Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1980; 12(2); 50-53; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb02308.x

The priority for equine research.

Abstract: An attempt is made to review the validity of the claim that more equine research is required with the conclusion that the problems in the equine field that would respond to research must be listed and each assigned a degree of priority according to suggested criteria. Future action will then depend upon identifying or stimulating scientific initiative and seeking the required financial support noting that self help from the equine industry has not been adequately utilised.
Publication Date: 1980-04-01 PubMed ID: 7371609DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb02308.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the need for prioritizing equine research, assessing problems in the field that could be solved with research, and the potential for financial backing and scientific initiative.

Assessing the Need for More Equine Research

  • The article begins by exploring the validity of the claim that the equine field necessitates more research. It is critical to assess this claim in light of several variables, such as the current status of equine health, diseases and disorders affecting horses, and the potential impact of further research on enhancing equine well-being and performance.

Identifying Problems and Assigning Priority

  • The paper suggests that to settle the validity of the claim, the problems in the equine field that can be solved through research should be identified and cataloged. This could include disease prevention and control, injury management, genetic and breeding studies, or nutrition and dietetics.
  • Each identified problem should then be assigned a priority level. The criteria for this prioritization could be based on factors like the prevalence of the problem, effects on equine health, potential for improving performance, and feasibility of research.

Stimulating Scientific Initiative and Funding

  • Once the problems have been identified and prioritized, the researchers propose that the next step is to stimulate scientific initiative. This could be achieved by engaging researchers in the field, collaborating with equine health organizations, and making use of contemporary research methods and technologies.
  • The search for necessary financial backing should also be initiated. The study notes that the equine industry’s self-help, meaning the industry’s own investment in research, has been underutilized.
  • This points to the existence of a potential funding source that could be tapped into more effectively. It also emphasizes the need for involvement from external funding agencies and research bodies interested in the field of equine health and performance.

Cite This Article

APA
Henderson WM. (1980). The priority for equine research. Equine Vet J, 12(2), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb02308.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Pages: 50-53

Researcher Affiliations

Henderson, W M

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Horses
    • Research Support as Topic / economics

    Citations

    This article has been cited 0 times.