Analyze Diet

Some factors affecting isolation of Clostridium tetani from human and animal stools.

Abstract: Clostridium tetani was isolated from human and animal stools at the following rates [95% confidence interval (CI)]: Human, 0% (1.5-0); horse, 1% (5-0); cow in cowshed, 4% (10-1); cow in pasture, 8.3% (17-1), calf in pasture, 0% (7-0); dog, 2% (11-0) and sheep in pasture, 25% (44-14). Quantification of C. tetani in 16 animal stools positive for the bacillus was impossible in most cases, as the number of tetanus bacilli present was not large enough for this purpose. Contaminating anaerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria in human and animal stools, i.e., C. perfringens and Streptococcus sp., Group G, inhibited isolation of C. tetani from these materials, particularly at the step of isolation employing its swarming character.
Publication Date: 1988-12-01 PubMed ID: 2908185
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studied the difficulty and rate of isolating Clostridium tetani, the bacteria causing tetanus, from human and animal stool samples. It found that the isolation encounters challenges due to the presence of other bacteria, and it occurs at different rates in different species.

Research Methodology and Findings

  • The research focused on isolating Clostridium tetani, a type of bacteria that causes tetanus, from the feces of humans and several animal species: horses, cows, calves, dogs, and sheep.
  • The success rates of the isolation varied among the subjects, with humans and pasture calves yielding no isolation of the bacteria at all, while cows in the pasture and sheep exhibited higher rates of 8.3% and 25% respectively. However, the variance in these rates was high, as shown by wide 95% confidence intervals.

Challenge in Quantifying Clostridium tetani

  • The study explained that in many cases, quantifying the number of Clostridium tetani bacteria in the feces samples was not possible. This issue arises because the quantity of the tetanus bacteria present in the samples is typically not large enough to analyze effectively.

Interference by Other Bacteria

  • The research found that other types of bacteria present in the feces samples – namely Clostridium perfringens and Streptococcus species of Group G, both of which are anaerobic (oxygen-free environment-loving) and facultative anaerobic (able to survive both with and without oxygen) – interfered with the isolation of Clostridium tetani.
  • These interfering bacteria can especially affect the isolation step that depends on the swarming nature of the Clostridium tetani. This swarming character refers to the bacteria’s ability to spread out rapidly in a thin layer when introduced to a solid surface, thus, when obstructed, it complicates the process of its isolation from the sample.

Cite This Article

APA
Ebisawa I, Takayanagi M, Kigawa M. (1988). Some factors affecting isolation of Clostridium tetani from human and animal stools. Jpn J Exp Med, 58(6), 233-241.

Publication

ISSN: 0021-5031
NlmUniqueID: 9800765
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 58
Issue: 6
Pages: 233-241

Researcher Affiliations

Ebisawa, I
  • Department of Public Health, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayanagi, M
    Kigawa, M

      MeSH Terms

      • Adult
      • Animals
      • Bacteria, Anaerobic / isolation & purification
      • Cattle
      • Clostridium perfringens / isolation & purification
      • Clostridium tetani / isolation & purification
      • Colony Count, Microbial
      • Culture Media
      • Dogs
      • Escherichia coli / isolation & purification
      • Ethanol
      • Feces / microbiology
      • Horses
      • Hot Temperature
      • Humans
      • Sheep
      • Staphylococcus aureus / isolation & purification
      • Streptococcus / isolation & purification

      Citations

      This article has been cited 0 times.