fašmon Durjava, Mojca
            Kouba, Maryline
              López-Alonso, Marta
                López Puente, Secundino
                  Marcon, Francesca
                    Mayo, Baltasar
                      Pechová, Alena
                        Petkova, Mariana
                          Ramos, Fernando
                            Sanz, Yolanda
                              Edoardo Villa, Roberto
                                Woutersen, Ruud
                                  Brantom, Paul
                                    Chesson, Andrew
                                      Westendorf, Johannes
                                        Manini, Paola
                                          Pizzo, Fabiola
                                            Dusemund, Birgit

                                              References

                                              This article includes 35 references
                                              1. van den Berg SJPL, Restani P, Boersma MG, Delmulle L, Rietjens IMCM. Levels of genotoxic and carcinogenic compounds in plant food supplements and associated risk assessment.. Food and Nutrition Sciences 2010;2:989–1010.
                                              2. Burdock GA. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients, 6th Edition.. 2009;pp. 241–242.
                                                doi: 10.1201/9781439847503google scholar: lookup
                                              3. Court MH, Greenblatt DJ. Molecular basis for deficient acetaminophen glucuronidation in cats. An interspecies comparison of enzyme kinetics in liver microsomes.. Biochem Pharmacol 1997 Apr 4;53(7):1041-7.
                                                pubmed: 9174118doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00072-5google scholar: lookup
                                              4. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a harmonised approach for risk assessment of substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic.. EFSA Journal 2005;3(10):282, 31 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2005.282google scholar: lookup
                                              5. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in contact with Food (AFC) on a request from the Commission on Camphor in flavourings and other food ingredients with flavouring properties.. EFSA Journal 2008;6(7):729, 15 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.729google scholar: lookup
                                              6. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Compendium of botanicals reported to contain naturally occurring substances of possible concern for human health when used in food and food supplements.. EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2663, 60 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2663google scholar: lookup
                                              7. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Guidance on the data required for the risk assessment of flavourings.. EFSA Journal 2010;8(6):1623, 38pp.
                                                doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2010.1623google scholar: lookup
                                              8. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 25, Revision 2 (FGE.25Rev2): Aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31.. EFSA Journal 2011;9(6):2177, 126 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2177google scholar: lookup
                                              9. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 25, Revision 3 (FGE.25Rev3): Aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31.. EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4069, 116 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4069google scholar: lookup
                                              10. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 78, Revision 2 (FGE.78Rev2): Consideration of aliphatic and alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons evaluated by JECFA (63rd meeting) structurally related to aliphatic hydrocarbons evaluated by EFSA in FGE.25Rev3.. EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4067, 72 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4067google scholar: lookup
                                              11. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Statement on the use of feed additives authorised/applied for use in feed when supplied via water.. EFSA Journal 2010;8(12):1956, 9 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1956google scholar: lookup
                                              12. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and alicyclic ethers (chemical group 16) when used as flavourings for all animal species.. EFSA Journal 2012;10(11):2967, 17 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2967google scholar: lookup
                                              13. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for sensory additives.. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2534, 26 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2534google scholar: lookup
                                              14. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers.. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2539, 5 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2539google scholar: lookup
                                              15. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic saturated and unsaturated tertiary alcohols and esters with esters containing tertiary alcohols ethers (chemical group 6) when used as flavourings for all animal species.. EFSA Journal 2012;10(11):2966, 25 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2966google scholar: lookup
                                              16. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of saturated and unsaturated aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and esters with esters containing secondary alcohols belonging chemical group 5 when used as flavourings for all animal species.. EFSA Journal 2015;13(11):4268, 21 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4268google scholar: lookup
                                              17. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species.. EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4053, 22 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4053google scholar: lookup
                                              18. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of secondary alicyclic saturated and unsaturated alcohols, ketones, ketals and esters with ketals containing alicyclic alcohols or ketones and esters containing secondary alicyclic alcohols from chemical group 8 when used as flavourings for all animal species.. EFSA Journal 2016;14(6):4475, 26 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4475google scholar: lookup
                                              19. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Gregoretti L, Manini P, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of 26 compounds belonging to chemical group 3 (α,β-unsaturated straight-chain and branched-chain aliphatic primary alcohols, aldehydes, acids and esters) when used as flavourings for all animal species and categories.. EFSA J 2019 Mar;17(3):e05654.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4339pmc: PMC7009239pubmed: 32626273google scholar: lookup
                                              20. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05023.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023pmc: PMC7010039pubmed: 32625313google scholar: lookup
                                              21. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05021.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5021pmc: PMC7009839pubmed: 32625311google scholar: lookup
                                              22. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Dujardin B, Galobart J, Innocenti ML. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer.. EFSA J 2017 Oct;15(10):e05022.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5022pmc: PMC7009902pubmed: 32625312google scholar: lookup
                                              23. Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos ML, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli PS, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa RE, Wallace RJ, Wester P, Anguita M, Galobart J, Innocenti ML, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives.. EFSA J 2018 May;16(5):e05274.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5274pmc: PMC7009555pubmed: 32625911google scholar: lookup
                                              24. Bampidis V, Bastos M, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brock T, de Knecht J, Kolar B, van Beelen P, Padovani L, Tarrés-Call J, Vettori MV, Azimonti G. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment.. EFSA J 2019 Apr;17(4):e05648.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5648pmc: PMC7009194pubmed: 32626279google scholar: lookup
                                              25. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Fašmon Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil from the fruits of Litsea c뺺 (Lour.) Pers. (litsea berry oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2021 Jun;19(6):e06623.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6623pmc: PMC8193530pubmed: 34135999google scholar: lookup
                                              26. Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Kouba M, Fašmon Durjava M, López-Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Westendorf J, Galobart J, Manini P, Pizzo F, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of expressed lemon oil and its fractions from Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck and of lime oil from Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).. EFSA J 2021 Apr;19(4):e06548.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6548pmc: PMC8085978pubmed: 33968248google scholar: lookup
                                              27. EFSA Scientific Committee. Guidance on safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements, on request of EFSA.. EFSA Journal 2009;7(9):1249, 19 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2009.1249google scholar: lookup
                                              28. EFSA Scientific Committee. Scientific Opinion on the applicability of the Margin of Exposure approach for the safety assessment of impurities which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic in substances added to food/feed.. EFSA Journal 2012;10(3):2578, 5 pp.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2578google scholar: lookup
                                              29. Lautz LS, Jeddi MZ, Girolami F, Nebbia C, Dorne JLCM. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of pharmaceuticals in cats (Felix sylvestris catus) and implications for the risk assessment of feed additives and contaminants.. Toxicol Lett 2021 Mar 1;338:114-127.
                                                pubmed: 33253781doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.11.014google scholar: lookup
                                              30. Miller EC, Swanson AB, Phillips DH, Fletcher TL, Liem A, Miller JA. Structure-activity studies of the carcinogenicities in the mouse and rat of some naturally occurring and synthetic alkenylbenzene derivatives related to safrole and estragole.. Cancer Res 1983 Mar;43(3):1124-34.
                                                pubmed: 6825084
                                              31. Moayedi Y, Greenberg SA, Jenkins BA, Marshall KL, Dimitrov LV, Nelson AM, Owens DM, Lumpkin EA. Camphor white oil induces tumor regression through cytotoxic T cell-dependent mechanisms.. Mol Carcinog 2019 May;58(5):722-734.
                                                pmc: PMC6724528pubmed: 30582219doi: 10.1002/mc.22965google scholar: lookup
                                              32. More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bennekou SH, Bragard C, Halldorsson TI, Hernández-Jerez AF, Koutsoumanis K, Naegeli H, Schlatter JR, Silano V, Nielsen SS, Schrenk D, Turck D, Younes M, Benfenati E, Castle L, Cedergreen N, Hardy A, Laskowski R, Leblanc JC, Kortenkamp A, Ragas A, Posthuma L, Svendsen C, Solecki R, Testai E, Dujardin B, Kass GE, Manini P, Jeddi MZ, Dorne JC, Hogstrand C. Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.. EFSA J 2019 Mar;17(3):e05634.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634pmc: PMC7009070pubmed: 32626259google scholar: lookup
                                              33. More S, Bampidis V, Benford D, Boesten J, Bragard C, Halldorsson T, Hernandez-Jerez A, Hougaard-Bennekou S, Koutsoumanis K, Naegeli H, Nielsen SS, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Aquilina G, Crebelli R, Gürtler R, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Mosesso P, Nielsen E, Solecki R, Carfì M, Martino C, Maurici D, Parra Morte J, Schlatter J. Genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures.. EFSA J 2019 Jan;17(1):e05519.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5519pmc: PMC7009058pubmed: 32626066google scholar: lookup
                                              34. More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bragard C, Halldorsson TI, Hernández-Jerez AF, Hougaard Bennekou S, Koutsoumanis KP, Machera K, Naegeli H, Nielsen SS, Schlatter JR, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Gundert-Remy U, Kass GEN, Kleiner J, Rossi AM, Serafimova R, Reilly L, Wallace HM. Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach in food safety assessment.. EFSA J 2019 Jun;17(6):e05708.
                                                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5708pmc: PMC7009090pubmed: 32626331google scholar: lookup
                                              35. Tisserand R, Young R. Essential oil safety. A Guide for Health Care Professionals. 2nd Edition. Chapter 13. Essential oil profiles. 2014;228 pp.
                                                doi: 10.1016/C2009-0-52351-3google scholar: lookup

                                              Citations

                                              This article has been cited 3 times.
                                              1. Pedroni L, Louisse J, Punt A, Dorne JLCM, Dall'Asta C, Dellafiora L. A Computational Inter-Species Study on Safrole Phase I Metabolism-Dependent Bioactivation: A Mechanistic Insight into the Study of Possible Differences among Species. Toxins (Basel) 2023 Jan 18;15(2).
                                                doi: 10.3390/toxins15020094pubmed: 36828409google scholar: lookup
                                              2. Cattaneo I, Kalian AD, Di Nicola MR, Dujardin B, Levorato S, Mohimont L, Nathanail AV, Carnessechi E, Astuto MC, Tarazona JV, Kass GEN, Liem AKD, Robinson T, Manini P, Hogstrand C, Price PS, Dorne JLCM. Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Multiple Chemicals at the European Food Safety Authority: Principles, Guidance Documents, Applications and Future Challenges. Toxins (Basel) 2023 Jan 4;15(1).
                                                doi: 10.3390/toxins15010040pubmed: 36668860google scholar: lookup
                                              3. Yu W, Zhang Y, Kang C, Zheng Y, Liu X, Liang Z, Yan J. The pharmacological evidence of the chang-yan-ning formula in the treatment of colitis. Front Pharmacol 2022;13:1029088.
                                                doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1029088pubmed: 36278202google scholar: lookup