Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1984; 16(1); 53-58; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1984.tb01853.x

Survey of resting blood pressure values in clinically normal horses.

Abstract: Resting coccygeal blood pressure values were measured, indirectly, on 296 horses (97 Thoroughbreds, 97 Standardbreds and 102 hacks). Blood pressure was found to vary with the class of horse examined; on average Thoroughbreds had significantly higher values than Standardbreds and hacks, whereas blood pressures of the last two groups were not significantly different. There was no demonstrable effect of sex, height or heart rate on blood pressure, but temperature and age did influence the value recorded. Mean (+/- sd) (n = 296) coccygeal uncorrected values (systolic pressure/diastolic pressure) were 112.1 +/- 16.5/77.3 +/- 14.3 mmHg. Allowing for bladder width to tail girth ratios used in each measurement, actual coccygeal pressures of 122.8 +/- 18.6/71.0 +/- 13.4 mmHg were determined. The latter corresponded to values of 149.4 +/- 19.0/97.6 +/- 14.0 mmHg, when corrected to heart (shoulder) level. Normal limits (defined as within 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) for all horses, regardless of class, were 80 to 144 mmHg/49 to 105 mmHg for coccygeal uncorrected values and 86 to 159 mmHg/45 to 97 mmHg adjusted for bladder width to tail girth ratio.
Publication Date: 1984-01-01 PubMed ID: 6714207DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1984.tb01853.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research looks at the resting blood pressure values in different types of healthy horses using indirect measures taken at the tail. The study found that blood pressure varies depending on the breed of the horse, with Thoroughbreds displaying higher values than Standardbreds and hacks. Factors like temperature and age showed an impact on the recorded blood pressure values. However, sex, height, or heart rate did not seem to influence blood pressure.

Research Methodology and Findings

  • The study involved measuring resting coccygeal blood pressure values indirectly on 296 horses. There were 97 Thoroughbreds, 97 Standardbreds, and 102 hacks in the sample.
  • The blood pressure measurements varied with the breed of the horse. On average, Thoroughbreds had significantly higher blood pressure values than Standardbreds and hacks. The blood pressure values of Standardbreds and hacks, however, showed no significant difference.
  • The researchers found no discernable effect of sex, height, or heart rate on the horse’s blood pressure. Nevertheless, factors such as temperature and age played a role in influencing the measurement recorded.

Mean Values

  • The mean uncorrected coccygeal values (systolic pressure/diastolic pressure) for the sample population were 112.1 +/- 16.5/77.3 +/- 14.3 mmHg.
  • After accounting for variables like bladder width to tail girth ratios used in each measurement, the actual coccygeal pressures determined were 122.8 +/- 18.6/71.0 +/- 13.4 mmHg.
  • These values corresponded to the values of 149.4 +/- 19.0/97.6 +/- 14.0 mmHg when corrected to heart (shoulder) level.

Normal Limits

  • The researchers established the normal limits (defined as within the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) for all horses, regardless of their breed. These were 80 to 144 mmHg/49 to 105 mmHg for coccygeal uncorrected values.
  • The normal limits adjusted for bladder width to tail girth ratio were 86 to 159 mmHg/45 to 97 mmHg.

Cite This Article

APA
Parry BW, McCarthy MA, Anderson GA. (1984). Survey of resting blood pressure values in clinically normal horses. Equine Vet J, 16(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1984.tb01853.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 1
Pages: 53-58

Researcher Affiliations

Parry, B W
    McCarthy, M A
      Anderson, G A

        MeSH Terms

        • Age Factors
        • Animals
        • Arteries / physiology
        • Blood Pressure
        • Diastole
        • Female
        • Heart Rate
        • Horses / physiology
        • Male
        • Reference Values
        • Sacrococcygeal Region / blood supply
        • Systole

        Citations

        This article has been cited 8 times.
        1. Cherdchutham W, Sukhong P, Sae-Oueng K, Supanwinijkul N, Wiangnak K, Srimuang J, Apichaimongkonkun T, Limratchapong S, Petchdee S. Effects of xylazine and adrenaline combinations: Preliminary clinical application for non-surgical protocols of nephrosplenic entrapment in horses. Vet World 2021 Dec;14(12):3188-3193.
        2. D' Fonseca NMM, Beukers M, Wijnberg ID, Navas de Solis C, de Ruijter-Villani M, van Doorn DA, Stout TAE, Roelfsema E. Effect of a long-term high-energy diet on cardiovascular parameters in Shetland pony mares. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Sep;35(5):2427-2436.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.16229pubmed: 34350640google scholar: lookup
        3. Boegli J, Schwarzwald CC, Mitchell KJ. Diagnostic value of noninvasive pulse pressure measurements in Warmblood horses with aortic regurgitation. J Vet Intern Med 2019 May;33(3):1446-1455.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.15494pubmed: 30938891google scholar: lookup
        4. Endoh C, Matsuda K, Okamoto M, Tsunoda N, Taniyama H. Morphometric changes in the aortic arch with advancing age in fetal to mature thoroughbred horses. J Vet Med Sci 2017 Mar 28;79(3):661-669.
          doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0600pubmed: 28190824google scholar: lookup
        5. Fouché N, Gerber V, Gorgas D, Marolf V, Grouzmann E, van der Kolk JH, Navas de Solis C. Catecholamine Metabolism in a Shetland Pony with Suspected Pheochromocytoma and Pituitary Pars Intermedia Dysfunction. J Vet Intern Med 2016 Nov;30(6):1872-1878.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.14606pubmed: 27859749google scholar: lookup
        6. Heliczer N, Lorello O, Casoni D, Navas de Solis C. Accuracy and Precision of Noninvasive Blood Pressure in Normo-, Hyper-, and Hypotensive Standing and Anesthetized Adult Horses. J Vet Intern Med 2016 May;30(3):866-72.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.13928pubmed: 27059803google scholar: lookup
        7. Brown JG. Jaw function in Smilodon fatalis: a reevaluation of the canine shear-bite and a proposal for a new forelimb-powered Class 1 Lever Model. PLoS One 2014;9(10):e107456.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107456pubmed: 25272032google scholar: lookup
        8. Amory H, Linden AS, Desmecht DJ, Rollin FA, McEntee K, Lekeux PM. Technical and methodological requirements for reliable haemodynamic measurements in the unsedated calf. Vet Res Commun 1992;16(5):391-401.
          doi: 10.1007/BF01839188pubmed: 1494863google scholar: lookup