Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 105893; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105893

Survey of equine pasture best management practices and soil fertility in southeast Pennsylvania after the grazing season.

Abstract: Proper pasture management improves forage yield, reduces costs, and minimizes environmental impacts, but may be difficult in suburban settings. Objective: This study evaluated pasture condition and management practices on 28 horse farms in counties adjacent to the Philadelphia metropolitan area. Methods: Between November 2019 and January 2020, 72 pastures (2-3/farm) were assessed via soil sampling, USDA-NRCS Pasture Condition Score Sheet (PCSS), Penn State Equine Pasture Evaluation Disc (EPED), and farm manager interviews. Linear models assessed effects of management factors on pasture condition and soil fertility. Follow-up surveys conducted in 2023 assessed whether management recommendations had been implemented. Results: Mean pasture size was 0.68±0.07 ha, with a stocking rate of 3.7 horses/ha. Few farms conducted soil tests (14%) within the past three years or applied lime (18%) or fertilizer (20%) in the past two years. Soil pH averaged 6.07±0.04, with 86% of pastures below optimum range. Mean desirable and total vegetative cover scored via EPED were 56.0±2.3% and 66.1±2.8%, respectively. Both PCSS and EPED scores were positively correlated (r=0.571; P<0.01) and both decreased with increasing stocking rate (r=-0.424; P<0.01 and r=-0.294; P=0.01, respectively). In the follow-up survey, 80% of participants reported their involvement in the project increased pasture management knowledge, though most had not implemented major changes. Conclusions: Pasture condition on suburban horse farms was negatively influenced by poor soil fertility management and high stocking rates. Although educational efforts improved awareness, most farms did not implement recommended changes, underscoring persistent barriers to adoption and opportunities for future programming.
Publication Date: 2026-04-11 PubMed ID: 41974256DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105893Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study assessed pasture management practices and soil fertility on horse farms near Philadelphia to understand their impact on pasture health and environmental sustainability.
  • It identified common shortcomings in soil testing and fertility management, linked pasture condition to stocking rates, and evaluated the adoption of management recommendations following educational efforts.

Background and Objectives

  • Proper pasture management is essential to improve forage yield, reduce costs, and minimize environmental impacts on horse farms.
  • Management can be challenging in suburban areas due to limited space and potential restrictions.
  • The study aimed to evaluate pasture condition and management on 28 horse farms in counties near the Philadelphia metro area after the grazing season.
  • Researchers sought to identify the relationships between management practices, soil fertility, stocking rates, and pasture condition.
  • A follow-up in 2023 assessed whether farms implemented changes based on study recommendations and educational outreach.

Methods

  • Data collection occurred between November 2019 and January 2020 on 72 pastures (2 to 3 per farm).
  • Assessment tools included:
    • Soil sampling to analyze soil fertility and pH.
    • The USDA-NRCS Pasture Condition Score Sheet (PCSS) to evaluate pasture health.
    • The Penn State Equine Pasture Evaluation Disc (EPED) to measure vegetative cover.
    • Interviews with farm managers recorded pasture management practices.
  • Statistical linear models were used to analyze the effects of management factors on pasture condition and soil fertility.
  • A follow-up survey was conducted in 2023 to determine if farms had applied suggested pasture management improvements.

Findings

  • Pasture Characteristics:
    • Average pasture size was approximately 0.68 hectares.
    • Mean stocking rate was 3.7 horses per hectare.
  • Soil Fertility and Management Practices:
    • Only 14% of farms had conducted soil testing in the previous three years.
    • Just 18% had applied lime to adjust soil pH in the last two years.
    • Only 20% had applied fertilizer during the past two years.
    • The average soil pH was 6.07, with 86% of pastures below the optimum pH range, indicating suboptimal soil conditions for forage growth.
  • Pasture Condition:
    • Using the EPED method, desirable vegetative cover averaged 56%, and total vegetative cover averaged 66%.
    • PCSS and EPED scores were positively correlated (r = 0.571), validating their use in assessing pasture condition.
    • Higher stocking rates were associated with lower pasture condition scores (negative correlations with both PCSS and EPED), indicating overgrazing stressed pasture quality.
  • Follow-Up Survey Results:
    • 80% of participants acknowledged that involvement in the project improved their pasture management knowledge.
    • Despite increased awareness, the majority did not implement significant management changes.
    • The findings highlight barriers to adoption of best practices in suburban horse farm settings.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Suburban horse pastures are often negatively impacted by poor soil fertility management practices and high stocking densities.
  • Improved soil testing, timely lime and fertilizer application, and appropriate stocking rates could enhance pasture health and sustainability.
  • Although educational programs successfully increased awareness, practical changes remain limited due to persistent challenges.
  • There are opportunities for future extension efforts and programming to address these barriers and promote adoption of best pasture management practices in suburban equine operations.

Cite This Article

APA
Splan RK, Noel FI, Gardner GM, Kenny LB. (2026). Survey of equine pasture best management practices and soil fertility in southeast Pennsylvania after the grazing season. J Equine Vet Sci, 105893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105893

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 105893
PII: S0737-0806(26)00129-2

Researcher Affiliations

Splan, R K
  • Department of Equine Science & Management, Delaware Valley University, 700 E. Butler Avenue, Doylestown, PA 18901. Electronic address: Rebecca.Splan@delval.edu.
Noel, F I
  • Department of Equine Science & Management, Delaware Valley University, 700 E. Butler Avenue, Doylestown, PA 18901.
Gardner, G M
  • Department of Equine Science & Management, Delaware Valley University, 700 E. Butler Avenue, Doylestown, PA 18901.
Kenny, L B
  • Penn State Extension, Pennsylvania State University, 1015 Bridge Road, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, 19426.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.