Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(3); doi: 10.3390/ani11030622

The Reported Use of Tongue-Ties and Nosebands in Thoroughbred and Standardbred Horse Racing-A Pilot Study.

Abstract: This article reports on the results of a survey of racehorse trainers (n = 112) outlining the reasons for tongue-tie (TT) and noseband (NB) use by Thoroughbred trainers (TBTs) (n = 72) and Standardbred trainers (SBTs) (n = 40). The study also investigated the reported effectiveness of TTs and possible complications arising from their use. Tongue-tie use was reported by 62.5% (n = 70) of racehorse trainers. The reasons for TT use varied between TBTs and SBTs. For TBTs, the most common reason for TT use was to prevent or reduce airway obstruction (72.3%, n = 34), followed closely by to prevent or reduce airway noise (55.3%, n = 16). Standardbred trainers assigned equal importance for TT use [to prevent or reduce airway obstruction (69.6%, n = 16) and to prevent the horse from moving its tongue over the bit (69.6%, n = 16)]. Tongue-ties were considered significantly less effective at improving performance than at reducing airway obstruction and preventing the tongue from moving over the bit (t = -2.700, p = 0.0007). For respondents who used both TTs and NBs, there was a mild to moderate positive association between the reasons for using TTs and NBs. Of the 70 TT-using respondents, 51.4% (n = 36) recorded having encountered either a physical or behavioural complication due to TT use, with redness/bruising of the tongue (20.0%, n = 14) being the most common physical complication reported. Duration of use influenced the risk of observing complications. The likelihood of a respondent reporting a behavioural complication due to TT use increased with every minute of reported application and a nine-minute increment in application period doubled the odds of a respondent reporting a complication. Tightness was a risk factor for physical complications: Checking TT tightness by noting the tongue as not moving was associated with increased reporting of physical complications (OR = 6.59; CI 1.1-67.5). This pilot study provides some insight into how and why TTs are applied by some racehorse trainers, and the potential risks associated with their use. A further study of a larger cohort is recommended because these results are valid for only the 112 trainers who responded and cannot be generalized to the equine industry.
Publication Date: 2021-02-26 PubMed ID: 33652950PubMed Central: PMC7996875DOI: 10.3390/ani11030622Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study investigates the reasons behind the use of tongue-ties and nosebands in racehorse training and their reported effectiveness and potential complications. The study concluded that while these tools are widely used and often effective at preventing airway obstruction, they can also cause physical and behavioural complications, depending on their duration and tightness of use.

Study Design and Participants

  • The study focused on a sample of 112 racehorse trainers, further split into 72 Thoroughbred trainers and 40 Standardbred trainers. It leveraged survey methodology to gather data on use, reasons, and perceived effectiveness of tongue-ties and nosebands.

Use of Tongue-Ties and Nosebands

  • Approximately 62.5% of the participating trainers reported the use of tongue-ties. However, reasons for use varied between the two types of trainers.
  • Thoroughbred trainers use tongue-ties primarily to prevent or reduce airway obstruction (72.3%) and secondarily, to curb airway noise (55.3%). Standardbred trainers, on the other hand, reported using them both to prevent airway obstruction (69.6%) and to prevent the horse from moving its tongue over the bit (69.6%).

Perceived Effectiveness of Tongue-Ties

  • The effectiveness of tongue-ties was viewed as being more significant for reducing airway obstruction and preventing the tongue from moving over the bit than for improving performance.

Complications Arising from the Use of Tongue-Ties

  • Over half (51.4%) of the tongue-tie users have encountered either a physical or behavioural complication. The most common physical complication was redness or bruising of the tongue (20%).
  • The likelihood of complications increased with every minute of application. Particularly, a nine-minute increase in the application period doubles the chances of reporting a complication.
  • The tightness of the tongue-tie was a risk factor for physical complications. Noting the tongue as immobile due to tightness was associated with increased reporting of physical complications.

Suggested Future Research

  • The study provides valuable insights into tongue-tie use but emphasizes that the findings are valid only for the responding trainers. A large-scale study is recommended to generalize the results across the equine industry.

Cite This Article

APA
Weller D, Franklin S, White P, Shea G, Fenner K, Wilson B, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. (2021). The Reported Use of Tongue-Ties and Nosebands in Thoroughbred and Standardbred Horse Racing-A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030622

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 3

Researcher Affiliations

Weller, Dominic
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Franklin, Samantha
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, 1454 Mudla Wirra Road, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
White, Peter
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Shea, Glenn
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Fenner, Kate
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Wilson, Bethany
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Wilkins, Cristina
  • Saddletops Pty Ltd., P.O. Box 557, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
McGreevy, Paul
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Grant Funding

  • 2658-005 / Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Franklin S, Naylor J, Lane J. The effect of a tongue-tie in horses with dorsal displacement of the soft palate.. Equine Vet. J. 2002;34:430–433.
  2. Fleming G. Roaring in Horses (Laryngismus Paralyticus): Its History, Nature, Causes, Prevention and Treatment.. Baillière, Tindall and Cox; London, UK: 1889.
    doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.100479google scholar: lookup
  3. Barakzai S, Dixon P. Conservative treatment for Thoroughbred racehorses with intermittent dorsal displacement of the soft palate.. Vet. Rec. 2005;157:337–340.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.157.12.337pubmed: 16170000google scholar: lookup
  4. Tan R, Dowling B, Dart A. High-speed treadmill videoendoscopic examination of the upper respiratory tract in the horse: The results of 291 clinical cases.. Vet. J. 2005;170:243–248.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.06.011pubmed: 16129344google scholar: lookup
  5. Lane J, Bladon B, Little J, Franklin S. Dynamic obstructions of the equine upper respiratory tract. Part 1: Observations during high-speed treadmill endoscopy of 600 racehorses.. Equine Vet. J. 2006;38:393–399.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406778400583pubmed: 16986598google scholar: lookup
  6. Priest D, Cheetham J, Regner A, Mitchell L, Soderholm L, Tamzali Y, Ducharme N. Dynamic respiratory endoscopy of Standardbred racehorses during qualifying races.. Equine. Vet. J. 2012;44:529–534.
  7. Pollock P, Reardon R, Parking T, Johnston M, Tatem J, Love S. Dynamic respiratory endoscopy in 67 Thoroughbred racehorses training under normal ridden exercise conditions.. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:354–360.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X407107pubmed: 19562896google scholar: lookup
  8. Cook W. Some observations on form and function of the equine upper airway in health and disease, 1: The pharynx. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, USA 1982; pp. 355–391.
  9. Chalmers H, Farberman A, Bermingham A, Sears W, Viel L. The use of a tongue tie alters laryngohyoid position in the standing horse.. Equine Vet. J. 2013;45:711–714.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12056pubmed: 24117933google scholar: lookup
  10. Beard W, Holcombe S, Hinchliffe K. Effect of a tongue-tie on upper airway mechanics during exercise following sternothyrohyoid myectomy in clinically normal horses.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001;62:779–782.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.779pubmed: 11341403google scholar: lookup
  11. Allen K, Christley R, Birchall M, Franklin S. A systematic review of the efficacy of interventions for dynamic intermittent dorsal displacement of the soft palate.. Equine Vet. J. 2012;44:259–266.
  12. Franklin S. Studies of Dorsal Displacement of the Soft Palate in Thoroughbred Racehorses.. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Bristol; Bristol, UK: 2003.
  13. Pollock P, Perkins J, Kelly P, Reardon R. Longitudinal overground endoscopy findings for conservative management of DDSP. Proceedings of the Annual Scientific Meeting for the European College of Veterinary Surgeons Lisbon, Portugal. 9 July 2016.
  14. Lees J. Tongue-Ties Outlawed in Germany over Welfare Concerns.. Racing Post 2018 Jun 1.
  15. Racing Australia. Revised Tongue-Tie Policy.. 2020.
  16. Barakzai S, Finnegan C, Boden L. Effect of ‘tongue tie’ use on racehorse performance of Thoroughbreds in the United Kingdom.. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:812–816.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X434134pubmed: 20095231google scholar: lookup
  17. Casey V, McGreevy P, O’Muiris E, Doherty O. A preliminary report on estimating the pressures exerted by a crank noseband in the horse.. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Applic. Res. 2013;8:479–484.
  18. Randle H, McGreevy P. The effect of noseband tightness on rein tension in the ridden horse.. J. Vet. Behav. Cl. Appl. Res. 2012;8:18–19.
  19. Weller D, Franklin S, Shea G, White P, Fenner K, Wilson B, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. The reported use of nosebands in racing and equestrian pursuits.. Animals 2020;10:776.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10050776pmc: PMC7278451pubmed: 32365844google scholar: lookup
  20. Harris P, Thielke R, Taylor R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.. J. Biomed. Inform. 2008;42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010pmc: PMC2700030pubmed: 18929686google scholar: lookup
  21. Venables W, Ripley B. Modern Applied Statistics with S.. 4th ed. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2002.
  22. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2016.
  23. Mukaka M. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research.. Malawi Med. J. 2012;24:69–71.
    pmc: PMC3576830pubmed: 23638278
  24. Findley J, Sealy H, Franklin S. Factors associated with tongue-tie use in Australian Standardbred racehorses.. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:7–10.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.32_12612google scholar: lookup
  25. Cheetham J, Pigott J, Thorson L, Mohammed H, Ducharme N. Racing performance following the laryngeal tie-forward procedure: A case-controlled study.. Equine Vet. J. 2008;40:501–507.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X313616pubmed: 18490235google scholar: lookup
  26. Latimer-Marsh L, Hazel S, Santos L, McGreevy P, Franklin S. The effect of tongue-tie application on stress responses in resting horses.. Equitation Science in Practice: Collaboration, Communication and Change, Proceedings of the 13th International Equitation Science Conference, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia, 23–25 November 2017. 2017; p. 38.
    doi: 10.1121/634717google scholar: lookup
  27. Jones B, McGreevy P. Ethical Equitation: Applying a cost-benefit approach.. J. Vet. Behav. 2010;5:196–202.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Uldahl M, Mellor DJ. Regulatory Integrity and Welfare in Horse Sport: A Constructively Critical Perspective. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 30;15(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15131934pubmed: 40646833google scholar: lookup