Analyze Diet

Susceptibility of equine bacterial isolates to antimicrobial agents.

Abstract: In vitro antimicrobic susceptibility patterns of commonly isolated aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial pathogens of equine origin were determined, using the agar-plate dilution method. All organisms were recent clinical isolates and included Corynebacterium (Rhodococcus) equi, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, (coagulase positive) Staphylococcus sp, Streptococcus equi, Streptococcus zooepidemicus, Actinobacillus sp, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella. In vitro susceptibility levels were outlined for 14 antimicrobics as follows: amikacin less than or equal to 4.0 micrograms/ml, ampicillin less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml, amoxicillin less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml, cefadroxil less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml, chloramphenicol less than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml, erythromycin less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml, gentamicin less than or equal to 2.0 micrograms/ml, kanamycin less than or equal to 4.0 micrograms/ml, penicillin less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml, tetracycline less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml, sulfadimethoxine less than or equal to 10.0 micrograms/ml, ormetoprim/sulfadimethoxine less than or equal to 0.5/9.5 micrograms/ml, sulfadiazine less than or equal to 10.0 micrograms/ml, and trimethoprim/sulfadiazine less than or equal to 0.5/9.5 micrograms/ml.
Publication Date: 1985-02-01 PubMed ID: 3994111
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigates the vulnerability of common bacterial pathogens found in horses to different antibiotics. Results for each antibiotic are given as effective concentrations against the bacteria.

Study Overview

This study aims to understand the susceptibility to antibiotics of a variety of bacterial pathogens commonly isolated from horses. These pathogens are regularly encountered in equine medicine and knowing their antibiotic susceptibility patterns is essential for effective treatment.

Methods

Researchers used the agar-plate dilution method, which is a standard technique to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics needed to inhibit the growth of the bacteria. The lower the MIC, the more effective the antibiotic is against the bacteria.

Bacterial Isolates

The study profiles several aerobic bacterial pathogens, including both gram-positive and gram-negative strains such as:

  • Corynebacterium (Rhodococcus) equi
  • Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis
  • Coagulase positive Staphylococcus species
  • Streptococcus equi
  • Streptococcus zooepidemicus
  • Actinobacillus species
  • Enterobacter cloacae
  • Escherichia coli
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Salmonella species

Antibiotic Susceptibility

The researchers tested susceptibility to 14 different antibiotics, providing the in vitro susceptibility levels for each antibiotic. The lower the concentration required, the greater is the bacteria’s susceptibility to that antibiotic. The antibiotics and their effective concentrations are as follows:

  • Amikacin (≤ 4.0 µg/ml)
  • Ampicillin, Amoxicillin, Erythromycin, Penicillin, Tetracycline (≤ 1.0 µg/ml)
  • Cefadroxil, Chloramphenicol (≤ 8.0 µg/ml)
  • Gentamicin (≤ 2.0 µg/ml)
  • Kanamycin (≤ 4.0 µg/ml)
  • Sulfadimethoxine, Sulfadiazine (≤ 10.0 µg/ml)
  • Ormetoprim/Sulfadimethoxine, Trimethoprim/Sulfadiazine (≤ 0.5/9.5 µg/ml)

The study provides detailed antimicrobial resistance data valuable for treating equine diseases caused by these pathogens. It helps veterinarians prescribe more effective antibiotics for treating infections in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Adamson PJ, Wilson WD, Hirsh DC, Baggot JD, Martin LD. (1985). Susceptibility of equine bacterial isolates to antimicrobial agents. Am J Vet Res, 46(2), 447-450.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 2
Pages: 447-450

Researcher Affiliations

Adamson, P J
    Wilson, W D
      Hirsh, D C
        Baggot, J D
          Martin, L D

            MeSH Terms

            • Aerobiosis
            • Animals
            • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
            • Drug Resistance, Microbial
            • Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria / drug effects
            • Gram-Positive Bacteria / drug effects
            • Horse Diseases / microbiology
            • Horses
            • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
            • Species Specificity

            Citations

            This article has been cited 8 times.
            1. Pezzanite L, Chow L, Hendrickson D, Gustafson DL, Russell Moore A, Stoneback J, Griffenhagen GM, Piquini G, Phillips J, Lunghofer P, Dow S, Goodrich LR. Evaluation of Intra-Articular Amikacin Administration in an Equine Non-inflammatory Joint Model to Identify Effective Bactericidal Concentrations While Minimizing Cytotoxicity. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:676774.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.676774pubmed: 34095281google scholar: lookup
            2. Dahan R, Oreff GL, Tatz AJ, Raz T, Britzi M, Kelmer G. Pharmacokinetics of regional limb perfusion using a combination of amikacin and penicillin in standing horses. Can Vet J 2019 Mar;60(3):294-299.
              pubmed: 30872853
            3. Feßler AT, Schwarz S. Antimicrobial Resistance in Corynebacterium spp., Arcanobacterium spp., and Trueperella pyogenes. Microbiol Spectr 2017 Dec;5(6).
            4. Rhodes DM, Magdesian KG, Byrne BA, Kass PH, Edman J, Spier SJ. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates (1996-2012). J Vet Intern Med 2015 Jan;29(1):327-32.
              doi: 10.1111/jvim.12534pubmed: 25586790google scholar: lookup
            5. Lavoie JP, Couture L, Higgins R, Laverty S. Aerobic bacterial isolates in horses in a university hospital, 1986-1988. Can Vet J 1991 May;32(5):292-4.
              pubmed: 17423784
            6. Jacks SS, Giguère S, Nguyen A. In vitro susceptibilities of Rhodococcus equi and other common equine pathogens to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 20 other antimicrobials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003 May;47(5):1742-5.
            7. Brown MP, Gronwall RR, Houston AE. Pharmacokinetics and body fluid and endometrial concentrations of ormetoprim-sulfadimethoxine in mares. Can J Vet Res 1989 Jan;53(1):12-6.
              pubmed: 2914221
            8. Green SL, Mayhew IG, Brown MP, Gronwall RR, Montieth G. Concentrations of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in mares with and without a dimethyl sulfoxide pretreatment. Can J Vet Res 1990 Apr;54(2):215-22.
              pubmed: 2357657