Analyze Diet
Tropical animal health and production2012; 44(8); 1927-1930; doi: 10.1007/s11250-012-0158-5

Subclinical leptospirosis may impair athletic performance in racing horses.

Abstract: The infection by Leptospira in horses, in both its acute disease and subclinical forms, is very common, particularly in endemic regions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of subclinical leptospirosis in the athletic performance of racing thoroughbred horses. Athletic performance of 119 racing Thoroughbred horses from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was calculated by assigning a point value for the results in racing (performance index (PI)), and serology for leptospirosis was conducted. A total of 85 (71.4 %) horses showed reactive titers (≥ 100), and of which 52 had high titers (34 with 400 and 18 with ≥ 800). Although those animals had high titers against Leptospira, no clinical signs associated with leptospirosis were observed. Seventeen (89.5 %) out of the 19 horses with substandard performance were seroreactive with high titers, in contrast with 35 % of seroreactivity in horses with good athletic performance (P < 0.0001). Additionally, seroreactivity to leptospirosis was more often observed in horses with substandard athletic performance in contrast to those with good performance (P < 0.0001, odds ratio 15.8). The Average PI of this group increased to 133 % after treatment (P < 0.0001). Leptospirosis may impair performance in racing horses, and antibiotic therapy may improve the performance of affected animals.
Publication Date: 2012-05-02 PubMed ID: 22547110DOI: 10.1007/s11250-012-0158-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates how the presence of a subclinical leptospirosis infection in horses, particularly in areas where the disease is prevalent, may negatively impact their athletic performance.

Study Design and Methodology

  • The study evaluated 119 thoroughbred racing horses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • The research conducted leptospirosis serology tests to determine the horses’ infection status.
  • A point value for racing results was used to calculate each horse’s performance index (PI), and this was used as an indicator to determine their athletic performance.
  • Findings and Analysis

    • Of the horses tested, 71.4% showed reactive titers, flagging a likely infection despite not showing clinical signs of leptospirosis. Among these, a significant number had high titers.
    • When comparing performance levels to infection markers, the researchers found that 89.5% of the horses with substandard performances were seroreactive (i.e. had reactive titers).
    • By contrast, only 35% of horses with good athletic performances showed seroreactivity, revealing a clear correlation between leptospirosis infection and decreased racing performance.
    • The odds ratio calculation further affirmed the increased likelihood of substandard performance among seroreactive horses.
    • Positively, after being treated for leptospirosis, the average performance index for the affected group improved by 133%.
    • Conclusion

      • Subclinical leptospirosis may impair the athletic performance of racing horses. This adds to the significance and need for regular health monitoring and possible treatment in the equine racing industry, even in the absence of clinical signs of disease.
      • The study also suggests that treating the infection improves the horses’ athletic performance, supporting the case for implementing antibiotic treatment for leptospirosis among the racing equine population.

Cite This Article

APA
Hamond C, Martins G, Lilenbaum W. (2012). Subclinical leptospirosis may impair athletic performance in racing horses. Trop Anim Health Prod, 44(8), 1927-1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0158-5

Publication

ISSN: 1573-7438
NlmUniqueID: 1277355
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 44
Issue: 8
Pages: 1927-1930

Researcher Affiliations

Hamond, Camila
  • Veterinary Bacteriology Laboratory, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro 24210-130, Brazil.
Martins, Gabriel
    Lilenbaum, Walter

      MeSH Terms

      • Agglutination Tests / veterinary
      • Animals
      • Asymptomatic Infections / epidemiology
      • Brazil / epidemiology
      • Female
      • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
      • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
      • Horse Diseases / microbiology
      • Horses
      • Leptospira interrogans / classification
      • Leptospira interrogans / immunology
      • Leptospira interrogans / isolation & purification
      • Leptospirosis / drug therapy
      • Leptospirosis / epidemiology
      • Leptospirosis / microbiology
      • Leptospirosis / veterinary
      • Male
      • Physical Exertion
      • Seroepidemiologic Studies
      • Statistics, Nonparametric

      References

      This article includes 12 references
      1. Equine Vet J. 2006 Mar;38(2):113-8
        pubmed: 16536379
      2. Vet Microbiol. 2011 Mar 24;148(2-4):449-51
        pubmed: 20863632
      3. Acta Vet Scand. 2009 Mar 30;51:15
        pubmed: 19331656
      4. Vet J. 2010 Jun;184(3):282-9
        pubmed: 19477143
      5. J Vet Med Sci. 2010 Feb;72(2):197-201
        pubmed: 19942812
      6. Acta Trop. 2008 Oct;108(1):1-5
        pubmed: 18721789
      7. Vet Rec. 1981 May 2;108(18):396-8
        pubmed: 7292908
      8. Equine Vet J. 2007 Jan;39(1):64-8
        pubmed: 17228598
      9. J Vet Intern Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;24(4):912-7
        pubmed: 20649749
      10. Br Vet J. 1992 Jan-Feb;148(1):6-14
        pubmed: 1551016
      11. Vet Microbiol. 2011 Jun 2;150(3-4):349-53
        pubmed: 21450416
      12. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000 Feb 15;216(4):554-8
        pubmed: 10687012