Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2016; 40(2); 172-178; doi: 10.1111/jvp.12345

The effects of dose and diet on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in the horse.

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the effect of diet and dose on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in the horse. Six horses received two doses (1 and 4 mg/kg) of omeprazole orally once daily for 5 days. Each dose was evaluated during feeding either a high-grain/low-fibre (HG/LF) diet or an ad libitum hay (HAY) diet in a four-way crossover design. Plasma samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis on days 1 and 5. Plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. In horses being fed the HG/LF diet, on day 1, the area under the curve (AUC) and maximal plasma concentration (C ) were higher on the 4 mg/kg dose than on the 1 mg/kg dose. The AUC was higher on day 5 compared to day 1 with the 4 mg/kg dose on the HG/LF diet. On days 1 and 5, the AUC and C were higher in horses being fed the HG/LF diet and receiving the 4 mg/kg dose than in horses being fed the HAY diet and receiving the 1 mg/kg dose. These findings suggest that both dose and diet may affect pharmacokinetic variables of omeprazole in the horse.
Publication Date: 2016-07-31 PubMed ID: 27478135DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12345Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study is about the influence of diet and dosage on the behavior or pharmacokinetics of the drug omeprazole in horses. The research found that both the type of diet a horse is on, and the dosage of the drug given, affected how the drug behaves in the horse’s body.

Overview of the Study

  • The research was conducted on six horses that were administered two different doses of omeprazole (1 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg) orally once daily for five days.
  • They tested each dose on two different diets for the horses: one high in grain but low in fiber (HG/LF), and the other a freely available hay diet (or ad libitum hay diet). This constituted a four-way crossover, in which each horse served as its own control, and also allowed for the effects of both dose and diet to be evaluated separately.
  • To evaluate how the drug behaved in the horse’s body (or pharmacokinetics), they took plasma samples from the horses on the first and fifth day of the study for analysis…

Findings of the Study

  • The pharmacokinetic variables they focused on were the area under the curve (AUC) and the maximal plasma concentration (Cmax). The AUC is a measure of the drug’s exposure over time and Cmax is the maximum concentration of the drug in the plasma. These measures are standard in pharmacokinetic studies and give an idea about how the drug is absorbed, distributed, and eliminated in the body.
  • On the first day, with the HG/LF diet, both the AUC and Cmax were higher with the 4 mg/kg dose than with the 1 mg/kg dose. This suggests that at higher doses, the drug is more available in the body (as indicated by a larger AUC) and reaches higher concentrations in the blood (as indicated by a higher Cmax).
  • Moreover, the AUC was higher on day 5 compared to day 1 with the 4 mg/kg dose on the HG/LF diet. This indicates that multiple doses of the drug over several days may increase the drug’s availability in the body.
  • On both days, the AUC and Cmax were higher in horses on the HG/LF diet receiving the 4 mg/kg dose than in the horses on the hay diet receiving the 1 mg/kg dose. This suggests that the type of diet might affect how the drug behaves in the horse’s body, with the HG/LF diet possibly leading to increased drug availability and concentrations.

Conclusion of the Study

  • The study concluded that both the dose of omeprazole and the type of diet may affect the drug’s pharmacokinetics in horses. This knowledge could be useful in adjusting drug dosages or administering the drug in different diet situations to manage the treatment of ulcers in horses more effectively.

Cite This Article

APA
Sykes BW, Underwood C, McGowan CM, Mills PC. (2016). The effects of dose and diet on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in the horse. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 40(2), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12345

Publication

ISSN: 1365-2885
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 40
Issue: 2
Pages: 172-178

Researcher Affiliations

Sykes, B W
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld, Australia.
Underwood, C
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld, Australia.
McGowan, C M
  • Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mills, P C
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Feed / analysis
  • Animals
  • Anti-Ulcer Agents / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Ulcer Agents / blood
  • Anti-Ulcer Agents / pharmacokinetics
  • Area Under Curve
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Diet / veterinary
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Half-Life
  • Horses / blood
  • Horses / metabolism
  • Omeprazole / administration & dosage
  • Omeprazole / blood
  • Omeprazole / pharmacokinetics

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Wise JC, Hughes KJ, Edwards S, Jacobson GA, Narkowicz CK, Raidal SL. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of 2 registered omeprazole preparations and varying dose rates in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Jan;35(1):620-631.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15971pubmed: 33340169google scholar: lookup
  2. Wise JC, Raidal SL, Wilkes EJA, Hughes KJ. Intragastric pH of foals admitted to the intensive care unit. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Nov;34(6):2719-2726.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15888pubmed: 32990384google scholar: lookup