Analyze Diet
PloS one2013; 8(4); e62324; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062324

Stress modulates instrumental learning performances in horses (Equus caballus) in interaction with temperament.

Abstract: The present study investigates how the temperament of the animal affects the influence of acute stress on the acquisition and reacquisition processes of a learning task. After temperament was assessed, horses were subjected to a stressor before or after the acquisition session of an instrumental task. Eight days later, horses were subjected to a reacquisition session without any stressor. Stress before acquisition tended to enhance the number of successes at the beginning of the acquisition session. Eight days later, during the reacquisition session, contrary to non-stressed animals, horses stressed after acquisition, and, to a lesser extent, horses stressed before acquisition, did not improve their performance between acquisition and reacquisition sessions. Temperament influenced learning performances in stressed horses only. Particularly, locomotor activity improved performances whereas fearfulness impaired them under stressful conditions. Results suggest that direct exposure to a stressor tended to increase acquisition performances, whereas a state of stress induced by the memory of a stressor, because it has been previously associated with the learning context, impaired reacquisition performances. The negative effect of a state of stress on reacquisition performances appeared to be stronger when exposure to the stressor occurred after rather than before the acquisition session. Temperament had an impact on both acquisition and reacquisition processes, but under stressful conditions only. These results suggest that stress is necessary to reveal the influence of temperament on cognitive performances.
Publication Date: 2013-04-23 PubMed ID: 23626801PubMed Central: PMC3633893DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062324Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study explores how stress, in conjunction with a horse’s temperament, impacts its learning process. It is found that stress can enhance a horse’s initial learning, but impairs its ability to relearn. Additionally, horses with higher levels of activity performed better under stress, while those with a fearful temperament performed worse.

Research Methodology

  • The study involved assessing the temperament of horses.
  • These horses were then exposed to a stressful event either before or after a learning task.
  • Eight days after the initial learning task, the horses were presented with the task again, this time without any prior stress exposure.
  • The aim was to observe how exposure to a stressor influenced the acquisition and reacquisition processes of the learning task.

Acquisition vs Reacquisition Results

  • The study found that stress before learning seemed to improve the initial success rate.
  • However, horses that were stressed after the initial task, and to a lesser extent those stressed before, did not display improvement during the relearning session eight days later.
  • This suggests that while a direct encounter with a stressor can enhance the initial acquisition process, a state of stress induced by the memory of a stressor can impair the reacquisition process.

Influence of Temperament

  • The researchers also noted that a horse’s temperament impacted learning performance, but only under stressful conditions.
  • Horses with a high degree of locomotor activity displayed better performance under stress, while those with high fearfulness levels underperformed under stress.
  • This implies that a horse’s temperament comes into play under stress and can significantly influence the learning processes.

Conclusions

  • The researchers concluded that while stress can enhance the initial learning process in horses, it hampers their ability to relearn.
  • They also deduced that a horse’s temperament plays a significant role in learning under stressful conditions.
  • They suggest that further research may lead to a better understanding of the impact of stress on learning processes in animals and could improve care practices.

Cite This Article

APA
Valenchon M, Lévy F, Prunier A, Moussu C, Calandreau L, Lansade L. (2013). Stress modulates instrumental learning performances in horses (Equus caballus) in interaction with temperament. PLoS One, 8(4), e62324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062324

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 8
Issue: 4
Pages: e62324
PII: e62324

Researcher Affiliations

Valenchon, Mathilde
  • INRA, UMR85 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France.
Lévy, Frédéric
    Prunier, Armelle
      Moussu, Chantal
        Calandreau, Ludovic
          Lansade, Léa

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Behavior, Animal
            • Conditioning, Operant
            • Female
            • Horses
            • Hydrocortisone / metabolism
            • Saliva / metabolism
            • Stress, Psychological / metabolism
            • Temperament

            Conflict of Interest Statement

            The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

            References

            This article includes 47 references
            1. Sandi C, Pinelo-Nava MT. Stress and memory: behavioral effects and neurobiological mechanisms.. Neural Plast 2007;2007:78970.
              pmc: PMC1950232pubmed: 18060012doi: 10.1155/2007/78970google scholar: lookup
            2. Mendl M. Performing under pressure: stress and cognitive function.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 65: 221–244.
            3. Joëls M, Pu Z, Wiegert O, Oitzl MS, Krugers HJ. Learning under stress: how does it work?. Trends Cogn Sci 2006 Apr;10(4):152-8.
              pubmed: 16513410doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.002google scholar: lookup
            4. Schwabe L, Wolf OT, Oitzl MS. Memory formation under stress: quantity and quality.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010 Mar;34(4):584-91.
            5. Nicol CJ. Equine learning: progress and suggestions for future research.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 78: 193–208.
            6. Jiao X, Pang KC, Beck KD, Minor TR, Servatius RJ. Avoidance perseveration during extinction training in Wistar-Kyoto rats: an interaction of innate vulnerability and stressor intensity.. Behav Brain Res 2011 Aug 1;221(1):98-107.
              pmc: PMC3079807pubmed: 21376086doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.02.029google scholar: lookup
            7. Goldsmith HH, Buss AH, Plomin R, Rothbart MK, Thomas A, Chess S, Hinde RA, McCall RB. Roundtable: what is temperament? Four approaches.. Child Dev 1987 Apr;58(2):505-29.
              pubmed: 3829791
            8. Bates JE. Concepts and measures of temperament.. .
            9. Lansade L, Bouissou MF. Reactivity to humans: A temperament trait of horses which is stable across time and situations.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 114: 492–508.
            10. Lansade L, Bouissou MF, Erhard HW. Fearfulness in horses: A temperament trait stable across time and situations.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 115: 182–200.
            11. Lansade L, Bouissou MF, Erhard HW. Reactivity to isolation and association with conspecifics: A temperament trait stable across time and situations.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 109: 355–373.
            12. Lansade L, Pichard G, Leconte M. Sensory sensitivities: Components of a horse’s temperament dimension.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 114: 534–553.
            13. Cazakoff BN, Johnson KJ, Howland JG. Converging effects of acute stress on spatial and recognition memory in rodents: a review of recent behavioural and pharmacological findings.. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2010 Jun 30;34(5):733-41.
              pubmed: 20394792doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.04.002google scholar: lookup
            14. Zoladz PR, Clark B, Warnecke A, Smith L, Tabar J, Talbot JN. Pre-learning stress differentially affects long-term memory for emotional words, depending on temporal proximity to the learning experience.. Physiol Behav 2011 Jul 6;103(5):467-76.
              pubmed: 21262248doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.016google scholar: lookup
            15. Diamond DM, Campbell AM, Park CR, Woodson JC, Conrad CD, Bachstetter AD, Mervis RF. Influence of predator stress on the consolidation versus retrieval of long-term spatial memory and hippocampal spinogenesis.. Hippocampus 2006;16(7):571-6.
              pubmed: 16741974doi: 10.1002/hipo.20188google scholar: lookup
            16. Park CR, Zoladz PR, Conrad CD, Fleshner M, Diamond DM. Acute predator stress impairs the consolidation and retrieval of hippocampus-dependent memory in male and female rats.. Learn Mem 2008 Apr;15(4):271-80.
              pmc: PMC2327269pubmed: 18391188doi: 10.1101/lm.721108google scholar: lookup
            17. Youngblood BD, Ryan DH, Harris RB. Appetitive operant behavior and free-feeding in rats exposed to acute stress.. Physiol Behav 1997 Oct;62(4):827-30.
              pubmed: 9284504doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00245-xgoogle scholar: lookup
            18. Janitzky K, Schwegler H, Kröber A, Roskoden T, Yanagawa Y, Linke R. Species-relevant inescapable stress differently influences memory consolidation and retrieval of mice in a spatial radial arm maze.. Behav Brain Res 2011 May 16;219(1):142-8.
              pubmed: 21219938doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.12.032google scholar: lookup
            19. Kaouane N, Porte Y, Vallée M, Brayda-Bruno L, Mons N, Calandreau L, Marighetto A, Piazza PV, Desmedt A. Glucocorticoids can induce PTSD-like memory impairments in mice.. Science 2012 Mar 23;335(6075):1510-3.
              pubmed: 22362879doi: 10.1126/science.1207615google scholar: lookup
            20. Wolff A, Hausberger M, Le Scolan N. Experimental tests to assess emotionality in horses.. Behav Processes 1997 Sep;40(3):209-21.
              pubmed: 24895882doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00784-5google scholar: lookup
            21. Le Scolan N, Hausberger M, Wolff A. Stability over situations in temperamental traits of horses as revealed by experimental and scoring approaches.. Behav Processes 1997 Dec;41(3):257-66.
              pubmed: 24896858doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00052-1google scholar: lookup
            22. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Rundgren M, Zetterqvist M, Morgan K, Blokhuis HJ. Responses of horses in behavioural tests correlate with temperament assessed by riders.. Equine Vet J 2003 Mar;35(2):176-83.
              pubmed: 12638795doi: 10.2746/042516403776114108google scholar: lookup
            23. McDonnell SM, Poulin A. Equid play ethogram.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 78: 263–290.
            24. Williams JL, Friend TH, Nevill CH, Archer G. The efficacy of a secondary reinforcer (clicker) during acquisition and extinction of an operant task in horses.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 88: 331–341.
            25. Whistance LK, Sinclair LA, Arney DR, Phillips CJC. Trainability of eliminative behaviour in dairy heifers using a secondary reinforcer.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 117: 128–136.
            26. Peeters M, Sulon J, Beckers JF, Ledoux D, Vandenheede M. Comparison between blood serum and salivary cortisol concentrations in horses using an adrenocorticotropic hormone challenge.. Equine Vet J 2011 Jul;43(4):487-93.
            27. Harewood EJ, McGowan CM. Behavioral and physiological responses to stabling in naive horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 25: 164–170.
            28. Moons CPH, Laughlin K, Zanella AJ. Effects of short-term maternal separations on weaning stress in foals.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 91: 321–335.
            29. Jongman EC, Bidstrup I, Hemsworth PH. Behavioural and physiological measures of welfare of pregnant mares fitted with a novel urine collection device.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 93: 147–163.
            30. Schmidt A, Möstl E, Wehnert C, Aurich J, Müller J, Aurich C. Cortisol release and heart rate variability in horses during road transport.. Horm Behav 2010 Feb;57(2):209-15.
              pubmed: 19944105doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.11.003google scholar: lookup
            31. Schmidt A, Biau S, Möstl E, Becker-Birck M, Morillon B, Aurich J, Faure JM, Aurich C. Changes in cortisol release and heart rate variability in sport horses during long-distance road transport.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2010 Apr;38(3):179-89.
            32. Hay M, Rue J, Sansac C, Brunel G, Prunier A. Long-term detrimental effects of tooth clipping or grinding in piglets: a histological approach.. Anim Welf 13: 27–32.
            33. Arbonnier P. L’analyse de l’information: aperçu théorique et application à la loi multinomiale.. 1966: 950–1020.
            34. Maros K, Gácsi M, Miklósi A. Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2008 Jul;11(3):457-66.
              pubmed: 18247069doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0136-5google scholar: lookup
            35. Proops L, Walton M, McComb K. The use of human-given cues by domestic horses, Equus caballus, during an object choice task.. Anim Behav 79: 1205–1209.
            36. McKinley J, Sambrook TD. Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 3: 13–22.
            37. Woodson JC, Macintosh D, Fleshner M, Diamond DM. Emotion-induced amnesia in rats: working memory-specific impairment, corticosterone-memory correlation, and fear versus arousal effects on memory.. Learn Mem 2003 Sep-Oct;10(5):326-36.
              pmc: PMC217998pubmed: 14557605doi: 10.1101/lm.62903google scholar: lookup
            38. Parasuraman R. Sustained attention in detection and discrimination.. 243–271.
            39. Dukas R, Clark CW. Sustained vigilance and animal performance.. Anim Behav 49: 1259–1267.
            40. Pierce WD, Cheney CD. Behavior Analysis and Learning.. 529 p.
            41. Barnet RC, Miller RR. Second-order excitation mediated by a backward conditioned inhibitor.. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1996 Jul;22(3):279-96.
              pubmed: 8691159doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.22.3.279google scholar: lookup
            42. Heth CD. Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning as a function of number of CS-UCS pairings.. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1976 Apr;2(2):117-29.
              pubmed: 1271015doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.2.2.117google scholar: lookup
            43. van den Bos R, Harteveld M, Stoop H. Stress and decision-making in humans: performance is related to cortisol reactivity, albeit differently in men and women.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009 Nov;34(10):1449-58.
            44. Keinan G. Decision making under stress: scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats.. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987 Mar;52(3):639-44.
              pubmed: 3572731doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.3.639google scholar: lookup
            45. Lansade L, Simon F. Horses’ learning performances are under the influence of several temperamental dimensions.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 125: 30–37.
            46. Coutellier L, Friedrich AC, Failing K, Marashi V, Würbel H. Effects of rat odour and shelter on maternal behaviour in C57BL/6 dams and on fear and stress responses in their adult offspring.. Physiol Behav 2008 Jun 9;94(3):393-404.
              pubmed: 18346766doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.02.006google scholar: lookup
            47. Faure JM, Val-Laillet D, Guy G, Bernadet MD, Guémené D. Fear and stress reactions in two species of duck and their hybrid.. Horm Behav 2003 May;43(5):568-72.
              pubmed: 12799174doi: 10.1016/s0018-506x(03)00062-xgoogle scholar: lookup

            Citations

            This article has been cited 13 times.
            1. Kappel S, Ramirez Montes De Oca MA, Collins S, Herborn K, Mendl M, Fureix C. Do you see what I see? Testing horses' ability to recognise real-life objects from 2D computer projections. Anim Cogn 2023 Jul;26(4):1147-1159.
              doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01761-6pubmed: 36864246google scholar: lookup
            2. Yokomori T, Ohnuma A, Tozaki T, Segawa T, Itou T. Identification of Personality-Related Candidate Genes in Thoroughbred Racehorses Using a Bioinformatics-Based Approach Involving Functionally Annotated Human Genes. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 20;13(4).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13040769pubmed: 36830556google scholar: lookup
            3. Henshall C, Randle H, Francis N, Freire R. Habit Formation and the Effect of Repeated Stress Exposures on Cognitive Flexibility Learning in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 18;12(20).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12202818pubmed: 36290204google scholar: lookup
            4. Gueguen L, Lerch N, Grandgeorge M, Hausberger M. Testing individual variations of horses' tactile reactivity: when, where, how?. Naturwissenschaften 2022 Aug 11;109(5):41.
              doi: 10.1007/s00114-022-01811-ypubmed: 35951112google scholar: lookup
            5. Henshall C, Randle H, Francis N, Freire R. The effect of stress and exercise on the learning performance of horses. Sci Rep 2022 Feb 4;12(1):1918.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03582-4pubmed: 35121736google scholar: lookup
            6. Rørvang MV, Ničová K, Sassner H, Nawroth C. Horses' (Equus caballus) Ability to Solve Visible but Not Invisible Displacement Tasks Is Associated With Frustration Behavior and Heart Rate. Front Behav Neurosci 2021;15:792035.
              doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.792035pubmed: 34955782google scholar: lookup
            7. Rosenberger K, Simmler M, Langbein J, Keil N, Nawroth C. Performance of goats in a detour and a problem-solving test following long-term cognitive test exposure. R Soc Open Sci 2021 Oct;8(10):210656.
              doi: 10.1098/rsos.210656pubmed: 34703619google scholar: lookup
            8. Burattini B, Fenner K, Anzulewicz A, Romness N, McKenzie J, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Age-Related Changes in the Behaviour of Domestic Horses as Reported by Owners. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 7;10(12).
              doi: 10.3390/ani10122321pubmed: 33297447google scholar: lookup
            9. Sauer FJ, Hermann M, Ramseyer A, Burger D, Riemer S, Gerber V. Effects of breed, management and personality on cortisol reactivity in sport horses. PLoS One 2019;14(12):e0221794.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221794pubmed: 31790402google scholar: lookup
            10. Lansade L, Nowak R, Lainé AL, Leterrier C, Bonneau C, Parias C, Bertin A. Facial expression and oxytocin as possible markers of positive emotions in horses. Sci Rep 2018 Oct 2;8(1):14680.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32993-zpubmed: 30279565google scholar: lookup
            11. Valenchon M, Lévy F, Moussu C, Lansade L. Stress affects instrumental learning based on positive or negative reinforcement in interaction with personality in domestic horses. PLoS One 2017;12(5):e0170783.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170783pubmed: 28475581google scholar: lookup
            12. Lansade L, Marchand AR, Coutureau E, Ballé C, Polli F, Calandreau L. Personality and predisposition to form habit behaviours during instrumental conditioning in horses (Equus caballus). PLoS One 2017;12(2):e0171010.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171010pubmed: 28158199google scholar: lookup
            13. Lansade L, Valenchon M, Foury A, Neveux C, Cole SW, Layé S, Cardinaud B, Lévy F, Moisan MP. Behavioral and Transcriptomic Fingerprints of an Enriched Environment in Horses (Equus caballus). PLoS One 2014;9(12):e114384.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114384pubmed: 25494179google scholar: lookup