FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Frontiers in veterinary science2020; 7; 633; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633

Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science.

Abstract: Vision, hearing, olfaction, taste, and touch comprise the sensory modalities of most vertebrates. With these senses, the animal receives information about its environment. How this information is organized, interpreted, and experienced is known as perception. The study of the sensory abilities of animals and their implications for behavior is central not only to ethology but also to animal welfare. Sensory ability, perception, and behavior are closely linked. Horses and humans share the five most common sensory modalities, however, their ranges and capacities differ, so that horses are unlikely to perceive their surroundings in a similar manner to humans. Understanding equine perceptual abilities and their differences is important when horses and human interact, as these abilities are pivotal for the response of the horse to any changes in its surroundings. This review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on the sensory abilities of horses. The information is discussed within an evolutionary context and also includes a practical perspective, outlining potential ways to mitigate risks of injuries and enhance positive horse-human interactions. The equine sensory apparatus includes panoramic visual capacities with acuities similar to those of red-green color-blind humans as well as aural abilities that, in some respects exceed human hearing and a highly developed sense of smell, all of which influence how horses react in various situations. Equine sensitivity to touch has been studied surprisingly sparingly despite tactile stimulation being the major interface of horse training. We discuss the potential use of sensory enrichment/positive sensory stimulation to improve the welfare of horses in various situations e.g. using odors, touch or sound to enrich the environment or to appease horses. In addition, equine perception is affected by factors such as breed, individuality, age, and in some cases even color, emphasizing that different horses may need different types of management. Understanding the sensory abilities of horses is central to the emerging discipline of equitation science, which comprises the gamut of horse-human interactions. Therefore, sensory abilities continue to warrant scientific focus, with more research to enable us to understand different horses and their various needs.
Copyright © 2020 Rørvang, Nielsen and McLean.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-09-09 PubMed ID: 33033724PubMed Central: PMC7509108DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses the sensory abilities of horses, particularly vision, hearing, taste, touch, and smell. It highlights the significance of these abilities in equitation science, the field encompassing horse-human interactions, and their role in dictating a horse’s response to environmental changes. An evolutionary and practical perspective is provided to understand possible ways to improve horse welfare and mitigate risk of injury.

Sensory Abilities of Horses

  • The researchers delve into an extensive overview of horses’ sensory abilities. They note that while horses have the same five primary senses as humans, the range and capacity of these senses differ significantly.
  • These differences in sensory abilities mean that horses perceive their surroundings differently to humans. Understanding these perceptual abilities is crucial when interacting with horses.

Specific Sensory Capacities of Horses

  • Horses possess a panoramic visual capacity with acuities similar to those of red-green color-blind humans. Their aural abilities, in some respects, exceed human hearing, and they have a highly developed sense of smell. Each of these influences the way horses react to various situations.
  • The sense of touch in horses is not as studied as the other senses, even though it forms a crucial interface in horse training. The paper hints at the potential of sensory enrichment or positive sensory stimulation through touch, smell, or sound to enhance a horse’s welfare.

Factors Influencing Equine Perception

  • Beyond the basic sensory abilities, various other factors can affect a horse’s perceptual experiences. These include the horse’s breed, individual characteristics, age and sometimes color. Understanding these factors is crucial in determining the unique management requirements of different horses.

Equitation Science and Importance of Further Research

  • Equitation science, the discipline focused on horse-human interactions, relies heavily on understanding the sensory abilities of horses. Since these abilities dictate how horses respond to environmental changes, they form a central topic in this emerging field.
  • The researchers emphasize the need for continuous scientific focus and research on equine sensory abilities to better understand the varying needs of different horses. This will enhance interactions and improve overall horse welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. (2020). Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science. Front Vet Sci, 7, 633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00633

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 7
Pages: 633
PII: 633

Researcher Affiliations

Rørvang, Maria Vilain
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Alnarp, Sweden.
Nielsen, Birte L
  • Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, Paris, France.
McLean, Andrew Neil
  • Equitation Science International, Tuerong, VIC, Australia.

References

This article includes 182 references
  1. College OS.nSensation and Perception [WWW Document]. Introduction to Psychology. Available online at: http://cnx.org/contents/Sr8Ev5Og@5.49:K-DZ-03P@5/Sensation-versus-Perception (accessed March 13, 2020).
  2. OIE nTerrestrial Animal Health Code 25/07/2017. Section 7 Animal Welfare, Chapter 7.1 (2017). Available online at: http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahc/current/chapitre_aw_introduction.pdf (accessed January 22, 2018).
  3. McGreevy PD. The advent of equitation science.. Vet J 2007 Nov;174(3):492-500.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.008pubmed: 17157542google scholar: lookup
  4. Blake H. Thinking with Horses. London: Souvenir Press Ltd; (1977).
  5. Saslow CA. Understanding the perceptual world of horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2002) 78:209–24.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00092-8google scholar: lookup
  6. Doherty O, Casey V, McGreevy P, Arkins S. Noseband Use in Equestrian Sports - An International Study.. PLoS One 2017;12(1):e0169060.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169060pmc: PMC5207535pubmed: 28045961google scholar: lookup
  7. Evans D, McGreevy P. An investigation of racing performance and whip use by jockeys in thoroughbred races.. PLoS One 2011 Jan 27;6(1):e15622.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015622pmc: PMC3026808pubmed: 21283587google scholar: lookup
  8. Carroll J, Murphy CJ, Neitz M, Hoeve JN, Neitz J. Photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision in the horse.. J Vis 2001;1(2):80-7.
    doi: 10.1167/1.2.2pubmed: 12678603google scholar: lookup
  9. Hanggi EB, Ingersoll JF, Waggoner TL. Color vision in horses (Equus caballus): deficiencies identified using a pseudoisochromatic plate test.. J Comp Psychol 2007 Feb;121(1):65-72.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.65pubmed: 17324076google scholar: lookup
  10. Macuda T, Timney B. Luminance and chromatic discrimination in the horse (Equus caballus).. Behav Processes 1999 Mar 1;44(3):301-7.
    doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(98)00039-4pubmed: 24897231google scholar: lookup
  11. Pick DF, Lovell G, Brown S, Dail D. Equine color perception revisited. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1994) 42:61–5.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)90007-8google scholar: lookup
  12. Grzimek B. Versuche über das Farbsehen von Pflanzenessern. Z Tierpsychol (1952) 9:23–39.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1952.tb01645.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  13. Timney B, Macuda T. Vision and hearing in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001 May 15;218(10):1567-74.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1567pubmed: 11393366google scholar: lookup
  14. Hanggi EB. Interocular transfer of learning in horses (Equus caballus). J Equine Vet Sci (1999) 19:518–24.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(99)80232-9google scholar: lookup
  15. Hanggi EB, Ingersoll JF. Stimulus discrimination by horses under scotopic conditions.. Behav Processes 2009 Sep;82(1):45-50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.04.009pubmed: 19389464google scholar: lookup
  16. Knill LM, Eagleton RD, Harver E. Physical optics of the equine eye.. Am J Vet Res 1977 Jun;38(6):735-7.
    pubmed: 879572
  17. Roberts SM. Equine vision and optics.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1992 Dec;8(3):451-7.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30435-2pubmed: 1458323google scholar: lookup
  18. Hughes A. The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: comparative optics and retinal organization. In: Crescitelli F, editor. The Visual System in Vertebrates, Vol. 7/5. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. New York, NY: Sringer-Verlag; (1977). p. 613–756.
  19. François J, Wouters L, Victoria-Troncoso V, de Rouck A, van Gerven A. Morphometric and electrophysiologic study of the photoreceptors in the horse.. Ophthalmologica 1980;181(6):340-9.
    doi: 10.1159/000309074pubmed: 7243191google scholar: lookup
  20. Hebel R. Distribution of retinal ganglion cells in five mammalian species (pig, sheep, ox, horse, dog).. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1976 Dec 22;150(1):45-51.
    pubmed: 1015629doi: 10.1007/bf00346285google scholar: lookup
  21. Timney B, Keil K. Local and global stereopsis in the horse.. Vision Res 1999 May;39(10):1861-7.
    doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00276-4pubmed: 10343877google scholar: lookup
  22. Stachurska A, Pieta M, Ussing AP, Kaprón A, Kwiecinska N. Difficulty of cross-country obstacles for horses competing in three day events. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2010) 123:101–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.01.001google scholar: lookup
  23. Stachurska A, Pieta M, Nesteruk E. Which obstacles are most problematic for jumping horses?. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2002) 77:197–207.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00042-4google scholar: lookup
  24. Harman AM, Moore S, Hoskins R, Keller P. Horse vision and an explanation for the visual behaviour originally explained by the 'ramp retina'.. Equine Vet J 1999 Sep;31(5):384-90.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03837.xpubmed: 10505953google scholar: lookup
  25. McGreevy P. Equine Behavior, Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientist. Sydney: Elsevier; (2004).
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2004.08.003google scholar: lookup
  26. Bartos L, Bartosová J, Starostová L. Position of the head is not associated with changes in horse vision.. Equine Vet J 2008 Sep;40(6):599-601.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X332417pubmed: 19031516google scholar: lookup
  27. McGreevy PD, Harman A, McLean A, Hawson L. Over-flexing the horse's neck: a modern equestrian obsession?. J Vet Behav (2010) 5:180–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.03.004google scholar: lookup
  28. Rørvang MV, Christensen JW. Attenuation of fear through social transmission in groups of same and differently aged horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2018) 209:41–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.10.003google scholar: lookup
  29. Wouters L, De Moor A. Ultrastructure of the pigment epithelium and the photoreceptors in the retina of the horse.. Am J Vet Res 1979 Aug;40(8):1066-71.
    pubmed: 525910
  30. Ollivier FJ, Samuelson DA, Brooks DE, Lewis PA, Kallberg ME, Komáromy AM. Comparative morphology of the tapetum lucidum (among selected species).. Vet Ophthalmol 2004 Jan-Feb;7(1):11-22.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2004.00318.xpubmed: 14738502google scholar: lookup
  31. Berger J. Wild Horses of the Great Basin: Social Competition and Population Size. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; (1986).
  32. Mayes E, Duncan P. Temporal patterns of feeding behaviour in free-ranging horses. Behaviour (1986) 96:105–29.
    doi: 10.1163/156853986X00243google scholar: lookup
  33. Saslow CA. Factors affecting stimulus visibility for horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1999) 61:273–84.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00205-6google scholar: lookup
  34. Roth LS, Balkenius A, Kelber A. The absolute threshold of colour vision in the horse.. PLoS One 2008;3(11):e3711.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003711pmc: PMC2577923pubmed: 19002261google scholar: lookup
  35. Hanggi E. Equine cognition and perception: understanding the horse. In: Fujita K, Itakura S, editors. Diversity of Cognition: Evolution, Development, Domestication, and Pathology. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press; (2006). p. 98–118.
  36. Geisbauer G, Griebel U, Schmid A, Timney B. Brightness discrimination and neutral point testing in the horse. Can J Zool (2004) 82:660–70.
    doi: 10.1139/z04-026google scholar: lookup
  37. Roth LS, Balkenius A, Kelber A. Colour perception in a dichromat.. J Exp Biol 2007 Aug;210(Pt 16):2795-800.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.007377pubmed: 17690226google scholar: lookup
  38. Smith S, Goldman L. Color discrimination in horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1999) 62:13–25.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00206-8google scholar: lookup
  39. Stachurska A, Janczarek I, Wilk I, Kedzierski W. Does music influence emotional state in race horses?. J Equine Vet Sci (2015) 35:650–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.06.008google scholar: lookup
  40. Paul SC, Stevens M. Horse vision and obstacle visibility in horseracing.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2020 Jan;222:104882.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104882pmc: PMC6988441pubmed: 32025069google scholar: lookup
  41. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses.. Laterality 2007 Sep;12(5):464-74.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500701495307pubmed: 17712716google scholar: lookup
  42. De Boyer Des Roches A, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S, Ezzaouïa M, Hausberger M. Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects' emotional value.. Physiol Behav 2008 Jun 9;94(3):487-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.03.002pubmed: 18455205google scholar: lookup
  43. Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne RW. Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans.. Anim Cogn 2010 Mar;13(2):229-38.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0260-xpubmed: 19618222google scholar: lookup
  44. McGreevy PD, Rogers LJ. Motor and sensory laterality in thoroughbred horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2005) 92:337–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.012google scholar: lookup
  45. Murphy J, Sutherland A, Arkins S. Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2004) 91:297–310.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.001google scholar: lookup
  46. Heffner HE, Heffner RS. Sound localization in large mammals: localization of complex sounds by horses.. Behav Neurosci 1984 Jun;98(3):541-55.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.98.3.541pubmed: 6732928google scholar: lookup
  47. Heffner RS, Heffner HE. Localization of tones by horses: use of binaural cues and the role of the superior olivary complex.. Behav Neurosci 1986 Feb;100(1):93-103.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.100.1.93pubmed: 3954885google scholar: lookup
  48. Heffner RS, Heffner HE. Hearing in large mammals: horses (Equus caballus) and cattle (Bos taurus). Behav Neurosci (1983) 97:299–309.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.97.2.299google scholar: lookup
  49. Fletcher NH. Sound production and hearing in diverse animals. Acoustics Australia (1985) 13:49–53.
  50. Fletcher NH. A simple frequency-scaling rule for animal communication.. J Acoust Soc Am 2004 May;115(5 Pt 1):2334-8.
    doi: 10.1121/1.1694997pubmed: 15139646google scholar: lookup
  51. Basile M, Boivin S, Boutin A, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M, Lemasson A. Socially dependent auditory laterality in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2009 Jul;12(4):611-9.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0220-5pubmed: 19283416google scholar: lookup
  52. Proops L, McComb K, Reby D. Cross-modal individual recognition in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Jan 20;106(3):947-51.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809127105pmc: PMC2630083pubmed: 19075246google scholar: lookup
  53. Lampe JF, Andre J. Cross-modal recognition of human individuals in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2012 Jul;15(4):623-30.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0490-1pubmed: 22526687google scholar: lookup
  54. Odberg FO. A study of the hearing ability of horses.. Equine Vet J 1978 Apr;10(2):82-4.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1978.tb02225.xpubmed: 648500google scholar: lookup
  55. Heffner RS, Heffner HE. The hearing ability of horses. Equine Pract (1983) 5:27–32.
  56. Wilson WJ, Mills PC, Dzulkarnain AA. Use of BAER to identify loss of auditory function in older horses.. Aust Vet J 2011 Mar;89(3):73-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00682.xpubmed: 21323652google scholar: lookup
  57. Mills D, Redgate S. Behaviour of horses. In: Jensen P, editor. The Ethology of Domestic Animals: An Introductory Text. Oxfordshire: CABI; (2017). p. 169–84.
    doi: 10.1079/9781786391650.0169google scholar: lookup
  58. Magdesian KG, Williams DC, Aleman M, Lecouteur RA, Madigan JE. Evaluation of deafness in American Paint Horses by phenotype, brainstem auditory-evoked responses, and endothelin receptor B genotype.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009 Nov 15;235(10):1204-11.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.235.10.1204pubmed: 19912043google scholar: lookup
  59. APHA (2020). Coat patterns [WWW Document]. Available online at: https://apha.com/ajpha/fun-zone/coat-patterns/ (accessed November 5, 2020).
  60. Nielsen BL. Making sense of it all: the importance of taking into account the sensory abilities of animals in their housing and management. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2018) 205:175–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.04.013google scholar: lookup
  61. Broom DM, Johnson KG. Stress and Animal Welfare. Netherlands: Springer; (1993).
  62. Hemsworth P. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2003) 81:185–98.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0google scholar: lookup
  63. Algers B, Ekesbo I, Strömberg S. The impact of continuous noise on animal health.. Acta Vet Scand Suppl 1978;(68):1-26.
    pubmed: 356566
  64. Stephens DB, Bailey KJ, Sharman DF, Ingram DL. An analysis of some behavioural effects of the vibration and noise components of transport in pigs.. Q J Exp Physiol 1985 Apr;70(2):211-7.
    doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1985.sp002904pubmed: 4011837google scholar: lookup
  65. Talling JC, Waran NK, Wathes CM, Lines JA. Behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to sound. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1996) 48:187–201.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01029-5google scholar: lookup
  66. Grandin T. Factors that impede animal movement at slaughter plants.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996 Aug 15;209(4):757-9.
    pubmed: 8756875
  67. Waynert D, Stookey J, Schwartzkopf-Genswein K, Watts J, Waltz C. The response of beef cattle to noise during handling. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1999) 62:27–42.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00211-1google scholar: lookup
  68. British Horse Society (2015). Advice on Wind Turbines and Horses – Guidance for Planners and Developers. BHS.
  69. Burton T, Sharpe D, Jenkins N, Bossanyi E. Wind Energy Handbook. New York, NY: Wiley; (2001).
  70. Kenison L. The effects of classical music on dairy cattle: a thesis presented to the faculty of alfred university. Fac Alfred Univ (2016) 1–46.
  71. Uetake K, Hurnik JF, Johnson L. Effect of music on voluntary approach of dairy cows to an automatic milking system. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1997) 53:175–82.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01159-8google scholar: lookup
  72. Neveux C, Ferard M, Dickel L, Bouet V, Petit O, Valenchon M. Classical music reduces acute stress of domestic horses. J Vet Behav (2016) 15:81.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2016.08.019google scholar: lookup
  73. Houpt K, Marrow M, Seeliger M. A preliminary study of the effect of music on equine behavior. J Equine Vet Sci (2000) 20:691–4.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(00)80155-0google scholar: lookup
  74. Kedzierski W, Janczarek I, Stachurska A, Wilk I. Comparison of effects of different relaxing massage frequencies and different music hours on reducing stress level in race horses. J Equine Vet Sci (2017) 53:100–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.02.004google scholar: lookup
  75. Lanier JL, Grandin T, Green RD, Avery D, McGee K. The relationship between reaction to sudden, intermittent movements and sounds and temperament.. J Anim Sci 2000 Jun;78(6):1467-74.
    doi: 10.2527/2000.7861467xpubmed: 10875628google scholar: lookup
  76. Talling JC, Lines JA, Wathes CM, Waran NK. The acoustic environment of the domestic pig. J Agric Eng Res (1998) 71:1–12.
    doi: 10.1006/jaer.1998.0291google scholar: lookup
  77. Bregman MR, Iversen JR, Lichman D, Reinhart M, Patel AD. A method for testing synchronization to a musical beat in domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus). Empir Musicol Rev (2013) 7:144.
    doi: 10.18061/emr.v7i3-4.3745google scholar: lookup
  78. ProductsSonicTechnology nRodent RepellerTM [WWW Document]. (2019). Available online at: https://www.sonictechnologyproducts.com/rodentrepeller-faq (accessed November 25, 2019).
  79. DTMcare nUltrasonic Electronic High Power Pest Repeller [WWW Document]. (2019). Available online at: http://www.dtmcare.com/pest-repeller/pestkicker-high-power-supersonic-pest-repeller/ (accessed November 25, 2019).
  80. Merkies K, Paraschou G, McGreevy PD. Morphometric Characteristics of the Skull in Horses and Donkeys-A Pilot Study.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 8;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061002pmc: PMC7341236pubmed: 32521777google scholar: lookup
  81. Papes F, Logan DW, Stowers L. The vomeronasal organ mediates interspecies defensive behaviors through detection of protein pheromone homologs.. Cell 2010 May 14;141(4):692-703.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.037pmc: PMC2873972pubmed: 20478258google scholar: lookup
  82. Marinier SL, Alexander AJ, Waring GH. Flehmen behaviour in the domestic horse: discrimination of conspecific odours. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1988) 19:227–37.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90003-2google scholar: lookup
  83. Briant C, Gaudé Y, Bruneau B, Yvon JM, Guillaume D, Bouakkaz A. Olfaction is not absolutely necessary for detection of the estrous mare by the stallion. In: International Symposium on Equine Reproduction, 25-31 July 2010. Lexington, KY: Animal Reproduction Science: (2010). p. 120–2.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.04.084google scholar: lookup
  84. Jezierski T, Jaworski Z, Sobczyńska M, Ensminger J, Górecka-Bruzda A. Do olfactory behaviour and marking responses of Konik polski stallions to faeces from conspecifics of either sex differ?. Behav Processes 2018 Oct;155:38-42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.015pubmed: 28962880google scholar: lookup
  85. Rampin O, Jérôme N, Briant C, Boué F, Maurin Y. Are oestrus odours species specific?. Behav Brain Res 2006 Sep 15;172(1):169-72.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.04.005pubmed: 16740322google scholar: lookup
  86. Krueger K, Flauger B. Olfactory recognition of individual competitors by means of faeces in horse (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2011 Mar;14(2):245-57.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0358-1pubmed: 21132447google scholar: lookup
  87. Hothersall B, Harris P, Sörtoft L, Nicol CJ. Discrimination between conspecific odour samples in the horse (Equus caballus). Appl Anim Behav Sci (2010) 126:37–44.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.002google scholar: lookup
  88. Péron F, Ward R, Burman O. Horses (Equus caballus) discriminate body odour cues from conspecifics.. Anim Cogn 2014 Jul;17(4):1007-11.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0717-9pubmed: 24305997google scholar: lookup
  89. Rubenstein DI, Hack MA. Horse signals: the sounds and scents of fury. Evol Ecol (1992) 6:254–60.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02214165google scholar: lookup
  90. Stahlbaum CC, Houpt KA. The role of the Flehmen response in the behavioral repertoire of the stallion.. Physiol Behav 1989 Jun;45(6):1207-14.
    doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(89)90111-Xpubmed: 2813545google scholar: lookup
  91. Deshpande K, Furton KG, Mills DEK. The equine volatilome: volatile organic compounds as discriminatory markers. J Equine Vet Sci (2018) 62:47–53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.05.013google scholar: lookup
  92. Wyatt TD. Semiochemicals: pheromones, signature mixtures and behaviour. In: Nielsen BL, editor. Olfaction in Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Oxfordshire: CABI; (2017). p. 26–38.
    doi: 10.1079/9781786391599.0026google scholar: lookup
  93. Wyatt TD. Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates.. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2010 Oct;196(10):685-700.
    doi: 10.1007/s00359-010-0564-ypubmed: 20680632google scholar: lookup
  94. Bombail V, Jerôme N, Lam H, Muszlak S, Meddle SL, Lawrence AB, Nielsen BL. Odour conditioning of positive affective states: Rats can learn to associate an odour with being tickled.. PLoS One 2019;14(6):e0212829.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212829pmc: PMC6561538pubmed: 31188832google scholar: lookup
  95. Falewee C, Gaultier E, Lafont C, Bougrat L, Pageat P. Effect of a synthetic equine maternal pheromone during a controlled fear-eliciting situation. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2006) 101:144–53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.01.008google scholar: lookup
  96. Collyer PB, Wilson HS. Does a commercial pheromone application reduce separation anxiety in separated horse pairs?. J Vet Behav (2016) 15:94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2016.08.064google scholar: lookup
  97. Berger JM, Spier SJ, Davies R, Gardner IA, Leutenegger CM, Bain M. Behavioral and physiological responses of weaned foals treated with equine appeasing pheromone : a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res (2013) 8:265–77.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2012.09.003google scholar: lookup
  98. Brennan PA, Kendrick KM. Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2061-78.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1931pmc: PMC1764843pubmed: 17118924google scholar: lookup
  99. Müller-Schwarze D, Müller-Schwarze C. Olfactory imprinting in a precocial mammal.. Nature 1971 Jan 1;229(5279):55-6.
    doi: 10.1038/229055a0pubmed: 4922790google scholar: lookup
  100. Nielsen BL. Innateness and learning in olfactory behaviour and odour perception. In: Nielsen BL, editor. Olfaction in Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Oxfordshire: CABI; (2017). p. 16–25.
    doi: 10.1079/9781786391599.0016google scholar: lookup
  101. Chamaillé-Jammes S, Malcuit H, Le Saout S, Martin JL. Innate threat-sensitive foraging: black-tailed deer remain more fearful of wolf than of the less dangerous black bear even after 100 years of wolf absence.. Oecologia 2014 Apr;174(4):1151-8.
    doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2843-0pubmed: 24288079google scholar: lookup
  102. Christensen JW, Keeling LJ, Nielsen BL. Responses of horses to novel visual, olfactory and auditory stimuli. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2005) 93:53–65.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.06.017google scholar: lookup
  103. Christensen JW, Rundgren M. Predator odour per se does not frighten domestic horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2008) 112:136–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.003google scholar: lookup
  104. Keeling LJ, Jonare L, Lanneborn L. Investigating horse-human interactions: the effect of a nervous human.. Vet J 2009 Jul;181(1):70-1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.013pubmed: 19394879google scholar: lookup
  105. von Borstel UU. Fear in Horses and Riders: Two Hearts Living in Just One Mind. The Influence of Rider, Training and Genetics on Horses' Fear. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller; (2008).
  106. Hama H, Yogo M, Matsuyama Y. Effects of stroking horses on both humans' and horses' heart rate responses. Jpn Psychol Res (1996) 38:66–73.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.1996.tb00009.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  107. Merkies K, Sievers A, Zakrajsek E, MacGregor H, Bergeron R, von Borstel UK. Preliminary results suggest an influence of psychological and physiological stress in humans on horse heart rate and behavior. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res (2014) 9:242–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.06.003google scholar: lookup
  108. Chamove AS, Crawley-Hartrick OJE, Stafford KJ. Horse reactions to human attitudes and behavior. Anthrozoos (2002) 15:323–31.
    doi: 10.2752/089279302786992423google scholar: lookup
  109. Sabiniewicz A, Tarnowska K, Swiatek R, Sorokowski P, Laska M. Olfactory-based interspecific recognition of human emotions: horses (Equus ferus caballus) can recognize fear and happiness body odour from humans (Homo sapiens). Appl Anim Behav Sci (2020) 2020:105072.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105072google scholar: lookup
  110. Rekwot PI, Ogwu D, Oyedipe EO, Sekoni VO. The role of pheromones and biostimulation in animal reproduction.. Anim Reprod Sci 2001 Mar 30;65(3-4):157-70.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00223-2pubmed: 11267796google scholar: lookup
  111. Dorries KM, Adkins-Regan E, Halpern BP. Sensitivity and behavioral responses to the pheromone androstenone are not mediated by the vomeronasal organ in domestic pigs.. Brain Behav Evol 1997;49(1):53-62.
    doi: 10.1159/000112981pubmed: 8980852google scholar: lookup
  112. Frye CA, Edinger KL. Testosterone's metabolism in the hippocampus may mediate its anti-anxiety effects in male rats.. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2004 Jul;78(3):473-81.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.04.019pubmed: 15251256google scholar: lookup
  113. Holcombe S, Ducharme G. Chapter 26 - upper airway function of normal horses during exercise. In: Hinchcliff K, Kaneps A, Geor R, editors. Equine Sports Medicine and Surgery. London: Elsevier; (2004). p. 541–58.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-2671-3.50030-1google scholar: lookup
  114. Randall RP, Schurg WA, Church DC. Response of horses to sweet, salty, sour and bitter solutions.. J Anim Sci 1978 Jul;47(1):51-5.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1978.47151xpubmed: 711642google scholar: lookup
  115. Janczarek I, Wilk I, Pietrzak S, Liss M, Tkaczyk S. Taste Preferences of Horses in Relation to Their Breed and Sex.. J Equine Vet Sci 2018 May;64:59-64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.02.010pubmed: 30973154google scholar: lookup
  116. Goodwin D, Davidson HPB, Harris P. Selection and acceptance of flavours in concentrate diets for stabled horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2005) 95:223–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.007google scholar: lookup
  117. van den Berg M, Giagos V, Lee C, Brown WY, Cawdell-Smith AJ, Hinch GN. The influence of odour, taste and nutrients on feeding behaviour and food preferences in horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2016) 184:41–50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.08.015google scholar: lookup
  118. Pfister JA, Stegelmeier BL, Cheney CD, Ralphs MH, Gardner DR. Conditioning taste aversions to locoweed (Oxytropis sericea) in horses.. J Anim Sci 2002 Jan;80(1):79-83.
    doi: 10.2527/2002.80179xpubmed: 11831531google scholar: lookup
  119. Houpt KA, Zahorik DM, Swartzman-Andert JA. Taste aversion learning in horses.. J Anim Sci 1990 Aug;68(8):2340-4.
    doi: 10.2527/1990.6882340xpubmed: 2401656google scholar: lookup
  120. Mills D, Nankervis K. Equine Behaviour: principles and practice. (1999). Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.
  121. Monteiro-Riviere NA, Bristol DG, Manning TO, Rogers RA, Riviere JE. Interspecies and interregional analysis of the comparative histologic thickness and laser Doppler blood flow measurements at five cutaneous sites in nine species.. J Invest Dermatol 1990 Nov;95(5):582-6.
    doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12505567pubmed: 2230221google scholar: lookup
  122. Love EJ, Murrell J, Whay HR. Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in horses: a review.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011 Jan;38(1):3-14.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00580.xpubmed: 21214705google scholar: lookup
  123. Haussler KK, Erb HN. Mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the axial skeleton of horses.. Equine Vet J 2006 Jan;38(1):70-5.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374315pubmed: 16411590google scholar: lookup
  124. Haussler KK, Erb HN. Pressure algometry for the detection of induced back pain in horses: a preliminary study.. Equine Vet J 2006 Jan;38(1):76-81.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374225pubmed: 16411591google scholar: lookup
  125. Christensen JW, McLean A, Ladewig J. From Pavlov to Bekhterev - and the pros and cons of positive and negative reinforcement. In: Proceedings of the 51st Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology (ISAE), arhus: (2017).
  126. Fenner K, Yoon S, White P, Starling M, McGreevy P. The Effect of Noseband Tightening on Horses' Behavior, Eye Temperature, and Cardiac Responses.. PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0154179.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154179pmc: PMC4854461pubmed: 27140187google scholar: lookup
  127. McGreevy P, Warren-Smith A, Guisard Y. The effect of double bridles and jaw-clamping crank nosebands on temperature of eyes and facial skin of horses. J Vet Behav (2012) 7:142–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.001google scholar: lookup
  128. Mogil JS, Ritchie J, Smith SB, Strasburg K, Kaplan L, Wallace MR, Romberg RR, Bijl H, Sarton EY, Fillingim RB, Dahan A. Melanocortin-1 receptor gene variants affect pain and mu-opioid analgesia in mice and humans.. J Med Genet 2005 Jul;42(7):583-7.
    doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.027698pmc: PMC1736101pubmed: 15994880google scholar: lookup
  129. Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Barneveld A, Schamhardt HC. Effects of weight and riding on workload and locomotion during treadmill exercise. Equine Vet J Suppl (1995) 18:413–7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb04963.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  130. Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL, Schamhardt HC, van Wessum R. The effects of a rider's mass on ground reaction forces and fetlock kinematics at the trot.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Jul;(30):218-21.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05221.xpubmed: 10659255google scholar: lookup
  131. Terada K, Mullineaux DR, Lanovaz J, Kato K, Clayton HM. Electromyographic analysis of the rider's muscles at trot. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol (2004) 1:193–8.
    doi: 10.1079/ECEP20042google scholar: lookup
  132. Münz A, Eckardt F, Witte K. Horse-rider interaction in dressage riding.. Hum Mov Sci 2014 Feb;33:227-37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.09.003pubmed: 24290612google scholar: lookup
  133. Engell MT, Clayton HM, Egenvall A, Weishaupt MA, Roepstorff L. Postural changes and their effects in elite riders when actively influencing the horse versus sitting passively at trot. Comp Exerc Physiol (2016) 12:27–33.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP150035google scholar: lookup
  134. Crowell-Davis SL, Houpt KA, Carini CM. Mutual grooming and nearest-neighbor relationships among foals of Equus caballus. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1986) 15:113–23.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(86)90057-2google scholar: lookup
  135. Moehlman PD. Behavioral patterns and communication in feral asses (Equus africanus). Appl Anim Behav Sci (1998) 60:125–69.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00162-2google scholar: lookup
  136. Feh C, de Mazières J. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses. Anim Behav (1993) 46:1191–4.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1309google scholar: lookup
  137. Keiper RR. Social interactions of the Przewalski horse (Equus przewalskii Poliakov, 1881) herd at the Munich Zoo. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1988) 21:89–97.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90102-5google scholar: lookup
  138. Normando S, Haverbeke A, Meers L, Odberg FO, Ibáñez Talegón M, Bono G. Effect of manual imitation of grooming on riding horses' heart rate in different environmental situations.. Vet Res Commun 2003 Sep;27 Suppl 1:615-7.
    doi: 10.1023/B:VERC.0000014230.52006.dfpubmed: 14535480google scholar: lookup
  139. Thorbergson ZW, Nielsen SG, Beaulieu RJ, Doyle RE. Physiological and Behavioral Responses of Horses to Wither Scratching and Patting the Neck When Under Saddle.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):245-59.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1130630pubmed: 26958705google scholar: lookup
  140. Christensen JW. Early-life object exposure with a habituated mother reduces fear reactions in foals.. Anim Cogn 2016 Jan;19(1):171-9.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0924-7pubmed: 26395986google scholar: lookup
  141. McGreevy P, McLean A. Equitation Science, First. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; (2010).
  142. McLean AN. Overshadowing: a silver lining to a dark cloud in horse training.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2008;11(3):236-48.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101064pubmed: 18569221google scholar: lookup
  143. Berridge KC. Reward learning: reinforcement, incentives, and expectations. In: Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory Cambridge: Academic Press (2000). p. 223–78.
    doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(00)80022-5google scholar: lookup
  144. McLean AN, Christensen JW. The application of learning theory in horse training. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2017) 190:18–27.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.020google scholar: lookup
  145. Farmer K, Krüger K, Byrne RW, Marr I. Sensory laterality in affiliative interactions in domestic horses and ponies (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2018 Sep;21(5):631-637.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1196-9pmc: PMC6097077pubmed: 29948296google scholar: lookup
  146. Smith MC, Stallings MA, Mariner S, Burrall M. Benefits of massage therapy for hospitalized patients: a descriptive and qualitative evaluation.. Altern Ther Health Med 1999 Jul;5(4):64-71.
    pubmed: 10394676
  147. McBride S, Hemmings A, Robinson K. A preliminary study on the effect of massage to reduce stress in the horse. J Equine Vet Sci (2004) 24:76–81.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2004.01.014google scholar: lookup
  148. Lange A, Franzmayr S, Wisenöcker V, Futschik A, Waiblinger S, Lürzel S. Effects of Different Stroking Styles on Behaviour and Cardiac Parameters in Heifers.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 4;10(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030426pmc: PMC7143138pubmed: 32143274google scholar: lookup
  149. Anderberg UM, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Plasma oxytocin levels in female fibromyalgia syndrome patients.. Z Rheumatol 2000 Dec;59(6):373-9.
    doi: 10.1007/s003930070045pubmed: 11201002google scholar: lookup
  150. Beckmann H, Lang RE, Gattaz WF. Vasopressin--oxytocin in cerebrospinal fluid of schizophrenic patients and normal controls.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1985;10(2):187-91.
    doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(85)90056-3pubmed: 4034849google scholar: lookup
  151. Uvnäs-Moberg K, Arn I, Theorell T, Jonsson CO. Gastrin, somatostatin and oxytocin levels in patients with functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract and their response to feeding and interaction.. J Psychosom Res 1991;35(4-5):525-33.
    doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(91)90047-Rpubmed: 1681097google scholar: lookup
  152. Kendrick KM, Keverne EB, Baldwin BA, Sharman DF. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of acetylcholinesterase, monoamines and oxytocin during labour, parturition, vaginocervical stimulation, lamb separation and suckling in sheep.. Neuroendocrinology 1986;44(2):149-56.
    doi: 10.1159/000124638pubmed: 3796790google scholar: lookup
  153. Sansone GR, Gerdes CA, Steinman JL, Winslow JT, Ottenweller JE, Komisaruk BR, Insel TR. Vaginocervical stimulation releases oxytocin within the spinal cord in rats.. Neuroendocrinology 2002 May;75(5):306-15.
    doi: 10.1159/000057340pubmed: 12006784google scholar: lookup
  154. Stock S, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Increased plasma levels of oxytocin in response to afferent electrical stimulation of the sciatic and vagal nerves and in response to touch and pinch in anaesthetized rats.. Acta Physiol Scand 1988 Jan;132(1):29-34.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08294.xpubmed: 3223304google scholar: lookup
  155. Watson JC, McDonnell SM. Effects of three non-confrontational handling techniques on the behavior of horses during a simulated mildly aversive veterinary procedure. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2018) 203:19–23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.02.007google scholar: lookup
  156. Beck L, Madresh EA. Romantic partners and four-legged friends: an extension of attachment theory to relationships with pets. Anthrozoos (2008) 21:43–56.
    doi: 10.2752/089279308X274056google scholar: lookup
  157. Odendaal JS, Meintjes RA. Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behaviour between humans and dogs.. Vet J 2003 May;165(3):296-301.
    doi: 10.1016/S1090-0233(02)00237-Xpubmed: 12672376google scholar: lookup
  158. Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Csányi V. Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies. Anim Behav (2005) 70:1367–75.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.025google scholar: lookup
  159. McGreevy PD, McLean AN. Arousal, attachment and affective state. In: 9th Conference of The International Society for Equitation Science. Newark, NJ: (2013).
  160. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Blokhuis MZ, Morgan EK, Hassmén P, Rundgren TM, Blokhuis HJ. Does horse temperament influence horse-rider cooperation?. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2008;11(3):267-84.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101254pubmed: 18569223google scholar: lookup
  161. Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, Keefe FJ, Mogil JS, Ringkamp M, Sluka KA, Song XJ, Stevens B, Sullivan MD, Tutelman PR, Ushida T, Vader K. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises.. Pain 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982.
    doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939pmc: PMC7680716pubmed: 32694387google scholar: lookup
  162. McGreevy PD, Hawson LA, Salvin H, McLean AN. A note on the force of whip impacts delivered by jockeys using forehand and backhand strikes. J Vet Behav (2013) 8:395–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.03.003google scholar: lookup
  163. McKillop IG, Sibly RM. Animal behaviour at electric fences and the implications for management. Mamm Rev (1998) 16:91–103.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1988.tb00078.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  164. Whiting TL. Pain in human and non-human animals caused by electricity.. Can Vet J 2016 Aug;57(8):883-6.
    pmc: PMC4944569pubmed: 27493291
  165. Perl ER. Pain mechanisms: a commentary on concepts and issues.. Prog Neurobiol 2011 Jun;94(1):20-38.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.03.001pmc: PMC3138063pubmed: 21419824google scholar: lookup
  166. Lagerweij E, Nelis PC, Wiegant VM, van Ree JM. The twitch in horses: a variant of acupuncture.. Science 1984 Sep 14;225(4667):1172-4.
    doi: 10.1126/science.6089344pubmed: 6089344google scholar: lookup
  167. McGreevy PD. Handling and transport. In: Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientist. Sydney: Saunders Elsevier; (2012). p. 307–23.
  168. Lansade L, Pichard G, Leconte M. Sensory sensitivities: components of a horse's temperament dimension. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2008) 114:534–53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.02.012google scholar: lookup
  169. Briefer Freymond S, Bardou D, Beuret S, Bachmann I, Zuberbühler K, Briefer EF. Elevated Sensitivity to Tactile Stimuli in Stereotypic Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:162.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00162pmc: PMC6593280pubmed: 31275947google scholar: lookup
  170. Hall C, Goodwin D, Heleski C, Randle H, Waran N. Is there evidence of learned helplessness in horses?. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2008;11(3):249-66.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101130pubmed: 18569222google scholar: lookup
  171. Dunn W. The sensations of everyday life: empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations.. Am J Occup Ther 2001 Nov-Dec;55(6):608-20.
    doi: 10.5014/ajot.55.6.608pubmed: 12959225google scholar: lookup
  172. Murphy JA. Describing categories of temperament in potential guide dogs for the blind. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1998) 58:163–78.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00047-6google scholar: lookup
  173. Finkemeier MA, Langbein J, Puppe B. Personality Research in Mammalian Farm Animals: Concepts, Measures, and Relationship to Welfare.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:131.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00131pmc: PMC6031753pubmed: 30003083google scholar: lookup
  174. Mills DS. Personality and individual differences in the horse, their significance, use and measurement.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1998 Nov;(27):10-3.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb05137.xpubmed: 10484996google scholar: lookup
  175. Larose C, Richard-Yris MA, Hausberger M, Rogers LJ. Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations.. Laterality 2006 Jul;11(4):355-67.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500600624221pubmed: 16754236google scholar: lookup
  176. Arnold W, Ruf T, Kuntz R. Seasonal adjustment of energy budget in a large wild mammal, the Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) II. Energy expenditure.. J Exp Biol 2006 Nov;209(Pt 22):4566-73.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.02536pubmed: 17079726google scholar: lookup
  177. Kuntz R, Kubalek C, Ruf T, Tataruch F, Arnold W. Seasonal adjustment of energy budget in a large wild mammal, the Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii) I. Energy intake.. J Exp Biol 2006 Nov;209(Pt 22):4557-65.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.02535pubmed: 17079725google scholar: lookup
  178. Brinkmann L, Gerken M, Hambly C, Speakman JR, Riek A. Saving energy during hard times: energetic adaptations of Shetland pony mares.. J Exp Biol 2014 Dec 15;217(Pt 24):4320-7.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.111815pubmed: 25359931google scholar: lookup
  179. Brinkmann L, Gerken M, Riek A. Adaptation strategies to seasonal changes in environmental conditions of a domesticated horse breed, the Shetland pony (Equus ferus caballus).. J Exp Biol 2012 Apr 1;215(Pt 7):1061-8.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.064832pubmed: 22399650google scholar: lookup
  180. Martin AM, Elliott JA, Duffy P, Blake CM, Ben Attia S, Katz LM, Browne JA, Gath V, McGivney BA, Hill EW, Murphy BA. Circadian regulation of locomotor activity and skeletal muscle gene expression in the horse.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2010 Nov;109(5):1328-36.
    doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01327.2009pubmed: 20847133google scholar: lookup
  181. Murphy BA. Circadian and Circannual Regulation in the Horse: Internal Timing in an Elite Athlete.. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 May;76:14-24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.026pubmed: 31084748google scholar: lookup
  182. Murphy BA, Walsh CM, Woodward EM, Prendergast RL, Ryle JP, Fallon LH, Troedsson MH. Blue light from individual light masks directed at a single eye advances the breeding season in mares.. Equine Vet J 2014 Sep;46(5):601-5.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12153pubmed: 23909505google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 27 times.
  1. Olczak K, Penar W, Nowicki J, Magiera A, Klocek C. The Role of Sound in Livestock Farming-Selected Aspects. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jul 14;13(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13142307pubmed: 37508083google scholar: lookup
  2. Hole C, Murray R, Marlin D, Freeman P. Equine Behavioural and Physiological Responses to Auditory Stimuli in the Presence and Absence of Noise-Damping Ear Covers. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 8;13(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13091574pubmed: 37174609google scholar: lookup
  3. Kappel S, Ramirez Montes De Oca MA, Collins S, Herborn K, Mendl M, Fureix C. Do you see what I see? Testing horses' ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections. Anim Cogn 2023 Jul;26(4):1147-1159.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6pubmed: 36864246google scholar: lookup
  4. Schubert CL, Ryckewaert B, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T. Garrano Horses Perceive Letters of the Alphabet on a Touchscreen System: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 12;12(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12243514pubmed: 36552434google scholar: lookup
  5. Harvey AM, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 1;12(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12233385pubmed: 36496906google scholar: lookup
  6. Janicka W, Wilk I, Próchniak T, Janczarek I. Can Sound Alone Act as a Virtual Barrier for Horses? A Preliminary Study. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 15;12(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12223151pubmed: 36428379google scholar: lookup
  7. Popescu S, Lazar EA, Borda C, Blaga Petrean A, Mitrănescu E. Changes in Management, Welfare, Emotional State, and Human-Related Docility in Stallions. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 30;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212981pubmed: 36359105google scholar: lookup
  8. Merkies K, Sudarenko Y, Hodder AJ. Can Ponies (Equus Caballus) Distinguish Human Facial Expressions?. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 7;12(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12182331pubmed: 36139191google scholar: lookup
  9. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar Schmidt C, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Earley B, Edwards S, Faucitano L, Marti S, Miranda de La Lama GC, Costa LN, Thomsen PT, Ashe S, Mur L, Van der Stede Y, Herskin M. Welfare of equidae during transport. EFSA J 2022 Sep;20(9):e07444.
    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7444pubmed: 36092762google scholar: lookup
  10. Rørvang MV, Nicova K, Yngvesson J. Horse odor exploration behavior is influenced by pregnancy and age. Front Behav Neurosci 2022;16:941517.
    doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.941517pubmed: 35967896google scholar: lookup
  11. Stachurska A, Tkaczyk E, Różańska-Boczula M, Janicka W, Janczarek I. Horses' Response to a Novel Diet: Different Herbs Added to Dry, Wet or Wet-Sweetened Oats. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 24;12(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12111334pubmed: 35681799google scholar: lookup
  12. Wiśniewska A, Janczarek I, Ryżak M, Tkaczyk E, Kędzierski W. Behavioural responses of Konik Polski horses to natural, familiar sound of thunderstorm, and unfamiliar similar-sounding sounds of volcanic eruption and sea storms. BMC Vet Res 2022 May 30;18(1):207.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03314-4pubmed: 35637528google scholar: lookup
  13. Buzek A, Serwańska-Leja K, Zaworska-Zakrzewska A, Kasprowicz-Potocka M. The Shape of the Nasal Cavity and Adaptations to Sniffing in the Dog (Canis familiaris) Compared to Other Domesticated Mammals: A Review Article. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 19;12(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12040517pubmed: 35203225google scholar: lookup
  14. Rørvang MV, Ničová K, Sassner H, Nawroth C. Horses' (Equus caballus) Ability to Solve Visible but Not Invisible Displacement Tasks Is Associated With Frustration Behavior and Heart Rate. Front Behav Neurosci 2021;15:792035.
    doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.792035pubmed: 34955782google scholar: lookup
  15. Merkies K, Franzin O. Enhanced Understanding of Horse-Human Interactions to Optimize Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 9;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051347pubmed: 34065156google scholar: lookup
  16. Górski K, Kondracki S, Kępka-Borkowska K. The Complexity of Communication in Mammals: From Social and Emotional Mechanisms to Human Influence and Multimodal Applications. Animals (Basel) 2026 Jan 15;16(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani16020265pubmed: 41594455google scholar: lookup
  17. Jardat P, Destrez A, Damon F, Tanguy-Guillo N, Lainé AL, Parias C, Reigner F, Ferreira VHB, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Human emotional odours influence horses' behaviour and physiology. PLoS One 2026;21(1):e0337948.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337948pubmed: 41533708google scholar: lookup
  18. Roth LSV, McGreevy P. Horse vision through two lenses: Tinbergen's Four Questions and the Five Domains. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1647911.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1647911pubmed: 40895790google scholar: lookup
  19. Pattaro A, Ghibaudi M, Corrente C, Telitsyn N, Graic JM, Aresu L, Sherwood CC, Bonfanti L. Phylogenetic variation of layer II cortical immature neurons in dog and horse confirms covariance with brain size and neocortical surface. Brain Struct Funct 2025 Jul 7;230(6):115.
    doi: 10.1007/s00429-025-02981-xpubmed: 40622463google scholar: lookup
  20. da Fé VCS, Dos Santos VMO, de Lima ACB, Hernandes MSP, Caldara FR, Gomes MNB. Auditory enrichment on facial and physiological responses of Pantaneiro geldings and mares under short-term stress. PLoS One 2025;20(5):e0323649.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323649pubmed: 40392914google scholar: lookup
  21. Torres Borda L, Auer U, Jenner F. The role of space availability and affiliation in shaping equine social distances and dynamics. Sci Rep 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10273.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92943-4pubmed: 40133443google scholar: lookup
  22. Haussler KK, le Jeune SS, MacKechnie-Guire R, Latif SN, Clayton HM. The Challenge of Defining Laterality in Horses: Is It Laterality or Just Asymmetry?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 21;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030288pubmed: 39943060google scholar: lookup
  23. Fiedler JM, Ayre ML, Rosanowski S, Slater JD. Horses are worthy of care: Horse sector participants' attitudes towards animal sentience, welfare, and well-being. Anim Welf 2025;34:e6.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.69pubmed: 39935777google scholar: lookup
  24. Bonnechère B. Animals as Architects: Building the Future of Technology-Supported Rehabilitation with Biomimetic Principles. Biomimetics (Basel) 2024 Nov 22;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9120723pubmed: 39727727google scholar: lookup
  25. Wu R, Deussen O, Couzin ID, Li L. Non-invasive eye tracking and retinal view reconstruction in free swimming schooling fish. Commun Biol 2024 Dec 12;7(1):1636.
    doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07322-ypubmed: 39668195google scholar: lookup
  26. Bogossian PM, Pereira JS, da Silva NF, Hilgert AR, Seidel SRT, Fülber J, Belli CB, Fernandes WR. Social facilitation of trotting: Can horses perceive and adapt to the movement of another horse?. PLoS One 2024;19(8):e0309474.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309474pubmed: 39186726google scholar: lookup
  27. Bini de Lima AC, Sebastião da Fé VC, Palermo Hernandes MS, Oliveira Dos Santos VM. Olfactory Stimulation as Environmental Enrichment for Domestic Horses-A Review. Animals (Basel) 2023 Oct 12;13(20).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13203180pubmed: 37893904google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,727 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.