Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice1991; 7(3); 485-488; doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30481-9

The decision process. Standing surgery versus general anesthesia and recumbency.

Abstract: The decision to perform a procedure in the standing patient rather than in a completely anesthetized patient depends on many factors, such as patient health, cost, time, facilities, and anesthetic expertise. Although the procedure often is technically easier to perform if the patient is anesthetized, cost and patient risk considerations may result in a decision to do the surgery standing. Surgical experience in performing procedures standing is important for a successful outcome.
Publication Date: 1991-12-01 PubMed ID: 1820221DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30481-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This article discusses the factors influencing the choice between standing surgery and general anesthesia in veterinary procedures, and that while anesthesia can make the process easier, cost, patient risk, and surgeon expertise in performing standing surgery can lead to the latter being chosen instead.

Introduction

The abstract discusses the key elements that influence the decision in opting for standing surgery instead of a surgery with the patient under general anesthesia. These surgeries specifically pertain to veterinary procedures and the choice heavily relies on several factors such as patient health, cost, time, facilities, and anesthetic expertise.

Factors influencing surgical decision

  • The health of the patient is a decisive factor. Some animals may not cope well with general anesthesia due to existing health issues and hence, standing surgery might be the better option.
  • Cost is another critical factor that impacts the decision. General anesthesia tends to be more expensive since it involves more advanced procedures, extra staff, and equipment. Hence, if the cost is a concern, standing surgery could be preferred.
  • The time available for the procedure and time needed for recovery can influence the choice. General anesthesia requires longer recovery periods which might not be feasible in some cases.
  • The facilities available for the procedure plays a notable role. Not all facilities may have the necessary equipment for general anesthesia, swaying the choice towards standing surgery.
  • The surgeon’s expertise in both procedures is also a significant consideration. If the surgeon has more experience in standing surgeries, the outcomes might be more favorable with this method.

Technically easier versus cost and risk

While the procedure is often more straightforward with the patient under general anesthesia, the higher costs and associated risks might tip the balance in favor of standing surgery. While standing surgery requires more surgical expertise, the lower cost and risk make it a viable choice.

Importance of surgical experience

It is important that the surgeon has adequate experience in performing procedures while the patient is standing. The success of the surgery often relies on the skill and experience of the surgeon, especially in the case of standing surgery. The patient’s well-being and recovery prognosis largely depend on the surgeon’s experience.

Cite This Article

APA
Bertone AL. (1991). The decision process. Standing surgery versus general anesthesia and recumbency. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 7(3), 485-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30481-9

Publication

ISSN: 0749-0739
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 7
Issue: 3
Pages: 485-488

Researcher Affiliations

Bertone, A L
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus.

MeSH Terms

  • Anesthesia, General / veterinary
  • Animals
  • Horses / surgery
  • Restraint, Physical / veterinary
  • Risk Factors

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Desjardins MR, Trout DR, Little CB. Surgical repair of rectovaginal fistulae in mares: Twelve cases (1983-1991). Can Vet J 1993 Apr;34(4):226-31.
    pubmed: 17424200