Abstract: This pilot study investigated stress-related behaviors in 238 dressage horse-rider combinations competing at national levels from Elementary (A) to Grand Prix (GP). Noseband tightness was assessed on-site using the FEI noseband measuring device (FNMD), and all but two horses complied with FEI regulations. Video-based analysis quantified conflict behaviors including mouth opening, tail swishing, and changes in head-neck position. Because noseband tightness showed minimal variation, no meaningful association with behavioral expression could be determined. In contrast, competition level had a clear influence on both the frequency and type of stress-related behaviors. Horses in lower-level classes displayed a wide range of behaviors at relatively low frequency, while horses in higher-level tests showed fewer behavior types but exhibited them more often, with mouth opening becoming the predominant indicator. Horses ridden in a double bridle generally demonstrated higher proportions of conflict behavior than those ridden in a snaffle. A strong negative correlation between conflict behavior and performance scores was observed only at the lowest levels (A, L). From Medium level upward, judging scores no longer reflected the amount of stress behavior displayed. Overall, the findings indicate that increasing test difficulty is associated with a rise in stress-related behaviors and a narrowing of behavioral expression. These results highlight the importance of considering equipment choice and competition demands when evaluating stress in dressage horses.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study analyzed stress-related behaviors in 238 dressage horses across different national competition levels, using the FEI noseband measuring device and video behavior analysis.
It found that competition level influenced stress behaviors more than noseband tightness, with higher levels showing fewer but more frequent stress behaviors, especially mouth opening.
Research Context and Objectives
The research aimed to understand how stress manifests behaviorally in dressage horses competing at various levels, ranging from Elementary (A) to Grand Prix (GP).
Previous concerns have been raised about the role of noseband tightness in restricting horse comfort and causing stress; this study sought to objectively measure noseband tightness using the FEI’s standardized measuring device.
The study also explored the relationship between stress behaviors, competition level, equipment used (double bridle vs. snaffle), and performance scores.
Noseband Tightness Measurement: Used the FEI Noseband Measuring Device (FNMD) on-site to ensure compliance with regulations and to quantify tightness.
Behavioral Observation: Video recordings were analyzed to quantify conflict behaviors, specifically:
Mouth opening
Tail swishing
Changes in head-neck position
Competition Levels Considered: National classes from the lowest level (Elementary/A) to the highest level (Grand Prix).
Equipment Assessment: Horses ridden in double bridles were compared to those ridden in snaffle bridles regarding behavior frequency and type.
Key Findings
Noseband Tightness:
Almost all horses (all but two) complied with FEI noseband tightness regulations.
Minimal variation in noseband tightness was observed.
Due to this minimal variation, no significant correlation between noseband tightness and conflict behaviors was found.
Influence of Competition Level:
Lower-level competitions (Elementary to Lower levels) showed a broad range of stress behaviors, but these occurred less frequently.
Higher-level classes (Medium upwards) exhibited fewer types of stress behavior but the behaviors occurred more frequently.
Mouth opening emerged as the predominant stress behavior in higher-level tests.
Effect of Equipment:
Horses ridden with double bridles showed a generally higher proportion of conflict behaviors compared to those ridden with snaffle bridles.
Performance and Stress Relationship:
A negative correlation between conflict behaviors and performance scores was evident only at the lowest competition levels (Elementary and Lower).
At Medium level and above, judging scores did not accurately reflect the amount of stress-related behavior exhibited by the horses.
Implications and Conclusion
The research suggests that as dressage test difficulty increases:
Stress-related behaviors become more frequent but more behavior types fade, indicating a narrowing of stress expression.
Horses tend to express stress primarily through mouth opening at higher levels.
The minimal impact of noseband tightness within regulation limits implies that other factors largely contribute to stress behaviors seen in these competitions.
The higher incidence of stress behaviors with double bridles points to the equipment choice as an important consideration in managing horse welfare.
The dissociation between performance scores and stress at higher levels raises concerns about judging criteria potentially overlooking stress indicators.
Overall, the study highlights the importance of:
Monitoring horse stress behaviors closely across different competition levels.
Considering both competition demands and equipment effects when evaluating horse welfare in dressage.
As a pilot study, these findings underscore the need for further research exploring stress responses and ways to optimize conditions for horses’ physical and psychological well-being in competitive dressage.
Cite This Article
APA
Fialová S, Kuřitková D, Sobotková E.
(2026).
Stress Responses in Dressage Horses: Insights from FEI Noseband Measurements Across National Competition Levels.
Animals (Basel), 16(3), 518.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030518
Victor Kaplan Department of Fluids Engineering, Brno University of Technology, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic.
Kuřitková, Dana
Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Sobotková, Eva
Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
This article includes 18 references
Ladewig J, McLean AN, Wilkins CL, Fenner K, Christensen JW, McGreevy PD. A Review of the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram and Its Potential to Improve Ridden Horse Welfare.. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;54:54–61.
Sykes BW, Hewetson M, Hepburn R, Luthersson N, Tamzali Y. European College of Equine Internal Medicine Consensus Statement—Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Adult Horses.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015;29:1288–1299.
Becker-Brick M, Schmidt A, Wulf M, Aurich J, von der Wense A, Möstl E, Berz R, Aurich C. Cortisol Release, Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability, and Superficial Body Temperature in Horses Lunged either with Hyperflexion of the Neck or with an Extended Head and Neck Position.. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012;96:102–111.
FEI. General and Discipline-Specific Protocols for Assessing the Tightness of Nosebands. 2025.
Hamilton KL, Lancaster BE, Hall C. Equine Conflict Behaviors in Dressage and Their Relationship to Performance Evaluation. J Vet Behav 2022;55–56:48–57.