FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Social Isolation of Horses vs. Support Provided by a Human.
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(11); 1649; doi: 10.3390/ani15111649

Social Isolation of Horses vs. Support Provided by a Human.

Abstract: It is assumed that horses have a strong herd instinct that cannot be suppressed by any form of social support from humans. The aim of this study was to assess the behaviour and heart rate parameters of horses that received various forms of human support during short-term social isolation. The research material consisted of 12 clinically healthy recreational warmblood mares and geldings. The test was carried out four times. The research test consisted of two parts, which began in the presence of accompanying horses and under conditions of social isolation, with and without support provided by a human (types of contact: tactile, vocal, tactile and vocal). Behavioural observations were carried out on a five-point scale, and the heart rate parameters were measured using Polar ELECTRO OY Kempele (Finland) measuring devices (Polar H9 type) and Polar Ignite2 receivers. Data analysis was carried out using the Polar Flowsync application coupled with the Polar Flow service. It was concluded that social support provided by humans in tactile, vocal, or tactile and vocal forms during the isolation of horses from the herd does not have very significant effects, especially in mares. The geldings respond much more favourably than the mares. In addition, at this point in the research, it can be suggested that vocal support may have the best effects. The more emotionally balanced the horses are, the more pronounced these effects should be.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-06-03 PubMed ID: 40509115PubMed Central: PMC12153905DOI: 10.3390/ani15111649Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article presents a study investigating how horses react to different forms of human interaction during periods of short-term social isolation, and discusses whether these interactions can compensate for the animals’ instinctual herd behavior.

Objective and Methodology

  • The goal of this research was to observe if various forms of human interaction could replace the support system typically provided by a herd in horses.
  • The study was conducted with a group of twelve healthy warmblood mares and geldings used for recreational purposes. The breed was likely chosen for its prevalent use in riding and close contact with humans, which makes it relevant to a larger audience of horse lovers.
  • The horses were subjected to test conditions four times. Each test contained two parts: one with social company (other horses) and one under conditions of social isolation.
  • In the isolated states, the subjects received human interaction in the forms of tactile (touch), vocal (sound), or both tactile and vocal support.
  • The behavioural patterns of the horses were observed on a five-point scale and their heart rate was measured using specific measuring devices.

Findings and Conclusion

  • Horses did not exhibit any significant changes in their behavior as a result of human support, particularly the mares, suggesting that they were not able to replace the instinctual urge for a herd environment.
  • In comparison to the mares, geldings showed a stronger response to human interaction, particularly vocalization, implying that they could be more susceptible to human influence.
  • Although the effects were not substantial, the study proposes that vocal support could have the best impact in replacing herd instinct, particularly among emotionally balanced horses.
  • This suggests that the animals’ mental state could influence the effectiveness of human support, with horses that are more stable emotionally possibly benefiting more from human interaction.

Therefore, according to this research, human interaction, especially in the form of vocal communication, may prove partially conducive in replacing social interaction for horses during short-term periods of isolation — particularly for geldings and emotionally stable horses. However, the herd instinct seems to be deeply ingrained, rendering the impact of human interaction relatively less significant.

Cite This Article

APA
Janczarek I, Gazda I, Barłowska J, Kurnik J, Łuszczyński J. (2025). Social Isolation of Horses vs. Support Provided by a Human. Animals (Basel), 15(11), 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111649

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 11
PII: 1649

Researcher Affiliations

Janczarek, Iwona
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13 Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Gazda, Izabela
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13 Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Barłowska, Joanna
  • Department Quality Assessment and Processing of Animal Products, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13 Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Kurnik, Julia
  • Department of Horse Breeding and Use, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13 Str., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Łuszczyński, Jarosław
  • Department of Genetics, Animal Breeding and Ethology, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Cracow, Al. Mickiewicza 21 Str., 31-120 Cracow, Poland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 74 references
  1. Mendonça R.S., Pinto P., Maeda T., Inoue S., Ringhofer M., Yamamoto S., Hirata S.. Population Characteristics of Feral Horses Impacted by Anthropogenic Factors and Their Management Implications. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022;10:848741.
    doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.848741google scholar: lookup
  2. Krueger K., Esch L., Farmer K., Marr I.. Basic Needs in Horses?—A Literature Review. Animals 2021;11:1798.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061798pmc: PMC8235049pubmed: 34208615google scholar: lookup
  3. Wolter R., Stefanski V., Krueger K.. Parameters for the Analysis of Social Bonds in Horses. Animals 2018;8:191.
    doi: 10.3390/ani8110191pmc: PMC6262610pubmed: 30373257google scholar: lookup
  4. Borda L.T., Auer U., Jenner F.. Equine Social Behaviour: Love, War and Tolerance. Animals 2023;13:1473.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13091473pmc: PMC10177386pubmed: 37174510google scholar: lookup
  5. Mendonça R.S., Pinto P., Inoue S., Ringhofer M., Godinho R., Hirata S.. Social determinants of affiliation and cohesion in a population of feral horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;245:105496.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105496google scholar: lookup
  6. Costa H., Fragoso S., Heitor F.. The relevance of affiliative relationships in horses: Review and future directions. Pet Behav. Sci. 2019;8:11–26.
    doi: 10.21071/pbs.v0i8.11463google scholar: lookup
  7. Seck M., Carder G., Wathan J., Randau M., Fletcher K., Proops L.. Working horse welfare in Senegal is linked to owner’s socioeconomic status, their attitudes and belief in horse sentience. PLoS ONE 2024;19:e0309149.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309149pmc: PMC11488707pubmed: 39423199google scholar: lookup
  8. Haddy E., Burden F., Raw Z., Rodrigues J.B., Zappi Bello J.H., Brown J., Kaminski J., Proops L.. Belief in Animal Sentience and Affective Owner Attitudes are linked to Positive Working Equid Welfare across Six Countries. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2023;28:116–134.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2023.2228029pubmed: 37381695google scholar: lookup
  9. Haddy E., Rodrigues J.B., Raw Z., Burden F., Proops L.. Documenting the Welfare and Role of Working Equids in Rural Communities of Portugal and Spain. Animals 2020;10:790.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10050790pmc: PMC7277599pubmed: 32370244google scholar: lookup
  10. Christensen J.W., Ladewig J., Søndergaard E., Malmkvist J.. Effects of individual versus group stabling on social behaviour in domestic stallions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;75:233–248.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00196-4google scholar: lookup
  11. Ruet A., Biau S., Arnould C., Galloux P., Destrez A., Pycik E., Boichot L., Lansade L.. Horses Could Perceive Riding Differently Depending on the Way They Express Poor Welfare in the Stable. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;94:103206.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103206pubmed: 33077101google scholar: lookup
  12. Hartmann E., Christensen J.W., McGreevy P.D.. Dominance and Leadership: Useful Concepts in Human–Horse Interactions?. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;52:1–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.01.015google scholar: lookup
  13. Fureix C., Bourjade M., Henry S., Sankey C., Hausberger M.. Exploring aggression regulation in managed groups of horses Equus caballus. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;138:216–228.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.009google scholar: lookup
  14. Phelipon R., Hennes N., Ruet A., Bret-Morel A., Górecka-Bruzda A., Lansade L.. Forage, freedom of movement, and social interactions remain essential fundamentals for the welfare of high-level sport horses. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024;11:1504116.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504116pmc: PMC11615640pubmed: 39634765google scholar: lookup
  15. Nellist J.. Separation anxiety in horses. Anim. Behav. Welf. Cases 2023:abwcases.2023.0001.
    doi: 10.1079/abwcases.2023.0001google scholar: lookup
  16. Lundblad J., Rashid M., Rhodin M., Andersen P.H.. Effect of transportation and social isolation on facial expressions of healthy horses. PLoS ONE 2021;16:e0241532.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241532pmc: PMC8177539pubmed: 34086704google scholar: lookup
  17. Foster R.. Is Your Horse Lonely? The Negative Effects of Social Isolation. The Horse (3 June 2021) [(accessed on 12 February 2025)].
  18. Reid K., Rogers C.W., Gronqvist G., Gee E.K., Bolwell C.F.. Anxiety and pain in horses measured by heart rate variability and behavior. J. Vet. Behav. 2017;22:1–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.09.002google scholar: lookup
  19. Yarnell K., Hall C., Royle C., Walker S.L.. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing. Physiol. Behav. 2015;143:51–57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040pubmed: 25725117google scholar: lookup
  20. Jørgensen G.H., Fremstad K.E., Mejdell C.M., Bøe K.E.. Separating a horse from the social group for riding or training purposes: A descriptive study of human-horse interactions. Anim. Welf. 2011;20:271–279.
    doi: 10.1017/S096272860000275Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Kay R., Hall C.. The use of a mirror reduces isolation stress in horses being transported by trailer. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;116:237–243.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.013google scholar: lookup
  22. Barrera G., Albiach-Serrano A., Guillén-Salazar F.. Exploring horses’ (Equus caballus) gaze and asymmetric ear position in relation to human attentional cues. Anim. Cogn. 2024;27:67.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01909-ypmc: PMC11496336pubmed: 39436472google scholar: lookup
  23. de Oliveira R.A., Aurich C.. Aspects of Breeding Stallion Management with Specific Focus on Animal Welfare. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;107:103773.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103773pubmed: 34802626google scholar: lookup
  24. Henderson A.J.Z.. Don’t fence me in: Managing psychological well being for elite performance horses. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2007;10:309–329.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700701555576pubmed: 17970632google scholar: lookup
  25. Harris R.B.S.. Chronic and acute effects of stress on energy balance: Are there appropriate animal models?. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2015;308:R250–R265.
    doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00361.2014pmc: PMC4329465pubmed: 25519732google scholar: lookup
  26. Hall C., Goodwin D., Heleski C., Randle H., Waran N.. Is there evidence of learned helplessness in horses?. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2008;11:249–266.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101130pubmed: 18569222google scholar: lookup
  27. McLean A.N.. Overshadowing: A silver lining to a dark cloud in horse training. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2008;11:236–248.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101064pubmed: 18569221google scholar: lookup
  28. Maurício L.S., Leme D.P., Hötzel M.J.. How to Understand Them? A Review of Emotional Indicators in Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2023;126:104249.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104249pubmed: 36806715google scholar: lookup
  29. Hartmann E., Søndergaard E., Keeling L.J.. Keeping horses in groups: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;136:77–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.004google scholar: lookup
  30. Bulens A., Van Beirendonck S., Van Thielen J., Driessen B.. The enriching effect of non-commercial items in stabled horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2013;143:46–51.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.012google scholar: lookup
  31. Bourjade M., Moulinot M., Henry S., Richard-Yris M.-A., Hausberger M.. Could adults be used to improve social skills of young horses, Equus caballus?. Dev. Psychobiol. 2008;50:408–417.
    doi: 10.1002/dev.20301pubmed: 18393282google scholar: lookup
  32. Cooper J., McGreevy P.D.. Stereotypic behaviour in the stabled horse: Causes, effects and prevention without compromising horse welfare. In: Waran N., editor. The Welfare of Horses. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2007. pp. 99–124.
    doi: 10.1007/978-0-306-48215-1_5google scholar: lookup
  33. Mills D.S., Davenport K.. The effect of a neighbouring conspecific versus the use of a mirror for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Anim. Sci. 2002;74:95–101.
    doi: 10.1017/S1357729800052255google scholar: lookup
  34. de Oliveira F.Y.U., Odakura A.M., de Castro Burbarelli M.F., dos Ouros C.C., de Lima Almeida Paz I.C., Braz J.M., Garcia R.G., Caldara F.R.. Impact of musical rhythm on blood, physiological and welfare parameters in stabled horses. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:31311.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82637-8pmc: PMC11682261pubmed: 39732892google scholar: lookup
  35. McAfee L.M., Mills D.S., Cooper J.J.. The use of mirrors for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:159–173.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00086-2google scholar: lookup
  36. Wiśniewska A., Janczarek I., Tkaczyk E., Wilk I., Janicka W., Próchniak T., Kaczmarek B., Pokora E., Łuszczyński J.. Minimizing the Effects of Social Isolation of Horses by Contact with Animals of a Different Species: The Domestic Goat as an Example. Animals 2022;12:2271.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12172271pmc: PMC9454851pubmed: 36077991google scholar: lookup
  37. Stanley C.R., Mettke-Hofmann C., Hager R., Shultz S.. Social stability in semiferal ponies: Networks show interannual stability alongside seasonal flexibility. Anim. Behav. 2018;136:175–184.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.04.013google scholar: lookup
  38. Diveica V., Pexman P.M., Binney R.J.. Quantifying social semantics: An inclusive definition of socialness and ratings for 8388 English words. Behav. Res. Methods. 2023;55:461–473.
    doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01810-xpmc: PMC10027635pubmed: 35286618google scholar: lookup
  39. Bavik Y.L., Shaw J.D., Wang X.H.. Social support: Multidisciplinary review, synthesis, and future agenda. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2020;14:726–758.
    doi: 10.5465/annals.2016.0148google scholar: lookup
  40. Uchino B.N.. Social Support and Physical Health: Understanding the Health Consequences of Relationships. Yale University Press; New Haven, CT, USA: 2004. The Meaning and Measurement of Social Support; pp. 9–32.
  41. Cobb S.. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom. Med. 1976;38:300–314.
    doi: 10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003pubmed: 981490google scholar: lookup
  42. Krueger K.. Social Ecology of Horses. In: Korb J., Heinze J., editors. Ecology of Social Evolution. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2008. pp. 195–206.
  43. Thompson K., Clarkson L.. How owners determine if the social and behavioral needs of their horses are being met: Findings from an Australian online survey. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:128–133.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.001google scholar: lookup
  44. Adamczyk K.. Dairy cattle welfare as a result of human-animal relationship—A review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2018;18:601–622.
    doi: 10.2478/aoas-2018-0013google scholar: lookup
  45. Hötzel M.J., Vieira M.C., Leme D.P.. Exploring horse owners’ and caretakers’ perceptions of emotions and associated behaviors in horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:18–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.10.002google scholar: lookup
  46. Merkies K., Franzin O.. Enhanced Understanding of Horse–Human Interactions to Optimize Welfare. Animals 2021;11:1347.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051347pmc: PMC8151687pubmed: 34065156google scholar: lookup
  47. Kelly K.J., McD￮ L.A., Mears K.. The Effect of Human-Horse Interactions on Equine Behaviour, Physiology, and Welfare: A Scoping Review. Animals 2021;11:2782.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102782pmc: PMC8532845pubmed: 34679804google scholar: lookup
  48. Sabiniewicz A., Tarnowska K., Świątek R., Sorokowski P., Laska M.. Olfactory-based interspecific recognition of human emotions: Horses (Equus ferus caballus) can recognize fear and happiness body odour from humans (Homo sapiens). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;230:105072.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105072google scholar: lookup
  49. Trösch M., Cuzol F., Parias C., Calandreau L., Nowak R., Lansade L.. Horses Categorize Human Emotions Cross-Modally Based on Facial Expression and Non-Verbal Vocalizations. Animals 2019;9:862.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9110862pmc: PMC6912773pubmed: 31653088google scholar: lookup
  50. Proops L., Grounds K., Smith A.V., McComb K.. Animals remember previous facial expressions that specific humans have exhibited. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:1428–1432.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.035pubmed: 29706519google scholar: lookup
  51. Smith A.V., Proops L., Grounds K., Wathan J., McComb K.. Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus). Biol. Lett. 2016;12:20150907.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0907pmc: PMC4780548pubmed: 26864784google scholar: lookup
  52. Baragli P., Padalino B., Telatin A.. The role of associative and non-associative learning in the training of horses and implications for the welfare (a review). Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita. 2015;51:40–51.
    doi: 10.4415/ANN_15_01_08pubmed: 25857383google scholar: lookup
  53. Birke L., Hockenhull J.. Journeys together: Horses and humans in partnership. Soc. Anim. 2015;23:81–100.
    doi: 10.1163/15685306-12341361google scholar: lookup
  54. Scopa C., Contalbrigo L., Greco A., Lanatà A., Scilingo E.P., Baragli P.. Emotional Transfer in Human-Horse Interaction: New Perspectives on Equine Assisted Interventions. Animals 2019;9:1030.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121030pmc: PMC6941042pubmed: 31779120google scholar: lookup
  55. Di Lucrezia A., Scandurra A., Lotito D., Iervolino V., D’Aniello B., Mastellone V., Lombardi P., Pinelli C.. The power of interspecific sociality: How humans provide social buffering for horses. Anim. Cogn. 2025;28:20.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01942-5pmc: PMC11903558pubmed: 40072705google scholar: lookup
  56. Janczarek I., Wilk I., Stachurska A., Krakowski L., Liss M.. Cardiac activity and salivary cortisol concentration of leisure horses in response to the presence of an audience in the arena. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:31–39.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.07.007google scholar: lookup
  57. Laborde S., Mosley E., Thayer J.F.. Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research–recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting. Front. Psychol. 2017;8:213.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213pmc: PMC5316555pubmed: 28265249google scholar: lookup
  58. Wilk I., Janczarek I.. Relationship between behavior and cardiac response to round pen training. J. Vet. Behav. 2015;10:231–236.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.01.001google scholar: lookup
  59. Janczarek I., Stachurska A., Wilk I., Krakowski L., Przetacznik M., Zastrzeżyńska M., Kuna-Broniowska I.. Emotional excitability and behaviour of horses in response to stroking various regions of the body. Anim. Sci. J. 2018;89:1599–1608.
    doi: 10.1111/asj.13104pubmed: 30155991google scholar: lookup
  60. Janczarek I., Stachurska A., Wilk I., Wiśniewska A., Różańska-Boczula M., Kaczmarek B., Łuszczyński J., Kędzierski W.. Horse Preferences for Insolation, Shade or Mist Curtain in the Paddock under Heat Conditions: Cardiac and Behavioural Response Analysis. Animals 2021;11:933.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11040933pmc: PMC8064440pubmed: 33805989google scholar: lookup
  61. Saslow C.A.. Understanding the perceptual world of horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:209–224.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00092-8google scholar: lookup
  62. Aune A., Fenner K., Wilson B., Cameron E., McLean A., McGreevy P.. Reported Behavioural Differences between Geldings and Mares Challenge Sex-Driven Stereotypes in Ridden Equine Behaviour. Animals 2020;10:414.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030414pmc: PMC7142782pubmed: 32131444google scholar: lookup
  63. Fenner K., Caspar G., Henshall C., Dhand N., Mcgreevy P.D., Probyn-Rapsey F.. It’s all about the sex: Preconceived ideas about horse temperament based on human gender and horse sex. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:150.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.06.014google scholar: lookup
  64. Dashper K., Fenner K., Hyde M., Probyn-Rapsey F., Caspar G., Henshall C., McGreevy P.. The Anthropomorphic Application of Gender Stereotypes to Horses. Anthrozoos 2018;31:673–684.
    doi: 10.1080/08927936.2018.1529349google scholar: lookup
  65. Lenoir A., Trachsel D.S., Younes M., Barrey E., Robert C.. Agreement between electrocardiogram and heart rate meter is low for the measurement of heart rate variability during exercise in young endurance horses. Front. Vet. Sci. 2017;4:170.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00170pmc: PMC5650972pubmed: 29090214google scholar: lookup
  66. Rietmann T.R., Stuart A.E.A., Bernasconi P., Staﾬher M., Auer J.A., Weishaupt M.A.. Assessment of mental stress in warmblood horses: Heart rate variability in comparison to heart rate and selected behavioural parameters. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;88:121–136.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.02.016google scholar: lookup
  67. Huangsaksri O., Wonghanchao T., Sanigavatee K., Poochipakorn C., Chanda M.. Heart rate and heart rate variability in horses undergoing hot and cold shoeing. PLoS ONE 2024;19:e0305031.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305031pmc: PMC11156413pubmed: 38843254google scholar: lookup
  68. Wonghanchao T., Sanigavatee K., Poochipakorn C., Huangsaksri O., Yalong M., Poungpuk K., Thanaudom K., Lertsakkongkul P., Lappolpaibul K., Deethong N.. Impact of different cooling solutions on autonomic modulation in horses in a novice endurance ride. Animal 2024;18:101114.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101114pubmed: 38471266google scholar: lookup
  69. Von Borell E., Langbein J., Després G., Hansen S., Leterrier C., Marchant J., Marchant-Forde R., Minero M., Mohr E., Prunier A.. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals—A review. Physiol. Behav. 2007;92:293–316.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007pubmed: 17320122google scholar: lookup
  70. Janicka W., Wilk I., Próchniak T.. Does social motivation mitigate fear caused by a sudden sound in horses?. Anim. Cogn. 2023;26:1649–1660.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01805-xpmc: PMC10442260pubmed: 37450226google scholar: lookup
  71. Żelazna R., Jezierski T.. Behavioural reactions of horses (Equus caballus) to separation stress in conspecifics. A pilot study on emotional contagion in the horse. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2018;36:333–338.
  72. Hartmann E., Christensen J.W., Keeling L.J.. Training young horses to social separation: Effect of a companion horse on training efficiency. Equine Vet. J. 2011;43:580–584.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00326.xpubmed: 21496087google scholar: lookup
  73. Koski S.E., Spännäri J.. Experiences of Intersubjectivity and Agency in Human–Horse Relationships Differ Between Box- and Open-Shed-Stable Environments. Anthrozoos 2024;37:687–704.
    doi: 10.1080/08927936.2024.2320999google scholar: lookup
  74. Stachurska A., Kędzierski W., Kaczmarek B., Wiśniewska A., Żylińska B., Janczarek I.. Variation of Physiological and Behavioural Parameters during the Oestrous Cycle in Mares. Animals 2023;13:211.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13020211pmc: PMC9854849pubmed: 36670751google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.