Analyze Diet
Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2014; 21(4); 478-483; doi: 10.1128/CVI.00649-13

Serodiagnosis of equine leptospirosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using four recombinant protein markers.

Abstract: Leptospirosis, caused by Leptospira spp., is one of the most common zoonotic diseases in the world. We tested four recombinant proteins of Leptospira interrogans, namely, rLipL21, rLoa22, rLipL32, and rLigACon4-8, to evaluate their potential for use as antigens for the diagnosis of equine leptospirosis. We employed equine sera (n = 130) that were microscopic agglutination test (MAT) negative and sera (n = 176) that were MAT positive for the 5 serovars that most commonly cause equine leptospirosis. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA compared to MAT were 82.39% and 86.15%, respectively, for LigACon4-8, 77.84% and 92.31%, respectively, for Loa22, 77.84% and 86.15%, respectively, for LipL32, and 84.66% and 83.85%, respectively, for LipL21. When one of the two antigens was test positive, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 93.75% and 78.46%, respectively, for rLigACon4-8 and LipL32, 93.18% and 76.15%, respectively, for rLigACon4-8 and LipL21, 89.77% and 80.77%, respectively, for rLigACon4-8 and Loa22, 91.48% and 78.46%, respectively, for LipL21 and Loa22, 93.75% and 76.92%, respectively, for LipL21 and LipL32, and 90.34% and 80.77%, respectively, for Loa22 and LipL32. In conclusion, we have developed an indirect ELISA utilizing rLigACon4-8, rLoa22, rLipL32, and rLipL21 as diagnostic antigens for equine leptospirosis. The use of four antigens in the ELISA was found to be sensitive and specific, the assay was easy to perform, and the results concurred with the results of the standard Leptospira MAT.
Publication Date: 2014-01-22 PubMed ID: 24451330PubMed Central: PMC3993115DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00649-13Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discusses the development of a new diagnostic test for equine leptospirosis using four recombinant proteins as antigens, finding it to be sensitive and specific, easy to use, and consistent with results from the standard diagnostic method.

Overview of Leptospirosis and the Existing Diagnostic Method

  • Leptospirosis is a prevalent zoonotic disease caused by Leptospira spp.
  • The disease often infects equines, or horses, and can be diagnosed via the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) – the standard testing method.
  • However, there is a need for potential alternative diagnostic methods.

Development of the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

  • The research team developed an alternative diagnostic test using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a popular lab technique used to detect antibodies in the blood.
  • The ELISA used four recombinant proteins of Leptospira interrogans (rLipL21, rLoa22, rLipL32, and rLigACon4-8) as antigens.
  • These antigens were evaluated using sera from horses that were MAT negative (130 samples) and MAT positive (176 samples) for the most common strains causing equine leptospirosis.

Performance of the ELISA

  • The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA compared to MAT were assessed, with varying rates depending on the antigens used. Sensitivity ranged from 77.84% to 84.66%, and specificity ranged from 83.85% to 92.31%.
  • As sensitivity is a measure of how accurately the test identifies positive results and specificity measures how accurately the test identifies negative results, these percentages suggest good performance of the test.
  • When using pairs of antigens, the test demonstrated higher sensitivity (up to 93.75%) but slightly lower specificity (as low as 76.15%).
  • This suggests that the test could be more sensitive but potentially less specific when using pairs of antigens.

Conclusion and Future Applications

  • The research concludes that the developed ELISA could be a promising diagnostic method for equine leptospirosis.
  • Its sensitivity, specificity, ease of performance, and accordance with standard MAT results make it a favourable alternative to current techniques.
  • However, further research and testing would be beneficial to validate the ELISA further and optimize its use in diagnosing equine leptospirosis.

Cite This Article

APA
Ye C, Yan W, McDonough PL, McDonough SP, Mohamed H, Divers TJ, Chang YF, Yang Z. (2014). Serodiagnosis of equine leptospirosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using four recombinant protein markers. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 21(4), 478-483. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00649-13

Publication

ISSN: 1556-679X
NlmUniqueID: 101252125
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 4
Pages: 478-483

Researcher Affiliations

Ye, Cuilian
  • Department of Pathogenic Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yan, Weiwei
    McDonough, Patrick L
      McDonough, Sean P
        Mohamed, Hussni
          Divers, Thomas J
            Chang, Yung-Fu
              Yang, Zhibang

                MeSH Terms

                • Animals
                • Antigens, Bacterial / genetics
                • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods
                • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
                • Horses
                • Leptospira interrogans / genetics
                • Leptospira interrogans / immunology
                • Leptospirosis / diagnosis
                • Leptospirosis / veterinary
                • Recombinant Proteins / genetics
                • Sensitivity and Specificity
                • Serologic Tests / methods

                References

                This article includes 39 references
                1. Palaniappan RU, Ramanujam S, Chang YF. Leptospirosis: pathogenesis, immunity, and diagnosis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 20:284–292.
                  doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32814a5729pubmed: 17471039google scholar: lookup
                2. Faisal SM, McDonough SP, Chang YF. Leptospira: invasion, pathogenesis and persistence, p 143–172 In Embers ME. (ed), The pathogenic spirochetes: strategies for evasion of host immunity and persistence. Springer Science, New York, NY .
                3. Levett PN. Leptospirosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:296–326.
                  doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.296-326.2001pmc: PMC88975pubmed: 11292640google scholar: lookup
                4. Divers TJ, Byars TD, Shin SJ. Renal dysfunction associated with infection of Leptospira interrogans in a horse. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 201:1391–1392.
                  pubmed: 1429185
                5. Broux B, Torfs S, Wegge B, Deprez P, van Loon G. Acute respiratory failure caused by Leptospira spp. in 5 foals. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 26:684–687.
                6. Toyokawa T, Ohnishi M, Koizumi N. Diagnosis of acute leptospirosis. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 9:111–121.
                  doi: 10.1586/eri.10.151pubmed: 21171882google scholar: lookup
                7. Ko AI, Goarant C, Picardeau M. Leptospira: the dawn of the molecular genetics era for an emerging zoonotic pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:736–747.
                  doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2208pmc: PMC3384523pubmed: 19756012google scholar: lookup
                8. Woodward MJ, Swallow C, Kitching A, Dalley C, Sayers AR. Leptospira hardjo serodiagnosis: a comparison of MAT, ELISA and Immunocomb. Vet. Rec. 141:603–604.
                  pubmed: 9429279
                9. Myers DM, Coltorti EA. Broadly reacting precipitating and agglutinating antigen of leptospirae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 8:580–590.
                  pmc: PMC275300pubmed: 83327
                10. Fairbrother JM. Serological interrelationship of Leptospira serovar and genus-specific antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20:1089–1093.
                  pmc: PMC271523pubmed: 6084016
                11. Yan W, Saleem MH, McDonough P, McDonough SP, Divers TJ, Chang YF. Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a recombinant LigA fragment comprising repeat domains 4 to 7.5 as an antigen for diagnosis of equine leptospirosis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 20:1143–1149.
                  doi: 10.1128/CVI.00245-13pmc: PMC3754523pubmed: 23720368google scholar: lookup
                12. Palaniappan RU, McDonough SP, Divers TJ, Chen CS, Pan MJ, Matsumoto M, Chang YF. Immunoprotection of recombinant leptospiral immunoglobulin-like protein A against Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona infection. Infect. Immun. 74:1745–1750.
                13. Cole JR Jr, Sulzer CR, Pursell AR. Improved microtechnique for the leptospiral microscopic agglutination test. Appl. Microbiol. 25:976–980.
                  pmc: PMC380950pubmed: 4736794
                14. Yan W, Faisal SM, Divers T, McDonough SP, Akey B, Chang YF. Experimental Leptospira interrogans serovar Kennewicki infection of horses. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 24:912–917.
                15. Jobbins SE, Sanderson CE, Alexander KA. Leptospira interrogans at the human-wildlife interface in northern Botswana: a newly identified public health threat. Zoonoses Public Health 61:113–123.
                  doi: 10.1111/zph.12052pubmed: 23672285google scholar: lookup
                16. Minor K, Mohan A. Severe leptospirosis: treatment with intravenous corticosteroids and supportive care. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 31:449.e1–449.e2.
                  doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.016pubmed: 22980361google scholar: lookup
                17. Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, Lovett MA, Levett PN, Gilman RH, Willig MR, Gotuzzo E, Vinetz JM. Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 3:757–771.
                  doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00830-2pubmed: 14652202google scholar: lookup
                18. Verma A, Stevenson B. Leptospiral uveitis—there is more to it than meets the eye!. Zoonoses Public Health 59(Suppl 2):132–141.
                19. Timoney JF, Kalimuthusamy N, Velineni S, Donahue JM, Artiushin SC, Fettinger M. A unique genotype of Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona type Kennewicki is associated with equine abortion. Vet. Microbiol. 150:349–353.
                  doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.049pubmed: 21450416google scholar: lookup
                20. Donahue JM, Williams NM. Emergent causes of placentitis and abortion. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 16:443–456.
                  pubmed: 11219342
                21. Schreier S, Doungchawee G, Chadsuthi S, Triampo D, Triampo W. Leptospirosis: current situation and trends of specific laboratory tests. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 9:263–280.
                  doi: 10.1586/eci.12.110pubmed: 23445200google scholar: lookup
                22. Bomfim MR, Ko A, Koury MC. Evaluation of the recombinant LipL32 in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the serodiagnosis of bovine leptospirosis. Vet. Microbiol. 109:89–94.
                  doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.05.002pubmed: 15950404google scholar: lookup
                23. Chalayon P, Chanket P, Boonchawalit T, Chattanadee S, Srimanote P, Kalambaheti T. Leptospirosis serodiagnosis by ELISA based on recombinant outer membrane protein. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 105:289–297.
                  doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.01.008pubmed: 21353274google scholar: lookup
                24. Flannery B, Costa D, Carvalho FP, Guerreiro H, Matsunaga J, Da Silva ED, Ferreira AG, Riley LW, Reis MG, Haake DA, Ko AI. Evaluation of recombinant Leptospira antigen-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the serodiagnosis of leptospirosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3303–3310.
                25. Croda J, Ramos JG, Matsunaga J, Queiroz A, Homma A, Riley LW, Haake DA, Reis MG, Ko AI. Leptospira immunoglobulin-like proteins as a serodiagnostic marker for acute leptospirosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1528–1534.
                  doi: 10.1128/JCM.02344-06pmc: PMC1865864pubmed: 17360842google scholar: lookup
                26. Hartleben CP, Leal FM, Monte LG, Hartwig DD, Seixas FK, Vasconcellos SA, Brihuega B, Dellagostin OA. Serological analysis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant antigen LipL32 for the diagnosis of swine leptospirosis. Curr. Microbiol. 66:106–109.
                  doi: 10.1007/s00284-012-0237-xpubmed: 23064970google scholar: lookup
                27. Joseph S, Thomas N, Thangapandian E, Singh VP, Verma R, Srivastava SK. Evaluation and comparison of native and recombinant LipL21 protein-based ELISAs for diagnosis of bovine leptospirosis. J. Vet. Sci. 13:99–101.
                  doi: 10.4142/jvs.2012.13.1.99pmc: PMC3317464pubmed: 22437542google scholar: lookup
                28. Oliveira TR, Longhi MT, de Morais ZM, Romero EC, Blanco RM, Kirchgatter K, Vasconcellos SA, Nascimento AL. Evaluation of leptospiral recombinant antigens MPL17 and MPL21 for serological diagnosis of leptospirosis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 15:1715–1722.
                  doi: 10.1128/CVI.00214-08pmc: PMC2583518pubmed: 18799647google scholar: lookup
                29. Sankar S, Harshan HM, Somarajan SR, Srivastava SK. Evaluation of a recombinant LigB protein of Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the serodiagnosis of bovine leptospirosis. Res. Vet. Sci. 88:375–378.
                  doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.11.004pubmed: 20022618google scholar: lookup
                30. Srimanote P, Wongdeethai N, Jieanampunkul P, Samonkiert S, Leepiyasakulchai C, Kalambaheti T, Prachayasittikul V. Recombinant ligA for leptospirosis diagnosis and ligA among the Leptospira spp. clinical isolates. J. Microbiol. Methods 72:73–81.
                  doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.10.012pubmed: 18079011google scholar: lookup
                31. Nabity SA, Ribeiro GS, Aquino CL, Takahashi D, Damiao AO, Goncalves AH, Miranda-Filho DB, Greenwald R, Esfandiari J, Lyashchenko KP, Reis MG, Medeiros MA, Ko AI. Accuracy of a dual path platform (DPP) assay for the rapid point-of-care diagnosis of human leptospirosis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6:e1878.
                32. Palaniappan RU, Chang YF, Hassan F, McDonough SP, Pough M, Barr SC, Simpson KW, Mohammed HO, Shin S, McDonough P, Zuerner RL, Qu J, Roe B. Expression of leptospiral immunoglobulin-like protein by Leptospira interrogans and evaluation of its diagnostic potential in a kinetic ELISA. J. Med. Microbiol. 53:975–984.
                  doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45568-0pubmed: 15358819google scholar: lookup
                33. Palaniappan RU, Chang YF, Jusuf SS, Artiushin S, Timoney JF, McDonough SP, Barr SC, Divers TJ, Simpson KW, McDonough PL, Mohammed HO. Cloning and molecular characterization of an immunogenic LigA protein of Leptospira interrogans. Infect. Immun. 70:5924–5930.
                34. Faine S, Adher B, Bloin C, Perolat P. Leptospira and leptospirosis, 2nd ed.. MedSci, Melbourne, Australia .
                35. WHO Leptospirosis Burden Epidemiology Reference Group. Zoonoses and veterinary public health. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland 13 July 2010, posting date.
                36. CDC Public Health Surveillance and Informatics Program Office. Leptospirosis (Leptospira interrogans). CDC, Atlanta, GA 2013.
                37. Subathra M, Senthilkumar TM, Ramadass P. Recombinant OmpL1 protein as a diagnostic antigen for the detection of canine leptospirosis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 169:431–437.
                  doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9973-4pubmed: 23212848google scholar: lookup
                38. Hartwig DD, Seixas FK, Cerqueira GM, McBride AJ, Dellagostin OA. Characterization of the immunogenic and antigenic potential of putative lipoproteins from Leptospira interrogans. Curr. Microbiol. 62:1337–1341.
                  doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9865-1pubmed: 21221970google scholar: lookup
                39. Lin X, Chen Y, Yan J. Recombinant multiepitope protein for diagnosis of leptospirosis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 15:1711–1714.
                  doi: 10.1128/CVI.00189-08pmc: PMC2583528pubmed: 18827193google scholar: lookup