Analyze Diet
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024; 79(11); 2901-2905; doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae303

The circulation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between humans, horses and the environment at the equine clinic.

Abstract: We performed a retrospective analysis of MRSA isolates collected at the university equine clinic including clinical isolates from 2008 to 2021 and screening environmental, equine and personnel isolates from 2016. Screening and clinical samples were cultured on Brilliance MRSA 2 and Columbia agar (Oxoid), respectively, with enrichment for environmental samples. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by disc diffusion. All the isolates were characterized by spa typing. Eighteen selected isolates were subjected to WGS with subsequent wgMLST clonal analysis. Among 75 MRSA isolates, five spa types were identified, the majority (n = 67; 89.33%) was t011. All isolates were resistant to cefoxitin and ampicillin and carried the mecA gene. In addition, the isolates were resistant to tetracycline (n = 74; 98.67%), gentamicin (n = 70; 93.33%), enrofloxacin (n = 54; 72.00%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (n = 5; 6.67%) and lincomycin (n = 3; 4.00%) with corresponding genetic markers for the resistance detected in the sequenced isolates. All 18 sequenced isolates belonged to ST398, 16 carried SCCmec type IVa and two carried SCCmec type Vc (5C2&5). Further, isolates carried aur, hlgA, hlgB and hlgC virulence genes, and five isolates carried sak and scn genes, which are part of the immune evasion cluster. Close genetic relatedness was found between isolates from the staff of the clinic and clinical samples of horses. Repeated introduction and long-term persistence of the equine LA-MRSA subclone (ST398-MRSA-IVa/Vc(5C2&5), t011) among the infected horses at the equine clinic with the colonization of personnel, and the environment contamination that might contribute to transmission were observed.
Publication Date: 2024-08-31 PubMed ID: 39212167PubMed Central: PMC11531815DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae303Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines the relationship between humans, horses, and their environment in the transmission and persistence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at a university equine clinic. It identifies that a particular subclone of MRSA often found in livestock (LA-MRSA) is the most common variant among the isolated MRSA samples from clinic staff, horses, and the environment.

Methods of the Research

  • The research was executed through a retrospective analysis of MRSA samples collected from the university equine clinic over almost a decade. Clinical samples were derived from 2008 to 2021, whereas environmental, equine, and personnel samples were obtained in 2016.
  • Both clinical and screening samples were cultured with various agar, and environmental samples went through an enrichment process. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed via disc diffusion.
  • All the collected MRSA isolates underwent spa typing, a conventional method used to categorize Staphylococcus aureus strains based on variation in the polymorphic ‘spa’ gene.
  • Eighteen selected isolates also underwent Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS), followed by clonal analysis through whole-genome, multi-locus sequence typing (wgMLST).

Results of the Research

  • Out of 75 MRSA isolates, five spa types were identified with the majority (89.33%) being t011. All isolates displayed resistance to cefoxitin and ampicillin and carried the mecA gene, a determinant of MRSA.
  • The isolates were also resistant to other antimicrobials such as tetracycline, gentamicin, enrofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, and lincomycin. Genetic markers corresponding to these resistances were identified in the sequenced isolates.
  • All 18 sequenced isolates belonged to the sequence type ST398 – a type commonly associated with livestock-associated MRSA. Among these, 16 carried SCCmec type IVa, and two carried SCCmec type Vc (5C2&5). These SCCmec types refer to the Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec, a mobile genetic element that carries the mecA gene.
  • The isolates also harbored virulence genes such as “aur”, “hlgA”, “hlgB”, and “hlgC”. Some strains also carried “sak” and “scn” genes, which are associated with immune evasion.
  • A significant genetic relatedness was observed between isolates from the clinic staff and clinical samples from horses, indicating possible transmission.

Conclusions of the Research

  • There was evidence of recurring introduction and long-term persistence of the equine LA-MRSA subclone (ST398-MRSA-IVa/Vc (5C2&5), t011) among the infected horses at the clinic.
  • The research also noted colonization of this MRSA subclone in personnel and the contamination of the environment, both of which may contribute to spread and transmission of this bacteria.

Cite This Article

APA
Papouskova A, Drabkova Z, Brajerova M, Krutova M, Cizek A, Tkadlec J. (2024). The circulation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between humans, horses and the environment at the equine clinic. J Antimicrob Chemother, 79(11), 2901-2905. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae303

Publication

ISSN: 1460-2091
NlmUniqueID: 7513617
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 79
Issue: 11
Pages: 2901-2905

Researcher Affiliations

Papouskova, Aneta
  • Institute of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Drabkova, Zuzana
  • Equine Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Brajerova, Marie
  • Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Krutova, Marcela
  • Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Cizek, Alois
  • Institute of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tkadlec, Jan
  • Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / microbiology
  • Animals
  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / genetics
  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / isolation & purification
  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / drug effects
  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / classification
  • Staphylococcal Infections / microbiology
  • Staphylococcal Infections / veterinary
  • Staphylococcal Infections / epidemiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Humans
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Multilocus Sequence Typing
  • Bacterial Proteins / genetics
  • Whole Genome Sequencing
  • Hospitals, Animal
  • Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial / genetics

Grant Funding

  • Brno No. 2022 ITA 31 / University of Veterinary Sciences
  • University of Veterinary Sciences

References

This article includes 20 references
  1. Sharma M, Nunez-Garcia J, Kearns AM. Livestock-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) clonal complex (CC) 398 isolated from UK animals belong to European lineages.. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1741.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01741pmc: PMC5101578pubmed: 27881973google scholar: lookup
  2. Matuszewska M, Murray GGR, Ba X. Stable antibiotic resistance and rapid human adaptation in livestock-associated MRSA.. Elife 2022;11:e74819.
    doi: 10.7554/eLife.74819pmc: PMC9239682pubmed: 35762208google scholar: lookup
  3. Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock.. mBio 2012;3:e00305-11.
    doi: 10.1128/mBio.00305-11pmc: PMC3280451pubmed: 22354957google scholar: lookup
  4. Albert E, Biksi I, Nemet Z. Outbreaks of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone ST398-t011 in a Hungarian equine clinic: emergence of rifampicin and chloramphenicol resistance after treatment with these antibiotics.. Microb Drug Resist 2019;25:1219–26.
    doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0384pubmed: 31066624google scholar: lookup
  5. Cuny C, Abdelbary MMH, Kock R. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from infections in horses in Germany are frequent colonizers of veterinarians but rare among MRSA from infections in humans.. One Health 2016;2:11–7.
  6. van Balen J, Mowery J, Piraino-Sandoval M. Molecular epidemiology of environmental MRSA at an equine teaching hospital: introduction, circulation and maintenance.. Vet Res 2014;45:31.
    doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-45-31pmc: PMC3974172pubmed: 24641543google scholar: lookup
  7. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Thirtieth Edition: M100.. 2020.
  8. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Twelfth Edition: M100.. 2002.
  9. Okolie CE, Wooldridge KG, Turner DP. Development of a new pentaplex real-time PCR assay for the identification of poly-microbial specimens containing Staphylococcus aureus and other staphylococci, with simultaneous detection of staphylococcal virulence and methicillin resistance markers.. Mol Cell Probes 2015;29:144–50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2015.03.002pubmed: 25790897google scholar: lookup
  10. Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management.. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:5442–8.
  11. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D. Using SPAdes de novo assembler.. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2020;70:e102.
    doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102pubmed: 32559359google scholar: lookup
  12. Smelikova E, Drevinek P, Nyc O. To screen or not to screen medical students for carriage of multidrug-resistant pathogens?. J Hosp Infect 2023;140:15–23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.06.028pubmed: 37478913google scholar: lookup
  13. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs.. Nat Biotechnol 2019;37:540–6.
    doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8pubmed: 30936562google scholar: lookup
  14. Wick RR, Holt KE. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies.. PLoS Comput Biol 2022;18:e1009802.
  15. Schurch AC, Arredondo-Alonso S, Willems RJL. Whole genome sequencing options for bacterial strain typing and epidemiologic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism versus gene-by-gene-based approaches.. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018;24:350–4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.016pubmed: 29309930google scholar: lookup
  16. Cuny C, Witte W. MRSA in equine hospitals and its significance for infections in humans.. Vet Microbiol 2017;200:59–64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.01.013pubmed: 26869097google scholar: lookup
  17. Abdelbary MM, Wittenberg A, Cuny C. Phylogenetic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus CC398 reveals a sub-lineage epidemiologically associated with infections in horses.. PLoS One 2014;9:e88083.
  18. Neradova K, Jakubu V, Pomorska K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary professionals in 2017 in the Czech Republic.. BMC Vet Res 2020;16:4.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2223-zpmc: PMC6945690pubmed: 31906922google scholar: lookup
  19. Zarfel G, Krziwanek K, Johler S. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes in human MRSA ST398 isolates in Austria.. Epidemiol Infect 2013;141:888–92.
    doi: 10.1017/S0950268812001343pmc: PMC3594834pubmed: 23084630google scholar: lookup
  20. Tkadlec J, Capek V, Brajerova M. The molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the Czech Republic.. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021;76:55–64.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa404pubmed: 33118033google scholar: lookup