Analyze Diet

Serratia marcescens septicemia associated with infusion of an amino acid solution in two horses.

Abstract: Clinical septicemia developed in 2 clinically normal horses after both were administered a portion of an amino acid solution IV. Serratia marcescens was subsequently isolated from blood of both horses. The isolates were shown to be identical on the basis of antibiograms and plasmid biochemistry, incriminating the infusate as the source of bacterial infection. The horses recovered after supportive and antimicrobial treatment.
Publication Date: 1989-08-01 PubMed ID: 2670862
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the occurrence of a bacterial infection in two horses after they were given an intravenous infusion of an amino acid solution. It is discovered that identical strains of a bacteria known as Serratia marcescens were responsible for the infection, and that the horses recovered following treatment.

Introduction and Objective of the Study

  • The objective of the research was to explore and understand the connection between the administration of an intravenous amino acid solution and subsequent development of septicemia, a severe bacterial blood infection, in two clinically normal horses.

Findings and Evidence

  • The researchers identified Serratia marcescens, a type of bacteria, in the blood samples from both horses. The presence of this bacteria indicated infection, implicating septicemia.
  • From the identical antibiograms and plasmid biochemistry of the bacterial isolates, it was inferred that both the horses were infected by the same strain of bacteria.
  • The findings strongly suggested that the intravenous amino acid solution administered to the horses served as the source of the bacterial infection, leading to the development of septicemia.

Treatment and Recovery

  • The horses received both supportive care and antimicrobial treatment to combat the bacterial infection.
  • Following the treatment prescribed by the researchers, both horses were seen to recover from the infection, demonstrating the effectiveness of the chosen therapeutic measures.

Conclusion and Implication

  • The study highlights the possibility of bacterial contamination in intravenous solutions like the amino acid infusion used, which can lead to severe outcomes like septicemia.
  • It underscores the importance of taking preventive measures to avert such infections. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for intensive care and prompt treatment in case such a bacterial infection does occur.

Cite This Article

APA
Young DR, Divers TJ, Benson CE. (1989). Serratia marcescens septicemia associated with infusion of an amino acid solution in two horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 195(3), 340-342.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 195
Issue: 3
Pages: 340-342

Researcher Affiliations

Young, D R
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square 19348.
Divers, T J
    Benson, C E

      MeSH Terms

      • Amino Acids / administration & dosage
      • Animals
      • Drug Contamination
      • Enterobacteriaceae Infections / etiology
      • Enterobacteriaceae Infections / veterinary
      • Horse Diseases / etiology
      • Horses
      • Infusions, Intravenous
      • Sepsis / etiology
      • Sepsis / veterinary
      • Serratia marcescens
      • Shock, Septic / etiology
      • Shock, Septic / veterinary
      • Solutions

      Citations

      This article has been cited 1 times.
      1. Vaid J. Bacteraemia in man and animals: an overview. Vet Res Commun 1991;15(5):341-62.
        doi: 10.1007/BF00366990pubmed: 1771758google scholar: lookup