Analyze Diet
Forensic science international2016; 264; 34-40; doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.023

Simulating forensic casework scenarios in experimental studies: The generation of footwear marks in blood.

Abstract: A study was designed to investigate the effects of external variables, including blood type, flooring surface, footwear tread depth and blood dryness, on the appearance of blood-based footwear marks, with particular reference to simulating a specific casework scenario. Results showed that footwear marks left in human blood tended to be of greater quality than those in equine blood, highlighting a potential issue in applying data generated with equine blood to human bloodstains in casework. Footwear tread effects were also dependent on blood type, but the type of flooring surface did not affect the appearance of the mark. Under some conditions, as the blood dried, the amount of detail retained from footwear contact decreased. These results provide the beginnings of an empirical evidence base to allow a more accurate interpretation of blood-based footwear marks in forensic casework. When applied to a disputed bloodstain in a specific case, these results also demonstrate the importance of such experiments in narrowing the range of explanations possible in the interpretation of forensic evidence.
Publication Date: 2016-03-18 PubMed ID: 27017082DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.023Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the impact of various factors, like blood type and floor type, on the quality of footprints left in blood, aiming to improve the accuracy of forensic analysis. The study reveals that human blood provides better quality footprints than horse blood, and that the drying rate of blood also affects the clarity of the footprint details.

Objective of the Research

  • The aim of this research is to simulate real forensic scenarios to determine how different external variables affect the quality and appearance of footprints in blood.
  • The research aims to provide valuable insights that could enhance the interpretation and analysis of blood-based footprints in forensic cases.

Variables and Results

  • Various factors were observed to understand their impact on the appearance of footprints. These factors included blood type (human or equine), floor surface, footwear tread depth, and level of blood dryness.
  • The study found that footprints in human blood had better quality in comparison with those in equine blood, pinpointing a potential issue of applying results from studies using equine blood to human blood scenarios.
  • The tread effect of footwear was also noted to depend on the type of blood. However, floor type did not seem to significantly affect the footprint’s appearance.
  • As blood began to dry, the level of detail in the footprint diminished under certain conditions.

Implication and Application of Results

  • The results of this study contribute to an empirical evidence base to support more precise interpretation of blood-based footwear marks in forensic cases.
  • When these findings were applied to a disputed bloodstain in a specific case, it was observed how such experiments could restrict the range of plausible interpretations of forensic evidence, thereby, increasing the accuracy of forensic analyses.

Cite This Article

APA
McElhone RL, Meakin GE, French JC, Alexander T, Morgan RM. (2016). Simulating forensic casework scenarios in experimental studies: The generation of footwear marks in blood. Forensic Sci Int, 264, 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.023

Publication

ISSN: 1872-6283
NlmUniqueID: 7902034
Country: Ireland
Language: English
Volume: 264
Pages: 34-40
PII: S0379-0738(16)30109-8

Researcher Affiliations

McElhone, Rachel L
  • UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK; UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK. Electronic address: rachel.l.mcelhone@bath.edu.
Meakin, Georgina E
  • UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK; UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK. Electronic address: g.meakin@ucl.ac.uk.
French, James C
  • UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK; UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK. Electronic address: james.french@ucl.ac.uk.
Alexander, Tracy
  • Forensic Services, City of London Police, 37 Wood Street, London EC2P 2NQ, UK. Electronic address: Tracy.Alexander@city-of-london.pnn.police.uk.
Morgan, Ruth M
  • UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK; UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK. Electronic address: ruth.morgan@ucl.ac.uk.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Blood Stains
  • Floors and Floorcoverings
  • Forensic Medicine / methods
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Shoes

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Baiker-Sørensen M, Herlaar K, Keereweer I, Pauw-Vugts P, Visser R. Interpol review of shoe and tool marks 2016-2019.. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2020;2:521-539.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.016pubmed: 33385145google scholar: lookup