Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2018; 14(1); 7; doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1326-7

The recovery of added nematode eggs from horse and sheep faeces by three methods.

Abstract: Nematode infections in horses are widespread across the world. Increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance, reported worldwide in equine parasites, have led to the creation of programs for the control of nematodes based on faecal egg counts (FEC). To improve nematode egg counting in equine faecal samples and establish whether the matrix of equine faeces or the eggs affect the counts, the analytical sensitivity, accuracy and precision of Mini-FLOTAC (combined with Fill-FLOTAC), McMaster and Cornell-Wisconsin techniques were compared. Known numbers of eggs extracted from equine or ovine faeces were added to egg free ovine and equine faeces to give counts of 10, 50, 200 and 500 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces. Results: The Cornell-Wisconsin significantly underestimated egg counts and McMaster showed a low analytical sensitivity, revealing 100% of sensitivity only for concentrations greater than 200 EPG. EPG values detected by Mini-FLOTAC did not differ significantly from expected counts at any level of egg density. Conclusions: Mini-FLOTAC combined to Fill-FLOTAC which provides an accurate method of weighing without need for a balance and filtering out debris, could be used for FEC on the farm as well as in the laboratory.
Publication Date: 2018-01-05 PubMed ID: 29304858PubMed Central: PMC5756441DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1326-7Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper discusses the comparison of three techniques (Mini-FLOTAC, McMaster, and Cornell-Wisconsin) for accurately counting nematode eggs in horse and sheep fecal matter, with Mini-FLOTAC being suggested as the most effective method.

Objective of the Study

  • The study primarily aims at improving the tactics for counting nematode egg counts in equine faecal samples. It does this by testing the sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of three methodologies: Mini-FLOTAC, McMaster, and Cornell-Wisconsin.
  • The research also seeks to establish whether the type of faeces (equine or ovine) or the eggs themselves have an effect on the counts.

Methodology

  • Known numbers of nematode eggs extracted from sheep or horse feces were added to egg-free ovine and equine feces. This was done to achieve counts of 10, 50, 200, and 500 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces.
  • These counts were then subjected to the three different techniques for comparison.

Results

  • The findings of the experiment indicated that the Cornell-Wisconsin method significantly underestimated the egg counts, thereby affecting its accuracy.
  • The second method, McMaster, showed a low analytical sensitivity, only being 100% sensitive when the egg density was above 200 EPG.
  • Conversely, Mini-FLOTAC showed no significant variation from the anticipated egg counts at any egg density levels, marking it as the most reliable technique.

Conclusions

  • Given the results, the study postulates that the Mini-FLOTAC method, when paired with Fill-FLOTAC (a method enabling accurate weighing without the need for a balance and filtering out debris), is the best-suited tool for fecal egg counts.
  • This combination could be utilized both in laboratories as well as directly on farms, offering a practical solution to combating increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites worldwide.

Significance of the Study

  • The research plays a significant role in the global effort to manage nematode infections in animals. By recommending an accurate technique for fecal egg counts, it offers a tangible and effective method for controlling nematode infections.
  • It further sheds light on the varying efficacy of different existing methods, helping streamline efforts and resources in the right direction.

Cite This Article

APA
Bosco A, Maurelli MP, Ianniello D, Morgoglione ME, Amadesi A, Coles GC, Cringoli G, Rinaldi L. (2018). The recovery of added nematode eggs from horse and sheep faeces by three methods. BMC Vet Res, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1326-7

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
Pages: 7

Researcher Affiliations

Bosco, Antonio
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Maurelli, Maria Paola
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Campania Region, Naples, Italy. mariapaola.maurelli@unina.it.
Ianniello, Davide
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Morgoglione, Maria Elena
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Amadesi, Alessandra
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Coles, Gerald C
  • University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Sciences, Langford House, Bristol, BS40 5DU, UK.
Cringoli, Giuseppe
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Campania Region, Naples, Italy.
Rinaldi, Laura
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, CREMOPAR Campania Region, Naples, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Feces / parasitology
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horses
  • Nematoda
  • Nematode Infections / diagnosis
  • Nematode Infections / veterinary
  • Parasite Egg Count / methods
  • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sheep
  • Sheep Diseases / diagnosis
  • Sheep Diseases / parasitology
  • Specimen Handling / methods
  • Specimen Handling / veterinary

Conflict of Interest Statement

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE: We have obtained verbal informed consent from the owners of animals to collect the faecal samples. CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION: Not applicable COMPETING INTERESTS: The FLOTAC and Mini-FLOTAC apparatus have been developed and are patented by G. Cringoli, but the patent will be handed over to the University of Naples Federico II. The fact that one of the authors is the current patent holder of the FLOTAC and Mini-FLOTAC apparatus played no role in the preparation and submission of the manuscript. Laura Rinaldi is a member of the editorial board (Section Editor) for BMC Veterinary Research, it didn’t influence the reviewers. The remaining authors have no competing financial interests. PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

This article includes 19 references
  1. Andersen UV, Howe DK, Olsen SN, Nielsen MK. Recent advances in diagnosing pathogenic equine gastrointestinal helminths: the challenge of prepatent detection.. Vet Parasitol 2013;192:1–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.11.003pubmed: 23199789google scholar: lookup
  2. Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Veneziano V, Capelli G, Scala A. The influence of flotation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the McMaster technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep.. Vet Parasitol 2004;131:121.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.05.021pubmed: 15265576google scholar: lookup
  3. Rinaldi L, Coles GC, Maurelli MP, Musella V, Cringoli G. Calibration and diagnostic accuracy of simple flotation, McMaster and FLOTAC for parasite egg counts in sheep.. Vet Parasitol 2011;177:345–352.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.12.010pubmed: 21216533google scholar: lookup
  4. Levecke B, Rinaldi L, Charlier J, Maurelli MP, Bosco A, Vercruysse J, Cringoli G. The bias, accuracy and precision on faecal egg count reduction test results in cattle using McMaster, Cornell-Wisconsin and FLOTAC egg counting methods.. Vet Parasitol 2012;188:194–199.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.017pubmed: 22503038google scholar: lookup
  5. Roeber F, Jex AR, Gasser RB. Advances in the diagnosis of key gastrointestinal nematode infections of livestock, with an emphasis on small ruminants.. Biotechnol Adv 2013;31:1135–1152.
  6. Crawley JA, Chapman SN, Lummaa V, Lynsdale CL. Testing storage methods of faecal samples for subsequent measurement of helminth egg numbers in the domestic horse.. Vet Parasitol 2016;221:130-133.
    pubmed: 27084484
  7. Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Maurelli MP, Utzinger J. FLOTAC: new multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopic diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans.. Nat Protoc 2010;5:503–515.
    doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.235pubmed: 20203667google scholar: lookup
  8. Godber OF, Phythian CJ, Bosco A, Ianniello D, Coles G, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G. A comparison of the FECPAK and mini-FLOTAC faecal egg counting techniques.. Vet Parasitol 2015;30:342–345.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.12.029pubmed: 25579397google scholar: lookup
  9. Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Albonico M, Bergquist R, Utzinger J. Geospatial (s)tools: integration of advanced epidemiological sampling and novel diagnostics.. Geospat Health 2013;7:399–404.
    doi: 10.4081/gh.2013.97pubmed: 23733301google scholar: lookup
  10. Rinaldi L, Levecke B, Bosco A, Ianniello D, Pepe P, Charlier J, Cringoli G, Vercruysse J. Comparison of individual and pooled faecal samples in sheep for the assessment of gastrointestinal strongyle infection intensity and anthelmintic drug efficacy using McMaster and mini-FLOTAC.. Vet Parasitol 2014;205:216–223.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.011pubmed: 25002307google scholar: lookup
  11. Cringoli G, Maurelli MP, Levecke B, Bosco A, Vercruysse J, Utzinger J, Rinaldi L. The mini-FLOTAC technique for the diagnosis of helminth and protozoan infections in humans and animals.. Nat Protoc 2017;12:1723–1732.
    doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.067pubmed: 28771238google scholar: lookup
  12. Whitlock HV. Some modifications of the McMaster helminth egg-counting technique and apparatus.. J Counc Sci Ind Res 1948;21:177–180.
  13. Egwang TG, Slocombe JO. Evaluation of the Cornell-Wisconsin centrifugal flotation technique for recovering trichostrongylid eggs from bovine feces.. Can J Vet Res 1982;46:133–137.
    pmc: PMC1320267pubmed: 7093809
  14. Kochanowsky M, Dabrowska J, Karamon J, Cencek T, Osinski Z. Analysis of the accuracy and precision of the McMaster method in detection of the eggs of Toxocara and Trichuris species (Nematoda) in dog faeces.. Folia Parasitologica (Praha) 2013;60:264–272.
    doi: 10.14411/fp.2013.030pubmed: 23951934google scholar: lookup
  15. Noel ML, Scare JA, Bellaw JL, Nielsen MK. Accuracy and precision of mini-FLOTAC and McMaster techniques for determining equine strongyle egg count.. J Equin Vet Sci 2017;48:182–187e.
  16. Vadlejch J, Petrtyl M, Zaichenko I, Cadkova Z, Jankovska I, Langrova I, Moravec M. Which McMaster egg counting technique is the most reliable?. Parasitol Res 2011;109:1387–1394.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2385-5pubmed: 21526406google scholar: lookup
  17. Morgan ER, Cavill L, Curry GE, Wood RM, Mitchell ESE. Effects of aggregation and sample size on composite faecal egg counts in sheep.. Vet Parasitol 2005;131:79–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.04.021pubmed: 15921855google scholar: lookup
  18. Dias de Castro L, Abrahao CLH, Buzatti A, Molento MB, Bastianetto E, Rodrigues DS, Lopes L, Xavier Silva M, Green de Freitas M, Conde MH, Borges F. Comparison of McMaster and mini-FLOTAC fecal egg counting techniques in cattle and horses.. Vet Parasitol Reg Studies and Re 2017;10:132–135.
    pubmed: 31014585
  19. Scare JA, Slusarewicz P, Noel ML, Wielgus KM, Nielsen MK. Evaluation of accuracy and precision of a smartphone based automated parasite egg counting system in comparison to the McMaster and mini-FLOTAC methods.. Vet Parasitol 2017;247:85–92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.10.005pubmed: 29080771google scholar: lookup