Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics1995; 18(6); 429-437; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1995.tb00621.x

The dose-related effects of phenylbutazone and a methylprednisolone acetate formulation (Depo-Medrol) on cultured explants of equine carpal articular cartilage.

Abstract: The dose-related effects of phenylbutazone and Depo-Medrol on chondrocyte viability and chondrocyte-mediated synthesis and depletion of proteoglycans were investigated using cultured explants of equine middle carpal joint articular cartilage. Explants from 12 horses (941 x 3 mm diameter) were cultured for a total of 5 days, which included 3 days' exposure to either phenylbutazone (0, 2, 20, 200 or 2000 micrograms/mL) or Depo-Medrol (0, 20, 200 or 2000 micrograms/mL). For each explant, amino sugar content was used as a measure of proteoglycan content, 35S incorporation as a measure of the rate of proteoglycan synthesis and the number of pyknotic nuclei as a measure of cell death. During culture, control explants remained metabolically active and viable but suffered a net loss of proteoglycans. Proteoglycan loss was reduced by the presence of either phenylbutazone or Depo-Medrol. This effect was significant at clinically relevant concentrations of phenylbutazone (2-20 micrograms/mL), but not Depo-Medrol (20-200 micrograms/mL). Depo-Medrol caused a dose-dependent suppression of proteoglycan synthesis at all concentrations, but chondrocyte viability was affected only at the 2000 micrograms/mL dose. Phenylbutazone affected proteoglycan synthesis and cell viability only at the 2000 micrograms/mL concentration. At all concentrations, the anticatabolic effects of each drug influenced the proteoglycan content of the explants far more than did any antianabolic or cytotoxic drug effect. The results suggest that the therapeutic potential of both phenylbutazone and Depo-Medrol may not be restricted to their anti-inflammatory effects on the soft tissues of the joint.
Publication Date: 1995-12-01 PubMed ID: 8789695DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1995.tb00621.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines the dose-related effects of two drugs, phenylbutazone and Depo-Medrol, on the viability and behavior of cells from horse’s carpal joint cartilage. The researchers found that both drugs were able to reduce the loss of key cartilage components in these cells, suggesting potential therapeutic benefits beyond their known anti-inflammatory effects.

Objective and Methodology

  • The objective of this study was to investigate the dose-related effects of two drugs, phenylbutazone and Depo-Medrol, on chondrocyte viability and proteoglycan dynamics in horse’s cartilage.
  • Cartilage explants from 12 horses were cultured for a total of five days with three days’ exposure to varying concentrations of either phenylbutazone or Depo-Medrol.
  • The researchers used different indicators to measure the effects of the drugs: amino sugar content to estimate proteoglycan content, 35S incorporation to measure the rate of proteoglycan synthesis, and the count of pyknotic nuclei to measure cell death.
  • Key Findings

  • During cultivation, while control explants remained viable, they suffered net proteoglycan loss.
  • Both phenylbutazone and Depo-Medrol reduced proteoglycan loss. This effect was significant in clinically relevant concentrations of phenylbutazone, but not Depo-Medrol.
  • Depo-Medrol caused a dose-dependent suppression of proteoglycan synthesis at all tested concentrations but only had an effect on cell viability at the highest dose.
  • Similarly, phenylbutazone influenced proteoglycan synthesis and cell viability only at the maximum tested concentration.
  • On the whole, both drugs’ anticatabolic effects had a much stronger influence on the proteoglycan content of the explants than any effect on synthesis (antianabolic) or direct toxicity (cytotoxic) to the cells.
  • Conclusion

  • The results from this study suggest that phenylbutazone and Depo-Medrol may have therapeutic potential for use in cartilage-targeted treatments, beyond their known anti-inflammatory effects. This use may stem from their ability to combat the breakdown of proteoglycans, a key component of cartilage health and integrity.
  • Cite This Article

    APA
    Jolly WT, Whittem T, Jolly AC, Firth EC. (1995). The dose-related effects of phenylbutazone and a methylprednisolone acetate formulation (Depo-Medrol) on cultured explants of equine carpal articular cartilage. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 18(6), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1995.tb00621.x

    Publication

    ISSN: 0140-7783
    NlmUniqueID: 7910920
    Country: England
    Language: English
    Volume: 18
    Issue: 6
    Pages: 429-437

    Researcher Affiliations

    Jolly, W T
    • Department of Physiology and Anatomy, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
    Whittem, T
      Jolly, A C
        Firth, E C

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Anti-Inflammatory Agents / pharmacology
          • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / pharmacology
          • Carpus, Animal
          • Cartilage, Articular / cytology
          • Cartilage, Articular / drug effects
          • Cell Survival / drug effects
          • Culture Techniques
          • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
          • Horses
          • Methylprednisolone / pharmacology
          • Phenylbutazone / pharmacology
          • Proteoglycans / metabolism

          Citations

          This article has been cited 4 times.
          1. Mercer MA, Davis JL, McKenzie HC. The Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Evaluation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Adult Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 10;13(10).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13101597pubmed: 37238029google scholar: lookup
          2. Jacobs CC, Schnabel LV, McIlwraith CW, Blikslager AT. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in equine orthopaedics. Equine Vet J 2022 Jan 25;54(4):636-48.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.13561pubmed: 35076950google scholar: lookup
          3. Braun HJ, Wilcox-Fogel N, Kim HJ, Pouliot MA, Harris AH, Dragoo JL. The effect of local anesthetic and corticosteroid combinations on chondrocyte viability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012 Sep;20(9):1689-95.
            doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1728-1pubmed: 22037813google scholar: lookup
          4. Vergne P, Bertin P, Bonnet C, Scotto C, Trèves R. Drug-induced rheumatic disorders: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 2000 Oct;23(4):279-93.