Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2026; 16(3); 518; doi: 10.3390/ani16030518

Stress Responses in Dressage Horses: Insights from FEI Noseband Measurements Across National Competition Levels.

Abstract: This pilot study investigated stress-related behaviors in 238 dressage horse-rider combinations competing at national levels from Elementary (A) to Grand Prix (GP). Noseband tightness was assessed on-site using the FEI noseband measuring device (FNMD), and all but two horses complied with FEI regulations. Video-based analysis quantified conflict behaviors including mouth opening, tail swishing, and changes in head-neck position. Because noseband tightness showed minimal variation, no meaningful association with behavioral expression could be determined. In contrast, competition level had a clear influence on both the frequency and type of stress-related behaviors. Horses in lower-level classes displayed a wide range of behaviors at relatively low frequency, while horses in higher-level tests showed fewer behavior types but exhibited them more often, with mouth opening becoming the predominant indicator. Horses ridden in a double bridle generally demonstrated higher proportions of conflict behavior than those ridden in a snaffle. A strong negative correlation between conflict behavior and performance scores was observed only at the lowest levels (A, L). From Medium level upward, judging scores no longer reflected the amount of stress behavior displayed. Overall, the findings indicate that increasing test difficulty is associated with a rise in stress-related behaviors and a narrowing of behavioral expression. These results highlight the importance of considering equipment choice and competition demands when evaluating stress in dressage horses.
Publication Date: 2026-02-06 PubMed ID: 41681499PubMed Central: PMC12897305DOI: 10.3390/ani16030518Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study analyzed stress-related behaviors in 238 dressage horses across different national competition levels, using the FEI noseband measuring device and video behavior analysis.
  • It found that competition level influenced stress behaviors more than noseband tightness, with higher levels showing fewer but more frequent stress behaviors, especially mouth opening.

Research Context and Objectives

  • The research aimed to understand how stress manifests behaviorally in dressage horses competing at various levels, ranging from Elementary (A) to Grand Prix (GP).
  • Previous concerns have been raised about the role of noseband tightness in restricting horse comfort and causing stress; this study sought to objectively measure noseband tightness using the FEI’s standardized measuring device.
  • The study also explored the relationship between stress behaviors, competition level, equipment used (double bridle vs. snaffle), and performance scores.

Methodology

  • Sample Size: 238 horse-rider pairs competing nationally.
  • Noseband Tightness Measurement: Used the FEI Noseband Measuring Device (FNMD) on-site to ensure compliance with regulations and to quantify tightness.
  • Behavioral Observation: Video recordings were analyzed to quantify conflict behaviors, specifically:
    • Mouth opening
    • Tail swishing
    • Changes in head-neck position
  • Competition Levels Considered: National classes from the lowest level (Elementary/A) to the highest level (Grand Prix).
  • Equipment Assessment: Horses ridden in double bridles were compared to those ridden in snaffle bridles regarding behavior frequency and type.

Key Findings

  • Noseband Tightness:
    • Almost all horses (all but two) complied with FEI noseband tightness regulations.
    • Minimal variation in noseband tightness was observed.
    • Due to this minimal variation, no significant correlation between noseband tightness and conflict behaviors was found.
  • Influence of Competition Level:
    • Lower-level competitions (Elementary to Lower levels) showed a broad range of stress behaviors, but these occurred less frequently.
    • Higher-level classes (Medium upwards) exhibited fewer types of stress behavior but the behaviors occurred more frequently.
    • Mouth opening emerged as the predominant stress behavior in higher-level tests.
  • Effect of Equipment:
    • Horses ridden with double bridles showed a generally higher proportion of conflict behaviors compared to those ridden with snaffle bridles.
  • Performance and Stress Relationship:
    • A negative correlation between conflict behaviors and performance scores was evident only at the lowest competition levels (Elementary and Lower).
    • At Medium level and above, judging scores did not accurately reflect the amount of stress-related behavior exhibited by the horses.

Implications and Conclusion

  • The research suggests that as dressage test difficulty increases:
    • Stress-related behaviors become more frequent but more behavior types fade, indicating a narrowing of stress expression.
    • Horses tend to express stress primarily through mouth opening at higher levels.
  • The minimal impact of noseband tightness within regulation limits implies that other factors largely contribute to stress behaviors seen in these competitions.
  • The higher incidence of stress behaviors with double bridles points to the equipment choice as an important consideration in managing horse welfare.
  • The dissociation between performance scores and stress at higher levels raises concerns about judging criteria potentially overlooking stress indicators.
  • Overall, the study highlights the importance of:
    • Monitoring horse stress behaviors closely across different competition levels.
    • Considering both competition demands and equipment effects when evaluating horse welfare in dressage.
  • As a pilot study, these findings underscore the need for further research exploring stress responses and ways to optimize conditions for horses’ physical and psychological well-being in competitive dressage.

Cite This Article

APA
Fialová S, Kuřitková D, Sobotková E. (2026). Stress Responses in Dressage Horses: Insights from FEI Noseband Measurements Across National Competition Levels. Animals (Basel), 16(3), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16030518

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 3
PII: 518

Researcher Affiliations

Fialová, Simona
  • Victor Kaplan Department of Fluids Engineering, Brno University of Technology, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic.
Kuřitková, Dana
  • Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Sobotková, Eva
  • Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 18 references
  1. Ladewig J, McLean AN, Wilkins CL, Fenner K, Christensen JW, McGreevy PD. A Review of the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram and Its Potential to Improve Ridden Horse Welfare.. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;54:54–61.
  2. Kienapfel K, Preuschoft H, Wulf M. Prevalence of Different Head–Neck Positions in Horses Shown at Dressage Competitions and Their Relation to Conflict Behaviour and Performance Marks.. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e103140.
  3. Williams LR, Warren-Smith AK. Conflict Responses Exhibited by Dressage Horses during Competition.. J. Vet. Behav. 2010;5:216–222.
  4. Ayala I, Martos NF, Silvan G, Gutierrez-Panizo C, Clavel JG, Illera JC. Cortisol, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Serotonin, Adrenaline and Noradrenaline Serum Concentrations in Relation to Disease and Stress in the Horse.. Res. Vet. Sci. 2012;93:103–107.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.05.013pubmed: 21641009google scholar: lookup
  5. Bartolomé E, Cockram MS. Potential Effects of Stress on the Performance of Sport Horses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;39:44–55.
  6. Sykes BW, Hewetson M, Hepburn R, Luthersson N, Tamzali Y. European College of Equine Internal Medicine Consensus Statement—Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Adult Horses.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015;29:1288–1299.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13578pmc: PMC4858038pubmed: 26340142google scholar: lookup
  7. Massányi M, Halo M, Mlyneková E, Kováčiková E, Tokárová K, Greń A, Massányi P. The Effect of Training Load Stress on Salivary Cortisol Concentrations, Health Parameters and Hematological Parameters in Horses.. Heliyon 2025;11:e19037.
  8. Nowak AC, Macho-Maschler S, Biermann NM, Palme R, Dengler F. Investigating the Interplay of Stressors and Health in Horses through Fecal Cortisol Metabolite Analysis.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2025;12:14567.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1545577pmc: PMC12013657pubmed: 40264993google scholar: lookup
  9. Becker-Brick M, Schmidt A, Wulf M, Aurich J, von der Wense A, Möstl E, Berz R, Aurich C. Cortisol Release, Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability, and Superficial Body Temperature in Horses Lunged either with Hyperflexion of the Neck or with an Extended Head and Neck Position.. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012;96:102–111.
  10. . FEI Dressage Judging Manual.. 2024.
  11. MacKechnie-Guire R, Murray R, Williams JM, Nixon J, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Clayton HM. Noseband Type and Tightness Level Affect Pressure on the Horse’s Face at Trot.. Equine Vet. J. 2024;56:123–132.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14420pmc: PMC11982415pubmed: 39305099google scholar: lookup
  12. . FEI Introducing the FEI Noseband Measuring Device.. .
  13. O’Connell E, Dyson S, McLean AN, McGreevy P. No More Evasion: Redefining Conflict Behaviour in Human–Horse Interactions.. Animals 2025;15:399.
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030399pmc: PMC11816191pubmed: 39943169google scholar: lookup
  14. Musial F, Weiss T. What If Horses Were Humans? Comparing Rein Tension and Bit Pressures to Human Pressure Pain Thresholds.. Animals 2025;15:2989.
    doi: 10.3390/ani15202989pmc: PMC12560900pubmed: 41153916google scholar: lookup
  15. Faithfull R, Lewis K, Drury E, McBride S. Influences of Double Versus Snaffle Bridles on Equine Behaviour at Dressage Competitions and Factors That Interact with Their Effect.. Animals 2025;15:1782.
    doi: 10.3390/ani15121782pmc: PMC12189879pubmed: 40564336google scholar: lookup
  16. FEI. General and Discipline-Specific Protocols for Assessing the Tightness of Nosebands. 2025.
  17. Hamilton KL, Lancaster BE, Hall C. Equine Conflict Behaviors in Dressage and Their Relationship to Performance Evaluation. J Vet Behav 2022;55–56:48–57.
  18. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram to Elite Dressage Horses Competing in World Cup Grand Prix Competitions. Animals 2021;11:1187.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051187pmc: PMC8143096pubmed: 33919208google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.