Analyze Diet

[The incidence of Dicrocoelium dendriticum in Emmental].

Abstract: A cross-sectional field study on the prevalence of Dicrocoelium dendriticum was performed in the Emmental. The study included 211 bovines, 170 equines, 20 ovines, 46 caprines and 23 rabbits (from 119 farms). In addition, laboratory routine diagnostic data obtained from 2.840 animals--all originating from the same area of investigation--were assessed in the same way. The infection extent concerning the different animal species were the following: bovines 46%, equines 12%, ovines 30%, caprines 48% and rabbits 9%. Univariate analyses of baseline epidemiological data identified no significant risk factors, with the exception of the type of stable used. Bovines kept in a modern free ranging stable had a significantly lower chance of infection with D. dendriticum than cattle in conventional tie stalls. The epidemiological data characterizing the area of investigation suggest the following procedure to reduce the problem of dicrocoeliosis: Pasturing animals of all ages should be regularly dewormed (e.g. every six week during pasture) using a compound effective against D. dendriticum. A treatment is especially indicated at the time after pasture in autumn or before housing the animals in winter. In spring, only animals having pastured the year before need to be treated prior to pasture in the new year. However, it is recommended to perform an economic analysis comparing costs of treatment versus putative costs of damage prior to the initiation of a strategic campaign: animal welfare aspects have to be considered. The laboratory routine diagnostic data showed infection extent similar to those of the cross-sectional study: bovines 60%, equines 24%, ovines 26%, caprines 31%, rabbits 32%. Atypical hosts such as dogs and cats exhibited low infection extent (3% and 1%, respectively), rather reflecting a gastro-intestinal passage of parasite eggs ingested by consumption of infected livers or by coprophagy of ruminant faeces.
Publication Date: 2006-10-03 PubMed ID: 17009717
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores the prevalence of the Dicrocoelium dendriticum infection in various animals in the Emmental region. The research implies that the type of stable used significantly influences the likelihood of infection, and suggests regular deworming as a potential preventive measure.

Research Scope and Methodology

  • The investigated population in this study consists of 211 bovines, 170 equines, 20 ovines, 46 caprines, and 23 rabbits across 119 farms in Emmental.
  • The researchers also analyzed laboratory diagnostic data from 2,840 animals from the same area.
  • The extent of the investigation encompassed assessing differing rates of infection among various animal species.

Findings on Infection Rates and Risk Factors

  • The study recorded varying degrees of infection among the different species: 46% in bovines, 12% in equines, 30% in ovines, 48% in caprines, and 9% in rabbits.
  • Among the baseline epidemiological data examined, the type of stable used emerged as a significant risk factor — bovines kept in modern free-ranging stables had a lower risk of contracting the D. dendriticum infection than those kept in traditional tie stalls.

Proposed Preventive Measures and Considerations

  • The researchers suggest regular deworming of pasturing animals of all ages as a potential solution to reduce the incidence of dicrocoeliosis caused by D. dendriticum.
  • The paper recommends therapeutic deworming particularly after pasturing in autumn or before housing the animals in the winter season. In spring, only previously pastured animals are to be treated before they are let out to pasture again.
  • An economic analysis comparing the costs of treatment and the potential costs of damage should precede the implementation of a strategic campaign against the parasite. Furthermore, animal welfare aspects must be taken into account in the process.

Data from Laboratory Diagnostics

  • Findings from the lab diagnostic data presented infection rates similar to those found in the field study, though the rates were slightly higher: 60% among bovines, 24% in equines, 26% in ovines, 31% in caprines, and 32% in rabbits.
  • Atypical hosts such as dogs and cats exhibited low infection rates (3% and 1% respectively), indicating that the infection in these species likely results from consuming infected livers or ruminant feces.

Cite This Article

APA
Burger NC, Nesvadba J, Nesvadba Z, Busato A, Gottstein B. (2006). [The incidence of Dicrocoelium dendriticum in Emmental]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 119(7-8), 324-329.

Publication

ISSN: 0005-9366
NlmUniqueID: 0003163
Country: Germany
Language: ger
Volume: 119
Issue: 7-8
Pages: 324-329

Researcher Affiliations

Burger, Nicole Christine
  • Institut für Parasitologie der Universität Bern.
Nesvadba, Jan
    Nesvadba, Zdenek
      Busato, Andre
        Gottstein, Bruno

          MeSH Terms

          • Animal Husbandry / methods
          • Animal Welfare
          • Animals
          • Animals, Domestic / parasitology
          • Cats
          • Cattle
          • Cross-Sectional Studies
          • Dicrocoeliasis / epidemiology
          • Dicrocoeliasis / veterinary
          • Dicrocoelium
          • Dogs
          • Feces / parasitology
          • Horses
          • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
          • Poaceae / parasitology
          • Prevalence
          • Rabbits
          • Risk Factors
          • Sheep
          • Species Specificity
          • Swine
          • Switzerland / epidemiology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 4 times.
          1. Ilić T, Stepanović P, Nenadović K, Dimitrijević S. Improving agricultural production of domestic rabbits in Serbia by follow-up study of their parasitic infections. Iran J Vet Res 2018 Fall;19(4):290-297.
            pubmed: 30774670
          2. Hazlett M, Stalker M, Lake M, Peregrine A. Hepatic Dicrocoelium dendriticum infection in a miniature horse. Can Vet J 2018 Aug;59(8):863-865.
            pubmed: 30104777
          3. Schweiger F, Kuhn M. Dicrocoelium dendriticum infection in a patient with Crohn's disease. Can J Gastroenterol 2008 Jun;22(6):571-3.
            doi: 10.1155/2008/912791pubmed: 18560636google scholar: lookup
          4. Solarte MF, Loaiza J, Eraso M, Úsuga-Monroy C, Llano HAB, Pizarro A, Stasiukynas D, Zapata JF. Clinical and diagnostic evaluation of a wild ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) specimen. Open Vet J 2024 Aug;14(8):1866-1876.
            doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i8.15pubmed: 39308732google scholar: lookup