FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Ecohealth / The Global Contributions of Working Equids to Sustainable Ag...
EcoHealth2022; 19(3); 342-353; doi: 10.1007/s10393-022-01613-8

The Global Contributions of Working Equids to Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihoods in Agenda 2030.

Abstract: Small farmers produce most food in low- and middle-income countries and most small farmers rely on directly or indirectly working equids (WE). The lack of methods and metrics for assessing the role of WE hampers realisation of WE contributions. Based on literature review and a survey of WE welfare experts, we propose a framework for optimising WE potential based on two axes of sustainable development goals (SDGs) and value chains. WE contribute especially to earning and sparing income (largely in food production) (SDG 1), but also have roles in accessing health and hygiene services and products (SDG 3 and 5), providing edible products (SDG 2), and benefiting women (SDG 6), with lesser contributions to other SDGs, notably climate action (SDG 13). Experts identified barriers to appropriate appreciation of WE contributions, in order to target actions to overcome them. They found WE are neglected because they belong to farmers who are themselves neglected; because information on WE is inadequate; and, because the unique nature and roles of WE means systems, policies, investors, markets and service providers struggle to cater for them. Harnessing WE to optimally contribute to sustainable development will require generating better evidence on their contributions to SDGs, ensuring better integration into ongoing efforts to attain SDGs, and building the WE capacity among development actors.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-09-01 PubMed ID: 36048298PubMed Central: PMC9434516DOI: 10.1007/s10393-022-01613-8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the crucial role of working equids (WE), which include horses, mules, and donkeys, in supporting sustainable agriculture and livelihoods, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It identifies a lack of suitable methods to assess their contribution and proposes a framework based on the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and value chains.

Background and Current Situation

  • Small farmers, who depend either directly or indirectly on working equids (WE), are responsible for the majority of food production in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Due to inadequate methodologies and metrics, there is a failure to recognize and measure the significant contributions of WEs towards sustainable farming and livelihoods.

Framework Proposal and Analysis

  • The researchers propose a new framework that aligns the potential of WE with two key axes: Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and value chains.
  • Importantly, WEs contribute to the achievement of several SDGs. They are especially instrumental to SDG 1 (ending poverty), as they help in income generation and conservation, mainly through food production. They also facilitate access to health and hygiene services and products (relating to SDG 3 and 5), provide edible products themselves (SDG 2), and offer particular benefits to women (SDG 6). Their contribution to other SDGs, such as SDG 13 (climate action), is less pronounced.

Barriers and Challenges

  • An expert survey was conducted to identify the key barriers obstructing the adequate recognition and harnessing of WE contributions.
  • Among the main issues found: the neglect of farmers who own WEs; insufficient and inadequate information on WEs; and the unique roles and characteristics of WEs, which makes it difficult for systems, policies, investors, markets, and service providers to cater to them.

Recommendations and Future Directions

  • In order to fully exploit the potential of WEs in promoting sustainable development, there is a need for generating comprehensive evidence on their contributions to SDGs.
  • Efforts should also be doubled to ensure better integration of WEs into ongoing efforts aimed at achieving the SDGs.
  • Moreover, it is important to build WE capacity among development actors.

Cite This Article

APA
Grace DC, Diall O, Saville K, Warboys D, Ward P, Wild I, Perry BD. (2022). The Global Contributions of Working Equids to Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihoods in Agenda 2030. Ecohealth, 19(3), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-022-01613-8

Publication

EcoHealth
ISSN: 1612-9210
NlmUniqueID: 101222144
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 19
Issue: 3
Pages: 342-353

Researcher Affiliations

Grace, D C
  • Natural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, ME4 4TB, Kent, UK.
  • Animal and Human Health Program, International Livestock Research Institute, Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya.
Diall, O
  • Independent Consultant, Bamako, Mali.
Saville, K
  • Brooke-Action for Working Horses and Donkeys, 52-56 Leadenhall Street, London, EC3A 2BJ, UK.
Warboys, D
  • World Horse Welfare, Anne Colvin House, Snetterton, NR16 2LR, Norwich, UK.
Ward, P
  • World Horse Welfare, Anne Colvin House, Snetterton, NR16 2LR, Norwich, UK.
Wild, I
  • World Horse Welfare, Anne Colvin House, Snetterton, NR16 2LR, Norwich, UK.
Perry, B D
  • Nuffield College of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 1NF, UK. prof.brianperry@gmail.com.
  • College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, South Bridge, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL, UK. prof.brianperry@gmail.com.

MeSH Terms

  • Agriculture
  • Climate
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Policy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Sustainable Development

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 77 references
  1. Admassu B, Shiferaw Y (2011) Donkeys, horses and mules - their contribution to people’s livelihoods in Ethiopia. https://www.thebrooke.org/sites/default/files/Advocacy-and-policy/Ethiopia-livelihoods-2020-01.pdf
  2. Allan FK (2021) A Landscaping Analysis of Working Equid Population Numbers in LMICs, with Policy Recommendations. https://www.thebrooke.org/sites/default/files/Images/Equid_Population_Landscaping_Analysis.pdf
  3. Alonso S, Lindahl J, Roesel K, Traore SG, Yobouet BA, Ndour AP, Carron M, Grace D. Where literature is scarce: observations and lessons learnt from four systematic reviews of zoonoses in African countries.. Anim Health Res Rev 2016 Jun;17(1):28-38.
    doi: 10.1017/S1466252316000104pubmed: 27427191google scholar: lookup
  4. Arriaga-Jordán CM, Colunga-González B, Velázquez-Beltrân LG. The contribution of working equines to sustainable rural livelihoods.. The Fifth International Colloquium on Working Equines., 264–275.
  5. Asmare B, Yayeh Z. Assessment on the management of draft horses in selected areas of Awi Zone, Ethiopia.. Agriculture and Food Security 2017;6(1):1–8.
    doi: 10.1186/S40066-017-0150-4/TABLES/7google scholar: lookup
  6. Austen L, Parkin H, Jones-Devitt S, McDonald K, Irwin B. Digital capability and teaching excellence: an integrative review exploring what infrastructure and strategies are necessary to support effective use of technology enabled learning (TEL).. .
  7. Babayani N. Donkey slaughter practices in Botswana.. Donkey Skin Conference 10 July, Gaberone.
  8. . Baseline focus group discussions with equid owners, Mafeteng District. 2018.
  9. Brooke. Brooke West Africa Study results revealed.. Brooke 2018.
  10. Brooke. Compassionate handling for life.. 2019.
  11. Brooke. The Socioeconomic Contribution of Donkeys in Burkina Faso.. 2019.
  12. Brooke. Factsheet: Breeding for the Donkey skin trade.. 2020.
  13. Brooke. The Burden of Animal Disease in Working Equids in Ethiopia.. 2020.
  14. Brooke. Working Livestock and Food Security.. 2021.
  15. Burn CC, Dennison TL, Whay HR. Relationships between behaviour and health in working horses, donkeys, and mules in developing countries.. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2010;109–118.
  16. Burridge J, Burford J, Henao Villegas S, Gomez J, Wild I, Warboys D, Maguire L, Freeman S, Lightfoot K. Perceptions on the replacement of working equids by mechanised vehicles in Colombia.. Proceedings from One Welfare World Conference 2021;100.
  17. Chang CR, Sapón M, Rodríguez D. Economic valuation of the impact of the working equine in the Peten and Chimaltenango communities in Guatemala.. The 6th International Colloquium on Working Equids: Learning from Others. Proceedings of an International Colloquium 2010;106–110.
  18. Davis T, Harness Aid. Workshops for Veterinary Students. Equine Harnessing methods in developing countries outlined.. Draught Animal News 2008;2(46):55–56.
  19. Dye C. One Health as a catalyst for sustainable development.. Nat Microbiol 2022 Apr;7(4):467-468.
    doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01076-1pubmed: 35210574google scholar: lookup
  20. FAOSTAT. Live Animals.. FAOSTAT 2019.
  21. FAOSTAT. Food and agriculture data.. FAOSTAT 2022.
  22. Farley MG. How Long Does It Take to Get Water? For Aysha, Eight Hours a Day.. UNICEF USA 2018.
  23. Faye B. How many large camelids in the world? A synthetic analysis of the world camel demographic changes.. Pastoralism 2020;10:25.
    doi: 10.1186/s13570-020-00176-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  24. Food and Agriculture Organization. Livestock and the Sustainable Development Goals:Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock.. Food and Agriculture Organization 2016.
  25. Geiger M, Hockenhull J, Buller H, Tefera Engida G, Getachew M, Burden FA, Whay HR. Understanding the Attitudes of Communities to the Social, Economic, and Cultural Importance of Working Donkeys in Rural, Peri-urban, and Urban Areas of Ethiopia.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:60.
    doi: 10.3389/FVETS.2020.00060/BIBTEXpmc: PMC7033506pubmed: 32118074google scholar: lookup
  26. Gichure M, Onono J, Wahome R, Gathura P. Analysis of the benefits and production challenges of working donkeys in smallholder farming systems in Kenya.. Vet World 2020 Nov;13(11):2346-2352.
    doi: 10.14202/VETWORLD.2020.2346-2352pmc: PMC7750220pubmed: 33363325google scholar: lookup
  27. . Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock. .
  28. Goodrum F, Theuri S, Mutua E, Carder G. The donkey skin trade: challenges and opportunities for policy change.. Global Policy 2022.
    doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.13072google scholar: lookup
  29. Haddy E, Burden F, Prado-Ortiz O, Zappi H, Raw Z, Proops L. Comparison of working equid welfare across three regions of Mexico.. Equine Vet J 2021 Jul;53(4):763-770.
    doi: 10.1111/EVJ.13349pubmed: 32920907google scholar: lookup
  30. Hirson T, Saville K, Skippen L. The use of interactive online learning platforms to improve resources for working equid veterinary education in low income countries.. The 7th International Colloquium on Working Equids 2014 Jul 1–3; p. 196.
  31. Horsetalk. New UN definitions recognise horses and donkeys as working livestock - Horsetalk.co.nz.. Horsetalk 2016.
  32. Horsetalk. One health, one world: Vital role of working equines emphasised.. Horsetalk 2020.
  33. International Coalition for Working Equids. Achieving Agenda 2030: how the welfare of Working Animals delivers for development.. International Coalition for Working Equids 2019.
  34. Kidanmariam G. The use of donkeys for transport in Amhara Region, Ethiopia.. 2000; pp 53–56.
  35. Longbottom J, Caminade C, Gibson HS, Weiss DJ, Torr S, Lord JS. Modelling the impact of climate change on the distribution and abundance of tsetse in Northern Zimbabwe.. Parasit Vectors 2020 Oct 19;13(1):526.
    doi: 10.1186/S13071-020-04398-3/FIGURES/6pmc: PMC7574501pubmed: 33076987google scholar: lookup
  36. Lönker NS, Fechner K, Wahed AAE. Horses as a Crucial Part of One Health.. Vet Sci 2020 Feb 29;7(1).
    doi: 10.3390/VETSCI7010028pmc: PMC7157506pubmed: 32121327google scholar: lookup
  37. Luna D, Vásquez RA, Rojas M, Tadich TA. Welfare Status of Working Horses and Owners' Perceptions of Their Animals.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Aug 1;7(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ANI7080056pmc: PMC5575568pubmed: 28788109google scholar: lookup
  38. Maichomo M, Karanja T, Olum M, Magero J, Okech T, Nyoike N. The status of donkey slaughter in kenya and its implications on community livelihoods.. 2019.
  39. Mosquera JV, Álvarez JC. Anatomical distribution of subcutaneous fat and its relationship with body condition score in pack mules from the central andean area of Colombia.. Veterinary Journal and Zootechnics (On Line) 2019;13(2):1–13.
    doi: 10.17151/VETZO.2019.13.2.1google scholar: lookup
  40. Norris SL, Little HA, Ryding J, Raw Z. Global donkey and mule populations: Figures and trends.. PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0247830.
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0247830pmc: PMC7906361pubmed: 33630957google scholar: lookup
  41. Perry B. We must tie equine welfare to international development.. Vet Rec 2017 Dec;181(22):600-601.
    doi: 10.1136/VR.J5561pubmed: 29192048google scholar: lookup
  42. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6.
    doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050pubmed: 26134548google scholar: lookup
  43. Pile E, Warboys D, Rosas R, Bravo O, Chang A, Chang E. Vista de Bienestar Equino Y Su Relación Con La Calidad De Vida De Familias Rurales En Panamá.. Revista Investigaciones Agropecuarias 2021;4(1):51–71.
  44. Pinillos RG, Appleby MC, Manteca X, Scott-Park F, Smith C, Velarde A. One Welfare - a platform for improving human and animal welfare.. Vet Rec 2016 Oct 22;179(16):412-413.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.i5470pubmed: 27770094google scholar: lookup
  45. Pritchard J. What role do working equids play in human livelihoods and how well is this currently recognised.. The 7th International Colloquium on Working Equids 2014 Jul 1–3; pp. 2–6.
  46. Pritchard JC, Lindberg AC, Main DC, Whay HR. Assessment of the welfare of working horses, mules and donkeys, using health and behaviour parameters.. Prev Vet Med 2005 Jul 12;69(3-4):265-83.
    doi: 10.1016/J.PREVETMED.2005.02.002pubmed: 15907574google scholar: lookup
  47. Pritchard J, Upjohn M, Hirson T. Improving working equine welfare in 'hard-win' situations, where gains are difficult, expensive or marginal.. PLoS One 2018;13(2):e0191950.
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0191950pmc: PMC5800664pubmed: 29408887google scholar: lookup
  48. Ricciardi V, Ramankutty N, Mehrabi Z, Jarvis L, Chookolingo B. How much of the world’s food do smallholders produce?. Global Food Security 2018;17:64–72.
    doi: 10.1016/J.GFS.2018.05.002google scholar: lookup
  49. . Riders for Health monthly monitoring data.. 2019.
  50. Rogers S. Cambodian vets see UK practice.. Vet Times 2014.
  51. Sack A, Oladunni FS, Gonchigoo B, Chambers TM, Gray GC. Zoonotic Diseases from Horses: A Systematic Review.. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2020 Jul;20(7):484-495.
    doi: 10.1089/vbz.2019.2541.Epubpmc: PMC7339018pubmed: 32077811google scholar: lookup
  52. Shah SZA, Nawaz Z, Nawaz S, Carder G, Ali M, Soomro N, Compston PC. The Role and Welfare of Cart Donkeys Used in Waste Management in Karachi, Pakistan.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Apr 12;9(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9040159pmc: PMC6523980pubmed: 31013717google scholar: lookup
  53. Soulsby L, Trawford AF, Matthews JB, de Aluja AS, Dorchies P, Gebreab F, Pangui LJ, Krecek RC. Donkey: hero or villain of the parasite world? Past, present and future.. Vet Parasitol 2004 Oct 28;125(1-2):43-58.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.05.004pubmed: 15536695google scholar: lookup
  54. SPANA. Rethinking Animal Welfare: A Conversation with Dr Brian Perry.. SPANA 2020.
  55. Starkey P. Moving forward with animal power for transport: how people, governments and welfare organisations can make an impact: examples from Africa and Madagascar.. 2004.
  56. Starkey P. Livestock for traction and transport: world trends, key issues and policy implications.. Animal Production and Health Working Paper Food and Agricultural Organisation FAO 2011.
  57. Stringer A, Lunn DP, Reid S. Science in brief: Report on the first Havemeyer workshop on infectious diseases in working equids, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, November 2013.. Equine Vet J 2015 Jan;47(1):6-9.
    doi: 10.1111/EVJ.12359/SUPPINFOpubmed: 25257182google scholar: lookup
  58. Tadich TA, de Aluja A, Cagigas R, Huerta LA, Galindo F. Children’s recognition of working donkeys’ needs in Tuliman, Mexico: Preliminary observations.. Veterinaria México OA 2016;3(4).
    doi: 10.21753/vmoa.3.4.404google scholar: lookup
  59. The World Bank. For Up to 800 Million Rural Poor, a Strong World Bank Commitment to Agriculture.. The World Bank 2014.
  60. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs.. United Nations 2015.
  61. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Agenda.. United Nations 2020.
  62. Valette D. Invisible Helpers: Women’s views on the contributions of working donkeys, horses and mules to their lives.. Invisible helpers. Women’s views on the contributions of working donkeys, horses and mules to their lives. The Brooke 2014.
  63. Valette D. Invisible Workers: The Economic Contributions of Working Donkeys, Horses and Mules to Livelihoods Invisible Workers.. 2015.
  64. Valette D, Mitra D. Brick by Brick.. .
  65. van Dijk L, Duguma BE, Marcoppido G, Ochieng F, Schlechter P, Starkey P, Wanga C, Zanella A. The role, impact and welfare of working (traction and transport) animals.. FAO Animal Production and Health Report 2014;5:1–54.
  66. Vasanthakumar MA, Upjohn MM, Watson TL, Dwyer CM. 'All My Animals Are Equal, but None Can Survive without the Horse'. The Contribution of Working Equids to the Livelihoods of Women across Six Communities in the Chimaltenango Region of Guatemala.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 22;11(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ANI11061509pmc: PMC8224632pubmed: 34067461google scholar: lookup
  67. Veterinarians for Animal Welfare in Zimbabwe, World Horse Welfare. Beitbridge District Donkey Health and Welfare Situation Analysis.. 2020.
  68. Visseren-Hamakers IJ. The 18th sustainable development goal.. Earth System Governance 2020.
    doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100047google scholar: lookup
  69. Watson TL, Kubasiewicz LM, Chamberlain N, Nye C, Raw Z, Burden FA. Cultural "Blind Spots," Social Influence and the Welfare of Working Donkeys in Brick Kilns in Northern India.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:214.
    doi: 10.3389/FVETS.2020.00214/BIBTEXpmc: PMC7201042pubmed: 32411736google scholar: lookup
  70. West R, Michie S. A brief introduction to the COM-B Model of behaviour and the PRIME Theory of motivation [v1].. Qeios 2020.
    doi: 10.32388/WW04E6.2google scholar: lookup
  71. Wild I, Gedge A, Burridge J, Burford J. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Working Equid Community: Responses from 1530 Individuals Accessing NGO Support in 14 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 11;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ANI11051363/S1pmc: PMC8151231pubmed: 34064832google scholar: lookup
  72. Wild I, Freeman S, Robles D, Matamoros D, Ortiz M, Rodriguez J, Burford J. Owners' Knowledge and Approaches to Colic in Working Equids in Honduras.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 13;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ANI11072087pmc: PMC8300094pubmed: 34359215google scholar: lookup
  73. World Horse Welfare. Current Situation within the Development Sector in Zimbabwe.. World Horse Welfare 2016.
  74. World Horse Welfare. Where we are helping Horses in Lesotho. World Horse Welfare 2019.
  75. World Organisation for Animal Health. OIE Guidelines for the Slaughter of Animals.. Terrestrial Animal Health Code 2007 3.7.5.1.
  76. World Organization for Animal Health. Animal Welfare in OIE Member Countries and Territories in the SADC Region; Summaries of baseline country assessments.. 2017.
  77. Zaman S, Kumar A, Compston P. Contribution of working equids to the livelihoods of their owners in Uttar Pradesh, India.. The 7th International Colloquium on Working Equids 2014 Jul 1–3; pp. 19–23.

Citations

This article has been cited 10 times.
  1. Bukhari SSUH, McElligott AG, Rosanowski SM, Parkes RSV. Recognition of emotion and pain by owners benefits the welfare of donkeys in a challenging working environment. PeerJ 2023;11:e15747.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.15747pubmed: 37576503google scholar: lookup
  2. Cameron A, Freeman SL, Wild I, Burridge J, Burrell K. Scoping Review of the Socioeconomic Value of Working Equids, and the Impact of Educational Interventions Aimed at Improving Their Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2026 Jan 7;16(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani16020165pubmed: 41594356google scholar: lookup
  3. Kithuka JM, Wachira TM, Ngetich W, Onono JO. Characterising donkey welfare challenges and opportunities associated with human activities and environmental factors in seven Kenyan counties. Anim Welf 2026;35:e5.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.10057pubmed: 41567521google scholar: lookup
  4. Mellish M, Stull J. Working donkey welfare assessment and owner survey in Meru County, Kenya. Anim Welf 2025;34:e60.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.10031pubmed: 40988865google scholar: lookup
  5. Haddy E, Proops L, Bradley T, Bowyer C, Sing'Oei O. Forum theatre as a tool to promote positive donkey welfare on Lamu Island, Kenya. Anim Welf 2025;34:e16.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.12pubmed: 40143830google scholar: lookup
  6. Hockenhull J, Burden FA, Clancy C, Watson T, Kubasiewicz LM. Comment on Ssuna et al. Animal Welfare Guidelines for International Development Organisations in the Global South. Animals 2024, 14, 2012. Animals (Basel) 2024 Nov 28;14(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14233446pubmed: 39682414google scholar: lookup
  7. Chapman M, Fenner K, Thomas MJW, Thompson K. Stakeholder Views on the Potential Benefits and Feasibility of an Equestrian Industry-Specific Health, Safety and Welfare Management System. Animals (Basel) 2024 Nov 28;14(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14233450pubmed: 39682412google scholar: lookup
  8. Cornell TR, Fye BL, Nyassi E, Ceesay F, Jallow M, Langendonk RF, Wootton DG, Pinchbeck G, Scantlebury CE. Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia's working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis project dataset. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1444887.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1444887pubmed: 39364262google scholar: lookup
  9. Kubasiewicz LM, Watson T, Thapa S, Nye C, Chamberlain N. Mule trains to mountain roads: the role of working mules in supporting resilient communities in the Himalayas. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1390644.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1390644pubmed: 39144084google scholar: lookup
  10. Raw Z, Collins JA, Burden FA. What Is a Working Equid? Analysis of Current Terminology and a Suggested Definition. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 9;14(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14142026pubmed: 39061488google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.