FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
The Veterinary record2014; 174(13); 324; doi: 10.1136/vr.101745

Survey of the UK veterinary profession: common species and conditions nominated by veterinarians in practice.

Abstract: The practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine involves the utilisation of scientific evidence for clinical decision making. To enable this, research topics pertinent to clinical practice need to be identified, and veterinary clinicians are best placed to do this. The main aim of this study was to describe the veterinary population, the common species and conditions veterinary clinicians nominated they saw in practice and how much information clinicians perceived was available in the literature for these. A questionnaire was distributed to all Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons registered veterinarians agreeing to be contacted for research purposes (n=14,532). A useable response rate of 33 per cent (4842/14,532) was achieved. The most commonly seen species reported by vets were dogs, cats and rabbits followed by equines and cattle. Overall, skin conditions were most commonly mentioned for small animals, musculoskeletal conditions for equines and reproduction conditions for production animals. Veterinary clinicians perceived there was a higher level of information available in the literature for conditions in dogs, cattle and equines and lower levels for rabbits and guinea pigs. The results from this study can be used to help define the research needs of the profession to aid the incorporation of evidence in veterinary practice.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2014-02-25 PubMed ID: 24570401PubMed Central: PMC3995283DOI: 10.1136/vr.101745Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article presents a survey conducted amongst UK veterinary professionals to identify the most common species and conditions they encounter in their practice. It also gauges how much information is available in relevant scientific literature for treating these. According to the survey, dogs, cats, and rabbits, followed by horses and cattle were the most commonly seen species, while skin conditions in small animals, musculoskeletal conditions in horses, and reproductive conditions in production animals were the most common medical issues. The survey indicates more literature availability for conditions in dogs, cattle and equines, and less for rabbits and guinea pigs.

Survey Methodology

  • A questionnaire was distributed to all Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons registered veterinarians who agreed to be contacted for research purposes. The total sample size was 14,532 veterinarians.
  • The survey had a usable response rate of 33%, meaning 4,842 completed responses were received from the distributed questionnaires.
  • The veterinarians were asked to nominate the species and conditions they commonly see in their practice and rate the availability of information in scientific literature for treating these conditions.

Results and Findings

  • The most common species encountered by the veterinarians were dogs, cats, and rabbits. These were followed by equines (horses, donkeys, etc.) and cattle.
  • In terms of common conditions, skin conditions were frequently reported for small animals like cats and dogs. Equines were often seen for musculoskeletal conditions, and reproduction conditions were prominent in production animals like cattle and pigs.
  • Veterinary clinicians reported there to be a higher level of information available in scientific literature for conditions in dogs, cattle and equines.
  • Conversely, there was reported to be a lower level of information availability for conditions in rabbits and guinea pigs.

Implications

  • The results of this study can help identify the research needs of the veterinary profession.
  • It can aid in focusing more veterinary scientific research on species and conditions that lack sufficient information in the literature, such as rabbits and guinea pigs.
  • Ultimately, this can support the incorporation of evidence in veterinary practice – a key principle of evidence-based veterinary medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Nielsen TD, Dean RS, Robinson NJ, Massey A, Brennan ML. (2014). Survey of the UK veterinary profession: common species and conditions nominated by veterinarians in practice. Vet Rec, 174(13), 324. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101745

Publication

The Veterinary record
ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 174
Issue: 13
Pages: 324

Researcher Affiliations

Nielsen, T D
  • Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.
Dean, R S
    Robinson, N J
      Massey, A
        Brennan, M L

          MeSH Terms

          • Adult
          • Animals
          • Attitude of Health Personnel
          • Cats
          • Cattle
          • Data Collection
          • Dogs
          • Evidence-Based Medicine
          • Female
          • Guinea Pigs
          • Horses
          • Humans
          • Male
          • Middle Aged
          • Musculoskeletal Diseases / veterinary
          • Rabbits
          • Reproduction
          • Skin Diseases / veterinary
          • United Kingdom
          • Veterinarians / psychology
          • Veterinarians / statistics & numerical data
          • Veterinary Medicine

          References

          This article includes 32 references
          1. Baruch Y. Response rate in academic studies: a comparative analysis. Human Relations 52, 421–438.
          2. Bowling A. Research Methods in Health. .
          3. CEVM. What is evidence-based veterinary medicine?. .
          4. Cockcroft P D, Holmes M A. Handbook of Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine. .
          5. Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires.. Health Serv Res 2001 Feb;35(6):1347-55.
            pmc: PMC1089194pubmed: 11221823
          6. Dillman D A, Smyth J D, Christian L M. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. .
          7. Dohoo I R, Martin W, Stryhn H. Questionnaire design. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research 53–64.
          8. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.. BMJ 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183.
            pmc: PMC111107pubmed: 12016181doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183google scholar: lookup
          9. Ekman A, Klint A, Dickman PW, Adami HO, Litton JE. Optimizing the design of web-based questionnaires--experience from a population-based study among 50,000 women.. Eur J Epidemiol 2007;22(5):293-300.
            pubmed: 17206467doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9091-0google scholar: lookup
          10. Everitt S. Applying evidence-based veterinary medicine. In Practice 30, 526–528.
          11. Hill PB, Lo A, Eden CA, Huntley S, Morey V, Ramsey S, Richardson C, Smith DJ, Sutton C, Taylor MD, Thorpe E, Tidmarsh R, Williams V. Survey of the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of dermatological conditions in small animals in general practice.. Vet Rec 2006 Apr 22;158(16):533-9.
            pubmed: 16632525doi: 10.1136/vr.158.16.533google scholar: lookup
          12. Holmes M, Cockcroft P. Evidence-based veterinary medicine 1. Why is it important and what skills are needed?. In Practice 26, 28–33.
          13. Holmes M A, Cockcroft P D. Designing questionnaires. Handbook of Veterinary Clinical Research 135–146.
          14. Hulley S B, Cummings S R, Browner W S, Grady D G, Newman T B. Designing questionnaires and interviews. Designing Clinical Research 3rd edn. 241–255.
          15. Kypri K, Samaranayaka A, Connor J, Langley JD, Maclennan B. Non-response bias in a web-based health behaviour survey of New Zealand tertiary students.. Prev Med 2011 Oct;53(4-5):274-7.
            pubmed: 21827781doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.017google scholar: lookup
          16. Loomans J B A, Stolk P W T, Weeren P R V, Vaarkamp H, Barneveld A. A survey of the workload and clinical skills in current equine practices in The Netherlands. Equine Veterinary Education 19, 162–168.
          17. Lumeij JT, Endenburg N, Luyten BR. The percentage of feline, canine, avian and exotic animal consultations in veterinary practice in The Netherlands in 1994 and suggested consequences for the veterinary curriculum and residency programs.. Vet Q 1998 Jan;20(1):35-7.
            pubmed: 9477535doi: 10.1080/01652176.1998.9694834google scholar: lookup
          18. Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, Kolar LM, Klausner JS. Health status and population characteristics of dogs and cats examined at private veterinary practices in the United States.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999 May 1;214(9):1336-41.
            pubmed: 10319174
          19. Malynicz G. Evidence-based medicine.. Vet Rec 1998 Nov 28;143(22):619.
            pubmed: 9871961
          20. MERCK & CO. The Merck Veterinary Manual. .
          21. Mörk M, Lindberg A, Alenius S, Vågsholm I, Egenvall A. Comparison between dairy cow disease incidence in data registered by farmers and in data from a disease-recording system based on veterinary reporting.. Prev Vet Med 2009 Apr 1;88(4):298-307.
            pmc: PMC7114122pubmed: 19178966doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.12.005google scholar: lookup
          22. R CORE TEAM. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. .
          23. Robertson-smith G, Robinson D, Hicks B, Khambhaita P, Hayday S. The 2010 RCVS Survey of the UK Veterinary and Veterinary Nursing Professions. .
          24. Robinson N J. Use of sentinel practices to obtain data regarding common clinical conditions and presentations in small animal consultations. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham .
          25. Rossdale PD, Jeffcott LB, Holmes MA. Clinical evidence: an avenue to evidence-based medicine.. Equine Vet J 2003 Nov;35(7):634-5.
            pubmed: 14649352doi: 10.2746/042516403775696267google scholar: lookup
          26. Sharp L, Cochran C, Cotton SC, Gray NM, Gallagher ME. Enclosing a pen with a postal questionnaire can significantly increase the response rate.. J Clin Epidemiol 2006 Jul;59(7):747-54.
            pubmed: 16765279doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.014google scholar: lookup
          27. Templeton L, Deehan A, Taylor C, Drummond C, Strang J. Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter?. Br J Gen Pract 1997 Feb;47(415):91-4.
            pmc: PMC1312913pubmed: 9101692
          28. Thrusfield M. Data collection and management. Veterinary Epidemiology 3rd edn. 188–213.
          29. Vandeweerd JM, Kirschvink N, Clegg P, Vandenput S, Gustin P, Saegerman C. Is evidence-based medicine so evident in veterinary research and practice? History, obstacles and perspectives.. Vet J 2012 Jan;191(1):28-34.
            pubmed: 21620746doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.04.013google scholar: lookup
          30. Werner S, Praxedes M, Kim H G. The reporting of nonresponse analyses in survey research. Organizational Research Methods 10, 287–295.
          31. Williams A. How to...write and analyse a questionnaire.. J Orthod 2003 Sep;30(3):245-52.
            pubmed: 14530423doi: 10.1093/ortho/30.3.245google scholar: lookup
          32. Young I, Hendrick S, Parker S, Rajić A, McClure JT, Sanchez J, McEwen SA. Knowledge and attitudes towards food safety among Canadian dairy producers.. Prev Vet Med 2010 Apr 1;94(1-2):65-76.
            pubmed: 19962773doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.010google scholar: lookup

          Citations

          This article has been cited 21 times.
          1. Timmerman I, Macaire C, Hanne-Poujade S, Bertoni L, Martin P, Marin F, Chateau H. A Pilot Study on the Inter-Operator Reproducibility of a Wireless Sensors-Based System for Quantifying Gait Asymmetries in Horses. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Dec 6;22(23).
            doi: 10.3390/s22239533pubmed: 36502233google scholar: lookup
          2. Feuser AK, Gesell-May S, Müller T, May A. Artificial Intelligence for Lameness Detection in Horses-A Preliminary Study. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 17;12(20).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12202804pubmed: 36290189google scholar: lookup
          3. Singleton DA, Ball C, Rennie C, Coxon C, Ganapathy K, Jones PH, Welchman D, Tulloch JSP. Backyard poultry cases in UK small animal practices: Demographics, health conditions and pharmaceutical prescriptions. Vet Rec 2021 Apr;188(7):e71.
            doi: 10.1002/vetr.71pubmed: 33835557google scholar: lookup
          4. Proks P, Johansen TM, Nývltová I, Komenda D, Černochová H, Vignoli M. Vertebral Formulae and Congenital Vertebral Anomalies in Guinea Pigs: A Retrospective Radiographic Study. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 24;11(3).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11030589pubmed: 33668174google scholar: lookup
          5. Keay S, Sargeant JM, O'Connor A, Friendship R, O'Sullivan T, Poljak Z. Veterinarian barriers to knowledge translation (KT) within the context of swine infectious disease research: an international survey of swine veterinarians. BMC Vet Res 2020 Nov 2;16(1):416.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02617-8pubmed: 33138811google scholar: lookup
          6. Persson-Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Haubro Andersen P, Holm Forsström K, Rhodin M. Effect of meloxicam treatment on movement asymmetry in riding horses in training. PLoS One 2019;14(8):e0221117.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221117pubmed: 31408491google scholar: lookup
          7. White CN, Jones G, Baker S, Dean RS, Brennan ML. Variation in the Reported Management of Canine Prolapsed Nictitans Gland and Feline Herpetic Keratitis. Vet Sci 2018 Jun 1;5(2).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci5020054pubmed: 29865183google scholar: lookup
          8. Robinson NJ, Lyons E, Grindlay D, Brennan ML. Veterinarian Nominated Common Conditions of Rabbits and Guinea Pigs Compared with Published Literature. Vet Sci 2017 Nov 22;4(4).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci4040058pubmed: 29165371google scholar: lookup
          9. Huntley SJ, Dean RS, Brennan ML. The Awareness of the International Veterinary Profession of Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine and Preferred Methods of Training. Vet Sci 2017 Mar 8;4(1).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci4010015pubmed: 29056674google scholar: lookup
          10. Grant RA, Montrose VT, Wills AP. ExNOTic: Should We Be Keeping Exotic Pets?. Animals (Basel) 2017 Jun 19;7(6).
            doi: 10.3390/ani7060047pubmed: 28629177google scholar: lookup
          11. Robin C, Bettridge J, McMaster F. Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession. Prev Vet Med 2017 Jan 1;136:39-48.
            doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.015pubmed: 28010906google scholar: lookup
          12. Caron-Lormier G, Harvey ND, England GC, Asher L. A New Metric for Quantifying the Relative Impact of Risk Factors on Loss of Working Life Illustrated in a Population of Working Dogs. PLoS One 2016;11(11):e0165414.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165414pubmed: 27829045google scholar: lookup
          13. Huntley SJ, Dean RS, Massey A, Brennan ML. International Evidence-Based Medicine Survey of the Veterinary Profession: Information Sources Used by Veterinarians. PLoS One 2016;11(7):e0159732.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159732pubmed: 27458724google scholar: lookup
          14. Belshaw Z, Asher L, Dean RS. Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Canine Osteoarthritis Research. Vet Surg 2016 May;45(4):480-7.
            doi: 10.1111/vsu.12479pubmed: 27120270google scholar: lookup
          15. Nielsen TD, Dean RS, Massey A, Brennan ML. Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians. Vet Rec 2015 Aug 15;177(7):172.
            doi: 10.1136/vr.103068pubmed: 26246397google scholar: lookup
          16. Robinson NJ, Dean RS, Cobb M, Brennan ML. Diagnostic testing in first opinion small animal consultations. Vet Rec 2015 Feb 14;176(7):174.
            doi: 10.1136/vr.102786pubmed: 25428904google scholar: lookup
          17. Robinson NJ, Brennan ML, Cobb M, Dean RS. Capturing the complexity of first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation. Vet Rec 2015 Jan 10;176(2):48.
            doi: 10.1136/vr.102548pubmed: 25262057google scholar: lookup
          18. Teixeira Costa C, Lebret A, Comer C, Rose N. Evidence-based veterinary medicine perception by swine veterinarians: a European survey across diverse practitioner profiles. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1599721.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1599721pubmed: 40948614google scholar: lookup
          19. Morales-Romero R, Gonzalez-Dominguez MS, Sánchez J, Correa-Valencia NM, Maldonado-Estrada JG. Efficacy of diagnostic testing for allergen sensitization in canine atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1551207.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1551207pubmed: 40470278google scholar: lookup
          20. Gummery E, Singh M, Channon SB. Establishing a veterinary anatomy core syllabus through a modified Delphi process. J Anat 2024 Jan;244(1):184-201.
            doi: 10.1111/joa.13948pubmed: 37664883google scholar: lookup
          21. Tyler S, Roberts C, Foster A, Barnard N, Murray JK. Owner-reported flea treatment measures and skin disease in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2019 Apr;21(4):282-285.
            doi: 10.1177/1098612X18773911pubmed: 29788829google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.