Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2026; 320; 106892; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2026.106892

Significant changes occur in the ultrasonographic appearance of the lungs in horses following exploratory celiotomy.

Abstract: General anesthesia for short periods of time in healthy horses for elective procedures produces minimal ultrasonographic changes in the lungs, but the effect of general anesthesia for exploratory celiotomy in horses has not previously been investigated. The objective of this study was to identify the degree of ultrasonographic changes in the lungs of horses following exploratory celiotomy and to identify risk factors that could increase the magnitude of change. 63 horses ≥ 2 years of age undergoing exploratory celiotomy were initially enrolled in a prospective observational study. Signalment, weight, exam findings and clinicopathologic data, surgical lesion and procedure were recorded for all horses. For survivors, time recumbent, laterality in recovery and presence of reflux or feed on the endotracheal tube in recovery were recorded. Thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) was performed pre- and 1, 3, and 5 days post-operatively on survivors. Linear mixed model with Bayesian estimation was used to explore day and group's effects on TUS scores, and significance level was set at 0.05. 82.5% (n = 52/63) horses survived surgery, and pre-operative TUS score was not associated with survival. Median Day 1 TUS scores (25.94, 95% CrI: 10.47-41.50), were significantly higher than pre-operative scores (21.19, 95% CrI: 9.75-32.50). Magnitude of change in TUS score from the pre-operative exam to Day 1 was significantly associated with the presence of feed on the endotracheal tube at the time of extubation (P = 0.03) and reflux in recovery (P = 0.006). Significant changes occur in the ultrasonographic appearance of the lungs the day following exploratory celiotomy, but appear to be self-limiting.
Publication Date: 2026-09-18 PubMed ID: 42759873DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2026.106892Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated how the lung appearance changes on ultrasound in horses after exploratory celiotomy surgery.
  • The researchers identified significant but temporary lung ultrasonographic changes following surgery and potential risk factors contributing to these changes.

Background and Rationale

  • General anesthesia for short elective procedures in healthy horses typically causes minimal changes visible on lung ultrasound (thoracic ultrasonography, TUS).
  • The impact of general anesthesia combined with exploratory celiotomy—a more invasive abdominal surgery—on lung ultrasound appearance had not been studied previously.
  • Understanding these changes helps clinicians anticipate and manage potential lung complications after surgery.

Study Objectives

  • To quantify the degree of ultrasonographic changes in the lungs of horses after undergoing exploratory celiotomy.
  • To identify clinical risk factors that may increase the severity of these ultrasonographic changes.

Methods

  • Prospective observational study design enrolling 63 horses aged ≥ 2 years undergoing exploratory celiotomy.
  • Data collected included:
    • Signalment (age, breed, sex), weight, physical exam findings, clinicopathologic data.
    • Details of the surgical lesion and the procedure performed.
    • For horses that survived surgery:
      • Duration of recumbency (laying down time) after surgery.
      • Which side the horse recovered on (laterality).
      • Presence of reflux (backflow of stomach contents) or feed material on the endotracheal tube during recovery from anesthesia.
    • Thoracic ultrasonography was performed at four time points: before surgery (pre-operative), and 1, 3, and 5 days post-operatively.
  • Statistical analysis used a linear mixed model with Bayesian estimation to examine the effects of time and clinical groups on TUS scores, with significance set at P < 0.05.

Key Results

  • Survival rate was 82.5% (52 out of 63 horses survived surgery).
  • The pre-operative TUS score was not predictive of survival.
  • TUS scores on Day 1 post-operation were significantly increased compared to pre-operative scores, indicating acute lung changes following surgery:
    • Median Day 1 TUS score was 25.94 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 10.47-41.50).
    • Pre-operative median TUS score was 21.19 (95% CrI: 9.75-32.50).
  • The change in TUS score from pre-operation to Day 1 was significantly associated with:
    • The presence of feed material on the endotracheal tube during extubation (P = 0.03).
    • Reflux occurring in recovery (P = 0.006).
  • These lung ultrasonographic changes appeared to resolve over time, indicating they were self-limiting rather than progressive.

Interpretation and Implications

  • Exploratory celiotomy in horses is associated with notable but temporary changes in lung ultrasound appearance within the first postoperative day.
  • The presence of feed or reflux during anesthesia recovery might reflect aspiration risk or other complications that worsen lung ultrasonographic findings.
  • These findings suggest perioperative management should include careful monitoring to minimize aspiration risk, as this may influence pulmonary status after surgery.
  • Clinicians can expect these ultrasonographic lung changes to improve over a few days without additional intervention in most cases.

Limitations and Future Directions

  • The study was observational and limited to horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy; results may not be generalizable to other surgeries or species.
  • Long-term effects beyond 5 days were not evaluated.
  • Further studies could investigate strategies to reduce reflux and aspiration during recovery to improve pulmonary outcomes.

Cite This Article

APA
Hepworth-Warren KL, Perez-Quesada J, Harbor K, Qu Y, Hallowell KL, Windrup A, Ballou ME. (2026). Significant changes occur in the ultrasonographic appearance of the lungs in horses following exploratory celiotomy. Vet J, 320, 106892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2026.106892

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 320
Pages: 106892
PII: S1090-0233(26)00349-7

Researcher Affiliations

Hepworth-Warren, Kate L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States. Electronic address: klhepwor@ncsu.edu.
Perez-Quesada, Javier
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.
Harbor, Kaitlyn
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.
Qu, Yang
  • Clinical Studies Core, Office of Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.
Hallowell, Kimberly L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.
Windrup, Alexandria
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.
Ballou, Megan E
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.