FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Tend and Befriend in Horses: Partner Preferences, Lateraliza...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2023; 13(2); 225; doi: 10.3390/ani13020225

Tend and Befriend in Horses: Partner Preferences, Lateralization, and Contextualization of Allogrooming in Two Socially Stable Herds of Quarter Horse Mares.

Abstract: Studies show that horses express favoritism through shared proximity and time and demonstrate unique affiliative behaviors such as allogrooming (mutual scratching) with favorite conspecifics. Allogrooming also occurs more frequently during stress and has been observed to occur more frequently in domestic herds than feral. The role of partner preference, lateralization, and duration of allogrooming as measures of social bonding has remained unclear. The present study looked at two socially stable herds of mares (n = 85, n = 115) to determine the frequency, duration, visual field of view and partner preference during allogrooming in both pasture settings (low stress) and confined settings (higher stress). One hundred and fifty-three videos for both herds were coded for allogrooming behaviors with 6.86 h recorded in confined conditions and 31.9 h in pasture settings. Six allogrooming sessions were observed in the pasture setting with an average duration of 163.11 s. In confined settings, a total of 118 allogrooming sessions were observed with an average duration of 40.98 s. Significant (p < 0.01) differences were found between settings for duration (s), number of allogrooming pairs, and frequency of allogrooming (per min) for each herd. All observed allogrooming sessions involved pairs of favored conspecifics (one partner per horse). The current study suggests that horses may have friendships that can be observed through the demonstration of specific affiliative behaviors during times of stress with more frequent, but shorter affiliative interactions with preferred partners during times of stress. This context suggests that horses adhere to the “tend and befriend” principles of friendship in animals.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-01-07 PubMed ID: 36670764PubMed Central: PMC9854972DOI: 10.3390/ani13020225Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about a study that monitors the mutual grooming behaviour of horses, often called allogrooming, in relation to their social bonds, stress levels and preferential partners.

Background and Objective of the Study

This study focuses on the social behavior of horses, particularly their mutual grooming habits. The research examines these behaviors across two primary environments: pasture and confined settings. The goal is to understand how different conditions and external factors affect social bonding behaviors. The researchers are interested in how often grooming occurs, which horses choose to groom each other, and how stress levels impact these behaviors.

Methodology and Data Collection

  • The study observed two socially stable herds of mares (female horses), one of 85 and one of 115 mares.
  • Data was collected through observation and video recording of the horses in both pasture (low stress) and confined (high stress) settings.
  • A total of 153 videos were coded for grooming behavior over a period of collective 38.76 hours across both environments.
  • The researchers focused on the frequency, duration, visual field of view, and partner preference during these grooming sessions.

Key Findings

  • The study showed that allogrooming occurred more frequently, but for a shorter duration in confined, stressful settings.
  • In the pasture setting, horses engaged in longer, but less frequent grooming sessions.
  • The partner preference during these sessions was observed to be consistent. Each horse had a favored conspecific – a horse of the same species – who they chose to engage with during allogrooming.
  • The difference in duration of allogrooming sessions, number of sessions and frequency across both settings was statistically significant.

Conclusions and Implications

The research suggests that horses do have social bonds resembling friendships, displayed through allogrooming with favored partners, particularly during times of stress. Notably, the grooming frequency increases while the duration decreases in stressful environments, which supports the “tend and befriend” theory of stress response behaviours in animals. This theory explains that animals under stress respond by seeking social interaction and bonding. One practical implication of this study is to promote the welfare of domestic herds by acknowledging and facilitating these social bonds. However, follow-up studies may be needed to further explore the implications of these findings.

Cite This Article

APA
Kieson E, Goma AA, Radi M. (2023). Tend and Befriend in Horses: Partner Preferences, Lateralization, and Contextualization of Allogrooming in Two Socially Stable Herds of Quarter Horse Mares. Animals (Basel), 13(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020225

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 2
PII: 225

Researcher Affiliations

Kieson, Emily
  • Department of Research, Equine International, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Goma, Amira A
  • Department of Animal Husbandry and Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21944, Egypt.
Radi, Medhat
  • Department of Pest Physiology Research, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza 12311, Egypt.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 62 references
  1. Massen J.J.M., Sterck E.H.M., De Vos H.. Close social associations in animals and humans: Functions and mechanisms of friendship.. Behaviour 2010;147:1379–1412.
    doi: 10.1163/000579510X528224google scholar: lookup
  2. Wasilewski A.. “ Friendship “ in Ungulates?-Socio-Positive Relationships between Non-Related Herd Members of the Same Species.. .
  3. Ramírez-i-Ollé M.. Friendship as a scientific method.. Sociol. Rev. 2019;67:299–317.
    doi: 10.1177/0038026119829760google scholar: lookup
  4. Wispé L.G.. Positive forms of social behavior: An overview.. J. Soc. Issues 1972;28:1–19.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00029.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Rault J.L.. Be kind to others: Prosocial behaviours and their implications for animal welfare.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019;210:113–123.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.10.015google scholar: lookup
  6. Raspa F, Tarantola M, Muca E, Bergero D, Soglia D, Cavallini D, Vervuert I, Bordin C, De Palo P, Valle E. Does Feeding Management Make a Difference to Behavioural Activities and Welfare of Horses Reared for Meat Production?. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jul 6;12(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12141740pmc: PMC9311627pubmed: 35883287google scholar: lookup
  7. Bartlett E., Cameron L.J., Freeman M.S.. A preliminary comparison between proximity and interaction-based methods to construct equine (Equus caballus) social networks.. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;50:36–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2022.01.005google scholar: lookup
  8. Schneider G., Krueger K.. Third-party interventions keep social partners from exchanging affiliative interactionswith others.. Anim. Behav. 2012;83:377–387.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.11.007google scholar: lookup
  9. Stanley C.R., Mettke-Hofmann C., Hager R., Shultz S.. Social stability in semiferal ponies: Networks show interannual stability alongside seasonal flexibility.. Anim. Behav. 2018;136:175–184.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.04.013google scholar: lookup
  10. VanDierendonck M.C., de Vries H., Schilder M.B.H., Colenbrander B., Thorhallsdóttir A.G., Sigurjónsdóttir H.. Interventions in social behaviour in a herd of mares and geldings.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;116:67–73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.003google scholar: lookup
  11. Maeda T, Ochi S, Ringhofer M, Sosa S, Sueur C, Hirata S, Yamamoto S. Aerial drone observations identified a multilevel society in feral horses.. Sci Rep 2021 Jan 8;11(1):71.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79790-1pmc: PMC7794487pubmed: 33420148google scholar: lookup
  12. Bouskila A., Lourie E., Sommer S., De Vries H., Hermans Z.M., Van Dierendonck M.. Similarity in sex and reproductive state, but not relatedness, influence the strength of association in the social network of feral horses in the Blauwe Kamer Nature Reserve.. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 2015;61:106–113.
    doi: 10.1080/15659801.2016.1149921google scholar: lookup
  13. Heitor F, do Mar Oom M, Vicente L. Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses Part II. Factors affecting affiliative relationships and sexual behaviours.. Behav Processes 2006 Nov 1;73(3):231-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.005pubmed: 16828984google scholar: lookup
  14. Kieson E., Sams J.. A Preliminary Investigation of Preferred Affiliative Interactions within and between Select Bonded Pairs of Horses: A First Look at Equine “ Love Languages ”.. Int. J. Zool. Anim. Biol. 2021;4:000318.
    doi: 10.23880/izab-16000318google scholar: lookup
  15. Wolter R, Stefanski V, Krueger K. Parameters for the Analysis of Social Bonds in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2018 Oct 27;8(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8110191pmc: PMC6262610pubmed: 30373257google scholar: lookup
  16. Christensen J.W., Ladewig J., Søndergaard E., Malmkvist J.. Effects of individual versus group stabling on social behaviour in domestic stallions.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;75:233–248.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00196-4google scholar: lookup
  17. Pierard M., McGreevy P., Geers R.. Effect of density and relative aggressiveness on agonistic and affiliative interactions in a newly formed group of horses.. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:61–69.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.03.008google scholar: lookup
  18. VanDierendonck M.C., Spruijt B.M.. Coping in groups of domestic horses-Review from a social and neurobiological perspective.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;138:194–202.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.007google scholar: lookup
  19. Pierard M., McGreevy P., Geers R.. Reliability of a descriptive reference ethogram for equitation science.. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:118–127.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.10.001google scholar: lookup
  20. Feh C., de Mazierès J.. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses.. Anim. Behav. 1993;46:1191–1194.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1309google scholar: lookup
  21. Kimura R.. Mutual grooming and preferred associate relationships in a band of free-ranging horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998;59:265–276.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00129-9google scholar: lookup
  22. Van Dierendonck M.C., Sigurjónsdóttir H., Colenbrander B., Thorhallsdóttir A.G.. Differences in social behaviour between late pregnant, post-partum and barren mares in a herd of Icelandic horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004;89:283–297.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.06.010google scholar: lookup
  23. Shimada M, Suzuki N. The Contribution of Mutual Grooming to Affiliative Relationships in a Feral Misaki Horse Herd.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 3;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091564pmc: PMC7552250pubmed: 32899116google scholar: lookup
  24. Baragli P, Scopa C, Felici M, Reddon AR. Horses show individual level lateralisation when inspecting an unfamiliar and unexpected stimulus.. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255688.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255688pmc: PMC8341651pubmed: 34351986google scholar: lookup
  25. Bloom JS, Hynd GW. The role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric transfer of information: excitation or inhibition?. Neuropsychol Rev 2005 Jun;15(2):59-71.
    doi: 10.1007/s11065-005-6252-ypubmed: 16211466google scholar: lookup
  26. van der Knaap LJ, van der Ham IJ. How does the corpus callosum mediate interhemispheric transfer? A review.. Behav Brain Res 2011 Sep 30;223(1):211-21.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.018pubmed: 21530590google scholar: lookup
  27. Letzner S, Simon A, Güntürkün O. Connectivity and neurochemistry of the commissura anterior of the pigeon (Columba livia).. J Comp Neurol 2016 Feb 1;524(2):343-61.
    doi: 10.1002/cne.23858pmc: PMC5049482pubmed: 26179777google scholar: lookup
  28. Farmer K, Krüger K, Byrne RW, Marr I. Sensory laterality in affiliative interactions in domestic horses and ponies (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2018 Sep;21(5):631-637.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1196-9pmc: PMC6097077pubmed: 29948296google scholar: lookup
  29. Crosby A.. A study of lateralized behaviours in domestic horses (Equus caballus). .
  30. Harrison KE, Byrne RW. Hand preferences in unimanual and bimanual feeding by wild vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops).. J Comp Psychol 2000 Mar;114(1):13-21.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.13pubmed: 10739308google scholar: lookup
  31. Rogers LJ. Brain Lateralization and Cognitive Capacity.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 3;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11071996pmc: PMC8300231pubmed: 34359124google scholar: lookup
  32. Berretz G, Packheiser J, Wolf OT, Ocklenburg S. Dichotic listening performance and interhemispheric integration after stress exposure.. Sci Rep 2020 Nov 30;10(1):20804.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77708-5pmc: PMC7705688pubmed: 33257757google scholar: lookup
  33. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses.. Laterality 2007 Sep;12(5):464-74.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500701495307pubmed: 17712716google scholar: lookup
  34. Austin N.P., Rogers L.J.. Limb preferences and lateralization of aggression, reactivity and vigilance in feral horses, Equus caballus.. Anim. Behav. 2012;83:239–247.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.033google scholar: lookup
  35. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. Equine Discomfort Ethogram.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 23;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020580pmc: PMC7931104pubmed: 33672338google scholar: lookup
  36. Luz M.P.F., Maia C.M., Pantoja J.C.F., Neto M.C., Puoli Filho J.N.P.. Feeding Time and Agonistic Behavior in Horses: Influence of Distance, Proportion, and Height of Troughs.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015;35:843–848.e1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.08.004google scholar: lookup
  37. Taylor S.E.. Taylor Tend and Befriend-Biobehavioral Bases of Affiliation Under Stress.pdf. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2006;15:273–277.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00451.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  38. Taylor S.E., Master S.L.. Social responses to stress: The tend-and-befriend model.. Handb. Stress Sci. Biol. Psychol. Health 2011;101:109.
  39. Decety J, Bartal IB, Uzefovsky F, Knafo-Noam A. Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150077.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0077pmc: PMC4685523pubmed: 26644596google scholar: lookup
  40. Kondrakiewicz K, Kostecki M, Szadzińska W, Knapska E. Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice.. Genes Brain Behav 2019 Jan;18(1):e12525.
    doi: 10.1111/gbb.12525pubmed: 30311398google scholar: lookup
  41. Scheggia D, Papaleo F. Social Neuroscience: Rats Can Be Considerate to Others.. Curr Biol 2020 Mar 23;30(6):R274-R276.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.093pubmed: 32208153google scholar: lookup
  42. Steinbeis N, Engert V, Linz R, Singer T. The effects of stress and affiliation on social decision-making: Investigating the tend-and-befriend pattern.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015 Dec;62:138-48.
    doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.08.003pubmed: 26311359google scholar: lookup
  43. Cardoso C, Valkanas H, Serravalle L, Ellenbogen MA. Oxytocin and social context moderate social support seeking in women during negative memory recall.. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016 Aug;70:63-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.05.001pubmed: 27164224google scholar: lookup
  44. Hartmann E., Søndergaard E., Keeling L.J.. Keeping horses in groups: A review.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;136:77–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.004google scholar: lookup
  45. Rose-Meierhöfer S., Klaer S., Ammon C., Brunsch R., Hoffmann G.. Activity behavior of horses housed in different open barn systems.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2010;30:624–634.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2010.10.005google scholar: lookup
  46. Topczewska J.. An attempt to assess the welfare of horses maintained in herd systems.. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2014;57:1–9.
    doi: 10.7482/0003-9438-57-024google scholar: lookup
  47. Majecka K, Klawe A. Influence of Paddock Size on Social Relationships in Domestic Horses.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2018 Jan-Mar;21(1):8-16.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1360773pubmed: 28820613google scholar: lookup
  48. Christensen J.W., Søndergaard E., Thodberg K., Halekoh U.. Effects of repeated regrouping on horse behaviour and injuries.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;133:199–206.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.013google scholar: lookup
  49. Heitor F, do Mar Oom M, Vicente L. Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses Part I. Correlates of social dominance and contexts of aggression.. Behav Processes 2006 Sep;73(2):170-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.004pubmed: 16815645google scholar: lookup
  50. Heitor F., Vicente L.. Dominance relationships and patterns of aggression in a bachelor group of Sorraia horses (Equus caballus). J. Ethol. 2010;28:35–44.
    doi: 10.1007/s10164-009-0152-1google scholar: lookup
  51. Basile M, Boivin S, Boutin A, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M, Lemasson A. Socially dependent auditory laterality in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2009 Jul;12(4):611-9.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0220-5pubmed: 19283416google scholar: lookup
  52. Rogers J.L., Vallortigara G.. When and why did brains break symmetry?. Symmetry 2015;7:2181–2194.
    doi: 10.3390/sym7042181google scholar: lookup
  53. Rogers L.J.. A matter of degree: Strength of brain asymmetry and behaviour.. Symmetry 2017;9:57.
    doi: 10.3390/sym9040057google scholar: lookup
  54. Hopkins W.D., Cantalupo C.. Theoretical speculations on the evolutionary origins of hemispheric specialization.. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2008;17:233–237.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00581.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  55. Dharmaretnam M, Rogers LJ. Hemispheric specialization and dual processing in strongly versus weakly lateralized chicks.. Behav Brain Res 2005 Jul 1;162(1):62-70.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.03.012pubmed: 15885818google scholar: lookup
  56. Lippolis G, Bisazza A, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G. Lateralisation of predator avoidance responses in three species of toads.. Laterality 2002;7(2):163-83.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500143000221pubmed: 15513195google scholar: lookup
  57. De Boyer Des Roches A, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S, Ezzaouïa M, Hausberger M. Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects' emotional value.. Physiol Behav 2008 Jun 9;94(3):487-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.03.002pubmed: 18455205google scholar: lookup
  58. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Forkman B, Dimitrov I, Langbein J, Bakken M, Veissier I, Aubert A. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):375-97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003pubmed: 17428510google scholar: lookup
  59. Janczarek I., Wiśniewska M., Wilk I., Liss M., Wnuk-Pawlak E., Dybczyńska M.. Assessment of affiliative behaviour in mares.. Rocz. Nauk. Pol. Tow. Zootech. 2019;15:49–58.
    doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.5068google scholar: lookup
  60. Mellor DJ, Burns M. Using the Five Domains Model to develop welfare assessment guidelines for Thoroughbred horses in New Zealand.. N Z Vet J 2020 May;68(3):150-156.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2020.1715900pubmed: 31973682google scholar: lookup
  61. Placci M, Marliani G, Sabioni S, Gabai G, Mondo E, Borghetti P, De Angelis E, Accorsi PA. Natural Horse Boarding Vs Traditional Stable: A Comparison of Hormonal, Hematological and Immunological Parameters.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2020 Jul-Sep;23(3):366-377.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2019.1663737pubmed: 32441218google scholar: lookup
  62. Mellor DJ. Enhancing animal welfare by creating opportunities for positive affective engagement.. N Z Vet J 2015 Jan;63(1):3-8.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926799pubmed: 24875268google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Kieson E. Interspecies Relational Theory: A Framework for Compassionate Interspecies Interactions. Vet Sci 2025 Jun 14;12(6).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12060586pubmed: 40559823google scholar: lookup
  2. Bhave A, Kieson E, Hafner A, Gloor PA. Identifying Novel Emotions and Wellbeing of Horses from Videos Through Unsupervised Learning. Sensors (Basel) 2025 Jan 31;25(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s25030859pubmed: 39943498google scholar: lookup
  3. Haussler KK, le Jeune SS, MacKechnie-Guire R, Latif SN, Clayton HM. The Challenge of Defining Laterality in Horses: Is It Laterality or Just Asymmetry?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 21;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030288pubmed: 39943060google scholar: lookup
  4. Fiedler JM, Ayre ML, Rosanowski S, Slater JD. Horses are worthy of care: Horse sector participants' attitudes towards animal sentience, welfare, and well-being. Anim Welf 2025;34:e6.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.69pubmed: 39935777google scholar: lookup
  5. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part I: Fulfilment of species-specific needs. Anim Welf 2024;33:e40.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.38pubmed: 39464387google scholar: lookup
  6. Torres Borda L, Roth P, Lumetzberger J, Auer U, Jenner F. Proximity tracking using ultra-wideband technology for equine social behaviour research. Sci Rep 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9971.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60805-0pubmed: 38693325google scholar: lookup
  7. Goma AA, Uddin J, Kieson E. Lateralised Behavioural Responses in Livestock to Environmental Stressors: Implications for Using Infrared Thermography to Assess Welfare Conditions. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 27;13(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13233663pubmed: 38067014google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.