FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Straw as an Alternative to Grass Forage in Horses-Effects on...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(8); doi: 10.3390/ani11082197

Straw as an Alternative to Grass Forage in Horses-Effects on Post-Prandial Metabolic Profile, Energy Intake, Behaviour and Gastric Ulceration.

Abstract: Straw's low energy content means it is a roughage option for horses with low energy requirements. Previously, in a field study, straw was associated with an increased risk for gastric ulcers. This study evaluated the effect on gastric ulcers, metabolic profile and behaviour of replacing, in a forage-only ration, 50% of the daily allowance with wheat straw. Six equines were studied in a 2 × 21-day cross-over design. The control diet (CON: 100% grass forage) and the straw diet (S: 50% grass forage and 50% straw [DM basis]) were iso-energetic. Gastroscopy was performed prior to the study and on day 21 and blood samples were collected and behavioural observations were performed. Diet did not affect squamous or glandular gastric ulcer scores (p > 0.05). Feed intake time was longer (p < 0.05) plus energy intake and plasma insulin concentrations were lower on diet S compared to CON (p < 0.0001). Plasma serotonin concentrations tended to be higher on diet S compared to CON (p = 0.05). The results suggest that good hygienic quality wheat straw can be included for up to 50% of the diet without causing gastric ulcers and that it can extend feeding time and promote a metabolic profile more suitable for overweight horses.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-07-24 PubMed ID: 34438656PubMed Central: PMC8388405DOI: 10.3390/ani11082197Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses a study on the effects of replacing half of a horse’s daily grass forage allowance with wheat straw. The results indicate that wheat straw does not increase the risk of gastric ulcers in horses, and it can actually offer benefits like a extended feeding time and a better metabolic profile for overweight horses.

Understanding the Study

  • The aim of the study was to assess the impact of replacing 50% of the daily allowance of grass forage with wheat straw in a horse’s diet.
  • The research was conducted on six horses over a period of 42 days (divided into two equal periods), in a cross-over design, which means each horse was exposed to both control and experimental conditions.
  • The two dietary conditions tested were a control diet (CON) consisting entirely of grass forage, and an experimental diet (S) containing 50% grass forage and 50% wheat straw. These diets were designed to have the same energy content.

Findings of the Study

  • The study found that including wheat straw in the diet did not impact gastric ulcer scores for either the squamous or glandular type, suggesting that wheat straw does not increase the risk of gastric ulcers.
  • Feeding time was extended on the straw diet compared to the control, meaning the horses took longer to consume their food when it included wheat straw. This could be beneficial for horse owners or trainers looking to occupy their horses for a longer amount of time with the same food quantity.
  • Energy intake and plasma insulin concentrations were found to be lower with the wheat straw diet. This shows potential for using wheat straw as a way to manage the diet of horses that need to maintain or lose weight.
  • It was also found that plasma serotonin concentrations tended to be higher on the straw diet. Serotonin is a hormone known to affect mood and behavior, but the implications of this finding for horse health and behavior are not directly addressed in the abstract.

Conclusion

  • In conclusion, the study suggests that good hygienic quality wheat straw can be included for up to 50% of the diet without causing gastric ulcers and that it can extend feeding time and promote a metabolic profile more suitable for overweight horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Jansson A, Harris P, Davey SL, Luthersson N, Ragnarsson S, Ringmark S. (2021). Straw as an Alternative to Grass Forage in Horses-Effects on Post-Prandial Metabolic Profile, Energy Intake, Behaviour and Gastric Ulceration. Animals (Basel), 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082197

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 8

Researcher Affiliations

Jansson, Anna
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Harris, Patricia
  • WALTHAM Petcare Science Institute Waltham-on-the Wolds, Melton Mowbray, Leics LE14 4RT, UK.
Davey, Sara Larsdotter
  • University Animal Hospital, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Luthersson, Nanna
  • Hestedoktoren I/S, Hvalsøvej 298, 4360 Kr. Eskilstrup, Denmark.
Ragnarsson, Sveinn
  • Department of Equine Science, Hólar University, IS-551 Sauðárkrókur, Iceland.
Ringmark, Sara
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

Grant Funding

  • no number / MARS Petcare UK
  • no number / Marie-Claire Cronstedts Stiftelse

Conflict of Interest Statement

With the exception of co-author PH, the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

This article includes 52 references
  1. Olsson N, Kihlén G, Cagell W. Smältbarhetsförsök med hästar (Digestibility experiments on horses). Lantbrukshögskolan Husdjursförsöksanstalten 1949;Meddelande nr 36:1–51.
  2. Slagsvold P, Hintz H.F, Schryver H.F. Digestibility by ponies of oat straw treated with anhydrous ammonia. Anim. Sci. 1979;28:347–352.
    doi: 10.1017/S0003356100023254google scholar: lookup
  3. Hansen D.K, Webb G.W, Webb S.P. Digestibility of wheat straw or ammoniated wheat straw in equine diets. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1992;12:223–226.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(06)81450-4google scholar: lookup
  4. Durham A.E, Frank N, McGowan C.M, Menzies-Gow N.J, Roelfsema E, Vervuert I, Feige K, Fey K. ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019;33:335–349.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15423pmc: PMC6430910pubmed: 30724412google scholar: lookup
  5. Rendle D, Argo P.C.M, Bowen P.M, Carslake H, German P.A, Harris P, Knowles E, Menzies-Gow D.N, Morgan R. Equine obesity: Current perspectives. UK-Vet Equine 2018;2:1–19.
    doi: 10.12968/ukve.2018.2.S2.3google scholar: lookup
  6. Harris P.A, Ellis A.D, Fradinho M.J, Jansson A, Julliand V, Luthersson N, Santos A.S, Vervuert I. Review: Feeding conserved forage to horses: Recent advances and recommendations. Animal 2017;11:958–967.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002469pubmed: 27881201google scholar: lookup
  7. Meyer H, Ahiswedeu L, Reinhardt H.J. Studies on the duration of feeding, masticatory frequency and mincing of feed in horses. DTW Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 1975;82:54–58.
    pubmed: 1091440
  8. McGreevy P.D, Cripps P.J, French N.P, Green L.E, Nicol C.J. Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the thoroughbred horse. Equine Vet. J. 1995;27:86–91.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03041.xpubmed: 7607155google scholar: lookup
  9. Redbo I, Redbo-Torstensson P, Ödberg F.O, Hedendahl A, Holm J. Factors affecting behavioural disturbances in race-horses. Anim. Sci. 1998;66:475–481.
    doi: 10.1017/S1357729800009644google scholar: lookup
  10. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. Pre-feeding behaviour in UK leisure horses and associated feeding routine risk factors. Anim. Welf. 2014;23:297–308.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.3.297google scholar: lookup
  11. Luthersson N, Nielsen K.H, Harris P, Parkin T.D. Risk factors associated with equine gastric ulceration syndrome (EGUS) in 201 horses in Denmark. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:625–630.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X441929pubmed: 19927579google scholar: lookup
  12. Airaksinen S, Heinonen-Tanski H, Heiskanen M.L. Quality of different bedding materials and their influence on the compostability of horse manure. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2001;21:125–130.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(01)70108-6google scholar: lookup
  13. Wichert B, Nater S, Wittenbrink M.M, Wolf P, Meyer K, Wanner M. Judgement of hygienic quality of roughage in horse stables in Switzerland. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2008;92:432–437.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00755.xpubmed: 18662352google scholar: lookup
  14. Henneke D.R, Potter G.D, Kreider J.L, Yeates B.F. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body-fat percentage in mares. Equine Vet. J. 1983;15:371–372.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01826.xpubmed: 6641685google scholar: lookup
  15. Nadeau J.A, Andrews F.M, Mathew A.G, Argenzio R.A, Blackford J.T, Sohtell M, Saxton A.M. Evaluation of diet as a cause of gastric ulcers in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2000;61:784–790.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.784pubmed: 10895901google scholar: lookup
  16. Sykes B.W, Hewetson M, Hepburn R.J, Luthersson N, Tamzali Y. European College of Equine Internal Medicine Consensus Statement-Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Adult Horses. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015;29:1288–1299.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13578pmc: PMC4858038pubmed: 26340142google scholar: lookup
  17. Sykes B.W, Kathawala K, Song Y, Garg S, Page S.W, Underwood C, Mills P.C. Preliminary investigations into a novel, long-acting, injectable, intramuscular formulation of omeprazole in the horse. Equine Vet. J. 2017;49:795–801.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12688pubmed: 28397996google scholar: lookup
  18. Jansson A, Harris P.A. A bibliometric review on nutrition of the exercising horse from 1970 to 2010. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2013;9:169–180.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP13018google scholar: lookup
  19. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Horses. National Academies Press 2007.
  20. Ringmark S, Roepstorff L, Essén-Gustavsson B, Revold T, Lindholm A, Hedenström U, Rundgren M, Ögren G, Jansson A. Growth, training response and health in Standardbred yearlings fed a forage-only diet. Animal 2013;7:746–753.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002261pubmed: 23228709google scholar: lookup
  21. Connysson M, Muhonen S, Jansson A. Road transport and diet affect metabolic response to exercise in horses. J. Anim. Sci. 2017;95:4869–4879.
    doi: 10.2527/jas2017.1670pmc: PMC6292253pubmed: 29293735google scholar: lookup
  22. Connysson M, Rhodin M, Jansson A. Effects of Horse Housing System on Energy Balance during Post-Exercise Recovery. Animals 2019;9:976.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9110976pmc: PMC6912715pubmed: 31739646google scholar: lookup
  23. Jansson A, Sandin A, Lindberg J. Digestive and metabolic effects of altering feeding frequency in athletic horses. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2006;3:83–91.
    doi: 10.1079/ECP200683google scholar: lookup
  24. Frank N, Tadros E.M. Insulin dysregulation. Equine Vet. J. 2014;46:103–112.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12169pubmed: 24033478google scholar: lookup
  25. Dosi M.C.M, Kirton R, Hallsworth S, Keen J.A, Morgan R.A. Inducing weight loss in native ponies: Is straw a viable alternative to hay?. Vet. Rec. 2020;187:e60.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105793pubmed: 32366497google scholar: lookup
  26. Carter R.A, Treiber K.H, Geor R.J, Douglass L, Harris P.A. Prediction of incipient pasture-associated laminitis from hyperinsulinaemia, hyperleptinaemia and generalised and localised obesity in a cohort of ponies. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:171–178.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X342975pubmed: 19418747google scholar: lookup
  27. Glunk E.C, Hathaway M.R, Weber W.J, Sheaffer C.C, Martinson K.L. The Effect of Hay Net Design on Rate of Forage Consumption When Feeding Adult Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2014;34:986–991.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.05.006google scholar: lookup
  28. Jansson A, Saastamoinen M, Lindberg J. Forage feeding systems. 2012. In: Saastamoinen M., Fradinho M.J., Santos A.S., Miraglia N., editors. Forages and Grazing in Horse Nutrition. Wageningen Academic Publishers; Wageningen, The Netherlands: pp. 289–303.
  29. Clarke L.L, Argenzio R.A, Roberts M.C. Effect of meal feeding on plasma volume and urinary electrolyte clearance in ponies. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1990;51:571–576.
    pubmed: 2327617
  30. Jansson A, Dahlborn K. Effects of feeding frequency and voluntary salt intake on fluid and electrolyte regulation in athletic horses. J. Appl. Physiol. 1999;86:1610–1616.
    doi: 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1610pubmed: 10233125google scholar: lookup
  31. Jansson A, Lindberg J, Rundgren M, Müller C, Connysson M, Kjellberg L, Lundberg M. Utfodringsrekommendationer för häst. 2011. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Uppsala, Sweden: pp. 1–39.
  32. Jose-Cunilleras E, Hinchcliff K.W, Sams R.A, Devor S.T, Linderman J.K. Glycemic index of a meal fed before exercise alters substrate use and glucose flux in exercising horses. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002;92:117–128.
    doi: 10.1152/jappl.2002.92.1.117pubmed: 11744650google scholar: lookup
  33. Van Weyenberg S, Buyse J, Janssens G.P. Digestibility of a complete ration in horses fed once or three times a day and correlation with key blood parameters. Vet. J. 2007;173:311–316.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.08.011pubmed: 16376126google scholar: lookup
  34. Lindedam J, Bruun S, Jørgensen H, Felby C, Magid J. Cellulosic ethanol: Interactions between cultivar and enzyme loading in wheat straw processing. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2010;3:25.
    doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-3-25pmc: PMC2998488pubmed: 21087497google scholar: lookup
  35. Tishler Y, Samach A, Rogachev I, Elbaum R, Levy A.A. Analysis of Wheat Straw Biodiversity for Use as a Feedstock for Biofuel Production. BioEnergy Res. 2015;8:1831–1839.
    doi: 10.1007/s12155-015-9631-0google scholar: lookup
  36. Alberghina D, Giannetto C, Visser E.K, Ellis A.D. Effect of diet on plasma tryptophan and serotonin in trained mares and geldings. Vet. Rec. 2010;166:133–136.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.c502pubmed: 20118469google scholar: lookup
  37. Banskota S, Ghia J.E, Khan W.I. Serotonin in the gut: Blessing or a curse. Biochimie 2019;161:56–64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2018.06.008pubmed: 29909048google scholar: lookup
  38. Tecott L.H. Serotonin and the Orchestration of Energy Balance. Cell Metab. 2007;6:352–361.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.09.012pubmed: 17983581google scholar: lookup
  39. Simansky K.J. Serotonergic control of the organization of feeding and satiety. Behav. Brain Res. 1996;73:37–42.
    doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00066-6pubmed: 8788474google scholar: lookup
  40. Miquel-Kergoat S, Azais-Braesco V, Burton-Freeman B, Hetherington M.M. Effects of chewing on appetite, food intake and gut hormones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiol. Behav. 2015;151:88–96.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.017pubmed: 26188140google scholar: lookup
  41. Gershon M.D. Review article: Serotonin receptors and transporters—Roles in normal and abnormal gastrointestinal motility. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004;20(Suppl. S7):3–14.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02180.xpubmed: 15521849google scholar: lookup
  42. Sumara G, Sumara O, Kim J.K, Karsenty G. Gut-derived serotonin is a multifunctional determinant to fasting adaptation. Cell Metab. 2012;16:588–600.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.09.014pmc: PMC3696514pubmed: 23085101google scholar: lookup
  43. VanderBroek A.R, Reef V.B, Aitken M.R, Stefanovski D, Southwood L.L. Assessing gastrointestinal motility in healthy horses comparing auscultation, ultrasonography and an acoustic gastrointestinal surveillance biosensor: A randomised, blinded, controlled crossover proof of principle study. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:246–251.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12990pubmed: 29975422google scholar: lookup
  44. Hudson J.M, Cohen N.D, Gibbs P.G, Thompson J.A. Feeding practices associated with colic in horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2001;219:1419–1425.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.219.1419pubmed: 11724182google scholar: lookup
  45. Connysson M, Muhonen S, Lindberg J.E, Essen-Gustavsson B, Nyman G, Nostell K, Jansson A. Effects on exercise response, fluid and acid-base balance of protein intake from forage-only diets in Standardbred horses. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:648–653.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05620.xpubmed: 17402499google scholar: lookup
  46. Essen-Gustavsson B, Connysson M, Jansson A. Effects of crude protein intake from forage-only diets on muscle amino acids and glycogen levels in horses in training. Equine Vet. J. 2010;42:341–346.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00283.xpubmed: 21059028google scholar: lookup
  47. Muhonen S, Lindberg J.E, Bertilsson J, Jansson A. Effects on fluid balance, digestion and exercise response in Standardbred horses fed silage, haylage and hay. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2008;5:133–142.
    doi: 10.1017/S1478061509342334google scholar: lookup
  48. Muhonen S, Julliand V, Lindberg J.E, Bertilsson J, Jansson A. Effects on the equine colon ecosystem of grass silage and haylage diets after an abrupt change from hay. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;87:2291–2298.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1461pubmed: 19329474google scholar: lookup
  49. Ragnarsson S, Jansson A. Comparison of grass haylage digestibility and metabolic plasma profile in Icelandic and Standardbred horses. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2011;95:273–279.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01049.xpubmed: 20796073google scholar: lookup
  50. Ringmark S, Jansson A. Insulin response to feeding forage with varying crude protein and amino acid content in horses at rest and after exercise. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2013;9:209–217.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP13014google scholar: lookup
  51. Ringmark S, Revold T, Jansson A. Effects of training distance on feed intake, growth, body condition and muscle glycogen content in young Standardbred horses fed a forage-only diet. Animal 2017;11:1–9.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000593pubmed: 28367770google scholar: lookup
  52. Muhonen S, Connysson M, Lindberg J.E, Julliand V, Bertilsson J, Jansson A. Effects of crude protein intake from grass silage-only diets on the equine colon ecosystem after an abrupt feed change. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0374pubmed: 18676731google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.