Analyze Diet
Scientific reports2019; 9(1); 2619; doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38935-7

The application of Lempel-Ziv and Titchener complexity analysis for equine telemetric electrocardiographic recordings.

Abstract: The analysis of equine electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings is complicated by the absence of agreed abnormality classification criteria. We explore the applicability of several complexity analysis methods for characterization of non-linear aspects of electrocardiographic recordings. We here show that complexity estimates provided by Lempel-Ziv '76, Titchener's T-complexity and Lempel-Ziv '78 analysis of ECG recordings of healthy Thoroughbred horses are highly dependent on the duration of analysed ECG fragments and the heart rate. The results provide a methodological basis and a feasible reference point for the complexity analysis of equine telemetric ECG recordings that might be applied to automate detection of equine arrhythmias in equine clinical practice.
Publication Date: 2019-02-22 PubMed ID: 30796330PubMed Central: PMC6385502DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38935-7Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the use of complexity analysis methods to identify non-linear properties in the ECG readings of healthy Thoroughbred horses, and examines the influence of fragment duration and heart rate on these estimates. The findings offer a methodology for the complexity analysis of equine ECG recordings that could help automate the detection of equine arrhythmias.

Objective of the Research

  • The research was motivated by the lack of a consensus on what constitutes abnormality in equine electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings. Its main objective was to evaluate the utility of complexity analysis methods for characterizing the non-linear aspects of such recordings. The complexity analysis methods deployed in this study were Lempel-Ziv ’76, Titchener’s T-complexity and Lempel-Ziv ’78.

Methodology

  • The study used ECG recordings of healthy Thoroughbred horses as its primary data source. The fragment duration and the heart rate were chosen as the variables for the complexity estimates generated by the three aforementioned analysis methods.

Findings

  • The researchers found that the complexity estimates derived from the three analysis methods depended highly on the duration of the ECG fragments analysed and the heart rate. It implies that these factors should be taken into consideration while using these methods for complexity analysis of ECG readings.

Implications

  • A crucial outcome of the study is the establishment of a methodological foundation for the complexity analysis of equine ECG recordings, particularly those monitored through telemetry. This could be potentially useful for clinical practice with automated detection of equine arrhythmias, that is, irregular heart rhythms, becoming a possibility.

Conclusion

  • By exploring the applications of complexity analysis methods for equine ECG recordings, the research illuminates a possible pathway for advancing diagnosis in veterinary cardiology. It highlights the important variables that must be considered when applying these methods, and provides a feasible reference point for future work in this area.

Cite This Article

APA
Alexeenko V, Fraser JA, Dolgoborodov A, Bowen M, Huang CL, Marr CM, Jeevaratnam K. (2019). The application of Lempel-Ziv and Titchener complexity analysis for equine telemetric electrocardiographic recordings. Sci Rep, 9(1), 2619. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38935-7

Publication

ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Pages: 2619
PII: 2619

Researcher Affiliations

Alexeenko, Vadim
  • Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7AL, United Kingdom.
  • Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, United Kingdom.
Fraser, James A
  • Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, United Kingdom.
Dolgoborodov, Alexey
  • Seven Bridge Genomics, Boston, MA, 02142, USA.
Bowen, Mark
  • Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
Huang, Christopher L-H
  • Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, United Kingdom.
  • Division of Cardiovascular Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QW, United Kingdom.
Marr, Celia M
  • Rossdales Equine Hospital and Diagnostic Centre, Exning, CB8 7NN, Suffolk, United Kingdom.
Jeevaratnam, Kamalan
  • Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7AL, United Kingdom. drkamalanjeeva@gmail.com.
  • Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, United Kingdom. drkamalanjeeva@gmail.com.

MeSH Terms

  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • Electrocardiography
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Systems Analysis
  • Telemetry

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 47 references
  1. Sharma S, Merghani A, Mont L. Exercise and the heart: the good, the bad, and the ugly.. Eur Heart J 2015 Jun 14;36(23):1445-53.
    doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv090pubmed: 25839670google scholar: lookup
  2. Slack J, Boston RC, Soma LR, Reef VB. Occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias in Standardbred racehorses.. Equine Vet J 2015 Jul;47(4):398-404.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12299pubmed: 24819401google scholar: lookup
  3. Ryan N, Marr CM, McGladdery AJ. Survey of cardiac arrhythmias during submaximal and maximal exercise in Thoroughbred racehorses.. Equine Vet J 2005 May;37(3):265-8.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054530713pubmed: 15892238google scholar: lookup
  4. Tse G. Mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias.. J Arrhythm 2016 Apr;32(2):75-81.
    doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.11.003pmc: PMC4823581pubmed: 27092186google scholar: lookup
  5. Goldberger AL, Amaral LA, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, Mark RG, Mietus JE, Moody GB, Peng CK, Stanley HE. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.. Circulation 2000 Jun 13;101(23):E215-20.
    pubmed: 10851218doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215google scholar: lookup
  6. Clifford GD, Liu C, Moody B, Lehman LH, Silva I, Li Q, Johnson AE, Mark RG. AF Classification from a Short Single Lead ECG Recording: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2017.. Comput Cardiol (2010) 2017 Sep;44.
    pmc: PMC5978770pubmed: 29862307doi: 10.22489/cinc.2017.065-469google scholar: lookup
  7. Julián M, Alcaraz R, Rieta JJ. Comparative assessment of nonlinear metrics to quantify organization-related events in surface electrocardiograms of atrial fibrillation.. Comput Biol Med 2014 May;48:66-76.
  8. Emery MS, Kovacs RJ. Sudden Cardiac Death in Athletes.. JACC Heart Fail 2018 Jan;6(1):30-40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.07.014pubmed: 29284578google scholar: lookup
  9. Li M, Chadda KR, Matthews GDK, Marr CM, Huang CL, Jeevaratnam K. Cardiac electrophysiological adaptations in the equine athlete-Restitution analysis of electrocardiographic features.. PLoS One 2018;13(3):e0194008.
  10. Fossa AA. Beat-to-beat ECG restitution: A review and proposal for a new biomarker to assess cardiac stress and ventricular tachyarrhythmia vulnerability.. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2017 Sep;22(5).
    doi: 10.1111/anec.12460pmc: PMC6931610pubmed: 28497858google scholar: lookup
  11. Abásolo D, James CJ, Hornero R. Non-linear analysis of intracranial electroencephalogram recordings with approximate entropy and Lempel-Ziv complexity for epileptic seizure detection.. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;2007:1953-6.
    pubmed: 18002366doi: 10.1109/iembs.2007.4352700google scholar: lookup
  12. Jouny CC, Bergey GK. Characterization of early partial seizure onset: frequency, complexity and entropy.. Clin Neurophysiol 2012 Apr;123(4):658-69.
  13. Hornero R, Abásolo D, Escudero J, Gómez C. Nonlinear analysis of electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram recordings in patients with Alzheimer's disease.. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2009 Jan 28;367(1887):317-36.
    doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0197pubmed: 18940776google scholar: lookup
  14. Amigó JM, Szczepański J, Wajnryb E, Sanchez-Vives MV. Estimating the entropy rate of spike trains via Lempel-Ziv complexity.. Neural Comput 2004 Apr;16(4):717-36.
    doi: 10.1162/089976604322860677pubmed: 15025827google scholar: lookup
  15. Goldberger AL. Is the normal heartbeat chaotic or homeostatic?. News Physiol Sci 1991 Apr;6:87-91.
  16. Udhayakumar RK, Karmakar C, Peng Li, Palaniswami M. Effect of embedding dimension on complexity measures in identifying Arrhythmia.. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016 Aug;2016:6230-6233.
    pubmed: 28269675doi: 10.1109/embc.2016.7592152google scholar: lookup
  17. Cabiddu R, Trimer R, Borghi-Silva A, Migliorini M, Mendes RG, Oliveira AD Jr, Costa FS, Bianchi AM. Are Complexity Metrics Reliable in Assessing HRV Control in Obese Patients During Sleep?. PLoS One 2015;10(4):e0124458.
  18. Ferrario M, Signorini MG, Cerutti S. Complexity analysis of 24 hours heart rate variability time series.. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2004;2004:3956-9.
    pubmed: 17271163doi: 10.1109/iembs.2004.1404105google scholar: lookup
  19. Schlemmer A, Baig T, Luther S, Parlitz U. Detection and characterization of intermittent complexity variations in cardiac arrhythmia.. Physiol Meas 2017 Jul 26;38(8):1561-1575.
    doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa7be0pubmed: 28746052google scholar: lookup
  20. Chesnokov YV. Complexity and spectral analysis of the heart rate variability dynamics for distant prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with artificial intelligence methods.. Artif Intell Med 2008 Jun;43(2):151-65.
    doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2008.03.009pubmed: 18455375google scholar: lookup
  21. Kolmogorov AN. Three approaches to the concept of the amount of information. Probl. Inform. Transmission 1965;1:1–7.
  22. Lempel A, Ziv J. Complexity of Finite Sequences. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1976;22:75–81.
    doi: 10.1109/TIT.1976.1055501google scholar: lookup
  23. Shannon CE. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948;27:379–423.
  24. Pincus SM. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991 Mar 15;88(6):2297-301.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.6.2297pmc: PMC51218pubmed: 11607165google scholar: lookup
  25. Richman JS, Moorman JR. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy.. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000 Jun;278(6):H2039-49.
  26. Alcaraz R, Rieta JJ. Application of Wavelet Entropy to predict atrial fibrillation progression from the surface ECG.. Comput Math Methods Med 2012;2012:245213.
    pmc: PMC3463933pubmed: 23056146doi: 10.1155/2012/245213google scholar: lookup
  27. Dharmaprani D, Dykes L, McGavigan AD, Kuklik P, Pope K, Ganesan AN. Information Theory and Atrial Fibrillation (AF): A Review.. Front Physiol 2018;9:957.
    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00957pmc: PMC6052893pubmed: 30050471google scholar: lookup
  28. Kedadouche M, Thomas M, Tahan A, Guilbault R. Nonlinear Parameters for Monitoring Gear: Comparison between Lempel-Ziv, Approximate Entropy, and Sample Entropy Complexity. Shock Vib 2015 (2015).
  29. Yentes JM, Hunt N, Schmid KK, Kaipust JP, McGrath D, Stergiou N. The appropriate use of approximate entropy and sample entropy with short data sets.. Ann Biomed Eng 2013 Feb;41(2):349-65.
    doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0668-3pmc: PMC6549512pubmed: 23064819google scholar: lookup
  30. Kaspar F, Schuster HG. Easily calculable measure for the complexity of spatiotemporal patterns.. Phys Rev A Gen Phys 1987 Jul 15;36(2):842-848.
    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.842pubmed: 9898930google scholar: lookup
  31. Aboy M, Hornero R, Abásolo D, Alvarez D. Interpretation of the Lempel-Ziv complexity measure in the context of biomedical signal analysis.. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006 Nov;53(11):2282-8.
    doi: 10.1109/TBME.2006.883696pubmed: 17073334google scholar: lookup
  32. Artan NS. EEG analysis via multiscale Lempel-Ziv complexity for seizure detection.. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016 Aug;2016:4535-4538.
    pubmed: 28269285doi: 10.1109/embc.2016.7591736google scholar: lookup
  33. Speidel U. A note on the estimation of string complexity for short strings. ICICS 2009 - Conf. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Information, Commun. Signal Process 2009.
  34. Hu J, Gao J, Principe JC. Analysis of biomedical signals by the lempel-Ziv complexity: the effect of finite data size.. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006 Dec;53(12 Pt 2):2606-9.
    doi: 10.1109/TBME.2006.883825pubmed: 17152441google scholar: lookup
  35. Balasubramanian K, Nagaraj N. Aging and cardiovascular complexity: effect of the length of RR tachograms.. PeerJ 2016;4:e2755.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.2755pmc: PMC5144723pubmed: 27957395google scholar: lookup
  36. Chouchou F, Desseilles M. Heart rate variability: a tool to explore the sleeping brain?. Front Neurosci 2014;8:402.
    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00402pmc: PMC4263095pubmed: 25565936google scholar: lookup
  37. Ziv J, Lempel A. Compression of Individual Sequences via Variable-Rate Coding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1978;24:530–536.
    doi: 10.1109/TIT.1978.1055934google scholar: lookup
  38. Speidel U, Titchener M, Yang J. How well do practical information measures estimate the Shannon entropy?. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Information, Commun. Signal Process 861–865 (2006).
  39. Titchener MR. Deterministic computation of complexity, information and entropy. Inf. Theory, 1998. Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Int. Symp. 1998;22:326.
    doi: 10.1109/ISIT.1998.708931google scholar: lookup
  40. Cosma Shalizi. Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of gzip. Available at, http://bactra.org/notebooks/cep-gzip.html (Accessed: 12th November 2018) (2003).
  41. Chen CH, Huang PW, Tang SC, Shieh JS, Lai DM, Wu AY, Jeng JS. Complexity of Heart Rate Variability Can Predict Stroke-In-Evolution in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.. Sci Rep 2015 Dec 1;5:17552.
    pmc: PMC4665162pubmed: 26619945doi: 10.1038/srep17552google scholar: lookup
  42. Zhang Y, Wei S, Di Maria C, Liu C. Using Lempel-Ziv Complexity to Assess ECG Signal Quality.. J Med Biol Eng 2016;36(5):625-634.
    doi: 10.1007/s40846-016-0165-5pmc: PMC5083778pubmed: 27853413google scholar: lookup
  43. Valenza G, Citi L, Garcia RG, Taylor JN, Toschi N, Barbieri R. Complexity Variability Assessment of Nonlinear Time-Varying Cardiovascular Control.. Sci Rep 2017 Feb 20;7:42779.
    doi: 10.1038/srep42779pmc: PMC5316947pubmed: 28218249google scholar: lookup
  44. Thijs V. Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Fishing for An Irregular Heartbeat Before and After Stroke.. Stroke 2017 Oct;48(10):2671-2677.
    doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017083pubmed: 28916671google scholar: lookup
  45. Matthews GD, Guzadhur L, Grace A, Huang CL. Nonlinearity between action potential alternans and restitution, which both predict ventricular arrhythmic properties in Scn5a+/- and wild-type murine hearts.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2012 Jun;112(11):1847-63.
  46. Matthews GD, Guzadhur L, Sabir IN, Grace AA, Huang CL. Action potential wavelength restitution predicts alternans and arrhythmia in murine Scn5a(+/-) hearts.. J Physiol 2013 Sep 1;591(17):4167-88.
  47. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Available at, https://www.r-project.org/ (2016).

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Huang YH, Lyle JV, Ab Razak AS, Nandi M, Marr CM, Huang CL, Aston PJ, Jeevaratnam K. Detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from normal sinus rhythm in equine athletes using Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction and machine learning.. Cardiovasc Digit Health J 2022 Apr;3(2):96-106.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.02.001pubmed: 35493267google scholar: lookup
  2. Huang YH, Alexeenko V, Tse G, Huang CL, Marr CM, Jeevaratnam K. ECG Restitution Analysis and Machine Learning to Detect Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Insight from the Equine Athlete as a Model for Human Athletes.. Function (Oxf) 2021;2(1):zqaa031.
    doi: 10.1093/function/zqaa031pubmed: 35330977google scholar: lookup
  3. Alexeenko V, Howlett PJ, Fraser JA, Abasolo D, Han TS, Fluck DS, Fry CH, Jabr RI. Prediction of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation From Complexity Analysis of the Sinus Rhythm ECG: A Retrospective Case/Control Pilot Study.. Front Physiol 2021;12:570705.
    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.570705pubmed: 33679427google scholar: lookup