Analyze Diet
Veterinary immunology and immunopathology1996; 55(1-3); 33-43; doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(96)05618-8

Separation of equine IgG subclasses (IgGa, IgGb and IgG(T)) using their differential binding characteristics for staphylococcal protein A and streptococcal protein G.

Abstract: Equine IgG possesses four well-defined subisotypes, designated IgGa, IgGb, IgGc and IgG(T) on the basis of their increasing anodal mobility in electrophoresis. However, the preparation of IgGa and IgGb reference proteins has not previously been reported. Certain bacterial cell wall proteins, termed protein A and protein G, have been used for purification of IgG subisotypes from the serum of domestic animals which, combined with other techniques utilising differences in the physico-chemical properties of the proteins, has allowed the purification of Ig isotypes. This paper describes purification of the subisotypes of equine IgG. Purification of IgGa and IgGb was achieved by the separation of a 'fall-through' peak from ion-exchange chromatography consisting of IgGa and IgGb into two fractions (peaks C and D) by FPLC protein A and protein G affinity chromatography. Peak C consisted of IgGb and peak D consisted of IgGa exhibiting slightly faster cathodal migration than peak C in IEP analysis. Affinity chromatography using protein A and G columns also indicated that there may be two different components of IgG(T); one with a low affinity for protein G and the other having a greater affinity for protein G.
Publication Date: 1996-12-01 PubMed ID: 9014304DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2427(96)05618-8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores a method for separating subclasses of equine IgG (a type of immunoglobulin) using bacterial proteins A and G. It reveals that these proteins can purify specific subclasses from the horse serum, giving separate peaks in chromatography for further analysis.

Background

  • Immunoglobulins, also known as antibodies, are important proteins produced by the immune system to combat pathogens. IgG or Immunoglobulin G is a class of these antibodies.
  • In horses, IgG has four subtypes: IgGa, IgGb, IgGc, and IgG(T), differentiated by their movement in electrophoresis, a technique used to separate molecules.
  • The research focuses on IgGa and IgGb because previously there were no reported methods for their separate preparation.

Use of Bacterial Proteins A and G

  • Proteins A and G, derived from bacterial cell walls, have known affinities for IgGs. They have been utilized in the past to purify IgG subtypes from animal serum.
  • In this study, these proteins were used in combination with other techniques based on the physical and chemical properties of the proteins to purify equine IgG subtypes.

Findings

  • IgGa and IgGb were purified by separating the ‘fall-through’ peak from ion-exchange chromatography using FPLC (Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography) protein A and protein G affinity chromatography. Ion-exchange chromatography is a process that separates ions and polar molecules based on their charge.
  • This separation process resulted in two distinct peaks, C and D. Peak C consisted of IgGb and peak D consisted of IgGa, which showed slightly faster movement than peak C in IEP (Isoelectric Point) analysis. The isoelectric point is the pH value at which a particular molecule carries no net electrical charge.
  • Additionally, the technique revealed potentially two different components within IgG(T). One had a low affinity for protein G whereas the other showed greater affinity.

Impact

  • The findings build upon the understanding of equine IgG classes, specifically IgGa and IgGb, providing a clear method for their separation and preparation for further studies.
  • The revelation about two distinct components within the IgG(T) subtype adds a new dimension to our understanding of equine immune response and these IgG subclasses.

Cite This Article

APA
Sheoran AS, Holmes MA. (1996). Separation of equine IgG subclasses (IgGa, IgGb and IgG(T)) using their differential binding characteristics for staphylococcal protein A and streptococcal protein G. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 55(1-3), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-2427(96)05618-8

Publication

ISSN: 0165-2427
NlmUniqueID: 8002006
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 55
Issue: 1-3
Pages: 33-43

Researcher Affiliations

Sheoran, A S
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK.
Holmes, M A

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Antigens, Bacterial / immunology
    • Bacterial Proteins / immunology
    • Binding Sites, Antibody
    • Horses
    • Immunoglobulin G / classification
    • Immunoglobulin Isotypes / isolation & purification
    • Molecular Weight
    • Staphylococcal Protein A / immunology
    • Streptococcus / immunology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 3 times.
    1. Lewis MJ, Wagner B, Woof JM. The different effector function capabilities of the seven equine IgG subclasses have implications for vaccine strategies. Mol Immunol 2008 Feb;45(3):818-27.
      doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.06.158pubmed: 17669496google scholar: lookup
    2. Hooper-McGrevy KE, Wilkie BN, Prescott JF. Immunoglobulin G subisotype responses of pneumonic and healthy, exposed foals and adult horses to Rhodococcus equi virulence-associated proteins. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003 May;10(3):345-51.
    3. Peri Ibáñez ES, Mazzeo A, Silva C, Juncos MJ, Costa Navarro GS, Pallarés HM, Wolos VJ, Fiszman GL, Mundo SL, Caramelo JJ, Yanovsky MJ, Fingermann M, Castello AA, Gamarnik AV, Peinetti AS, Capdevila DA. Overcoming Limited Access to Virus Infection Rapid Testing: Development of a Lateral Flow Test for SARS-CoV-2 with Locally Available Resources. Biosensors (Basel) 2024 Aug 27;14(9).
      doi: 10.3390/bios14090416pubmed: 39329791google scholar: lookup