FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Hyg (Lond) / Studies with inactivated equine influenza vaccine. 2. Protec...
The Journal of hygiene1983; 90(3); 385-395; doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029016

Studies with inactivated equine influenza vaccine. 2. Protection against experimental infection with influenza virus A/equine/Newmarket/79 (H3N8).

Abstract: Forty ponies immunized with inactivated virus vaccine containing A/equine/Miami/63 (H3N8) virus and six unvaccinated, seronegative ponies were experimentally challenged with a representative of recent equine H3N8 virus isolates, A/equine/Newmarket/79. All unvaccinated ponies became infected as judged by virus excretion, febrile responses and antibody responses, but only two of the vaccinated ponies were fully protected. Pre-challenge antibody levels to A/Newmarket/79 virus detected by single radial haemolysis (SRH) correlated well with the degree of clinical protection but the levels required for complete protection (SRH zones greater than 65 mm2) were high. The importance of these results in relation to conventional vaccination procedures against equine influenza is discussed.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 1983-06-01 PubMed ID: 6306098PubMed Central: PMC2134271DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400029016Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study focused on examining the effectivity of an inactivated equine influenza vaccine in protecting against a later strain of the virus. Unvaccinated ponies got notably sick upon challenge with this later strain, whereas only a few vaccinated horses did, indicating a degree of protection from the vaccine.

Research Process

  • The scientists initially immunized forty ponies with an inactivated virus vaccine containing the A/equine/Miami/63 (H3N8) virus.
  • These ponies, along with six unvaccinated and seronegative ponies, were then intentionally exposed to a recent variant of the equine H3N8 virus, specifically the A/equine/Newmarket/79.

Results

  • All of the unvaccinated ponies exhibited signs of infection, such as virus excretion, fever response, and antibody responses.
  • Conversely, only two of the forty ponies that had been previously immunized became fully infected. This suggests that the virus vaccine developed from the Miami strain provided some degree of protection against this later Newmarket variant of the same virus.

Relationship Between Antibody Levels and Clinical Protection

  • The researchers then proceeded to measure the pre-challenge antibody levels towards the A/Newmarket/79 virus in the tested ponies using single radial haemolysis (SRH) – a method that measures the ability of serum to neutralize the virus.
  • They found a positive correlation between the SRH results and the degree of protection the ponies experienced from the virus. In other words, higher levels of these antibodies (represented by SRH values greater than 65 mm2) were linked with full protection against the virus.

Implications for Vaccination Procedures

  • The outcomes of this research bring in fresh perspectives concerning traditional vaccination routines against equine influenza, suggesting that continuously updating these vaccines to include more recent viral strains could enhance their effectiveness.
  • The correlation between high antibody levels and protection infers that vaccine formulations that can elicit strong immune responses could offer better protection against subsequent strains of the equine influenza virus.

Cite This Article

APA
Mumford J, Wood JM, Scott AM, Folkers C, Schild GC. (1983). Studies with inactivated equine influenza vaccine. 2. Protection against experimental infection with influenza virus A/equine/Newmarket/79 (H3N8). J Hyg (Lond), 90(3), 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400029016

Publication

The Journal of hygiene
ISSN: 0022-1724
NlmUniqueID: 0375374
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 90
Issue: 3
Pages: 385-395

Researcher Affiliations

Mumford, J
    Wood, J M
      Scott, A M
        Folkers, C
          Schild, G C

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Antibodies, Viral / analysis
            • Antibody Specificity
            • Cross Reactions
            • Hemolytic Plaque Technique
            • Horse Diseases / immunology
            • Horses / immunology
            • Influenza A Virus, H3N8 Subtype
            • Influenza A virus / immunology
            • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / immunology
            • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
            • Vaccination / veterinary
            • Vaccines, Attenuated / immunology
            • Viral Vaccines / immunology

            References

            This article includes 23 references
            1. Lief FS, Cohen D. Equine influenza. Studies of the virus and of antibody patterns in convalescent, interepidemic and postvaccination sera.. Am J Epidemiol 1965 Nov;82(3):225-46.
              pubmed: 5892595doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120546google scholar: lookup
            2. John TJ, Fulginiti VA. Parainfluenza 2 virus: increase in hemagglutinin titer on treatment with Tween-80 and ether.. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1966 Jan;121(1):109-11.
              pubmed: 4285503doi: 10.3181/00379727-121-30711google scholar: lookup
            3. Blaskovic D, Szántó J, Kapitáncik B, Lesso J, Lackovic V, Skarda R. Experimental pathogenesis of A-equi 1 influenza virus infection in horses.. Acta Virol 1966 Nov;10(6):513-20.
              pubmed: 4381986
            4. Kasel JA, Hume EB, Fulk RV, Togo Y, Huber M, Hornick RB. Antibody responses in nasal secretions and serum of elderly persons following local or parenteral administration of inactivated influenza virus vaccine.. J Immunol 1969 Mar;102(3):555-62.
              pubmed: 5773312
            5. Rouse BT, Ditchfield WJ. The response of ponies to Myxovirus influenzae A-Equi-2. 3. The protective effect of serum and nasal antibody against experimental challenge.. Res Vet Sci 1970 Nov;11(6):503-7.
              pubmed: 5498567
            6. Virelizier JL. Host defenses against influenza virus: the role of anti-hemagglutinin antibody.. J Immunol 1975 Aug;115(2):434-9.
              pubmed: 807637
            7. Schild GC, Smith JW, Cretescu L, Newman RW, Wood JM. Strain-specificity of antibody to haemagglutinin following inactivated A/port chalmers/1/73 vaccine in man: evidence for a paradoxical strain-specific antibody response.. Dev Biol Stand 1977 Jun 1-3;39:273-81.
              pubmed: 604109
            8. Powell DG, Burrows R, Spooner P, Mumford J, Thomson G. Field observations on influenza vaccination among horses in Britain, 1971-1976.. Dev Biol Stand 1977 Jun 1-3;39:347-52.
              pubmed: 604119
            9. Yap KL, Ada GL. Cytotoxic T cells in the lungs of mice infected with an influenza A virus.. Scand J Immunol 1978;7(1):73-80.
              pubmed: 305613doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1978.tb00428.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            10. Oxford JS, Schild GC, Potter CW, Jennings R. The specificity of the anti-haemagglutinin antibody response induced in man by inactivated influenza vaccines and by natural infection.. J Hyg (Lond) 1979 Feb;82(1):51-61.
              pubmed: 105040doi: 10.1017/s0022172400025468google scholar: lookup
            11. Couch RB, Webster RG, Kasel JA, Cate TR. Efficacy of purified influenza subunit vaccines and relation to the major antigenic determinants on the hemagglutinin molecule.. J Infect Dis 1979 Oct;140(4):553-9.
              pubmed: 92511doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.4.553google scholar: lookup
            12. Klingeborn B, Rockborn G, Dinter Z. Significant antigenic drift within the influenza equi 2 subtype in Sweden.. Vet Rec 1980 Apr 19;106(16):363-4.
              pubmed: 7376395doi: 10.1136/vr.106.16.363google scholar: lookup
            13. Oxford JS, Haaheim LR, Slepushkin A, Werner J, Kuwert E, Schild GC. Strain specificity of serum antibody to the haemagglutinin of influenza A (H3N2) viruses in children following immunization or natural infection.. J Hyg (Lond) 1981 Feb;86(1):17-26.
              pubmed: 7462596doi: 10.1017/s0022172400068704google scholar: lookup
            14. Haaheim LR, Schild GC. Antibodies to the strain-specific and cross-reactive determinants of the haemagglutinin of influenza H3N2 viruses. Antiviral activities of the antibodies in biological systems.. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B 1980 Dec;88(6):335-40.
              pubmed: 6164247doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1980.tb02652.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            15. van Oirschot JT, Masurel N, Huffels AD, Anker WJ. Equine influenza in the Netherlands during the winter of 1978-1979; antigenic drift of the A-equi 2 virus.. Vet Q 1981 Apr;3(2):80-4.
              pubmed: 7245173doi: 10.1080/01652176.1981.9693801google scholar: lookup
            16. Lin YL, Askonas BA. Biological properties of an influenza A virus-specific killer T cell clone. Inhibition of virus replication in vivo and induction of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.. J Exp Med 1981 Aug 1;154(2):225-34.
              pubmed: 6267157doi: 10.1084/jem.154.2.225google scholar: lookup
            17. Burrows R, Denyer M, Goodridge D, Hamilton F. Field and laboratory studies of equine influenza viruses isolated in 1979.. Vet Rec 1981 Oct 17;109(16):353-6.
              pubmed: 6275599doi: 10.1136/vr.109.16.353google scholar: lookup
            18. Yamagishi H, Nagamine T, Shimoda K, Ide S, Igarashi Y, Yoshioka I, Matumoto M. Comparative measurement of equine influenza virus antibodies in horse sera by single radial hemolysis, neutralization, and hemagglutination inhibition tests.. J Clin Microbiol 1982 Apr;15(4):660-2.
              pubmed: 7040463doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.660-662.1982google scholar: lookup
            19. Burrows R, Goodridge D, Denyer M, Hutchings G, Frank CJ. Equine influenza infections in Great Britain, 1979.. Vet Rec 1982 May 22;110(21):494-7.
              pubmed: 6287694doi: 10.1136/vr.110.21.494google scholar: lookup
            20. Burrows R, Denyer M. Antigenic properties of some equine influenza viruses.. Arch Virol 1982;73(1):15-24.
              pubmed: 6181759doi: 10.1007/BF01341723google scholar: lookup
            21. Wood JM, Mumford J, Folkers C, Scott AM, Schild GC. Studies with inactivated equine influenza vaccine. 1. Serological responses of ponies to graded doses of vaccine.. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Jun;90(3):371-84.
              pubmed: 6345659doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029004google scholar: lookup
            22. DAVENPORT FM, HENNESSY AV, FRANCIS T Jr. Epidemiologic and immunologic significance of age distribution of antibody to antigenic variants of influenza virus.. J Exp Med 1953 Dec;98(6):641-56.
              pubmed: 13109114doi: 10.1084/jem.98.6.641google scholar: lookup
            23. DOLL ER. Influenza of horses.. Am Rev Respir Dis 1961 Feb;83(2)Pt 2:48-53.
              pubmed: 13723557doi: 10.1164/arrd.1961.83.2P2.48google scholar: lookup

            Citations

            This article has been cited 14 times.
            1. El-Hage C, Hartley C, Savage C, Watson J, Gilkerson J, Paillot R. Assessment of Humoral and Long-Term Cell-Mediated Immune Responses to Recombinant Canarypox-Vectored Equine Influenza Virus Vaccination in Horses Using Conventional and Accelerated Regimens Respectively.. Vaccines (Basel) 2022 May 26;10(6).
              doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060855pubmed: 35746463google scholar: lookup
            2. Pavulraj S, Bergmann T, Trombetta CM, Marchi S, Montomoli E, Alami SSE, Ragni-Alunni R, Osterrieder N, Azab W. Immunogenicity of Calvenza-03 EIV/EHV(®) Vaccine in Horses: Comparative In Vivo Study.. Vaccines (Basel) 2021 Feb 17;9(2).
              doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020166pubmed: 33671378google scholar: lookup
            3. Wood JM, Weir JP. Standardisation of inactivated influenza vaccines-Learning from history.. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2018 Mar;12(2):195-201.
              doi: 10.1111/irv.12543pubmed: 29356318google scholar: lookup
            4. Paillot R. A Systematic Review of Recent Advances in Equine Influenza Vaccination.. Vaccines (Basel) 2014 Nov 14;2(4):797-831.
              doi: 10.3390/vaccines2040797pubmed: 26344892google scholar: lookup
            5. Ozawa M, Kawaoka Y. Cross talk between animal and human influenza viruses.. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2013 Jan;1:21-42.
              doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103733pubmed: 25387011google scholar: lookup
            6. Ault A, Zajac AM, Kong WP, Gorres JP, Royals M, Wei CJ, Bao S, Yang ZY, Reedy SE, Sturgill TL, Page AE, Donofrio-Newman J, Adams AA, Balasuriya UB, Horohov DW, Chambers TM, Nabel GJ, Rao SS. Immunogenicity and clinical protection against equine influenza by DNA vaccination of ponies.. Vaccine 2012 Jun 6;30(26):3965-74.
              doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.026pubmed: 22449425google scholar: lookup
            7. Bryant NA, Paillot R, Rash AS, Medcalf E, Montesso F, Ross J, Watson J, Jeggo M, Lewis NS, Newton JR, Elton DM. Comparison of two modern vaccines and previous influenza infection against challenge with an equine influenza virus from the Australian 2007 outbreak.. Vet Res 2010 Mar-Apr;41(2):19.
              doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009067pubmed: 19863903google scholar: lookup
            8. Baguelin M, Newton JR, Demiris N, Daly J, Mumford JA, Wood JL. Control of equine influenza: scenario testing using a realistic metapopulation model of spread.. J R Soc Interface 2010 Jan 6;7(42):67-79.
              doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0030pubmed: 19364721google scholar: lookup
            9. Park AW, Wood JL, Daly JM, Newton JR, Glass K, Henley W, Mumford JA, Grenfell BT. The effects of strain heterology on the epidemiology of equine influenza in a vaccinated population.. Proc Biol Sci 2004 Aug 7;271(1548):1547-55.
              doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2766pubmed: 15306299google scholar: lookup
            10. Mumford JA, Wilson H, Hannant D, Jessett DM. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of equine influenza vaccines containing a Carbomer adjuvant.. Epidemiol Infect 1994 Apr;112(2):421-37.
              doi: 10.1017/s0950268800057848pubmed: 8150017google scholar: lookup
            11. Wood JM, Mumford J, Folkers C, Scott AM, Schild GC. Studies with inactivated equine influenza vaccine. 1. Serological responses of ponies to graded doses of vaccine.. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Jun;90(3):371-84.
              doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029004pubmed: 6345659google scholar: lookup
            12. Mumford JA, Wood JM, Folkers C, Schild GC. Protection against experimental infection with influenza virus A/equine/Miami/63 (H3N8) provided by inactivated whole virus vaccines containing homologous virus.. Epidemiol Infect 1988 Jun;100(3):501-10.
              doi: 10.1017/s0950268800067236pubmed: 2837409google scholar: lookup
            13. Kawaoka Y, Webster RG. Origin of the hemagglutinin on A/Equine/Johannesburg/86 (H3N8): the first known equine influenza outbreak in South Africa.. Arch Virol 1989;106(1-2):159-64.
              doi: 10.1007/BF01311048pubmed: 2548457google scholar: lookup
            14. Appleton JA, Antczak DF, Lopes AD. Characterization of the equine influenza virus H3 with monoclonal antibodies.. Arch Virol 1987;94(3-4):339-46.
              doi: 10.1007/BF01310728pubmed: 2437891google scholar: lookup
            Subscribe to our newsletter
            Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.