Analyze Diet

The cancellation of mirror-image electrocardiograms in the horse.

Abstract: The paper describes the use of a four-electrode cancellation technique, employing a bridge circuit to cancel mirror-image ECGs on the body surface of six horses. The axes joining points at which good cancellations were obtained were plotted on planar diagrams. Evidence is presented which suggests that a considerable proportion of cardiac activity could be regarded as though arising from the activity of a single resultant dipole although there is probably some mobility of the dipole centre during different parts of the cardiac cycle.
Publication Date: 1970-04-01 PubMed ID: 4245788PubMed Central: PMC1319517
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research articulates the application of a four-electrode cancellation method to eliminate mirror-image ECGs on the surface of the body in horses. The study furnishes evidence that a significant portion of cardiac activity might be treated as if it emerged from a single resultant dipole.

Research Methodology

The study was primarily focused on exploring an innovative four-electrode cancellation technique to eliminate mirror-image ECGs on the body of horses.

  • There were six horses involved in the study.
  • A bridge circuit was employed as the cancellation method.
  • After applying the method, the axes that connected the points at where good cancellations were achieved were mapped on planar diagrams.

Findings of the Study

The pivotal findings of the study can be categorised into two aspects: observations related to cardiac activity and possible movement of the dipole centre.

  • Assessments from the study provided evidence that a significant proportion of cardiac activity could be interpreted as if it originated from the activity of a single resultant dipole. This suggests that the heartbeat’s electrical impulses may be simplified to a single pathway for most of the horses.
  • However, there was also conjecture that the dipole centre experienced some mobility during different stages of the cardiac cycle – representing that the heart’s electrical pathway may alter or shift at specific stages of the heartbeat.

Implications of the Research

Overall, this research provides essential insights into the heart’s electrical activity in horses and the innovative techniques to effectively eliminate mirror-image ECGs.

  • It advances our understanding of cardiac activity in horses and might have implications for veterinary diagnosis and treatment of heart conditions.
  • The insights about possible mobility of the dipole centre during different stages of the cardiac cycle could influence the further development of ECG technology and its interpretation.
  • The introduction and successful application of the four-electrode cancellation technique can be beneficial for future studies looking to simplify the analysis of complex bioelectrical signals.

Cite This Article

APA
Darke PG, Holmes JR. (1970). The cancellation of mirror-image electrocardiograms in the horse. Can J Comp Med, 34(2), 126-133.

Publication

ISSN: 0008-4050
NlmUniqueID: 0151747
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 34
Issue: 2
Pages: 126-133

Researcher Affiliations

Darke, P G
    Holmes, J R

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Electrocardiography / veterinary
      • Horses / physiology
      • Methods

      References

      This article includes 21 references
      1. SCHMITT OH, LEVINE RB, SIMONSON E. Electrocardiographic mirror pattern studies. I. Experimental validity tests of the dipole hypothesis and of the central terminal theory.. Am Heart J 1953 Mar;45(3):416-28.
        pubmed: 13030396doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(53)90152-5google scholar: lookup
      2. LEVINE RB, SCHMITT OH, SIMONSON E. Electrocardiographic mirror pattern studies. II. The statistical and individual validity of the heart dipole concept as applied in electrocardiographic analysis.. Am Heart J 1953 Apr;45(4):500-18.
        pubmed: 13030404doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(53)90163-xgoogle scholar: lookup
      3. BRODY DA, COPELAND GD. Electrocardiographic cancellation: some observations concerning the nondipolar fraction of precordial electrocardiograms.. Am Heart J 1958 Sep;56(3):381-95.
        pubmed: 13571116doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(58)90277-1google scholar: lookup
      4. HELM RA. Electrocardiographic cancellation: mathematical basis.. Am Heart J 1960 Aug;60:251-65.
        pubmed: 14400924doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(60)90101-0google scholar: lookup
      5. LANGNER PH Jr, MOORE SR. Location of the electrical center of ventricular repolarization.. Am Heart J 1956 Sep;52(3):335-42.
        pubmed: 13354595doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(56)90208-3google scholar: lookup
      6. SIMONSON E, SCHMITT OH, LEVINE RB, DAHL J. Electrocardiographic mirror pattern studies. III. Mirror pattern cancellation in normal and abnormal subjects.. Am Heart J 1953 May;45(5):655-64.
        pubmed: 13040262doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(53)90307-xgoogle scholar: lookup
      7. McFEE R, JOHNSTON FD. Electrocardiographic leads. II. Analysis.. Circulation 1954 Feb;9(2):255-66.
        pubmed: 13127187doi: 10.1161/01.cir.9.2.255google scholar: lookup
      8. Darke PG, Holmes JR. Studies on the equine cardiac electric field. I. Body surface potentials.. J Electrocardiol 1969 Jul;2(3):229-34.
        pubmed: 5367878doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(69)80082-8google scholar: lookup
      9. FRANK E. Measurement and significance of cancellation potentials on the human subject.. Circulation 1955 Jun;11(6):937-51.
        pubmed: 14379428doi: 10.1161/01.cir.11.6.937google scholar: lookup
      10. SEIDEN GE, KEISMAN RA. Cancellation of the abnormal QRS complex of heart disease.. Am Heart J 1956 Jul;52(1):62-9.
        pubmed: 13326835doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(56)90118-1google scholar: lookup
      11. McFEE R, JOHNSTON FD. Electrocardiographic leads. I. Introduction.. Circulation 1953 Oct;8(4):554-68.
        pubmed: 13094793doi: 10.1161/01.cir.8.4.554google scholar: lookup
      12. Helm RA, Chou TC. Electrocardiographic cancellation. A study of a single dipole at variable locations.. Am Heart J 1966 Aug;72(2):218-37.
        pubmed: 5915558doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(66)90446-7google scholar: lookup
      13. NELSON CV. Human thorax potentials.. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1957 Aug 9;65(6):1014-50.
      14. FRANK E. Determination of the electrical center of ventricular depolarization in the human heart.. Am Heart J 1955 May;49(5):670-92.
        pubmed: 14376320doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(55)90212-xgoogle scholar: lookup
      15. TACCARDI B. [Spatial distribution of cardiac potentials].. Acta Cardiol 1958;13(2):173-89.
        pubmed: 13532284
      16. FRANK E. A comparative analysis of the eccentric double-layer representation of the human heart.. Am Heart J 1953 Sep;46(3):364-78.
        pubmed: 13080176doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(53)90328-7google scholar: lookup
      17. MORTON RF, ROMANS WE, BRODY DA. Cancellation of esophageal electrocardiograms.. Circulation 1957 Jun;15(6):897-902.
        pubmed: 13437415doi: 10.1161/01.cir.15.6.897google scholar: lookup
      18. MCFEE R. On the interpretation of cancellation experiments. II.. Am Heart J 1960 Mar;59:433-41.
        pubmed: 13848634doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(60)90306-9google scholar: lookup
      19. HELM RA, CHOU TC. ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC LEADS.. Am J Cardiol 1964 Sep;14:317-29.
        pubmed: 14206177doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(64)90074-8google scholar: lookup
      20. MOORE SR, LANGNER PH Jr. Location of the electrical center of ventricular depolarization.. Am Heart J 1956 Mar;51(3):405-14.
        pubmed: 13292337doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(56)90066-7google scholar: lookup
      21. McFEE R, JOHNSTON FD. Electrocardiographic leads. III. Synthesis.. Circulation 1954 Jun;9(6):868-80.
        pubmed: 13161116doi: 10.1161/01.cir.9.6.868google scholar: lookup

      Citations

      This article has been cited 0 times.