Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice2014; 30(1); 169-190; doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2013.11.005

Standing male equine urogenital surgery.

Abstract: The advantages of performing standing male urogenital surgeries are numerous when compared with performing the same surgery in the anesthetized animal. Some traditional standing male urogenital surgeries, such as castrations, may be faster and cheaper to perform. Laparoscopic standing male urogenital surgeries may allow for improved visualization of the surgical field, decreased hemorrhage, and decreased morbidity and convalescence. Limitations of standing procedures may include increased danger to the surgeon because of fractious behavior of the patient, and increased expense and training associated with instrumentation for specialized procedures such as laparoscopy.
Publication Date: 2014-01-31 PubMed ID: 24680211DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2013.11.005Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article explores the benefits of performing urogenital surgeries on standing male horses, as compared to operating on anesthetized animals. It highlights reduced cost, improved visibility during surgery, decreased bleeding, and less post-operative complications as advantages, while pointing out potential challenges such as safety risks for surgeons and increased costs for specialized procedures.

Pros and Cons of Standing Urogenital Surgeries in Male Equines

The paper presents a comprehensive comparison between undertaking standing urogenital surgeries on male horses and conducting similar procedures on anesthetized ones. It discusses both advantages and potential limitations of such surgeries, which are essential aspects for any veterinary to consider.

  • Advantages: The study suggests that standing surgeries, such as castrations, might be both faster and less costly. The author points out that laparoscopic procedures, in particular, may provide better visualization of the surgical area. This increased clarity can lead to reduced hemorrhages—a common risk in surgeries. Less bleeding also results in a decrease in post-operative complications and a shorter recovery period for the horse.
  • Limitations: Despite the mentioned benefits, the paper also draws attention to several drawbacks of standing urogenital surgeries. For instance, a standing procedure might place the surgeon at an increased risk due to the unpredictable behavior of the patient. Additionally, specialized procedures, such as laparoscopy, might come with higher expenses, both in terms of specialized equipment required and the additional training needed to perform these procedures.

Implication of the Study

Overall, this study aims to provide a comprehensive perspective on performing standing urogenital surgeries on male equines. The research offers essential insights that can aid professionals in the veterinary field in deciding the most favorable surgical method – both for the welfare of the animal and for an effective and safe surgical outcome. It emphasizes that while standing surgeries have their distinct advantages, it is vital to be aware of and prepared for their potential challenges. This awareness helps ensure that the benefits of these surgeries are maximized, while the risks are minimized.

Cite This Article

APA
Adams A, Hendrickson DA. (2014). Standing male equine urogenital surgery. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 30(1), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2013.11.005

Publication

ISSN: 1558-4224
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 30
Issue: 1
Pages: 169-190
PII: S0749-0739(13)00089-8

Researcher Affiliations

Adams, Aric
  • Equine Medical Center of Ocala, 7107 W Hwy 326, Ocala, FL 34482, USA. Electronic address: aadams@emcocala.com.
Hendrickson, Dean A
  • Professional Veterinary Medicine, 1601 Campus Delivery, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horses / surgery
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Laparoscopy / veterinary
  • Male
  • Urogenital Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Urogenital Surgical Procedures / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Vázquez FJ, Vitoria A, Gómez-Arrue J, Fuente S, Barrachina L, de Blas I, Romero A. Complications in Laparoscopic Access in Standing Horses Using Cannula and Trocar Units Developed for Human Medicine. Vet Sci 2023 Jan 15;10(1).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci10010061pubmed: 36669062google scholar: lookup
  2. Straticò P, Guerri G, Palozzo A, Varasano V, Petrizzi L. Current Use of Equine Laparoscopy in Urogenital Disorders: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2000 to 2021. Vet Sci 2022 Jan 22;9(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020041pubmed: 35202295google scholar: lookup
  3. Straticò P, Varasano V, Guerri G, Celani G, Palozzo A, Petrizzi L. A Retrospective Study of Cryptorchidectomy in Horses: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcome and Complications in 70 Cases. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 21;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122446pubmed: 33371184google scholar: lookup
  4. Nocera I, Moroni R, Fanelli D, Rota A, Di Franco C, Ungari C, Puccinelli C, Gandini M, Giusto G, Vannozzi I. Cryptorchidism in Equid: A Retrospective Study on Diagnostic Approach, Anaesthesia Management, Surgical Treatment and Outcomes. Animals (Basel) 2025 Oct 9;15(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15192923pubmed: 41096518google scholar: lookup