Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 106071; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106071

Short-term provision of moderate dietary starch alters fecal microbiota but does not exacerbate exercise-induced inflammation in yearling Quarter Horses.

Abstract: Energy-dense feeds commonly provided to equine athletes may be high in starch, which alter gastrointestinal microbiota and could promote systemic inflammation. Objective: To test the hypothesis that exercise-induced inflammation would be greater in horses receiving a starch- versus fiber-based concentrate. Methods: Quarter Horses (mean±SD 16±1mo; 337±30kg) received either a fiber-based control (CON; 7 fillies, 8 geldings) or an isocaloric, isonitrogenous starch concentrate (STARCH; 8 fillies, 7 geldings) for 24d. Fecal metagenomics were evaluated on d0 and 21. Blood inflammatory mediators were quantified on d0, d21, and surrounding a 2-h submaximal exercise test (SET) on d22. Results: On d21, CON horses had greater Lactobacillaceae (∼5.7% vs. ∼2.4% in STARCH), while STARCH had greater Lachnospiraceae (∼38% vs. ∼32% in CON) but diet alone did not impact inflammatory markers. On d22, CRP increased at 24h post-SET in all horses (P<0.0001). By 48h, CRP returned to pre-SET in STARCH but remained elevated in CON (P=0.0005), resulting in greater CRP in CON than STARCH at 48h (P=0.02). TNFα increased from pre-SET to 1h in STARCH horses (P=0.02), then returned to pre by 6h. In CON horses, TNFα increased at 24h (P=0.04) and remained elevated at 48h (P=0.0005). Throughout the SET, CON had greater IL-10 than STARCH horses (P=0.005). SAA, IL-4, IL-8, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A were differentially impacted by the SET but were unaffected by diet. Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, fiber-fed horses appeared to elicit a more robust acute inflammatory response to exercise than starch-fed horses despite an altered gastrointestinal microbiome.
Publication Date: 2026-06-27 PubMed ID: 42364789DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106071Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Objective Summary

Introduction and Background

  • Equine athletes often receive energy-dense feeds that are high in starch.
  • High starch intake can change the gut microbiota in horses, potentially leading to systemic inflammation.
  • The relationship between dietary starch, gut microbiome changes, and exercise-induced inflammation in horses is not fully understood.
  • The study aimed to directly compare inflammatory responses in horses fed starch vs. fiber-based diets during exercise.

Methods

  • Subjects: Yearling Quarter Horses averaging 16 months old and 337 kg in weight.
  • Groups: Horses were divided into two groups:
    • CON (fiber-based control concentrate): 7 fillies, 8 geldings
    • STARCH (isocaloric, isonitrogenous starch concentrate): 8 fillies, 7 geldings
  • Duration: Each horse was fed their respective diet for 24 days.
  • Sample Collection:
    • Fecal samples for metagenomic analysis on days 0 and 21.
    • Blood samples for inflammatory mediators on days 0, 21, and during a 2-hour submaximal exercise test (SET) on day 22.
  • Exercise Test: A controlled 2-hour submaximal exercise session to trigger potential inflammatory responses.

Results – Microbiota Changes

  • By day 21, horses on the control fiber diet had higher levels of Lactobacillaceae bacteria (~5.7%) compared to starch-fed horses (~2.4%).
  • Starch-fed horses had higher abundance of Lachnospiraceae bacteria (~38%) compared to fiber-fed horses (~32%).
  • These findings indicate that dietary starch vs. fiber modulates the gut bacterial community structure.
  • Despite these microbiome alterations, the diet alone did not significantly affect inflammatory markers before exercise.

Results – Exercise-Induced Inflammation

  • C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammation marker, increased significantly 24 hours after exercise in all horses.
  • By 48 hours post-exercise:
    • CRP levels returned to baseline in starch-fed horses.
    • CRP remained elevated in fiber-fed horses, leading to higher CRP compared to starch group.
  • Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) behavior:
    • In starch-fed horses, TNFα increased at 1 hour post-exercise but returned to baseline by 6 hours.
    • In fiber-fed horses, TNFα increased later (at 24 hours) and remained elevated at 48 hours.
  • Interleukin-10 (IL-10), an anti-inflammatory cytokine, was higher throughout exercise in fiber-fed horses compared to starch-fed horses.
  • Other inflammation-related molecules like serum amyloid A (SAA), IL-4, IL-8, and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) responded to exercise but were not influenced by diet type.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Contrary to expectations, horses fed the fiber-based diet exhibited a stronger acute inflammatory response to exercise than those fed starch-based diets.
  • The alterations in gut microbiota from different diets did not correspond with increased systemic inflammation in starch-fed horses.
  • This suggests that moderate starch intake in young horses may not exacerbate exercise-induced inflammation as previously thought.
  • Fiber-fed horses possibly mount a more robust immune response to exercise, highlighting complex interactions between diet, gut microbiota, and inflammation.
  • These findings may impact feeding strategies for optimizing equine athlete health and performance.

Cite This Article

APA
DiSilvestro AN, Wesolowski LT, Williams BD, Warren LK, Athrey G, White-Springer SH. (2026). Short-term provision of moderate dietary starch alters fecal microbiota but does not exacerbate exercise-induced inflammation in yearling Quarter Horses. J Equine Vet Sci, 106071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106071

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 106071
PII: S0737-0806(26)00306-0

Researcher Affiliations

DiSilvestro, A N
  • Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, and AgriLife Research, 400 Bizzel St, College Station, TX 77843.
Wesolowski, L T
  • Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, and AgriLife Research, 400 Bizzel St, College Station, TX 77843.
Williams, B D
  • Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, and AgriLife Research, 400 Bizzel St, College Station, TX 77843.
Warren, L K
  • Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, 2250 Shealy Dr, Gainesville FL 32611.
Athrey, G
  • Department of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, and AgriLife Research, 400 Bizzel St, College Station, TX 77843.
White-Springer, S H
  • Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, and AgriLife Research, 400 Bizzel St, College Station, TX 77843; Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, 400 Bizzel St, College Station, TX 77843. Electronic address: s.white@ag.tamu.edu.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.