Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2025; 12; 1548978; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1548978

Survey on outcomes of emergency standing caesarean section in equids.

Abstract: Standing caesarian section (C-section) in mares is poorly documented in the literature. It is reportedly straightforward to perform for veterinarians experienced in bovine practice and is more accessible and less expensive than recumbent techniques. The study aimed to create a survey to report the outcomes of in field C-section through a flank laparotomy with the mare standing under sedation. Unassigned: A survey was developed for field veterinarians practicing standing C-sections. Data were collected regarding the veterinarian's experience and practice type, details about the mare and the reasons for performing the standing C-section in the field, the mare's condition during the procedure, as well as information on asepsis protocols, anesthesia, surgical techniques, medications used, and the follow-up of complications, including the survival outcomes of both the mare and the foal. Complication and survival rates were then used to determine potential risk factors. Fisher's exact tests were used, and significance was set at p < 0.05. Unassigned: 35 questionnaires, each addressing one C-section case, completed by a total of 19 veterinarians were considered. The most important factor for performing the surgery was the economic concern. The main postoperative complication of the surgery was infection/dehiscence of the wound (12/34). The mare survival rate at 1 year was 74% (25/34). The foal survival rate at 6 months was 20% (7/35). More live foals were delivered when dystocia lasted less than 2 h. Unassigned: This survey shows that performing a standing C-section in the field might be a viable technique, both economically and in terms of mare's and foal's survival.
Publication Date: 2025-04-24 PubMed ID: 40343373PubMed Central: PMC12061027DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1548978Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the outcomes of emergency standing caesarean sections (C-sections) performed on equids (horses) using a survey that collected data from veterinarians. The results showed that despite the main postoperative complication being infection, the survival rate for mares was quite high, leading researchers to suggest that the socio-economic benefits and survival rates make this method a feasible option.

Study Design and Methodology

  • The researchers developed a questionnaire aimed at field veterinarians who have practiced standing C-sections. The focus of the survey was to capture data around their experience and the circumstances surrounding the procedures they performed.
  • Details about the mare, the reasons for performing the C-section, the condition of the mare during the procedure, and information about asepsis protocols were all included in the survey.
  • Additionally, the survey looked into the anesthesia used, surgical techniques, medications used, and the management of any complications that arose post-operatively. Information was further gathered on the survival outcomes of both the mare and the foal.
  • These details were used to compute complication and survival rates, which were analyzed to identify any potential risk factors. Fisher’s exact tests were employed for this statistical measurement with significance set below 0.05.

Results and Findings

  • Out of 35 questionnaires compiled by 19 different veterinarians, the prime reason given for opting for this type of surgical intervention was primarily economical.
  • The most recurrent postoperative complication was infection or wound dehiscence (splitting open of the surgical wound), which occurred in 12 out of 34 reported cases.
  • Despite these complications, the survival rate of mares one year after surgery was reasonably high at 74 percent.
  • However, the survival rate for foals six months post-operation was significantly lower at 20 percent.
  • Interestingly, the researchers found that a greater number of live foals were delivered when dystocia (difficult labor) lasted for a duration under two hours.

Conclusion

  • The findings of the survey suggest that performing an emergency standing C-section in the field could be a practical technique when considering both economic and survival aspects.
  • The results, however, highlight the necessity of prompt intervention in case of dystocia to increase the likelihood of the foal’s survival, and the importance of proper postoperative care to mitigate the risk of infection.

Cite This Article

APA
de la Rebière de Pouyade G, Binard M, Deleuze S, Ponthier J. (2025). Survey on outcomes of emergency standing caesarean section in equids. Front Vet Sci, 12, 1548978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1548978

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Pages: 1548978

Researcher Affiliations

de la Rebière de Pouyade, Geoffroy
  • Clinical Department of Equids, Surgery and Orthopedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Binard, Maureen
  • Clinical Department of Equids, Surgery and Orthopedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Deleuze, Stéfan
  • FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Clinical Department of Equids, Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Ponthier, Jérôme
  • FARAH Comparative Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Clinical Department of Equids, Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Vandeplassche M, Spincemaille J, Bouters R, Bonte P. Some aspects of equine obstetrics. Equine Vet J (1972) 4:105–9.
  2. Abernathy-Young KK, LeBlanc MM, Embertson RM, Pierce SW, Stromberg AJ. Survival rates of mares and foals and postoperative complications and fertility of mares after cesarean section: 95 cases (1986-2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc (2012) 241:927–34.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.241.7.927pubmed: 23013507google scholar: lookup
  3. Embertson RM. Ovaries and uterus. Equine Surgery 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; (2012). 883–93.
  4. Embertson RM. Indications and surgical techniques for caesarean section in the Mare. Equine Vet Educ (2002) 14:60–4.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2002.tb01795.xpubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  5. Juzwiak JS, Slone DE Jr, Santschi EM, Moll HD. Cesarean section in 19 mares results and postoperative fertility. Vet Surg (1990) 19:50–2.
  6. Gandini M, Iotti B, Nervo T. Field caesarean section in seven miniature horses and ponies (2009-2012). Reprod Domest Anim (2013) 48:e49–51.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.12158pubmed: 23489709google scholar: lookup
  7. Freeman DE, Hungerford LL, Schaeffer D, Lock TF, Sertich PL, Baker GJ. Caesarean section and other methods for assisted delivery: comparison of effects on Mare mortality and complications. Equine Vet J (1999) 31:203–7.
  8. Edwards GB, Edward Allen W, Newcombe JR. Elective caesarean section in the Mare for the production of Gnotobiotic foals. Equine Vet J (1974) 6:122–6.
  9. Vandeplassche M. Obstetrician's view of the physiology of equine parturition and dystocia. Equine Vet J (1980) 12:45–9.
  10. Watkins JP, Taylor TS, Day WC, Varner DD, Schumacher J, Baird AN. Elective cesarean section in mares: eight cases (1980-1989). J Am Vet Med Assoc (1990) 197:1639–45.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1990.197.12.1639pubmed: 2276966google scholar: lookup
  11. Byron CR, Embertson RM, Bernard WV, Hance SR, Bramlage LR, Hopper SA. Dystocia in a referral hospital setting: approach and results. Equine Vet J (2003) 35:82–5.
    doi: 10.2746/042516403775467405pubmed: 12553468google scholar: lookup
  12. Maaskant A, De Bruijn CM, Schutrups AH, Stout TAE. Dystocia in Friesian mares: prevalence, causes and outcome following caesarean section. Equine Vet. Educ. (2010) 22:190–5.
  13. Descours G. La, Césarienne Debout À, Droite Chez Une, Jument Pur-Sang. Le nouveau praticien vétérinaire équine (2006) 7:42–6.
  14. Covillault G. La Césarienne Debout Chez La Jument. pratique vétérinaire équine (2017) N°17 Spécial: la jument gestante: guide pratique 17:130–6.
  15. Mangold L, Kazmierczyk A, Lheraud P. Césarienne Debout Lors De Torsion Utérine Chez Une Jument. Le nouveau praticien vétérinaire équine (2006) 7:47–50.
  16. Vandeplassche M. Dystocia. Equine Reproduction Williams Wilkins Media: Pennsylvania; (1993). 578–87.
  17. Frazer GS. Fetotomy technique in the Mare. Equine Vet Educ. (2001) 13:151–9.
  18. Brinsko SP, Blanchard TL, Varner DD, Schumacher J, Love CC, Hinrichs K. Manual of equine reproduction (third edition). Saint Louis: Mosby; (2011). p. 132–134.
  19. Rioja E, Cernicchiaro N, Costa MC, Valverde A. Perioperative risk factors for mortality and length of hospitalization in mares with dystocia undergoing general anesthesia: a retrospective study. Can Vet J (2012) 53:502–10.
    pmc: PMC3327588pubmed: 23115362
  20. Frazer GS, Perkins NR, Embertson RM. Normal parturition and evaluation of the Mare in dystocia. Equine Vet Educ. (2002) 14:22–6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2002.tb01790.xpubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  21. Kümmerle JM, Fogle C. Chapter 16 - suture materials and patterns. Equine Surgery Fifth ed. Saint-Louis: W.B. Saunders; (2019). 255–80.
  22. Bussy C, Sublime E. Comment Réaliser Une Césarienne Par La Ligne Blanche Chez La Jument. Le nouveau praticien vétérinaire équine (2006) 7:37–41.
  23. Freeman DE, Johnston JK, Baker GJ, Hungerford LL, Lock TF. An evaluation of the Haemostatic suture in Hysterotomy closure in the Mare. Equine Vet J (1999) 31:208–11.
  24. Lopes MAF, Hardy J, Farnsworth K, Labens R, Lam WYE, Noschka E. Standing flank laparotomy for colic: 37 cases. Equine Vet J (2022) 54:934–45.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13511pubmed: 34482568google scholar: lookup
  25. Honnas CM, Cohen ND. Risk factors for wound infection following Celiotomy in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc (1997) 210:78–81.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1997.210.01.78pubmed: 8977653google scholar: lookup
  26. Newman KD. Bovine cesarean section in the field. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract (2008) 24:273–93, vi.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2008.02.009pubmed: 18471569google scholar: lookup
  27. Smith LJ, Mellor DJ, Marr CM, Reid SW, Mair TS. Incisional complications following exploratory Celiotomy: does an abdominal bandage reduce the risk?. Equine Vet J (2007) 39:277–83.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407x193963pubmed: 17520982google scholar: lookup